veloper of the software has the
power to revoke the license, without your doing anything to give cause,
the software is not free."
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jonathan Oxer wrote:
> [CCd to relevant parties including the eAccelerator developers]
>
> Hi Roberto,
>
> Just a quick update on distributability of Turck-MMCache / eAccelerator:
> I've now contacted Jeremy Malcolm of iLaw (who also happens to be a DD!)
> and provide
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xwc
Version : 0.91.5a
Upstream Author : Maxim Baranov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://xwc.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Descrip
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: webcpp
Version : 0.8.4
Upstream Author : Jeffrey Bakker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://webcpp.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Descript
Peter Samuelson wrote:
>>>Yes, I'm aware that if it's possible to revoke the GPL, it fails
>>>the Tentacles of Evil test, and GPL software would be completely
>>>unsuitable for any serious deployment.
>
>
> [Roberto C. Sanchez]
>
>
Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> not. Does anyone happen to have a six-month-old copy of the FSF FAQ?
>
>From 11-2004:
http://web.archive.org/web/20041130014304/http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20041105024302/http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
would
appreciate it. Please reply off-list and we can make arrangements
to meet.
-Roberto
[0] http://nm.debian.org/gpg_offer.php
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Luk Claes wrote:
> Hi Roberto
>
>
>>>I am looking for someone to sign my gpg key. I have contacted
>>>the three people listed as offering to sign keys in Ohio [0],
>>>but I have received no response after a few days. Anibal
>>>suggested I ask
n-free version of unrar. The newer releases are of a free version
that is going into main.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: releaseforge
Version : 0.7.1
Upstream Author : Phil Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://releaseforge.sourceforge.net/
* License
ge no longer exists?
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ing the package control files
(everything in debian/) under a source control system accessible to all
of the package co-maintainers.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in gnome is actually GNOME. They are components that
are useful in a GNOME environment. Likewise, every package in a
multimedia section does not specifically need to provide all multimedia
functions itself. It simply has to be useful in a multimedia
environment.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpIK3lqylp7G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
TK2 version and press ahead with a GTK+ only package.
I would like to know what everyone thinks.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpf54b2OU5j2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 06:59:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:43:26PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I am working on taking over toshutils. One of the things I would like
> > to do is incorporate a patch that updates it from GTK+ to GTK2. The
ress the warning. Is this OK? What about the other files that
it says are not there?
2) Should I do anything about the timestamp warnings on config.guess and
config.sub?
3) I already discussed the warning about depending on automake and
autoconf with Anibal and he seems to think it is justified. Are there
any disagreements?
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpUPvboM63An.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 01:31:31PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Roberto C. Sanchez]
> > > W: toshutils; Package Build-Depends on automake* or autoconf.
> > > This package Build-Depends on automake* or autoconf. This is almost
> > > never a good idea, as t
No problem. Based on the SubIDs in your GPG key, I consider myself
fortunate you did not also answer in French :-) (Sorry, I really
couldn't resist).
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpRRQWeoK2dR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> included in ipkungfu, although IPv6 support is still not included.
>
I would change "are not high on IP security knowledge" to read "have
only limited knowledge of proper security and IP filtering practices."
The phrase "high on IP security" seems
idling on my sarge box or in clean Sarge and Sid chroots.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpO6b7ISHPzI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 11:03:14PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 06:40:26PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think a dependency on automake and autoconf are almost always
>
proach, rather
than patch and "rerelease" the upstream source. The reason for that is
that I don't want to give the impression that I am taking over upstream
maintenance unless that is what I really intend to do.
In this case, everything is working out OK with the build requirin
successfully build on
all architectures *prior* to being admitted to the archive.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpI8C5czx4iR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
y people disliked/wer
uncomfortable with it because of the complex way in which it employs
makefiles. Wouldn't your packages be more accessible (in terms of other
developers being able to patch/fix bugs/etc.) in a more universal
format?
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: vncsnapshot
Version : 1.2a
Upstream Author : Grant McDorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://vncsn
developers and users will review it and provide some feedback. After a
week or so, I will probably submit it to some Debian-related wikis and
websites. But, I first want to make sure that it is in reasonable
shape before I *really* present it to the world :-)
-Roberto
[0] http://lists.debian.org
by tex2im script (imagemagick) and the image is sent to
> your contact.
>
This totally rocks! Please get this in soon.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpoP5ofdewUy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 08:53:06PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi Roberto,
> I read it and it seems great! Haven't had a change to build anything yet
> but I'm sure it will help me when I do. a minor typo, search for
> 'since'. As someone commented, I believe pbui
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:58:18PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Roberto C Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Today Kevin Mark poitned out[0] that I should turn a brief outline I
> > gave[1] on how to customize Debian pacakges into a full blown HOWTO. I
> > ha
package similar in function to
pbuilder) to ensure that every package is built in a clean environment
(note: some slower architectures do not actually clean after every
package build, but the concept is the same)."
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpfelO3unE7Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
y official packages without rebuilding and without a clean
> environment.
>
Which is why I finally changed it :-)
Thanks.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpOH3D88NAW0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
o avoid furhter confusion, I have removed any mention
of buildds and sbuild and simply discuss the policy requirement that
dictates that pacakges build with only build-essential + Build-Depends
and why that is a good idea even for non-official packages.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://f
. That way, by sending one message,
the maintainers of all dependent packages ar notified. This would be
especially good for packages which have many dependents.
Just my $.02.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpVSE94E3p4i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
; about it).
>
I thought the same thing. Really, it is a 200+ line bash script,
including comments and blank lines. Martin could always include in
giam-latex until he can get it into another related package.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpryS5MTezg5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
iosity, what was that?
>
Out of even greater curiousity, how was something in the public domain
"stolen"? That seems contradictory.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgprdytFTunXq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
g on your machine, else
you may as well unplug it and find something else to do. I understand
what you are saying, but we can't put everyone in a small padded room.
Based on your assessment, we would have cause to seek the removal of
latex, vi, emacs, cat and less.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpIZmnbSAqka.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:28:55PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > At some point, you do need to execute something on your machine, else
> > you may as well unplug it and find something else to do. I understand
> > what you are saying, b
ere all here to help this project build the
> best OS ever.
>
Please don't forget world domination. I really decided to start the
process of becoming a NM after Branded told me about his plans for total
world domination :-) Nothing like a good session of planning to take
over the world to
om
person comes along they know which bugs are considered high priority for
a particular package and which need the most help.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpbAOd74WpCW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
-Roberto
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=httperf
[1] http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=luca%40debian.org
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpVmBmyvBMzD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:56:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:52:22PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I am wondering what the deal is with Luca and his packages,
> > specifically httperf.
>
> Yeah, I'm about to orphan his packag
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:26:37PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:56:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:52:22PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > > I am wondering what the deal is with Luc
"/etc/init.d/networking stop", which is
> all that you are proposing.
>
I agree. I rather like being able to configure run levels to my liking.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpufaQVeDlUh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, or both.
I have already adopted toshutils and will be adopting/uploading toshset
next week with a new version that is supposed to (according to upstream)
handle both APM and ACPI variants. Let me know what I need to do.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpNPdDeqfGfd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:40:48PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Why? What if I prefer to have something from inetd only when necessary
> > instead of constantly running daemons everywhere?
>
> Why on
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:27:58PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 at 10:16 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I asked a while back (on IRC) about packaging the NX components that are
> > under the GPL. Someone pointed me to Fabian's packages in Sko
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:51:46PM -0400, Brendan wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 June 2005 09:37 am, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I agree. I rather like being able to configure run levels to my liking.
>
> I'm sorry, but this sets off my "Give me a break" reaction...
>
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:50:58AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 02:56:08PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:52:22PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >>I am wondering what the deal is with Luca and his packages
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:20:56PM -0400, Brendan wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 June 2005 07:09 pm, John Hasler wrote:
> > Roberto C. Sanchez writes:
> > > Where, pray tell, is a newbie going to learn about [runlevels]?
> >
> > a) By having used Red Hat.
> > b) By read
admin of the pkg-nx
> repo, so I'm able to give access to everybody who is interested.
>
If you could grant me access, I would appreciate it. My Alioth username
is el_cubano-guest.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgp0Ry5Pu9J23.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ed the issue.
>
Is that not the purpose of single user mode or run level 1?
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpXehaC3rFGT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:39:16PM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Hello.
>
Hi.
> -
>
OpenOffice.org 2 will be a fairly large undertaking, AIUI.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpjmspx9bgke.pgp
Description: PGP signature
behave. I would like to know if there is a
better way to handle this.
-Roberto
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/153070
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpHTyVBjt0W9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
iba laptop utilities
> Changed Bug title.
> (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
>
I adopted [0] this package. Is there anything else I need to do?
-Roberto
[0]
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/t/toshutils/toshutils_2.0.1-12/changelog
--
Roberto C. Sanc
conflicts with dpkg's use of it in versions.
>
> So, to those wondering, this is more than just removing some simple
> forbiddince check. It also requires not just completely allowing it; ~ can
> only be allowed for uploads into testing and unstable.
Doesn't that a
new license becomes part of the package in Sarge?
-Roberto
- Forwarded message from Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: h
* Orphaned 520 days ago
> * Package orphaned > 360 days ago.
>
I use both of these and would like to adopt them. I will upload next
week (via Anibal).
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpNfAq6XxJaG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 10:12:01AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote, on Friday, June
> 17, 2005 6:37 AM:
>
> > Below I have included the text rejecting my httperf package. I am
> > taking over as maintainer
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 12:57:13PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> On Friday 17 June 2005 07:04, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 06:18:06PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > iceme -- A graphical menu editor for IceWM [#227054]
> > > * Orphaned 520
850)
> stl-manual (bug #314845)
I'd like to take stl-manual since I use it. I'll prepare an upload this
week.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgp5j1iQb5WWV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ed -n '/^Depends/p'
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.4.1-3), libjpeg62,
libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.4-1), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1), vnc-common
Why is this?
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpKgadZFwRcZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:17:43AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The excuses pages are showing that my vncsnapshot package is being held
> > back for two reasons. First, it is only 4 of 10 days old, which is
> > acce
package to reflect the new version prior to
uploading. Is the PTS just not caught up yet?
-Roberto
[0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/toshset.html
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpBKI9nEv1nY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: rote
Version : 0.2.6
Upstream Author : Bruno Takahashi C. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http:
ut the version number?
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgphBnOaUmRaA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ed to change?
Is there an automated way to do that?
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpvLZ3ZvzSVt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;next version." That is, after it goes into sid, someone with
iceme or icepref installed should see a new version, which brings in
icewmcp. What is the best way in which to accomplish this?
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgp3gnqbVX6QZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
But, if I also make icewmcp Replace and Conflict
with iceme and icepref, will that not cause problems (since the new
dummy versions of iceme and icepref will depend on icewmpc)?
The thing is, I would like to be able to package icewmcp and request the
removal of iceme and icepref and know that all
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:38:34PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> On 6/23/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OK. How would I make use of this. I was going to adopt iceme and
> > icepref, but then I saw that they are abandoned upstream. They have
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 07:22:28PM +0300, Brian Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:02:44PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > Right. However, what I would like is to be able to do it *without*
> > using dummy packages. I think that what I want is not possi
updates become
necessary to httperf, the Sarge users won't get them.
Does this situation need to be dealt with? Is this the correct way of
going about it?
-Roberto
[0] http://packages.debian.org/httperf
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpjhtQCGBG71.pgp
Descri
there any advantage to avoiding the built-in?
* why the different implementations?
Incidentally, the script is a bash script.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpwEvRbk8cHn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of Debian is not to
appease the unwashed masses. However, it seems logical (and warranted)
to bump the major version number to indicate the dramatic differences
between Sarge and (the to be released) Etch.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpCfnl0moASN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:24:07PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I was reading the kill man page today looking for some information for a
> > script I am writing. The man page mentioned that some shells have a
> > kill built-in command. On fur
I posted this to debian-release yesterday, but have received no replies.
I would like to know if it is possible to get httperf back into Sarge
(for the reasons stated below), or if I should simply not worry about
it.
-Roberto
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 09:18:16AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 07:56:55PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 01:33:14PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I posted this to debian-release yesterday, but have received no replies.
>
> So you decided to post it to debian-devel? Seems odd to me.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:04:49PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I have been corresponding with the developer and maintainer of httperf
> > [0], which I intend to adopt. The issue was that a libssl linking
> > exception was needed for t
006
>
Not sure if I missed it, but you seem to claim a copyright but not give
an explicit license. I imagine you meant to put it under GPL or a free
version of the GFDL. Could you please clarify and also add it to the
document?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Frank Küster wrote:
> "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Not sure if I missed it, but you seem to claim a copyright but not give
>>an explicit license. I imagine you meant to put it under GPL or a free
>>version of the GFDL. Coul
s is not
"official" development since backports are not officially supported, but
I know I occasionally backport packages for my own use.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ng in
> > that moment.
>
> Then don't call it renice*d*, please.
>
Agreed, the name makes me think that it is a daemon that monitors for
new processes starting up and *then* renices the processes based on the
provided regex.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez
name (as they
all conflict with each other anyways).
The same should probably go for pop3d, httpd, inetd and so on.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
r was to the
right of the decimal, making the zero significant. I think you will be
hard pressed to find a mathematician who supports dropping significant
zeros for no good reason.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 02:21:04AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sanchez [Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:47:36 -0400]:
>
> > Except that the final comparison ignores that the number was to the
> > right of the decimal, making the zero significant.
>
> Er, read Policy 5
r, to put it another way: your numbers are not our numbers.
>
I never said I was a mathematician :-)
The original comparison, though, was 0.09 and 0.9.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
emu, bochs e.g.) ?
Because the performance of qemu is quite bad without the non-free
accelerator module and bochs is generally very slow and targeted at
hobbyists. I'm not trying to say anything bad about them, just that
their target markets are generally different than the target market
ecific machine in order to send mail to Alioth.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:18:12AM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Roberto C. Sanchez said:
> > Is the mailing list software on Alioth broken or misconfigured? If I
> > send from any host on my network other than the one which happens to be
> > t
. I remember
> dealing with this once by getting mutt to add an explicit Sender
> header, but perhaps you can configure the mail server to rewrite the
> header to your normal email.
>
Interesting.
> Hope this helps,
>
I added this to my muttrc:
my_hdr Sender: <[EMAIL P
; purely-informative Sender header. :-)
>
Interesting. My previous attempt at solving this was to have mutt
explicitly set the Return-Path header. However, it did not work. I
don't know if it was because postfix on my gateway host stripped it or
rewrote it, or if it is j
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:06:37AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sanchez [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 01:45:30 -0400]:
>
> > Interesting. My previous attempt at solving this was to have mutt
> > explicitly set the Return-Path header. However, it did not work. I
> &
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:59:21AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > accessible mail server. The point is that I only experience this
> > problem with Alioth and SourceForge lists, where they use braindead call
> > back mecha
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 07:24:31AM -1000, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Roberto C. Sanchez [Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:10:22 -0400]:
>
> > > Nope, that won't help. Knowing you use Mutt, and unless your MTA is
> > > configured in a quite restrictive way, this should solve your pr
problem is that the GPL is not compatible with the PHP license. There
is no way around it, other than a clean rewrite of eacclerator by people
who have not seen the mmchache-derived code.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
If you are interested I can provide you with the source package that I
created so that you are not reinventing the wheel.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I would have guessed that -uk refers to the
> United Kingdom.
>
UA is also the ISO standard two-letter code for Ukraine:
http://www.iso.org/iso/en/prods-services/iso3166ma/02iso-3166-code-lists/list-en1.html#sz
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ecurity. If a vulnerability is
discovered in ffmpeg, then the seucrity team knows that they have to
update ffmpeg. However, if five other packages are vulnerable and the
security does now know about them, we have a bad situation.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
er --force-badname to
> create accounts with @ in user names?
>
I'm thinking of this slightly obscure service called email. It might
possibly be affected by such brain damage. Why can't the bug submitter
make to with +, ., and other such characters?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 12:39:39PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 01:34:35PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > I'm thinking of this slightly obscure service called email. It might
> > possibly be affected by such brain damage. Why can't the bug s
3DFC603)
Then, on the receiving mail server, it stripped off the @the.real.host
and then proceeded to deliver it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Now, I don't
know the effect if that were a system account, but it certainly works
with virtual accounts.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http:/
101 - 200 of 691 matches
Mail list logo
