On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 03:51:46PM -0400, Brendan wrote: > On Tuesday 07 June 2005 09:37 am, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > I agree. I rather like being able to configure run levels to my liking. > > I'm sorry, but this sets off my "Give me a break" reaction... > There's nothing wrong with a "By Default, this runlevel is this...but you can > change it if you wish"...You'll be getting rid of an easy-to-remember key > that helps many newbies remember what the heck is going on "Oh, /etc/inittab > says I start up in 3, that must mean it's multi-user with no GUI". > To leave it up in the air so that a few people can dork out and define their > own (yes, I'm kidding...but only a little) seems a bit like throwing over > some ease-of-use for dorkin' it hardcore. > > I mean, it's not up to me, but if it was, I would have some easy-to-remember > guidelines like > "3 is multi-user with no X" "5 is full gui, etc." > Remember, init 0 and 6 are well-defined already....
OK. Where, pray tell, is a newbie going to learn about that? Most
newbies that come from MS Windows and Mac OS understand three modes of a
computer, to us run levels 0, 6 and {2,3,4,5}. Personally, I think it
is much more newbie friendly to have run levels 2-5 be the same. It is
also more expert friendly since you can tweak to your heart's content.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr
pgpykf1tNBbeM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
