On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 08:28:58PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> I do not think the variable is the real issue here. If we grab a snippet of
> the MPlayer's debian/rules:
> ./configure --prefix=/usr --confdir=/etc/mplayer $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)
That's a bug. What happens when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=n
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 03:54:18PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> If they are global defaults, a la Gentoo, perhaps a small shell script
> would do the job:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> # ~/bin/gcc - Give GCC global flags
> #
> /usr/bin/gcc `cat /etc/gcc-options.default` "$*"
>
> Obviously that's j
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:52:35AM -0700, Paul Telford wrote:
> [no response from debian-python, trying my luck here]
> [...snip vague problem report...]
You probably didn't get a response because you didn't provide any
information about 1) the code you are running, or 2) what actually happens
wh
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 01:15:03PM -0700, Paul Telford wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > You probably didn't get a response because you didn't provide any
> > information about 1) the code you are running, or 2) what actually happens
> > w
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:18:10PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think I do understand your position; I simply disagree. I feel that
> > changes which close Debian bugs should be documented in debian/changelog
> &g
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:00:14AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 10:21, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > The only disagreement is with what to do with upstream changes that
> > happen to close Debian bugs.
>
> Is there any chance of everyone agreeing to leave it up to the
> maintainer to
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 02:56:35AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 05:38:50PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > > As far as the BTS is concerned, it is irrelevant how a bug is fixed.
> >
> > Wrong. The BTS is a front-end to users. When bugs are closed, the
> > submitter(a norma
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 01:07:20PM +0200, JL wrote:
> Would it be possible (if a sensible question at all) to include a
> feature into apt wich generates an /etc/apt/preferences.db file wich
> would include any information required to build the preferences file ?
I do not understand your question
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:41:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I've got a few points for you:
>
> * The vanilla kernel source is readily available:
>
> apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.22 kernel-patch-debian-2.4.22
> tar xjf /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.22.tar.bz2
> cd kernel-source-2.4.22
> /usr/
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:54:15PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I run vanilla sources anyhow, so I am not too concerned as a user. But as
> a maintainer of a kernel patch, I am not willing to modify the source to
> make it fit the inofficial kernel Debian provides. If I were to do so, I'd
> ha
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:07:18AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Also there's the issue of whether we should try to have one kernel source
> tree that everything applies to. I think that perhaps we should have
> options as to which tree things apply to. So we can have kernel patches
> to apply a
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 07:09:55PM +0200, Sebastian wrote:
> Thus, while I really like the "stability" of woody, I frequently need
> kernel updates. This means that the kernel packages don't really fit into
> Debian's concept of "stable" and "unstable".
Debian's concept of "stable" and "unstable"
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:31:36PM +0300, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> The whole point of having a stable branch (currently 2.4) is to guarantee that
> people can have a _reliable_ kernel that they can trust will:
>
> 1) Behave in a predictable way that is consistant with previous releases from
>
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 09:11:29PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Also, please explain: how is the normal kernel not DFSG but
> a derived version is?
See the bottom of /usr/share/doc/kernel-source-2.4.22/README.Debian.gz
--
- mdz
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:01:51PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Debian seems to have problems with certain firmware images. Note that the
> way it's removed in kernel-source is rather useless to meet DFSG as it's
> a) still in the orig.tar.gz and b) many of the arch kernel patches back
> out
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 03:53:00PM -0700, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
> In my looking I check'd out http.us.debian.org, debian.seabone.net and
> security.debian.org... The IPv6 repository was the one in question that
> used "Component" while the others used the plural version... Although
> obviou
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 06:36:25PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2003 20:32:05 -0400, Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > dh-kpatches provides a dependency/ordering facility which has worked
> > well for me in my packages. It also provides
>
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:20:36PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > That sounds backwards. "Component" is the one recognized by apt, and
> > (naturally) the one used by official Release files in the
> > Debian archive.
>
>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:31:50AM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:48:24AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:20:36PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote:
> >
> > > Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:22:40PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A reasonable explanation includes enough information for:
> >
> > - the submitter to recognize that their bug was in fact fixed
>
> Agreed. However I mus
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:04:22PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> Let me point out that Debian has always provided upstream (unmodified/
> pristine) kernel source by the means of kernel-source-x.y.z packages and
> kernel-patch- ... and so on ... Now with kernel-source-2.4.22 the
> situation has
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 09:30:28PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So, I'm curious why you chose to make it a part of the Debian kernel source,
> > rather than a separate patch (kernel-patch-ipsec or such).
>
&g
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:57:14PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-20 07:37]:
> > Neither SCP nor anonymous-FTP methods work and I want to get that
> > fixed.
> >
> > SSH works. SCP doesn't.
>
> Well, it works for everyone else. So it would be good if
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:59:02PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Please do this instead. I'm not sure why sysklogd does it's own
> rotation[...]
Because sysklogd doesn't have a fixed set of log files.
--
- mdz
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:46:01PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman said on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:43:04PM -0400:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:59:02PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> >
> > > Please do this instead. I'm not sure why sysklogd
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:03:50PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.22.1343 +0200]:
> > However, they might be useful to people using make-kpkg and patch
> > packages to get the right dependencies and ease the download. Thus
> > I would not vote
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:20:59AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Both should record the change in the package which caused the bug to be
> > closed. The change may be described at a high level (fixed the problem
> > which cau
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:08:07AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I currently patch my kernels with device-mapper, a few evms-related patches
> > and skas3. It would be very convenient if device-mapper and the evms
> > patch
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:27:49PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I am always willing to improve my packages; the constraints
> are ability (I would need to grok the details of the current
> implementation), time, and collaboration (I would need to find out
> how to get a hook into the
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:34:31PM +0100, Andrew Lyon wrote:
> Since installing Debian in May the amount of disk space required for my OS
> has risen from 1.5GB to 3GB and has reached the limit of the partition.
> I don't really want to allocate any more space to the OS as I'm sure there
> must
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 08:08:39AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I ran it through diffstat, and removed the files which are created entirely
> > by
> > the patch, so these are the changes to common code:
>
&g
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 06:08:45PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 28, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Yes but those criterion fail to mention why it is required in the Debian
> >Kernel Source. I understand it should be in the default Binary images...
> >but as for inclusion i
uld I file bugs individually, post to
d-d-a, or do something else?
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
aspell-de-alt
aspell-el
aspell-es
aspell-fr
aspell-ga
aspell-is
aspell-it
aspell-pt
aspell-sk
aspell-sl
aspell-sv
aspell-ukr
Should I file bugs against each of these packages? Should I contact
the maintainers directly via email? Should I email d-d-a?
--
Matt
signature.asc
Descr
m that way.
>
> Unless there is a chance of reintroducing aspell-bin package,
> that should probably be the case.
>
> I think this is the call of aspell maintainer.
Brian, are you planning to reintroduce the aspell-bin package or
should I file bugs against the packages that fail to build?
--
Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
at is necessary.
thanks
Matt
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 04:56:09PM +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> linuxsampler has been FTBFS since its first upload, is now
> uninstallable, and requires a rebuild against the latest g++.
>
> Matt, are you still interested in maintaining this
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:57:34PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 17 juillet 2005 à 15:51 +0300, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
> > This is meant as a more convenient way for Debian maintainers to look
> > for possible useful patches from Ubuntu.
>
> This is a good idea, but it is based
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 07:29:00PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 10:21 -0700, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 09:57:34PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le dimanche 17 juillet 2005 à 15:51 +0300, Joachim Breitner a écrit
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 08:22:25PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 juillet 2005 à 10:48 -0700, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
> > What you have is a 3-way merge of (1.4-1)->(1.4-1 + Ubuntu changes) against
> > 1.5-1.
>
> Sorry, but no.
> http://utnubu
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 02:48:51PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > a new debian maintainer is also a ubuntu maintainer in some sense.
>
> Great news! Where's my paycheck?
>
> (both of the above "arguments" have already been raised long ago, yes.)
A
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>apt-listchanges
>cricket
>flac
I have no idea how or why flac ended up with a debconf dependency; it
doesn't use it. I've removed it in CVS for my next
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:28:46PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks Goswin, this is what I thought.
> Now I need someone help me with EVMS steps.
> How to make a snapshot and rollback.
This mailing list is for development-related discussion; please use
debian-user@lists.debian.org for tech
e on some machines. Maybe
willy/kyle/thibault can comment more.
--
Matt Taggart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
transition. Then the transition will take some time too...
Sorry for the delay, thanks for you patience.
--
Matt Taggart
[EMAIL PROTECTED] aka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 07:16:17PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:50:33AM +0200, Mikael Olenfalk wrote:
> > I have built ubuntu-hoary packages for anjuta 2.0.1 for amd64, which I
> > have made available in my repository at: http://mikael.is-a-geek.org/.
> >
> > I want to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: miredo
Version : 0.5.3
Upstream Author : Rémi Denis-Courmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.simphalempin.com/dev/miredo/
* License : GPL v2
Descriptio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cdpr
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Author : Lance O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.d.umn.edu/~mzagrabe/debian/cdpr/
* License : GPL
Descri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libfastthread-ruby
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : MenTaLguY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rubyforge.org/frs/?group_id=1306
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fossology
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : The FOSSology Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://fossology.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL)
Programming L
he PHPwiki source
tree, fix any breakage/changes required by the newer versions and then submit
the patches upstream. I don't have the time to undertake this kind of work at
the moment.
Let me know if you are interested.
Cheers
--
Matt Brown
ma...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:20:23AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> In stable/testing/unstable you have releases with a fixed version that
> can only split of from the main trunk. Any change to stable/testing
> MUST be made special for the old version in stable/testing and forks
> off the main
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 03:07:27PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 10:20:23AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> In Ubuntu you have a parallel version. You split of from the main
> &g
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 11:30:32PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 4/2/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >As some of you may have noticed, the patches.ubuntu.com website and
> >equivalent mailing of changes to the Debian PTS and ubuntu-patches
> >mailing list has been offline,
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 02:39:27PM +0200, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> Hello Bart,
>
> is there some kind of agreement between Debian and Ubuntu concerning the
> distribution part of the version?
The scheme is described here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment#UbuntuPackages
which is linked, al
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 12:25:50AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> After 6 years or so of setting ftp.jp.debian.org as default for
> pbuilder, I'm finally determined that it shouldn't stay like this. So
> I'd like to have some default guessing to happen. Preferably I don't
> want to ask via debcon
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 03:51:15PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> "Michael Vogt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> - automatic removal of unused dependencies moved into libapt so that
>> applications like synaptic, python-apt, update-manger etc directly
>> benefit from
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libthread-queue-any-perl
Version : 0.09
Upstream Author : Elizabeth Mattijsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
*
http://search.cpan.org/~elizabeth/Thread-Queue-Any-0.0
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libthread-serialize-perl
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Elizabeth Mattijsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
*
http://search.cpan.org/~elizabeth/Thread-Serialize-0.1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libload-perl
Version : 0.19
Upstream Author : Elizabeth Mattijsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
* http://search.cpan.org/~elizabeth/load-0.19/lib/load.pm
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libnet-mac-vendor-perl
Version : 1.18
Upstream Author : brian d foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
* http://search.cpan.org/~bdfoy/Net-MAC-Vendor-1.18/lib/Vendor.
re useful, but which for some reason
can't be supported in Debian. I also see this as a way for NMs to show
their stuff without the sometimes painfully slow sponsorship process.
Cheers
Matt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
ays enough
> There's no reason to spend/waste more time/resources on all that extra
stuff
> only newcomers will, wrongly, use.
You are making the assumption that it will be like Upload > in, without
QA, NEW or anything and that is not what has been proposed.
> Or do we have so m
swer, but I
just had to look it up again (Michigan) despite being caught out by
this just the other week!
--
Matt Brown
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mob +353 86 608 7117 www.mattb.net.nz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 07:18:11PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> What do you think about this approach? I'm well aware that this alone
> won't rescue desktop security (getting there is looots of more work),
> but one has to start somewhere.
I'm not particularly fussed about the race conditions invol
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:26:00AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, January 16, 2008 10:13, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > Hi Anibal,
> >
> >
> > please write what actually changed, what the issue was about.
> >
> > | bzip2 (1.0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > |
> > | * Synchronise with Ubuntu.
ed: 1:4.0.4.alpha-14.2
Candidate: 1:4.0.4.alpha-14.2
Version table:
*** 1:4.0.4.alpha-14.2 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1:4.0.4.alpha-14 0
500 http://ftp.us.debian.org oldstable/main Packages
--
Matt Zagrabelny - mzagr...@d.umn.edu - (218) 726 8844
University of Minnesota D
,
[1] http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/notes/debian/git.html
--
Matt Zagrabelny - mzagr...@d.umn.edu - (218) 726 8844
University of Minnesota Duluth
Information Technology Systems & Services
PGP key 4096R/42A00942 2009-12-16
Fingerprint: 5814 2CCE 2383 2991 83FF C899 07E2 BFA8 42A0 0942
He is n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Arnold
* Package name: bitlespeak
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : myself
* URL : http://github.com/marnold/BitleSpeak
* License : GPL V 3
Programming Lang: python
Description : A tiny text to speech
be enabled for squeeze?) and
> <http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts> which leads me to think that
> Apache needs something like "Should-Start: $database_server", but this
> is mainly guessing. I would appreciate input from those familiar with
> this part of the Debian in
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:43:44AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> At the same time, In doing all that we should not consider Ubuntu as a
> special case, as that would be a mistake. Ubuntu is currently one of a
> kind in term of users, but assuming it will be the case forever is
> risky. After a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matt Brown
* Package name: libpam-ssh-agent
Version : 0.9.2
Upstream Author : Jamie Beverly
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/pamsshagentauth/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : PAM module
laesie
laiose
laius
laos
las
lasa
lase
laus
leas
lease
lees
leese
leis
leos
les
lese
liaise
lias
lies
lieus
lis
lisu
loasa
looies
loos
loose
los
lose
louies
louis
louise
louse
ls
luaus
lues
Which one is it?!
Unless it is 'Also' and your capital L is nothing more than a red herring.
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 03:18:53PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Herbert Xu
>
> | Very few people really need cramfs if they're building custom kernels.
> | This is because initrd only makes sense when you're building for a
> | large number of machines. If you're building a custom kernel, j
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 10:20:57PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.29.0232 +0200]:
> > Hear, hear. IPsec in particular is long overdue in the Linux
> > kernel and I am glad to see it.
>
> It has existed in the
-xmms
-
It seems that as a couple, xmms and alsa-xmms are likely to break up
soon. Can anyone help them? Or at least me?
thanks,
Matt
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product s
ing if it wouldn't have been clearer to say
that XMMS 1.2.8 Provides alsa-xmms instead of saying alsa-xmms
Conflicts with xmms. Any thoughts?
thanks,
Matt
__
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
"Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Bonner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Thanks! I was wondering if it wouldn't have been clearer to say
> > that XMMS 1.2.8 Provides alsa-xmms instead of saying alsa-xmms
> > Conflicts wi
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 04:54:07PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> I just got the following messages replacing syslog by syslog-ng from dselect
> (Woody).
> Should this be reported as a bug? Against which package (syslog, syslog-ng,
> apt)?
Definitely not apt.
> The problems are:
> - - messages rega
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:45:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> It's amazing how problem solving here is equated with "actively
> waiting for problems to go away".
>
> I wanted to improve Debian, but apparently there is no interest.
> Herbert gets to pollute the kernel-source all he wants beca
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:25:17PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
>
> Debian and Democracy
> Posted 7 Oct 2003 by exa (Master)
Ha. Hahahaa. Ha, ha, ha...
--
- mdz
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:30:06PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.10.0223 +0200]:
> > ...and the freeswan patch is not in the Linux kernel (and as I understand
> > it, it never will be).
>
> The IPsec patch is n
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:04:38PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Note that the testing scripts themselves do not examine Build-Depends
> today; such problems are only identified through manually filed RC bug
> reports. Which is not to say that we shouldn't be tracking such
> problems -- just tha
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:43:37PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Eventually I found aptitude's "Dselect" theme, which helped some.
>
> I guess aptitude could be made the recommended default package manager,
> but I would hope that:
> 1. Something more closely approximating the Dselect theme i
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:39:49AM +1000, Kim Lester wrote:
> Some of the ideas I have implemented include a "pkg info" file in each
> package
> containing the
> pathname
> uid, gid (numeric)
> md5sum,
> size (useful to humans)
> mode
> symlink target (for syml
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:40:27AM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> I would be glad to change it if there were a fair number of
> developers who think that suggesting contrib software is fine.
Suggesting contrib software is fine.
--
- mdz
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:38:57PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> /*
>
> You might ignore this comment...
>
> Looking at the list of RC bugs the packages seems to fall in two
> categories. Packages I don't use and packages I don't feel comfortable
> in touching (glibc being an example of the
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 03:13:23AM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> I still need to get KDE 3.1.4 into sid and stablized. I hope for it to
> be ready to migrate into sarge by Oct 20 (including the 10 day wait
> time). From what Colin Watson mentioned to me earlier today there are
> some other packages
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:04:27PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.10.2333 +0200]:
> > It is in 2.5 and 2.6. It is in Linux henceforth. FreeSWAN, on top of
> > its other issues, is not, has never been, and never
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:05:56PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.10.11.0554 +0200]:
> > People care more about some things than others. Given a choice between
> > IPsec in Debian kernels by default and being able t
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:44:01PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Yes. This way to show issues is the right one but the James way is
> not. He doesn't do a suggestion but an exigency. This is wrong.
He did the right thing.
> Yes. The reson of my first mail is exactly this. I want make some trou
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:32:11PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Policy is not everything that counts. Just because policy doesnt say
> > something it means it is good to do it.
>
> Of course but I think if the developper did something is because he
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 08:27:17PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> If any package that needs to add a user should always use adduser,
> should that not be a required package rather than just important?
The priority has nothing to do with how many packages use it; there is an
explicit definition in
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:30:26PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> Searching for a general consensus here...
>
> These days Debian's nethack packages contain default nethackrcs which
> enable number_pad style controls (instead of hjkl keys) by default, due
> to a bug filed on the packages a long time
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:04:31AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> To cap it off, the discard service seems to be enabled out of the box. So
> is daytime. Daytime's not too bad, but discard? I personally believe we
> should be shipping sarge such that it installs offering the smallest
> number of n
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:48:47AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 01:40:51AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > I would like to see inetd leave the base system as well, but what problem
> > could you possibly have with the discard service?
>
> Well it
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:53:15PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 01:40:51AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:04:31AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> >
> > It's pretty trivial with netkit-inetd as well; you edit /etc/
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:37:58PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 09:32:54PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Yes, it receives data from the network and throws it away. But I don't see
> > how this figures into your example. If you can give me an sce
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:40:25PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Oct 19, Norbert Tretkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/
> >Any plans for an upload to unstable?
> I'd like to know first if it works or not and how much useful it is in
> its current form, as
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:51:20AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> c) The package is uploaded from the real-world environment where it works,
> built on the architecture 99% of the users have. The breakage in the
> other architectures' autobuilt packages is not noticed until after Sarge,
> and/or
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 07:15:47PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> what Depends are best to guarantee that after package installation at
> least one True Type font package is installed??
> Should I add a best guess font package or is there a kind of meta
> package available for ttf packages?
What
501 - 600 of 1069 matches
Mail list logo
