"Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Bonner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thanks! I was wondering if it wouldn't have been clearer to say > > that XMMS 1.2.8 Provides alsa-xmms instead of saying alsa-xmms > > Conflicts with xmms. Any thoughts? > > xmms both provides and conflicts (with) alsa-xmms; dselect just only > chooses to mention the latter relationship, at least on that screen. > I agree that its interface could be better, and personally favor > aptitude; however, it doesn't have explicit conflict-resolution > screens at all.
Amazing. dselect managed to mention 4 relationships, but not that one. "There has to be a beter way..." thanks for explaining, Matt __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
