Package: general
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear developers,
Almost everytime [it happens randomly] I try to see some video content via DRI
[VLC/XBMC, etc] on kernels with version higher than 3.2.0-3-686-pae the whole
system freeze [screen goes black, system is unre
bian that was managed on this professional level. I
especially praise the way you have communicated the progress.
Greetings
Marc
--
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Rh
f the problematic toolchain features.
I'm open for arguments though. Please also see #1043281 which has most
of the technical points there.
Greetings
Marc
--
----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the
still in
>production use, etc.?
It is not enough to be willing. It is necessary to actually do. I
think that once i686 (re)qualifies as release arch, it will be (again)
one.
Greetings
Marc
--
----
Marc Haber | &qu
t into the update-grub kernel snippet, with the
advantage that it would be easier to get rid of the warning locally.
Greetings
Marc
--
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im H
t reached the ease-of-use-level¹ of ifupdown
paired with ifupdown-scripts-zg2 that I maintained and used in the
2000 years, but I eventually decided to drop that easy-of-use for
networkd, lowering my workload significantly.
Greetings
Marc
¹ ifupdown-scripts-zg2 cached commands needed for the takedo
plementations of DHCP client,
the Linux world seems to be without a working DHCP relay
implementation in those days. That's REALLY bad for an installation
with Linux routers.
Greetings
Marc
--
----
Marc Haber |
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:48:06 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>On Jul 11, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>
>> On 11.07.24 08:13, Marc Haber wrote:
>> > Therefore, you could change
>> > configuration while the Interfacce was up and then just say "ifdown ;
>>
(and NetworkManager), so we would
>actually have more minds knowledgeable about our network stack.
Other than being fully RFC 1925 6a compliant, why do we need that
layer then? And why do we need it in the installer, which is only
geared to supposed the most easy ne
x27;s praised way to communitate in an MR is
VASTLY inferior to a decently threading mail client like mutt or even
Thunderbird.
I violently disagree with the rest of the message as well and am not
willing to spoil the rest of my day by replying in detail. I'd prefer
learning a bit more Slowfoxt
On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 18:36:29 +0100, Luca Boccassi
wrote:
>On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 18:16, Marc Haber wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 12:23:43 +0100, Luca Boccassi
>> wrote:
>> >The vast majority of people who
>> >are forced to use emails do so for work via a
&
of d/changelog, and successfull of the previous) or
>will there be a need for salsa CI successfully completedon the specific
>release commit?
CI could skip if only changelog changed. That would be helpful for
anager on my mobile boxes that need Wi-Fi, and
systemd-networkd on everything else.
I happen to LOVE the orthogonality of systemd-networkd: One file per
network layer, one file per interface, and the cross product of that.
That makes con
d contains way to much not-invented-here code regarding
IPv6, or ifupdown, which is outdated if I'm being friendly, and a
Debianism.
Greetings
Marc
--
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadre
e default install and we remove it from the
beginner- and intermediate-level docs.
Greetings
Marc
--
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Rhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of W
installs. As a distribution that supports upgrades, we have to. We are
not Red Hat where the recommended way to go from one major release to
the next one is a full reinstall.
Greetings
Marc
--
Marc Haber | "
es like "now I have downloaded
all 7 woody CDs, and what do I do with them?".
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany |
installation stored
persistently in the first place?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://ww
d be easy if all syslogd log files were in a single directory,
which is not the case.
It would be easier for logrotate if it would support backticks in a
logrotate config file:
`syslogd-listfiles` {
}
Geez, one more point for the logrotate++ todo list.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:29:36 +0100, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Please send me the patch.
Honestly, looking at sysklogd's bug list doesn't make people get the
impression that it makes sense to file patches against the sysklogd
packa
an-announce, press
>> contacts, ...)
>
>No. Why should it?
Because it was widely announced to start on September 15, and many
people are already running sarge.
Greetings
Marc
--
------ !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Q
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:00:22 +1100, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to store it
>all on for anyone that is *truly* that starved of space.
Low-Memory systems are unlikely to have USB
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 05:07:42PM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> I'm trying to trim my system a little bit. I wanted to purge Evolution
> from my system since I use Mutt for email. But doing that wants to
> remove Gnome.
So it wants to remove the Gnome meta-package. So wh
ame thing this morning:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=288763
If you have any suggestions on how to implement that, I'm all ears.
- Marc
ueless horde do exactly that, install
Firefox, Thunderbird, and Sunbird.
And then somehow think they're superior for not simply installing Mozilla.
--
Marc Wilson | Sometimes I wonder if I'm in my right mind. Then it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | passes off and I'm a
to a 2.6 kernel. Not
even if you're using devfs. Only people unfortunate enough to be using
Gnome 2.8 are required to have udev running.
Udev. Just say no.
--
Marc Wilson | Those who can't write, write manuals.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
ld approve them, but
that is (a) unlikely to happen and (b) likely to be solved swiftly.
Jörgs Appointment as DAM is a Good Thing[tm], I congratulate him, and
his actions on the job have already shown to be effective.
Keep it up, guys!
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !
" with potato and
woody, and that sarge is an even bigger one is as clear as one can
see. I suspect a tendency here.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Maila
ease cycle.
Additionally, Maintainers refrain from updating unstable because they
need unstable to update testing. See exim4, which has a grossly
outdated version in unstable because there is no
testing-proposed-updates yet.
Greetings
Marc
--
--
>buggy non-RE packages out of testing.
That would leave testing users who happen to have such a package
installed alone because they wouldn't notice their package vanishing
from the mirrors, continuing to use a potentially vulnerable package.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
s (or users) that we *want* to release
>Debian that frequently.
We should, however, concentrate all available effort on keeping etch's
release time _well_ below 24 months.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc
logic, Spamcop is not a reputable DNSBL. If a site does not
originate legitimate e-mail to english speaking users in copious
quantities, it is trivially listable in the Spamcop BL.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber
running
4.43 for weeks without any problems, and we would like to have broader
testing before uploading to sid and asking the release team to hin
4.43 into sarge.
Thanks for your consideration.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:26:51 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
,>scp to a Debian host (like gluck or merkel) and ftp from there. Or
>just scp it to the DELAYED queue on gluck (1day) and let it ftp it for
>you ;)
Does it ftp in time for the daily dinstall?
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:37:27PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> During the Solutions Linux expo in Paris, the DD's present at the
> Debian booth have been approached by a representative from Trend Micro
> Corp. who develops and sells security software (the most well known
> being probably a vi
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 10:57:08PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > > Would any people around have pointers which could be given to such
> > > people ? Do we already have an entry point for such technical issues
> > > as proprietary SW vendors needing technical information about the way
> > >
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:01:25PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:35:41AM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> > I've been under the impression that the only machine-level
> > incompatibilities are really kernel and driver issues and not issues
&g
"sys" which will be confusing if paired with
sysusers.
May I ask for comments?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany |
Hi,
adduser has two bug reports open where people are asking for user name
rules to be relaxed. One report wants "." to be allowed in user names,
another wants usernames to start with numbers.
May I ask for your opinion before denying or following the requests?
Gree
ories, and it will stop deleting at a mountpoint.
I would appreciate your comments and bug reports before I upload to
unstable and start pestering the release team to push adduser to
sarge.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 17:21:28 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Why not make it an configurable RE?
I am quite reluctant with a so big change in a base package, ranking
at #1 in popcon, so soon before sarge release.
Greetings
Marc
--
---
duser "binary" to allow their
user names.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:38:36 +0100, Marc Haber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>adduser has two bug reports open where people are asking for user name
>rules to be relaxed. One report wants "." to be allowed in user names,
>another wants usernames to start with numbers.
>
ory that, like
>/usr/share/doc or others, can safely be purged by the local admin if they
>don't want the disk bloat.
I would not like to see this in Debian before dpkg can be configured
to exclude subtrees (like /usr/share/doc, for example) fro
d reject them, just to be sure
>(and maybe a few more funny characters).
Just being sure will prompt strange bug reports. There is always
useradd doing its own checks behind though.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc
Hi,
#290810 was filed to keep eximdoc4 from moving to sarge. However,
after reaching the proper age, eximdoc4 moved to sarge despite of the
bug.
What did we do wrong?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:06:17 +0200, Petri Latvala
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 12:15 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> By default, adduser will verify the user against a configurable
>> regexp, default being the most conservative ^[a-z][a-z0-9\-]*$. The
>
nburg and Klaus Ethgen. (mh)
| Closes: #293559, #271829
You should have received this in a "fixed-in-experimental" message
from the BTS after I uploaded the new version.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber
a default account.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature |
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:38:58 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 05:35:48PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> #290810 was filed to keep eximdoc4 from moving to sarge. However,
>> after reaching the proper age, eximdoc4 moved to sarge
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 18:06:17 +0200, Petri Latvala
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 12:15 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> By default, adduser will verify the user against a configurable
>> regexp, default being the most conservative ^[a-z][a-z0-9\-]*$. The
>
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:31:13 +0100, Michelle Konzack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It works since more then 4 years :-)
For you.
Greeting
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadr
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 09:51:18 +0100, Christophe Chisogne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Marc Haber a écrit :
>> By default, adduser will verify the user against a configurable
>> regexp, default being the most conservative ^[a-z][a-z0-9\-]*$. The
>> --force-badname option
filebrowser_setup_tree ()
#13 0x08057d9f in filebrowser_new ()
#14 0x08058b09 in gnomebaker_new ()
#15 0x08051315 in main ()
--
Marc Wilson | If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Albert Einstein
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
tself is, as it
contains passwords and other system confidential data.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom "
h _some_ files under version control and
others not is a pain, even with subversion.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginni
Is it really necessary to take our internal issues to upstream's
mailing lists? Can't we have internal flamage internally?
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>To: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:16:24 -0500, Greg Folkert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Except I'd rather see --keepcomments as
>default and changed to --removecomments. My only gripe, pretty minimal.
And fixed soon. #295735.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! N
ners. Maybe I missed some great documentation out there, but using Google, I
>found no such documentation.
May I ask if you did the obvious thing, searching in /usr/share/doc?
Did you find the rather verbose README.Debian.gz file?
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No cou
4 hours is that people do not
bother to read available documentation, regardless of where it is
stored. You have to hurl it right into the user's face.
I begin to understand the blurb of rants that cdrecord prints on
invocation.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !
ggestion to exim package people: if someone chooses the big config
>file, don't even install the little ones.
How do I do this with current dpkg?
>I promise I won't respond to any further condescending comments.
That is a bad thing.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----
can be done "today's morning". Is the configuration
>migrated to the new version (mine is pretty simple), or does one have to
>start anew?
If your exim 3 configuration was generated by eximconfig, exim4 will
try to guess your answers you have given when configuring ex
s is deprecated. The Debian Exim 4 maintainers strongly
recommend using the debconf-driven setup scheme.
See /usr/share/doc/exim4-base/README.Debian.gz.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | &quo
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:25:18 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> If your exim 3 configuration was generated by eximconfig, exim4 will
>> try to guess your answers you have given when configuring exim3, a
e script
upstream, and upstream said that convert4r4 is not being used any more
and that it is too much work to fix that bug.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im He
e.
|[11/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/chroot/sid-exim4/home/mh/exim4/trunk$ find debian/po
-name '*.po' | wc -l
|40
|[12/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/chroot/sid-exim4/home/mh/exim4/trunk$
The translators would kill us for doing that to them at this stage of
the
gt;Perhaps a tool could generate the single-file config for easier
>double-checking of the split-file config.
That tool is already there.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the
rs.
>Really big sites will have their own config files anyway, so nothing
>done by Debian matters much to them.
Really big sites will probably roll their own exim4-config package if
they bother to see what advantages that will bring to them.
Greetings
Marc
--
cely gives hints about the scope of a change.
The bells and whistles would also need to include mechanisms to allow
dropping the ban on maintainer scripts modifying dpkg-conffiles,
including dpkg-conffiles belonging to other packages.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !!
this has caused. I would consider it a feature to have
mailman work immediately after installation on a default system, and
the exim4 configuration scheme has explicitly invented with that
possibility in mind.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, plea
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:06:46 -0600, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>At least make enabling the change a Debconf
>question.
Impossible with current policy since maintainer scripts are forbidden
to mess with dpkg-conffiles.
Greetings
Marc
--
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 03:15:58AM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> But to the best of my knowledge, Marco's (blog) post from a few months
> ago which showed download from ftp.it.debian.org by architecture stands
> undisputed: essentially all users are on i386 clearly dominating all other
> ar
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 08:56:27PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It does seem prudent to find a way to permit a release on x86 and
> > ppc before all architectures are complete. Especially if this
> > tactic w
s.
I have a dedicated opinion about this time of service the major arches
received during this time, but I do not want to voice it here as I am
only talking about a rumour and I do not want to start yet another
flame war.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copi
doing their work, as in processing new
packages in reasonable time.
Please note also, that currently there is no official statement that
the NEW queue is frozen, and queries regarding the obviously stalled
NEW queue are - as usual - ignored.
Greetings
Marc
--
f the package will be totally broken when the other
>> is updated.
>
>Upload it to experimental. When the packages reach it after NEW-processing,
>you can re-upload them to unstable without any delay.
Even uploads to experimental are currently stalled by ftpmasters not
proce
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:15:30 -0800, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 04:28:36PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Chances are that it was uploaded together with the library it depends
>> on, relying on ftpmasters doing their work, as in processi
osen was random and unpredictable.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nord
eam developers find our arrogance endearing?
>
>(Specifically yours.)
I seldomly agree with asuffield, but having worked for a law office
for seven years has given me sufficient legal experience to know that
he is right this time. If you want to put down something legally
binding, go see a
ible refuse - as usual - to communicate. So
nobody knows about the reason.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom
e that this "bits from foo" is the first article of
that kind I have ever read that was not being posted by a member of
the foo team.
IMO, this actually _proves_ the case that ftpmaster is one of the
biggest problems that Debian has at the moment, now that the DAM
problem has been
>security/usability of my own setup based on the best practices offered up in
>reply to this thread.
I would suggest putting the script in the Debian wiki.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Ques
voking
apt-get via sudo?
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by
s have empty
> needs-build queues, it is harmless to force them to execute a
> recompile and costs no scarce resources. I did check this before
> uploading.
Did you also check how much network traffic would be wasted by rolling
out the unnecessary package to
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:04:17 +0900, Junichi Uekawa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The current practice and trend is going the other way,
>but I strongly recommend for using autoconf/automake in build scripts.
Does cdbs do it right?
Greetings
Marc
--
re I believe it is today.
You are, however, at the same time, basically pulling the plug on
important resources without which the porters will have an awfully
hard time to even keep up with scc requirements.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copi
longer "officially supported", means that people will
>view this as a negative thing.
Additionally, they are being excluded from having access to important
resources, and the possibility of filing RC bugs which is the only way
to get lazy maintainers moving is being taken away.
Greeti
Debian roles they still hold without
having time to fulfil them.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom &q
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:41:16 +, Scott James Remnant
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 15:38 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> It does a significant number of other things, one of them being paying
>> a number of Debian developers to work on Ubuntu and obviously k
. This is bad. People who are not doing any actual work should
resign and allow themselves to be replaces with people who are eager
to do work and to take responsibility.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Ques
th doable and
>likely to be good enough to meet the standards outlined.
If you are able to get the new buildd recognized by the empowered
ones. Which has proven to be hard or impossible.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Ha
emember, dak is in the archive now) so they can run their own testing in
>parallel to the mainline one.
What a huge waste of manpower, done seven times in a row.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -
Marc Haber | " Ques
s notifications won't
>> be available.
>
>Why can't porters join the security team? Then everyone benefits.
Established Debian teams are traditionally extremely reluctant to
allow new people joining in.
Greetings
Marc
--
------ !! No
t;
>No testing and release support by the current RMs and no security support by
>the current security team.
And existing infrastructure no longer available, needing hardware
solicitation and re-inventing some wheels.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No cou
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:11:01 +0100, Sven Luther
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well, it just calls for smarther mirroring tricks.
Do not expect mirror admins to run Debian, and to be willing to pull
smart mirroring tricks.
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No
y have to lie about what the printer supports in order to get CUPS +
xprint to *not* produce either fantastically large printing, or
microscopically small printing.
--
Marc Wilson | This font is starting to come out very
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | nicely Knghtbrd: oh dear, are you hack
to how poorly Mozilla supports non-English character
sets unless you use Xprint instead of its built-in postscript support.
--
Marc Wilson | But it does move! -- Galileo Galilei
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and OOo.
>
> Xprint works perfectly fine out of the box.
Apparently you missed the flamage when Mozilla's maintainer went insane and
started requiring it. :)
--
Marc Wilson | No purchase necessary.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &
ari unstable/
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~ari unstable/
Maybe he'd take over xscreensaver. :)
--
Marc Wilson | Needs are a function of what other people have.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:51:40 +0100, Sven Luther
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:04:53PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:11:01 +0100, Sven Luther
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Well, it just calls for smarther mi
1 - 100 of 1900 matches
Mail list logo
