* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:50:44PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:20:57AM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimarães wrote:
> > > > > Does the o
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 07:23:39PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:48:55AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > > * Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROT
* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Jun 16, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm not trying to say it's non-free. It is free. What I'm trying to
> > determine is if we should use the marks within Debian. Let me try
> Go
* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > > * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > > All of
l's
> investigation into this matter, yes. There were several others, too.
Sorry Andrew, which investigation are you referring to? Which other
outcomes? You've got some context there I'm not getting.
> Oddly enough, I *do* know what happened.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PRO
* Raphaël Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Le jeudi 16 juin 2005 à 14:45 -0400, Eric Dorland a écrit :
> > I'm not trying to say it's non-free. It is free. What I'm trying to
> > determine is if we should use the marks within Debian.
>
>
* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Well I don't think DFSG #4 says the rename has to be easy, it just
> > has to be possible.
>
> Yes. However, the last sentence in DFSG #4 only talks about renaming,
> no
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 03:10:07PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 06:08:36PM +0200, Rapha?l Hertzog wrote:
> > > > Le vendredi 17 juin 2005 à
* Gervase Markham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> >* Simon Huggins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>I was under the impression that downstreams could call the packages
> >>firefox as they had been blessed with official Debian penguin pee as
> >>
ey have the legal
> right to do everything that we want to do with or without permission.
>
> So let's accept the "arrangement" and move on. There is no DFSG problem
> here even if we do accept the notion that the DFSG applies to trademarks.
If we don't need the "
* Dale C. Scheetz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 02:16:18 -0400
> Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > * Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Jun 15, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >
* Gervase Markham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> >But I don't think it's good for our users for Debian to have rights
> >that the user don't have.
>
> Debian already has rights that their users don't have, the most
> prominent among
* Michael K. Edwards ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 6/17/05, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Exactly. If Debian doesn't need such an arrangement, neither do our
> > > users.
> > > And i
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland writes:
> > If we don't need the "arrangement", why exactly would we accept it
> > anyway?
>
> Because they want it and it costs us nothing to give it to them. They are
> our friends. Let's acc
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland writes:
> > We may be their friends, but that shouldn't give us special privileges.
>
> If what we are doing does not actually infringe their trademark we would
> not be getting any special privileges.
What we are d
s that I found in BR case law were to
> > *advertising* and *misrepresenting* something as being from the wrong
> > origin.
>
> Same in the US.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
* Michael K. Edwards ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 6/19/05, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Michael K. Edwards ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I wouldn't say "accept" it, I would say "acknowledge" the safety zone
> > >
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I wrote:
> > If what we are doing does not actually infringe their trademark we would
> > not be getting any special privileges.
>
> Eric Dorland writes:
> > What we are doing already is against their trademark policy.
* Eric Dorland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> I'd certainly
>
be interested in trying to develop some sort of policy for Debian
regarding trademarks. I'm not sure how much weight it could carry, but
at least if people like the ideas.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROT
Supersedes:", "Takes-Over:", "Drop-In Replaces:",
> "Follows:" ?
Since there should be a unique replacement that old and new package
maintainer(s) agree on, I think the old package (the one being
replaced) should have the header. (Perhaps "Replaced-By:"
the issue up again if I see it happening.
Hopefully this will make everyone happy (or at least equally unhappy),
but I think it is the best compromise for the time being, until at
least better policies are worked out with regard to trademarks.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138
* Gervase Markham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> >* Gervase Markham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>Debian already has rights that their users don't have, the most
> >>prominent among them being to label a Linux distribution as "Debian&quo
* Shachar Shemesh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am not a lawyer.
>
> I am a consultant trying to understand the world he lives in, and as
> such, studied the applicable law a little.
>
> Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> >So, I don't feel I can accept the agreement offe
* Gervase Markham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> >The thread is petering out
>
> Only because there's only one of me, and I'm too busy to deal with the
> volume! It's currently ten to midnight and I just got back from speaking
> at a conf
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:48:19AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> [...]
> > So, I don't feel I can accept the agreement offered by the Mozilla
> > Foundation, because of my objections to it and because I don't feel
> &
ith the DFSG), I would urge you to not keep the
> > > status quo.
> >
> > If Eric were to rename the packages there is the potential for somebody
> > else to package again using the Firefox name. Redundant but useful for
> > our users.
> >
>
> If the MoFo i
* Martin Waitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> hoi :)
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:18:19AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > The whole question is whether Debian can accept a Debian-specific
> > agreement to call Firefox "Firefox".
>
> sure, and the consensus se
* Baptiste Carvello ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> First I wanted to say again that whatever your final decision, a build
> system
> that optionally does the renaming would still be appreciated. It would be
> even
> better if the MoFo would do it themselves, of
ishable issues -- one is a presentation format for distribution,
> the other is a means for the work to identify itself.
My problem with it is DFSG 8. If we accept a trademark license, we're
attaching additional rights to the program that are Debian-specific. I
understand that the DFSG wer
This thread suggests that it's time for toolchain-source to be retired:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-embedded/2006/07/msg00068.html
If not, perhaps some documentation pointing to this alternative method
of building cross tools should be added to the toolchain-source package.
--
Eric C
s against upstream. I really don't
> understand the whole cdbs/dpatch/whatever thing -- why use a hack to
> manage your patches when you could use a real VC tool that does it
> better?
Amen to that. (although I use svn)
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, J
s. Levels consist of
> little
> platforms connected by ladders, so you can go up and down or find cover
> if needed.
Is this one better or worse than pangzero?
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ing with automake. I have a patch to remove the
documentation cleanly, I'll try to get it all sorted out over the
weekend.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rly stage of development, but it's there.
Looking at the CVS it hasn't been touched in a year, with a bug open
saying it doesn't work with qemu 0.8.0.
> See also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322344.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586
> > the current conffile architecture in dpkg?
>
> no, you will lose data if you try. Arguably this should be fixed.
>
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ummary
> [5] http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/6017
> [6] http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/
>
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
7;t it be possible to move the alternatives around in an atomic
fashion? ln -sf bar foo.tmp ; mv foo.tmp foo . Or am I missing
something?
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Gabor Gombas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 05:25:57PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't it be possible to move the alternatives around in an atomic
> > fashion? ln -sf bar foo.tmp ; mv foo.tmp foo . Or am I missing
> > somethi
* Matthias Julius ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> - If you set up the alternatives in preinst, then there is a time when
> >> the symlink exists but the pointed binary hasn't been unpacked yet ->
> >>
* Matthias Julius ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Matthias Julius ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> >> - If you set up the alternatives in
means anything referenced in
> the etch_rc_policy-document.
I would have thought that meant a violation of
http://www.us.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/. I certainly think it's
the release manager's responsibility to mark bugs that are not release
blocking etch-ignore, but if it is a violation of policy it should
still be serious.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gt; more with it later.
If I recall correctly, only the submitter of the bug and people
properly blessed can turn on the ask for review flag.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
---
* Martin Michlmayr ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 10:34]:
> > > get this in. I can confirm that the patch in our firefox works -
> > > at least firefox starts and loads the Debian homepage. I'll play
> > > some
t; Admin takes full reponsabilty about rubygem. On purge rubygem only remove
> its
> files in /usr/lib.
>
> I consider rubygem as package similar to wget. I don't expect dpkg -P wget
> to remove files i have downloaded when i typed:
>
> wget -O /usr/local/somefile h
version anymore.
> > > >
> > > > >From my irc backlog this looks like a DAK screwup and not the
> > > > maintainers fault and is probably being investigated already. But that
> > > > doesn't help the rest of the world in the short run.
> >
an rely on
> us not to fake version numbers, and b) Manoj can continue to
> package Gnus.
There is a fairly long tradition of stripping non-free things out of
the upstream tarball and adding a dfsg to the version. While the
documentation removal is probably some of the most intrusive
DFS
the only documentation. The "dfsg" tag in
> > version names means not "this is the upstream dfsg version", it
> > means "this is the Debian-modified version, where the only
> > modifications made were those we did to make the package meet the
> > DFSG
ool I should be using?
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
experimental distribution deleted? Ideally, they should go away as
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E
anyway) and while not signing his key because of this is reasonable, or
> even revoking a signature which had been based on this ID, the constant
> inflammatory claims of Martin being a 'cracker' and how this could lead
> to other 'cracks' is extreme, insulting, and chi
. The Easy Pickings stuff would be ideal start-up
> work for new maintainers / mentorship; some of the others do need some
> work.
> * gnupg2
> (some clean-up work)
I'd like to take this, as it ties into some of my work packaging
OpenSC quite nicely.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL
At http://people.debian.org/~eric/mozilla-firefox you'll find
mozilla-firefox 1.0.4-2sarge8. It contains backports of the security
fixes present in 1.5.0.4. All these fixes are the work of Alexander
Sack, who's been working tirelessly the last couple of weeks to get
things ported. I
the next upload will break compatibility with dxpc running
> on older systems.
That information is a very good candidate for a NEWS.Debian file.
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
* Martin Spoehrle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:34:55PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > Please test these packages! There was quite a lot of code change in
> > some of these patches, and the more users we have to test the sooner
> > we can resolve any
ED]>
fwbuilder
libfwbuilder
libgcgi
Rob Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
anjuta
Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gato
Rune B. Broberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tuxtype
Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fluidsynth
Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTEC
* Artur R. Czechowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 07:11:14PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > automake1.4: This is the old school package, that's been completely
> > unsupported for a number of years (since 2002). It certainly not used
* Alexander Sack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 06:25:36PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Martin Spoehrle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:34:55PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > > Please test these packages! There
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > Scott James Remnant dropped me an email recently, interested in
> > improving the automake situation in Ubuntu and Debian[0].
> >
> > [0] Their plan, whi
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:37 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > * Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >
> > > > Scott James Remnan
* James Westby ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On (29/06/06 19:37), Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >
> > > > Scott James Remnant dropped me an email re
o available under the GPL. I don't really see why that's
> relevant...)
Just to point out that as of Firefox/Thunderbird 2 the entire codebase
is triple licensed under the MPL, GPL and LGPL and any objection to
the MPL as far as Mozilla is concerned is fairly academic at this
poin
* Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just to point out that as of Firefox/Thunderbird 2 the entire codebase
> > is triple licensed under the MPL, GPL and LGPL and any objection to
> > the MPL as far as Mozilla i
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:47:32AM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > * Matthew Garrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
ptcstubs_asm_ppc_linux.s and
> xptcinvoke_asm_sparc_linux.s are NPL only ;
> xptcinvoke_asm_mips.s is MPL.
Even if we don't use the irix, vms, etc files, if they're problematic
license-wise, we'd need to strip them out or get the license fixed.
> I'm going to contact G
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:58:13PM -0400, Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Some examples and test files are licensed under Mozilla-sample-code.
> >
> > Uh, is that actually a license?
>
> Yes it is:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-sha1
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Vincent Hanquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://tab.snarc.org/download/ocaml/ocaml_sha1-0.4.tar.bz2
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: jrpg
Version : 20060524-2151
Upstream Author : Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : mostly GPL, but will go
* Matthew R. Dempsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 06:01:57PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * URL : http://www.example.org/
>
> Does this package not have an actual web site?
Sorry, http://www.zabor.org/jrpg/
--
Eric Dorland <[EMA
ages? And with the recent upload of ffmpeg
make these objections moot?
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: svn-arch-mirror
Version : 0.2.6
Upstream Author : Eric Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://des.petta-tech.bogomips.org/eric/MusicPD/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/svn-arch-mirror/
* License : GPL v2
Descr
; Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-g4
> Locale: LANG=es_ES, LC_CTYPE=es_ES (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
>
>
--
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
-BEGIN GEEK C
;agnostic" utility that does this kind of thing?
- would the 'mime-support' maintainer be interested in adding URL
handling to the 'see' utility? (would this be at all a good idea?)
Thanks, Eric
--
Gewalt ist die letzte Zuflucht der Inkompetenz.
Violence is the La
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: blktool
Version : 4
Upstream Author : Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/gkernel/
* License : GPL
Description : Program that does stuff with block devices
blktool is use
and hardcoding some interface
>into the kernel to use that name under certain circumstances. [much
>hand waving here.]
This gives me a headache just thinking about it.
-Eric
--
"The woods are lovely, dark and deep. But I have promises to keep,
And lines to code before I sleep, And lines to code before I sleep."
* Exactly what you typed or did to demonstrate the problem.
On another
machine, I typed
ftp erich1
erich (my user name)
sdlfskldfj (my
password)
binary
cd /usr/local/bin
get emacs
* A description of the
inco
done
#endif /* InstallNonExecList */
----
Best regards.
--
Eric Delaunay | "La guerre justifie l'existence des militaires.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | En les supprimant." Henri Jeanson (1900-1970)
X-Window defaults.
Regards.
--
Eric Delaunay | "La guerre justifie l'existence des militaires.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | En les supprimant." Henri Jeanson (1900-1970)
e is no trouble.
It seems that bash isn't 100% compatible with sh :-(
Does mkdirhier be patched to accept this syntax ?
Thanks in advance.
--
Eric Delaunay | "La guerre justifie l'existence des militaires.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | En les supprimant." Henri Jeanson (1900-1970)
14:53 vim_unix.txt.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root15596 Sep 24 14:53 vim_w32.txt.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root22133 Sep 24 14:53 vim_win.txt.gz
Regards.
--
Eric Delaunay | "La guerre justifie l'existence des militaires.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | En les sup
ghts and lodging. I'm aware that there
are high concentrations of developes in the San Fran/San Jose Bay area
as well as in Europe. Whatever it takes I hope it comes together.
Eric
--
Eric Scrogerhttp://www.promosaic.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.novare.net
code monkey 214.720.0700
ng as each package and packager "does the right thing" when
a potential conflict crops up.
The bottom line: let the user decide.
Eric
Bestnet Internet Inc
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999 10:28:03 +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 08:34:48AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Do we still want to support very old hardware, especially low memory system
> > (eg. some old sparc, and maybe old 386, 486 as well) ?
>
> Then you also need a 1.x kernel. 2.0 is wasting mem
And/or make the new Perl pre-depend on the new apt, so the apt update
will happen before anything else?
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000, Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:
> > > Trouble ahead?
> > Please run "apt-get install apt" before doing the dist-upgrade. Old apt
> > don't manage well the perl transition. This w
License problems: namely, there isn't one, and it's not clearly public
domain, and nobody knows who the author is.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why doesn't netstd depend: on all the packages it previously included?
> >
er to split the
scsi part out of it and create a new scsitools package (I can adopt it if you
want).
What do you think about this?
Regards.
--
Eric Delaunay | S'il n'y a pas de solution, c'est qu'il n'y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | a pas de problème. Devise Shadok.
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 02:42:26AM -0300, Taupter wrote:
> > Strange. If i can remember, Slink has libc5 compatibility libs.
> > Why not glibc2.0 compatibility libs for potato, as RH-based distros
> > have?
>
> They're both libc 6.0 -- how would ld.so
agree with this proposal? It should go under /bin or /sbin (/sbin
preferably) because I need it early at boot time, before any partition (like
/usr) is mounted.
I will file a bug against loadlin & util-linux if I get a consensus on it.
Thanks in advance.
--
Eric Delaunay
eceived headers is a mistake. They are
useful for tracking problems, not just spam. Maybe X-Received is an
option for dealing with broken mailers.
Cheers!
Eric
--
Mathematics belongs to God -- Donald Knuth
I just logged in on console as root, and ulimit -a reported 256
processes max. So I don't think the problem is with su.
Maybe it's PAM?
I wonder where this gets configured?
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Brian Greenfield wrote:
> >On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:12:12 +0900, Junichi Uek
Ag, evil. If you plan to use busybox upgrade to .46 there are some serious
problems with .45 in regards to tar and nfs.
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Frank Smith wrote:
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> Ben Armstrong wrote:
>
> > anywhere else in Debian? It's curious that busybox isn't packaged
> > separately.
>
> A
Numbers make a lot of things easier.
> And we'd have a goal for the name. Like the goal for "whiskey" release
> would be every package that needs it supports debconf, or the goal for
> "vodka" is every package supports kernel 2.4 and IPv6, or the goal for
> "scotch" is every package supports perl 5.6 or whatever.
A great idea. But can't we do that now?
-=Eric
--
Any philosophy that can be put in a nutshell belongs there.
-- Sydney J. Harris
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: yaz
Version : 2.0.2
Upstream Author : IndexData
* URL : http://www.indexdata.dk/yaz/
* License : BSD-ish: http://www.indexdata.dk/yaz/doc/license.php
Description : A
kage, or else xemacs would never have been uploaded. :) Just
attempt something catchy (which my contribution isn't, really), and
leave the full description for the appropriate section.
-=Eric (xemacs user, BTW)
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-31
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: irqbalance
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/irqbalance/
* License : OSL 1.1
Description
, many US firms have legally mandated document retention
policies; archiving sent mail may be a required part of that. Of
course, most of the time it's probably not.
You should value your integrity more than that.
Which is why he wants to send personal mail through a non-work server,
no?
-=Eric
but it is not successful install, please help on this, highly appreciate your
time and effort, and looking to hear from any suggestions, sincere eric
_
Have you signed up for the World's Fastest Free Email ? http://www.Luxmail.com
and time
sincere ERic
_
Have you signed up for the World's Fastest Free Email ? http://www.Luxmail.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eric Lavarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libforms-java
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Karsten Lentzsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://forms.dev.java.net/
* License : BSD
Description
ler?
Perhaps a confusion of "evaporate" with "condense"? (Maybe the
thermodynamic equivalent of an "off by 1" error? :-)
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
snort, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
splint, Samuele Giovanni Tonon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sppc, Mikael Hedin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sweep, Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
swscanner, Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tapiir,
101 - 200 of 480 matches
Mail list logo
