* Uwe Hermann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:36:35PM +0300, Linas ??virblis wrote: > > Oh come one guys. So instead of providing QEMU + QEMU Acclerator, a > > partially free solution, we just go for totally non-free one? VMware was > > not an option when there actually was no alternative to it, so why is it > > an option now? > > > > I know that QEMU Accelerator is not distributable, [...] > > There's a free replacement, see http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/qvm86/. > It's probably in an early stage of development, but it's there.
Looking at the CVS it hasn't been touched in a year, with a bug open saying it doesn't work with qemu 0.8.0. > See also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=322344. -- Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
