Didier Depri (02/05/2013):
> i'm sure you get busy but i would like to know why Côte d'Ivoire is
> not in the list of countries when we are installing Debian.
If you picked “French” as a language, you just have to select “Autre”
instead of the default “Europe”, then “Afrique”, and there you go.
Holger Levsen (02/05/2013):
> On Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > People do this all the time: upload packages built against local
> > packages, experimental or even on Ubuntu to Debian sid.
>
> /me shivers. This hurts. There is no reason not to rebuild in sane
> environments.
Daniel Schepler (12/05/2013):
> Maybe we could have a release goal of dropping as many lib32* and
> lib64* packages as possible in favor of multi-arch. (And also as
> many package dependencies on libc6-[i386|amd64] as possible, which
> would in addition mean limiting some packages to arch:i386 if
Goswin von Brederlow (13/05/2013):
> Please don't. That just eats up developer time to implement, more time
> to un-implement when the real solution comes and probably delays the
> real solution because nobody wants to break the temporary fix.
No. What eats up user and developer time is useless d
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2013-11-16):
> I have yet to see someone who does. I'm a long-time emacs user and so
> are many of other developers I work together with and everyone I know
> of who uses emacs as their primary editor doesn't use X11 support, you
> just don't need it in most cases. emacs
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2013-11-16):
> > And, rather more to the point, what the hell business is it of
> > yours? Other Debian Developers don't have to justify their
> > priorities and the disposition of their time to you. I think this
> > sort of grilling is quite demoralizing and frustrati
Wouter Verhelst (2013-12-02):
> It will revert to throwaway chroots the minute LVM gets unbroken in
> stable.
What's the bug report for the issue you're mentioning?
In the meanwhile, I think tarball-based chroots are an alternative as
far as sbuild/schroot are concerned.
How are the other power
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (2013-12-03):
> On 2 December 2013 23:08, Hector Oron wrote:
> > 5 arm64 Debian port support
> > ═══
> >
> > If Debian is unable to find ARM 64-bit hardware before Jessie gets
> > frozen, it likely won't be Jessie supported.
> >
> >
>
> What is the op
Hi Mark,
Mark Brown (2013-12-04):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Mark Brown
>
> * Package name: sparse
> Version : 0.4.5
> Upstream Author : Christopher Li
> * URL : https://sparse.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
> * License : MIT
> Prog
Dimitri John Ledkov (2013-12-22):
> On 28 November 2013 20:04, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > * Architecture Status
> >* ia64 in danger
> >* sparc/ppc/mips/kfreebsd at risk
> >* s390 dropped from testing
>
> Is "ppc" - powerpc or ppc64?
powerpc. (For ppc64, same answer as below.)
> Is p
Pau Garcia i Quiles (2013-12-27):
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Mònica Ramírez wrote:
>
> ===
> > MiniDebConf 2014 Barcelona Call for Proposals
> > ===
> >
> > Debian Women is proud to announce that it
shawn wilson (2014-01-13):
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:25 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
> > Not sure if this is the proper list, but this is broken:
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/d-i/trunk/packages/partman/partman-crypto/README?op=file
> >
> > Which is from the 'Documentation for hackers' link.
[ -boot@ added to cc. ]
Vasudev Kamath (2014-01-15):
> [I've set myself in reply-to so I won't loose the replies please
> consider ccing me even though I'm subscribed to d-d]
>
> Hi,
>
> As per the change in font naming convention, all (most) fonts are
> renamed from ttf-*-fonts to fonts-* and
Craig Small (2014-02-25):
> I got a bug report stating that there is no i386 build for procps.
> First I'm not really sure that's how bug reports work, but anyhow.
#739874 should have been called a failure to build from source (FTBFS),
and could have linked to [1], but anyhow.
1. https://buildd
Jakub Wilk (2014-02-24):
> I just hope you didn't mean to say that only perfect bug reports are
> welcome these days, and those merely good are somehow frowned upon.
No, I wasn't sure what Craig was not sure about, that's why I tried to
connect the dots with the usual FTBFS bug reports developers
Joerg Jaspert (2014-02-09):
> Lets see, the following license-problem-* sound interesting beside the
> json-evil we already have:
>
> license-problem-font-adobe-copyrighted-fragment (14 packages, 3032 tags, plus
> 3539 overrides)
> license-problem-font-adobe-copyrighted-fragment-no-credit (7 pac
Andreas Tille (2014-03-01):
> which used to work previously as well. I opened a ticket this morning
> at rt.debian.org but I think this might interest people here on this
> list as well.
ticket in rt for alioth? I think you want to check this:
https://wiki.debian.org/Alioth#Maintenance
Mraw,
Marc Haber (2014-03-25):
> They renew their certificates only in the last (two?) weeks of the
> lifetime.
Correct, two weeks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
brian m. carlson (2014-04-05):
> I just realized my statement was unclear. I believe some people had
> stated that GNOME had regressed in accessibility support at the time,
> and XFCE was a better choice in this regard. I can't say more because I
> don't have enough knowledge on the subject. Ma
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2014-04-07):
> On 04/07/2014 08:24 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > That's what I'm using yes. Probably you should have read my message
> > up to its end, where I wrote: "I'm also unsure all my KVM over IPs
> > support images for DVDs rather than simply CD."
>
> No need to
Xavier Roche (2014-04-13):
>
> See tests/test-suite.log
>
> Would it be relevant to emit to stderr the tests/test-suite.log content
> in this case to ease debugging (or to keep it somehow) ?
That's a good idea, yeah. Th
Hi Wookey,
Wookey (2014-04-20):
> You may or may not have noticed that 'arm64' is coming. This a 64-bit
> arm architecture also known as 'aarch64' and implemented in the ARM
> CPU architecture 'v8'. Apart from iphones there is no publically
> available 64-bit silicon yet, but that'll be changing
Michael Biebl (2014-05-09):
> Am 09.05.2014 18:22, schrieb Russ Allbery:
> > I think we need some sort of critical debconf prompt here for the jessie
> > release, similar to how we handled the change of /bin/sh to dash and how
> > we handled the switch to startpar. Probably in systemd-sysv, which
Marc Haber (2014-05-11):
> Just curious as the maintainer of another package using su in an init
> script since 2001, how am I supposed to start a non-root process from
> an init script?
start-stop-daemon has:
-c, --chuid username|uid[:group|gid]
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description:
Thibaut Paumard (2014-05-13):
> Le 13/05/2014 17:36, Russ Allbery a écrit :
> > Right, which I've been arguing for already in this thread. I don't think
> > we should force this on upgrades. There should be a prompt and an
> > opportunity to not change init systems.
>
> Instead of or in additio
Thorsten Glaser (2014-05-13):
> (But it was nice to have a published list of those people who maybe
> could accidentally be hit by a tactical small-bus…)
That's absolutely shocking and intolerable.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Treinen (2014-05-22):
> Hello,
>
> the analysis of not-installable packages due to dependency issues that
> we did since 2006 under the name edos.debian.net is now operating again
> at [1]. What is new:
[…]
>
> [1] qa.debian.org/dose
great news!
I'd suggest two things:
- maybe
Hi,
Steffen Möller (24/03/2011):
> Dear kfreebsd users,
this is -devel@; cc-ing -bsd@…
> amd64 is fine, but i386 does not build the BOINC package. The only other
> platofrm making difficulties is hurd, but this is something very
> different and will most likely be already fixed with the next up
Thomas Goirand (29/03/2011):
> Description : open source software for building reliable cloud
> infrastructure
Please drop “open source software”, that's what Debian is about, no
need to mention it in package descriptions (both short and long btw).
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digit
Bernd Zeimetz (29/03/2011):
> And as you have to test-build your packages anyway the only reason I
> see why you wouldn't be able to upload them is a very slow
> connection to the rest of the world.
One can test-build in her own, non-chroot environment, and still be
cautious about what changed in
Samuel Thibault (31/03/2011):
> Michael Biebl, le Thu 31 Mar 2011 14:30:06 +0200, a écrit :
> > As you can see, xserver-xorg still uses hal on kfreebsd, but iirc
> > KiBi did some work in that regard.
>
> AFAIK, it was agreed that hal is needed for now. FreeBSD's devd
> should be a long-term repl
Hi,
Dmitry Katsubo (31/03/2011):
> The mentioned symbols are exported from libgomp (a part of gcc-4.4
> package), which is correctly linked to the SO:
>
> # ldd ./src/libosra_java.so | grep gomp
> libgomp.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgomp.so.1 (0xb68df000)
you may want to check through objdump
g
I have no useful idea to share about the practical implementation, but
for the general idea:
Acked-by: Cyril Brulebois
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Michael Biebl (04/04/2011):
> I might be mistaken, but I think Steve's meant something more along
> the lines of http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586082
I guess I could have been more specific, and quoted Steve a bit
further:
| Once that's made its way through the archive, we coul
Hi,
Josselin Mouette (04/04/2011):
> I think squeeze already does a lot better, but there is still work
> to do, especially with the installation process.
>
> On my personal wishlist for wheezy is d-i actually calling NM behind
> the scenes to configure the network, instead of ifupdown. I’ll
> d
Luk Claes (04/04/2011):
> The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: important
> is obviously that one needs to declare a dependency on bash when
> it's used in a package. Which means quite some packages will need to
> be changed.
What is the most obvious reason to degrade bash to P
Ralf Treinen (21/04/2011):
> * Package name: aspcud
> Version : 2011.03.17
> Upstream Author : Roland Kaminski
> * URL : http://www.cs.uni-potsdam.de/wv/aspcud/
> * License : GPL3+
> Programming Lang: C++
> Description : a CUDF solver based on answer se
Hi,
Arnaud Fontaine (22/04/2011):
> * Package name: xml_marshaller
not a valid package name. :)
> Version : 0.9.7
> Upstream Author : Nicolas Delaby
> * URL : http://www.python.org/community/sigs/current/xml-sig/
> * License : Python License (CNRI Python Lic
Ben Hutchings (23/04/2011):
> I would like to see policy forbid the use of commit hashes in
> versions. They aren't ordered, and the information about exactly
> which commit the snapshot was can be included in the changelog.
I'll be happy to second any wording you could come up with on that
topi
Jon Dowland (27/04/2011):
> ~ sorts after ., so "0~110427" will be considered newer than "0.1".
> Therefore, the 0 in 0~YYMMDD is meaningless, and would be no better
> than ~YYMMDD (which would still sort after 0.1, and require an
> epoch).
$ dpkg --compare-versions 0~110427 '<<' 0.1 && echo "Jon
Bernd Zeimetz (29/04/2011):
> Instead of Martin's project you might want to look into ipcfg by
> Wouter Verhelst, which is in experimental already.
You may want not to. Last I checked (#dd yesterday, but not quoting
without permission), the idea was to scratch everything and start
over.
Mraw,
Ki
Hi,
(not a gcc maintainer)
Charles Plessy (04/05/2011):
> I just got a bug from you explaining some changes (= more FTBFS)
> about 4.6.1. Will there be similar 4.6.x changes in the future ?
my reading of it is that to prevent too many FTBFSes while introducing
4.6 in Debian, some changes were
Hi,
Mark Johnson (03/05/2011):
> However, I wasn't able to find any info on how to rejoin the
> organization in the standard documents. Do I simply go through the
> New Maintainer application process as I did initially?
might be that it's a bit uncommon, and maybe under-documented; anyway,
I had
Hi,
(you already know, but let's state that on dd@ too)
Josselin Mouette (04/05/2011):
> during the recent discussions about rolling, a proposal was made in
> a blog comment, and after giving it some quick thoughts, most people
> I’ve talked with seem to think it is a good idea, so it’s time for
Jonathan Nieder (05/05/2011):
> I personally don't think uploading packages to experimental before
> it is time for them to participate in transitions to testing and
> integrate with the rest of the next stable distribution is abuse at
> all. In fact I wish people would do it more often.
Being a
Hi,
Joerg Jaspert (07/05/2011):
> As we have received no notice of errors and as we also do not see
> anything bad ourself, I just activated the new generator for the
> archive. Starting with the next dinstall run in a few minutes all
> Packages and Sources files[2] will be generated using the ne
Hi again,
Cyril Brulebois (08/05/2011):
> is that a related breakage?
>
> [Can't debootstrap]
>
> Same happens with ftp{.fr,.uk,.de,}.debian.org; with i386 and amd64.
Also, ftp.ch.d.o exhibited the infamous Hash Sum mismatches for the
kfreebsd-i386 sid chroot on io.debi
Hi,
Dominic Hargreaves (17/05/2011):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Dominic Hargreaves
>
> * Package name: libdevel-dprof-perl
> Version : 20110228.00
> Upstream Author : Florian Ragwitz
> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-DProf/
> * License
Hi,
Roland Mas (23/05/2011):
> We should now be in the phase where we pretend it's done, wait for
> the complaints, and fix the problems as they are reported (or laugh
> them off when they come from the too-common expectation that Alioth
> can be used to run any random stuff by anyone).
sorry,
Hi,
Raphael Hertzog (29/05/2011):
> from time to time I hear some rumblings about how "3.0 (quilt)"
> mixes badly with VCS. Indeed, one of the primary goals of the format
> was to not require prior knowledge of the patch system to be able to
> modify a package.
thanks for trying to improve the s
Hi,
Philip Ashmore (06/06/2011):
> While trying to build QT 4.8.0 technology preview I had occasion to
> search for openvg.h.
while it would be nice to have a functional packages.debian.org, I
probably should be sharing that (at least in the meanwhile):
# apt-get install apt-file
$ apt-file
Zed Pobre (08/06/2011):
> What's involved in editing wiki.debian.org? My debian.org password
> doesn't seem to apply […]
That's a separate login system, not reserved to DD only. Create an
account, log in, and enjoy.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cyril Brulebois
A while ago wayland was split into two separate repositories, wayland
and wayland-demos. I'll keep #611400 for the former, and this is the ITP
bug for the latter. I'll post descriptions for #611400 later on.
(http://cgit.freed
Here's a tiny update, and below, the descriptions.
Cyril Brulebois (28/01/2011):
> * Package name: wayland
> Version : git
> Upstream Author : Kristian Høgsberg and others
> * URL : http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
> * License
Hi.
Hans-J. Ullrich (18/06/2011):
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri/i915_dri.so
> /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/dri/swrast_dri.so
>
> Solution:
> As "apt-file search i386-linux-gnu" did not show any package with this
> content,
> I added the directories manually and created some symlinks to i915_dri.so
Hans-J. Ullrich (18/06/2011):
> Well, I thought the problem is not related to i915, as this is part of
> the kernel, and I did not change the kernel.
Just to clarify: You mentioned a .so, not a .ko; there are i915 bits in
the kernel, and in userspace; in this case, this is about userspace.
Mraw,
Hans-J. Ullrich (18/06/2011):
> Yes, it is userspace. Pity I don't have the logs any more (Xorg.log.0), where
> the error was shown. It showed me, that the *_dri.so could not found (so GLX
> could not be started). They originally reside below /usr/lib/dri/, but the
> driver search them below /u
Johan Walles (13/07/2011):
> Build log says "Maybe successful":
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?arch=powerpc&pkg=libtasn1-3&ver=2.9-4
>
> What does "maybe" mean in this case? Is it the "Maybe" that's holding
> the package back? What does it take to get from "Maybe successful" to
> "
Russ Allbery (18/07/2011):
> The upstart maintainers have expressed considerably more willingness
> to date to work with Debian on meeting our project's goals and
> incorporating those changes into the upstream release.
For reference, that would likely be:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/200
Michael Meskes (19/07/2011):
> could anyone tell me what the difference between scribus and scribus-ng is?
> According to the description scribus-ng is the development branch but scribus
> itself is a later rc than -ng. Besides it appears to me that the package(s)
> could need a little bit of love
Hi all.
(Putting -bsd@ in the loop, since I believe not everyone there reads
-devel@. The (very long) thread starts at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/07/msg00269.html)
Josselin Mouette (20/07/2011):
> You are both framing the discussion through a fallacy: that the only
> choice
Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> 1) What's the proper way to address this issue in squeeze?
>a) Build a i386 package with broken symlink?
>b) Build whatever-arch package with working symlink?
Stop using basename on what's in /lib, and do that on what's under
debian/tmp.
> 2) How can we ma
Cyril Brulebois (22/08/2011):
> Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> > 1) What's the proper way to address this issue in squeeze?
> >a) Build a i386 package with broken symlink?
> >b) Build whatever-arch package with working symlink?
>
> Stop using basename o
Michael Prokop (22/08/2011):
> * Adam D. Barratt [Mon Aug 22, 2011 at 07:11:08PM +0100]:
> > Looking at the procps source package in unstable, it appears to have the
> > same issue. If that's the case, then I'm afraid your question should
> > really have been "what's the proper way to address thi
Bastien ROUCARIES (23/08/2011):
> And for middle ages dog (not oldtimer) they are the ssh -X root@localhost
> trick
or: sudo XAUTHORITY=~/.Xauthority wireshark
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
Miguel Landaeta (26/08/2011):
> * URL : http://winswitch.org/documentation/protocols/xpra.html
(there's no such thing as X windows, first line of General Information)
> Programming Lang: C, Python
> Description : tool to detach/reattach running X programs
What's the sta
Russ Allbery (29/08/2011):
> Does this work now? Previously, setting the architecture list didn't
> do anything useful if the source package built at least one arch: all
> package.
Since arch: all as per-arch (…) now, I guess that limitation is gone.
And yes, arch restrictions have been working
Andreas Tille (30/08/2011):
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:40:30PM +0100, Wolodja Wentland wrote:
> > is there a specific reason why metapackages depend rather then
> > recommend packages they are meant to pull in?
>
> The statement that metapackages depend from packages is not true in
> general.
Wolodja Wentland (30/08/2011):
> It is my impression that the problems mentioned in my initial mail can
> be solved by changing metapackages (like those mentioned by Cyril in
> his reply) to use Recommends instead of Depends.
>
> I am, however, not entirely sure if there are any g
Lucas Nussbaum (31/08/2011):
> hurd-i386, kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 are probably too
> experimental to be used on production systems. For kfreebsd, my main
> problem (with my Ruby hat) is the linuxthreads-based thread library, but
> there might be other problems.
http://lists.debian.org/87
Raphael Hertzog (05/09/2011):
> I would like to find one or two persons to lead a new release goal
> centered around hardening. The big goal is to have the maximum number of
> packages using hardening by the time Wheezy is released but it could
> include more specific sub-goals like "all packages
Bill Allombert (03/09/2011):
> I would like to thanks all the developpers that have worked toward
> removing circular dependencies, and especially the X Strike Force and
> the Debian Java maintainers.
The X Strike Force would like to thank David Kalnischkies for his hints
about getting X packages
Steve Langasek (27/06/2011):
> But when can I use it?
> ==
>
> As noted above, support for the multiarch filesystem layout solves only one
> of the two problems preventing side-by-side installation of packages from
> multiple architectures. The other problem, package manager
Hi,
Sebastian Reichel (06/09/2011):
> Description : X.Org X server -- OMAP display driver
FWIW: http://x.debian.net/reference/dependencies.html
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Sebastian Reichel (07/09/2011):
> I would be glad if you can give the package (available from [0]) a
> quick review before I upload it to experimental. You can change
> Architecture to any if you want to build it on a x86 system for
> testing purposes (OMAP chips are ARM based, but the code can be
Jonas Smedegaard (2014-11-25):
> August 8th, Debian began supporting¹ choice among several init systems.
> August 21st, Debian changed² default init.
>
> To me, flexibility is an important feature of Debian. I am excited that
> Debian extends its flexibility to cover several init systems.
>
>
Jonas Smedegaard (2014-11-25):
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-11-25 18:31:33)
> > I'm not sure why people seem to believe that broadcasting a call for
> > tests through their blog, Planet Debian, various Debian mailing
> > lists, etc. is going to change anything here.
Jonas Smedegaard (2014-11-26):
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-11-25 19:50:48)
> > Jonas Smedegaard (2014-11-25):
> >> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (2014-11-25 18:31:33)
> >>> I'm not sure why people seem to believe that broadcasting a call for
> >>> t
Why on earth is that landing on debian-devel@?
Thorsten Glaser (2014-12-02):
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > > Could you please add support for the Tanglu[1] Debian derivative?
>
> > Without having looked at it yet: thanks.
>
> > Yes, plea
Leif Lindholm (2014-12-11):
> The point is, when we add support for another architecture which
> supports UEFI, there are a number of packages that you will want to
> enable for that architecture. Currently, this means trawling through
> all of the packages and explicitly adding entries for
> If
Ole Streicher (2015-02-09):
> Hi,
>
> some days ago, I uploaded a package (python-astropy_1.0~rc1-3); however
> the package never reached incoming. I got a confirmation about the upload:
>
> 8<
> python-astropy_1
Jerome BENOIT (2015-04-03):
> Hello List,
>
> does anyone have in mind a working sample for the automake include feature
> [1] ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Jerome
>
> [1]
> https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Include.html#Include
You may want to ask https://codesearch.debian
Jeff Epler (2015-04-15):
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:06:53AM +1000, Riley Baird wrote:
> > What if that website goes down one day?
>
> Hmm. I thought a Debian package should not require an internet
> connection to be built from source, but in quickly scanning the debian
> policy manual and the
Paul Tagliamonte (2015-04-16):
> Background
> ==
>
> Python 2 is scheduled to be EOL'd upstream officially and for good in 2020.
> We're in 2015 now (wow, that went quickly), and keeping our release cadence up
> (3 years a pop) puts Stretch up in 2018, and Buster in 2021.
Wheezy was firs
Guillem Jover (2015-04-18):
> General News
>
>
> * Raphaël Hertzog has stepped down as maintainer.
It seems a little sad there's not even a thanks or two, so here it is:
Thanks so much for all the hard (and not only technical) work, Raphaël!
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description:
Lucas Nussbaum (2015-05-04):
> I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
> in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
> other teams. I'm not entirely clear on the status of debian-ports.org,
> and of what the current downsides of using debian
Hi Norbert,
Norbert Preining (2015-05-14):
> Hi everyone
>
> (please Cc)
>
> I recently switched from a pre-release of the installer images
> .../sid_d-i/current/amd64/iso-cd/firmware-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
> (taken sometime about a year ago, or so)
>
> to the final version
> ... firmware-
Arnaud Fontaine (2015-05-14):
> I tried to use http.debian.net instead of my local mirror, namely
> http://ftp.jp.debian.org, last year and it was redirecting me to much
> mirrors not in Japan (Taiwan or Korea). I sent 2 emails to you about
> that but never got any reply so not sure
Hi,
Christian PERRIER (2015-05-25):
> Quoting Hideki Yamane (henr...@debian.or.jp):
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun Apr 19, 2015 at 16:25:30 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Improvements in this release of the installer
> > >
Wouter Verhelst (2015-05-27):
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 08:47:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 19:42:48 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >
> > > On 25/05/15 18:24, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 24 May 2015 21:27:47 Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
Hi,
mudongliang (2015-05-29):
> First , when does debian8.1 come?
dda@
→ https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/05/msg5.html
→ https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/05/msg00605.html
> Second, I know the development of debian big version (for Debian 7 -> 8).
>
> oldstabl
Geert Stappers (2015-06-07):
> What about creating a guide line where upstream creates a directory
> Packaging where sub directories are like Debian, Ubuntu, Mint,
> Redhat, CentOS, Suse and such?
>
> So Upstream can ship their tar-balls / git repositories with
> the package stuff ( Spec files, d
Niels Thykier (2015-06-15):
> On 2015-06-15 08:04, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 13:26:26 -0700
> > Russ Allbery wrote:
> >
> >> Simon McVittie writes:
> >>
> >>> This is a recurring (anti-)pattern:
> >>
> >>> * an ABI-stable, high-level library, say libhigh0, links to a
> >>>
Michael Biebl (2015-07-19):
> Am 17.07.2015 um 19:17 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
> > [tag]
> > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/systemd-no-service-for-init-rcS-script.html
> > , but there are some false positives in this list.
>
> ..
>
> > dd-list of affected packages:
>
> This list seems to be inc
Hi,
Ansgar Burchardt (2015-05-05):
> [ Please send replies only to boot@ ]
>
> I would like to re-evaluate what we change by default for Stretch, that
> is the list of packages with priorities required, important and
> standard. In general my plan involves installing less, taking into
> conside
Control: reassign -1 src:debian-installer
Hi,
Dominik George (2015-08-03):
> The Debian installer images for jessie apparently do not have watchdog
> support enabled in the kernel, so they do not send heartbeats to the
> BIOS.
>
> This results in the installer system aborting and the machine re
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek (2015-08-12):
> At Matthias's suggestion, I'm attaching here a script that I've been
> using in Ubuntu to trigger library package transitions for the g++5
> ABI change. It needs a bit of tuning to be usable in Debian (for
> instance, you probably don't want to pull the s
Steve Langasek (2015-08-12):
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 03:14:18AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Thanks! Does the hazardous sed call touching debian/rules now account
> > for the dh_makeshlibs call(s) that might have been missed previously?
>
> I don't know
Chris Bannister (2015-08-30):
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 10:42:13PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le jeudi 27 août 2015 à 05:22 +0200, Michael Meskes a écrit :
> > > Besides, what causes the system to make those package downloads before?
> > > I may be behind a slow or expensive line and don't
Jakub Wilk (2015-08-30):
> * Cyril Brulebois , 2015-08-30, 05:38:
> >>JFTR, what is g-s-d? gnome-software-?
> >
> >kibi@arya:~$ apt-file search /usr/bin/g*-s*-d*
> >gnome-settings-daemon: /usr/bin/gnome-settings-daemon
>
> To clarify: it only worked because yo
501 - 600 of 707 matches
Mail list logo
