Package: general
Severity: normal
After upgrading to Wheezy, the resolution randomly change at boot causing
screen goes to sleep just after authentication.
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ × 2
Gallium 0.4 on NV84
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.1
APT prefers stable-upda
s go away.
I'd be glad if someone could take it up from here, I've burned up all
the time I had to spend on Netplan on the short term. Thanks already!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freela
.org/1022843#42
This is not to put any blame on ifupdown or its maintainer(s), I just
meant to share than even “easy-peasy use cases” can be tricky with “good
old tools that have been known to work reliably”: that doesn't quite
match my experience. :(
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...
roject management tool
--
Cyril Bouthors
pgpxqwaaAQwBM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
iption : Manages links into a shared DRBD partition
--
Cyril Bouthors
pgpxsj6fqXkB0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm asking for someone else to maintain xdiskusage because I'm not
using it anymore because I've switched to fsview (package
konq-plugins).
--
Cyril Bouthors
pgpITfCDyLs0z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: graphthing
Version : 1.3.1
Upstream Author : David Symonds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://graph.seul.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-pygraphviz
Version : 0.32
Upstream Author : Aric Hagber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://networkx.lanl.gov/wiki/pygraphviz
* License : BSD
Prog
g to do with the upload.
--
Cyril Bouthors
pgpawg32cFh3r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e on the fixes and
less on the mailing lists.
If you'd like to spend more time on the packages too, I'll be glad to
welcome you as a co-maintainer. Please let me know.
Thanks.
--
Cyril Bouthors
pgpbADWgnEmVQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cyril Lacoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: digitools
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Andrew Calkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Richard Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ben Potter <[EM
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: smarty-gettext
Version : 1.0b1
Upstream Author : Sagi Bashari
* URL or Web page : http://sf.net/projects/smarty-gettext/
* License : GPL
Description : provides gettext support for smarty
--
Cyril Bouthors
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: luxrender
Version : 0.1~rc4
Upstream Authors: PHARR Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
HUMPHREYS Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
something similar with Debian? I have not seen any 2.21
packages in experimental yet. "Debian GNOME Packaging" [2] does not seem
to have them yet.
Thank you.
Regards,
Cyril Jaquier
P.S. Please, do not forget to CC me as I did not subscribe to the list.
[1] http://overlays.gentoo.or
t time? Thanks.
Regards,
Cyril Jaquier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
>>
> How would that solve the lack of manpower?
>
It won't solve the lack of manpower but could help a bit. I know this is
probably a way too simple but:
- take Ubuntu source packages.
- remove Ubuntu specific patches, adapt dependencies, etc.
But packaging is probably not t
AIL PROTECTED]> [1] and below.
1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/12/msg00221.html
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpPXp0mfHnhy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
keep that patch as the first of the series, so that only
this one is applied when running upstream's clean, and unapplied
afterwards? (You may want to use “quilt pop -a” to be sure.)
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgprNL2hNJVCp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
's quite easy to remember firefox -> iceweasel,
but that might help tracking successors over years, even if they aren't
as famous as that one.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpmBXtcHwYHv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
A1 ^NAME
| NAME
|debcheckout - checkout the development repository of a Debian package
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp0YCoIRxXZt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
sence of a “dfsg” string).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpfo6sfWt2Mx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgprIbcQkPJZx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
kages having such a “Yes” value and [1].
1. http://ftp-master.debian.org/dm-uploaders.html
FTPmasters, would it make sense to reject packages with a
Dm-Upload-Allowed flag set, but not set to “yes”, so that this is clear
to everyone at once?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpw0eCPXAVMO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
one is testing/hacking on
packages without using the -nc switch, that is: using “fakeroot
debian/rules $target”, where $target needs (fake)root rights, hence the
“fakeroot”.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpIVCsGe9DWd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t to keep -p0.
* --remove-timestamps, if you want --no-timestamps.
* dpatch stuff will be stripped.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpeD34ElH1X1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
packaged tarballs.
I already pointed to Devref 6.7.8.2, now quoting it:
| A repackaged .orig.tar.gz:
| …
| 4. should use -.orig as the name of the
| top-level directory in its tarball. This makes it possible to
| distinguish pristine tarballs from repackaged ones.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpvlmjcnGgm
On 28/01/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Build-Conflicts: libwxgtk2.6-dev?
I thought we were moving away from wx 2.4, not from 2.6. ;-)
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpLO4s4mwjfE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of
cmake.mk, without setting the two (C and CXX) offending variables.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpq40lfbcfZy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that having a common pattern in the policy or the devref
would make sense. There are several combinations of the above, mixed
together with the use of ‘+’, ‘~’ and ‘.’, and getting a standard for
that couldn't hurt.
Cc'ing -policy.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp38jPLnd6TN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgptBO9Ki7Bk3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e the debian/-only layout svn-buildpackage offers.
Me too… although you don't need *-buildpackage at all to achieve that.
tar is very sufficient.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp5U8emGfE2o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi all,
I'm new to Debian so sorry for this newbie question ;)
Why do not the linux-source-2.6.* packages provide linux-kernel-headers?
Regards,
Cyril Jaquier
P.S. Please, do not forget to CC me because I am not subscribed to the list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
On 30/01/2008, Paul Wise wrote:
> Has there been any bashisms checks on maintainer scripts (postinst/etc)?
There's already:
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tpossible-bashism-in-maintainer-script.html
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpu6gpae1W7J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/usr/include/linux wouldn't do the trick? Mmmhhh... maybe
/usr/include/linux must point to the headers which were used to compile
glibc?
Thank you.
Cyril
P.S. Please CC me if you reply to this e-mail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
fully free IIRC
FWIW: 2008/01/22: icedtea-java7 7~b24-1.5-2 landed in NEW
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/icedtea-java7_7~b24-1.5-2.html
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpxv3ealxknc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpPdAaYTnWTB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
check-tarball hack can be extended).
To give you an idea of the extra cost of storing original tarballs
(their content, rather) in git: graphviz's unpacked sources are around
30MB. Gzipped, around 5MB. After having imported 7 such tarballs in git
(and still with my whole debian/-only packag
On 04/02/2008, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Yes. Apparently what's special about this is that it can be
> controlled over the network. Probably not the only one but
> noticeable enough to be mentioned in a short description.
mpd also supports that (tcp/6600).
Cheers,
--
C
er modification.
> Or maybe someone has an NM, and doesn't know what he should do for
> T&S? ;)
Not yet, already passed, too late. :p
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp2lM64Vk7g9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ing fillets-ng in fillets-ng_0.8.0-2.diff.gz
| dpkg-source: building fillets-ng in fillets-ng_0.8.0-2.dsc
| debian/rules build
`
There you are. -b/-B aren't used, the source package gets (re)built,
and due to gzip magic, the diff.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpl07dlnpJBV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e that if a package isn't DFSG-free, it can't go to contrib either.
Contrib is for DFSG-free material depending on non-free (or contrib in
turn) stuff, see Policy 2.2.2.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpCQ2mURhche.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 06/02/2008, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> Just to make this clear […]
Yep, thank you (all) for clarifying that, sorry for the inconvenience.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpFkxYGMPJdq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
gt; may occur once a year for a kernel security update is not worth a
> single broken script, nor a single failed backup, nor a single lost
> data bit.
Since you're talking about *production* systems, “stable” case above,
so “not a problem”.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpgIoQn5TCta.pgp
Description: PGP signature
d rebuilding them from scratch.
>
> SCNR, really.
I just made the same remark to Raphaël on IRC, thanks for summing it
up here.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp2DcNLCmqq4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
porting bugs (with eventually the NMU patches that
are already prepared)? See gcc folks' advanced warnings, that looks
like the way to go, instead of NMUing in the wild.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpSNgxYPUiRI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
icons in desktop/menu files.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpGmD9xFI6pW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
interested in being part of such
a group.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgprVSIa57DEf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eenshots, with some additional arrows and other
comments. Not that I need it, but that would (have been|be) nice.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpITYEH0ADJu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 25/02/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> What you want him to do is using:
>
> git rebase -i
Probably with -p.
--
Cyril Brulebois, who tried, w/o prior knowledge of the code.
pgpi79bZt6Ty5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
or updated packages), at the very same time?
I believe it's possible. And I believe you'll find a trivial example.
Now. How come it wouldn't be possible to apply for a GSOC slot,
lowering the involvement in one (or more) of the above-mentioned
areas, and concentrating
on
> him. Many Debian teams might not be able to afford to lose an active
> contributor during the summer (just before the lenny release!) so he
> can work on his GSOC project.
Huh? You know about libre arbitre, right? If people apply to GSOC,
their choice. I really don't know why you would forbid them to apply.
So that they keep doing the dirty job before a release?
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpSjKxjhcWxG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to
> > apply. So that they keep doing the dirty job before a release?
>
> Gah, you discovered my evil plans :-)
I don't find that funny. At all.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpoGJUuUPPma.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ather than anything else? Why didn't you provide us with
info/pointers, then, instead of “It would be a good idea…”? It would
be nice to stop using maybe's.
> I understand that you are frustrated by the current state of DAM
> (Cyril has been waiting for DAM to review his applicatio
On 01/03/2008, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> Should I remove it manually, or just let it go as the version
> numbers will ensure that it will not be installed?
Wait until it moves to DELAYED/0, and gets REJECTED since there's a
newer version in the archive.
Cheers,
--
Cyri
step in during the next week.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpQ03SHu9ckH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ncy-based initscripts?
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpO4ipOJOweh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
gt; Please be assured of the sympathy I have for your project,
Please be assured of the sympathy I have for your trying to have your
packages into testing at all costs,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpZwLabADZMj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
some of his packages, because of his being busy,
which might explain a lag (in case your typo was only in this Subject:).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpfhH5CmHVeG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
mp the
version (I'm not talking about incrementing the Debian revision here)
to upload e new .orig.tar.gz
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpUudGCzJgsH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| 0.7.0-1 to unstable: Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You'll sometimes need to use --max-uploads=N (N defaults to 3).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpcMT3b3A0Wh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
blender
>blender (U)
>
> Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>blender (U)
>
> Wouter van Heyst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>blender (U)
I'm on my way to report it to upstream already (which already ships some
.svn/ in the tarball).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpYvLqGphsi9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
is currently “there's no loop; try and add foo; if a
loop is introduced, foo is guilty; otherwise, be happy”. If you don't
have the “we're trying to add foo” bit, I guess it's hard (if possible
at all) to find which package(s) is/are guilty.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpl0qzvelLLA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> The document is supplied in HTML, PDF, PostScript and plain ascii.
^ ASCII?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpGrENNN5l9x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 06/04/2008, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
> automatic build of wengophone [1] on arm failed because of a GCC
> internal compiler error. Who should I ask to request a retry of the
> build?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpLEaHFaZMAE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
: http://www.musicpd.org/~jat/python-mpd/
> * License : GPL
> Programming Lang: Python
> Description : Python MPD client library
>
> An MPD (Music Player Daemon) client library written in pure Python.
Hi,
how does it compare to python-mpdclient?
Chee
due to lack of RAM, which especially happens on
arm buildds. The only way to get the package built is then to ask for a
rebuild, which hopefully will hit another box. I've already asked
Aurélien for several give-backs, following his own instructions.
No need to Cc me, thank you.
--
-free packages to be
autobuilt. See the following announcement for more info.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg00012.html
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpHiQC2uFJJZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I'm wondering whether the ArchitectureSpecificsMemo[1] wiki page is
(well-)known, and whether its content got reviewed, esp. by porters of
each architecture, who could fix obvious errors or typos, or eventually
add special-cases, exceptions, and the like.
1. http://wiki.debian.org/Architectu
On 03/05/2008, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH)
> ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),amd64)
> FLAVORS := std
> else ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ia64)
> FLAVORS := std
> else ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64)
> FLAVORS := std
> else ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),s390x)
> FL
On 17/05/2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Other idea: when the package is produced through a workflow that uses
> debian/patches, shipping them in /usr/share/doc/package/patches.
Do you really want that?
openoffice.org_2.4.0-6.diff.gz 82,595.1 kB
Not to mention all packages where an autoreconf run
On 18/05/2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> oh boy, are we really "fighting" over a dupe of a mail ? wasting 4k of
> data and two keystrokes ? (in mutt, D~=\n will remove dupes, kmail has
> the same functionnality, and most decent MUA do to). CoC is meant to
> reduce rudeness, not technical issues from
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/06/2008):
> Ideally the .config files used to build the standard Debian kernels
> would be available in a light-weight package. I think the only
> solution currently is to install that package and get the
> configuration from /boot/config-.
You may play aroun
Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/06/2008):
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (13/06/2008):
> > Ideally the .config files used to build the standard Debian kernels
> > would be available in a light-weight package. I think the only
> > solution currently i
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20/06/2008):
> $ sudo aptitude reinstall ncurses-base
> $ ls -l /lib/terminfo/*/*
> -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1481 2008-06-16 22:40 /lib/terminfo/a/ansi
> -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1502 2008-06-16 22:40 /lib/terminfo/c/cons25
> -rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1529 2008-06-16 22:40 /
"Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (28/06/2008):
> Possibly libpano12 could be removed from Debian after taking care
> about hugin.
Correct. libpano13 is packaged already, and I've been waiting for a
hugin release for some months. I've finally to pick up an svn snapshot
since there's still
Josselin Mouette (29/06/2009):
> All existing frontends use the same dependency resolution engine,
> except for aptitude. Installing a package with synaptic, apt-get,
> adept or gnome-app-install should give the same result.
cupt! cupt! cupt!
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital sign
Tony Houghton (02/07/2009):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Tony Houghton
>
>
> * Package name: roxterm
> Version : 1.15.1
> Upstream Author : Tony Houghton
> * URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net/
> * License : GPL
> Programming Lang: C
>
Philipp Kern (05/07/2009):
> How could one help to get multiarch happen by the way? Or does it currently
> depend on Guillem coding up the foundation in dpkg anyway?
Maybe we could have a bug against general about multiarch support,
blocked by bugs against each and every component that needs twe
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Heya folks.
I request assistance with maintaining the graphviz package. That might
also move to an RFA later on.
Given I'm slowly drifting to more porting, I'm currently lacking time to
maintain graphviz properly. If you're interested, you may want to be
aware of s
Mathieu Malaterre (13/07/2009):
> I'd suggest you reread it:
>
> http://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html#id292437
Let's quote it further:
| So, when will it be released?
| The first planned official Debian release of 64bit userland for AMD64 will be
Etch (Sarge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Kavanagh (14/07/2009):
> This package will also provide the library packages librpass0 and
> librpass0-dev,
> with long description:
>
> Static library installed with tlock, it provides a function readpass() that
> reads in a password string
Steffen Moeller (17/07/2009):
> Wouter's comment aside, checks at buildd level would be too late.
Yes, sure. It'd rather be time for critical packages (say: dpkg-dev,
debhelper, cdbs) to have proper non-regression testsuites.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello -devel, I need a tiny wider audience for that one.
Bill Allombert (18/07/2009):
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 09:35:57PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Package: menu
> > Version: 2.1.41
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: Fucks up upgrades.
> >
>
Sven Joachim (18/07/2009):
> This looks strange, it seems that the test found update-menus
> executable, but it no longer is. Namely, the shell has apparently
> hashed it, since otherwise you would "update-menus: command not found"
> instead of "permission denied".
>
> This may be because the dp
Raphael Hertzog (22/07/2009):
> Yes. Check "man dpkg-gensymbols" and see how some nice tools
> […propaganda…]
FSVO “nice”. #536034.
In case a maintainer of a shared lib never did this, I strongly advise
playing around with a simple combo of diff, find, and nm, in order to
have a look at what sym
Raphael Hertzog (17/07/2009):
> At least dpkg-dev has one and it's run at build-time.
I thought the goal of dpkg-dev was to actually build other packages. I
don't know how dpkg-dev developers see this, but maybe having a few
packages rebuilt using the new dpkg-dev package would help spotting
brea
Raphael Hertzog (23/07/2009):
> > In case a maintainer of a shared lib never did this, I strongly
> > advise playing around with a simple combo of diff, find, and nm, in
> > order to have a look at what symbols are becoming between two
> > releases.
>
> Why is that better than comparing both symb
Goswin von Brederlow (24/07/2009):
> Give me the freedom to choose.
It looks like we just reached the “Linux is about choice” Goswin point.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Vincent Danjean (29/07/2009):
> kooot:/home/vdanjean# aptitude why dash
> i linux-image-2.6.30-1-amd64 Depends initramfs-tools (>= 0.55) | yaird (>=
> 0.0.13) | linux-initramfs-tool
> p yaird Depends dash
Got a winner here, I believe:
| -(cy...@talisker pts/8)-(~)
| $ rm
Michael Banck (29/07/2009):
> At that time, either you have thrown away the debugging information
> already (via dh_strip, e.g.), or not.
>
> This is all AIUI.
There are some environment variables set by dpkg-buildpackage already, I
guess debhelper stuff could be set accordingly. Meh. :)
Mraw,
Manoj Srivastava (29/07/2009):
> Coming up with a standard and policy after the fact, with 97% of
> the archive not quite following policy would be a nightmare, no?
97% of the archive using yada?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Goswin von Brederlow (29/07/2009):
> Thoughts from the maintainer?
You may want to read #468209, which is kind of related.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Charles Plessy (30/07/2009):
> I have three questions about Multi-arch:
>
> 1) […]
>
> 2) […]
3) Where is the third question? :)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Russell Coker (30/07/2009):
> http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/license/softwarelicense1-1.html
>
> I've packaged libdomainkeys for internal use and am considering adding a
> package that depends on it to Debian/Unstable. Is the domainkeys license
> suitable for inclusion in Debian?
Hint, try
Adrian Perez (30/07/2009):
> I'd like to see this in unstable ASAP.
Get to work?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(Torn between replying to -project for the former, -devel for the
latter.)
Luk Claes (30/07/2009):
> Adam D. Barratt (adsb), Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) and Jurij
> Smakov (jurij) joined us as release assistants. Let's welcome them in
> our team.
Welcome!
> Architectures
> =
>
Bastien ROUCARIES (30/07/2009):
> I was trying to check why a package was in contrib (jabref), and I
> could not find a means to do that automatically.
>
> Could we add an automatic mechanism based on package description, for
> getting the reason, like for instance, why-contrib: reason
>
> It w
Ryan Niebur (30/07/2009):
> would you mind providing a .deb of that so that I can test and update
> my dh build system patch to use it?
waf deb? Check first mail in the thread.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Charles Plessy (01/08/2009):
> I would really love to have such a functionality in apt.
reportbug cupt
(Seems to be an interesting challenge. Not sure it's worth the pain
though.)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi folks.
It's been a while and I'm now really wondering what to do with
Blender. So that everyone can understand, I'm going to try and sum up
what I'm facing. Please note it's not intended to be a rant, rather a
summary of what I've to deal with.
* Upstream doesn't really care about being distr
1 - 100 of 702 matches
Mail list logo
