since 31 of May in 2003? The
> > > package is neither orphaned nor up for adoption, which I would do
> > > then.
> >
> > Have you asked the maintainer, Adrian Bridgett? He's around (last made an
> > upload less than a month ago, for tkdiff), so I don't see w
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 15:40:46 +0100 (+0100), Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 the mental interface of
> adrian told:
[snip]
> > Hi, sorry for not responding earlier, I've less and less time for
> > Debian stuff as time goes by (busy). There are substanti
unsubscribe
On 07.11.2016 09:07, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> TL;DR: all Debian contributors --- from bug reporters to Debian project
> members and participants in any Debian team --- are invited to take part
> in the first edition of the Debian contributors survey. To participate
> visit:
>
> h
nding problems for Turkish users.
cu
Adrian
complete
the 1 minute post Approval Form.
http://www.r-fi-now.com/45.asp
Best Regards,
Adrian Blanton
Regional CEO
supervene iti galway kit satisfaction mt requisite lc eden ue continuo fr
poison mpi reliant lyu triphenylphosphine oyw zag tw
http://r-fi-now.com/gone.asp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
but e.g. blocking a more recent KDE from
testing might prevent any new package of vim that might fix some
nasty non-RC bugs from entering testing.
Yes, some of these things can be done better with testing (e.g. via
version tracking in the BTS).
But this still leaves the question whether i
architectures
(GNU Hurd and sh) to a different location. Depending on what exactly
hinders amd64 today, this might be sufficient [2].
Regarding mirrors, offering only m architectures or offering only Debian
stable for n architectures should be solvable on a per-mirror basis
without any effect
f the Debian developers intereested in the ports Debian intends to drop
would switch to Gentoo for helping Gentoo to support all of their
architectures and for providing easy Debian -> Gentoo transition paths
this would serve your users better.
> -- John
cu
Adrian
--
"Is th
rors?
-> Not all mirrors have to mirror all ports.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
xpressed my impression is that if
testing was completely dumped, many of the issues leading to this
dropping of several architectures wouldn't exist.
> Thomas
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. T
server..."
> B: "Let us install Debian on it!"
> *browsing the web*
> A: "Oh, no release of Debian for Alpha... it's unsupported..."
> B: "Sad... it's a nice machine, but without a working Linux on it, we're gonna
> throw it away&quo
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:40:09PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Not after October 1st 2003 it sould have been clear that the progress
> > of the installer wasn't as good as expected. This was 2 months before
> > the announced release date.
>
needs to be
> compiled manually.
>...
NetBSD also offers binary packages for many years.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days
y points regarding testing -
neither in favor nor against them.
I do not claim my points have to be correct, but IMHO this would be an
alternative solution that should be evaluated.
> Daniel Jacobowitz
cu
Adrian
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/03/msg01320.html
[2] http://lists.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:51:16PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 March 2005 18:12, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I already sent two mails [1,2] where I expressed my opinion that dumping
> > testing might be an option since it's the main reason for the underlying
>
rd.
Thomas' question is simply whether five of your six DPL candidates have
signed that they want to kick GNU/Hurd even out of the proposed SCC
archive or not.
Steve's announcement only listed actions without giving the rationale
for each of them, and it would therefore be required t
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:29:28AM +, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Adrian Bunk may or may not have written...
>
> [snip]
> > And without testing, all these transition problems wouldn't exist.
>
> And without testing, there are those who currently use testing
gt; trouble, we are all penalized.
Are there any reasons why you "are all penalized" that are not only
imposed by testing?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
f freezing unstable, and even more do I doubt it's worth
sacrificing 8 architectures.
> Steve Langasek
cu
Adrian
[1] The installer might be a point, but since all sarge architectures
will have a working installer and I hope there's not another
installer rewrite planned for et
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 12:06:15PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:43:26PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > [1] The installer might be a point, but since all sarge architectures
> > will have a working installer and I hope there's not another
>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 09:39:10PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> On Thursday 17 March 2005 00:21, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:51:16PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> > "libraries transitioned" is a big point against testing:
> >
> > Transiti
in /etc/init.d
Thanks,
Adrian
--
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Artificial intelligence - the
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | art of making computers act
PGP key available on public key servers | like those in the movies
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word &
e description, I think these should be distributed.
Maybe we should have a vote on what should be in the various sections. I
for one found the choices a bit limited last time.
Adrian
--
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Artificial intelligence - the
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | art of
any
reason why I *shouldn't* file a wishlist item against dpkg (apart from the
fact that it will be lost amongst the other few hundred bug reports!)
Thanks
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unstable
ng sixteen
directories. I've just looked at the X stuff and it has loads of
directories, each with a copyright file in it. Hmmm.
Thanks
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unstable
PGP key availabl
y mechanical means.
which is *almost* what I wanted - it only allows symlinking the
/usr/doc/ directory, not any file inside it.
Cheers
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unstable
PGP key availa
(apart from getting another VT and doing "cat" to a
temporary file!)
Thanks
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unstable
PGP key available on public key servers | operating systems are from MS
gs fail. Could you run the command under script and provide us
> with the exact output?
It also doesn't work with changed symlinks.
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unstable
PGP key availa
emails to be stored).
b) be able to specify a URL which can be checked for changes - for instance:
ftp://sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk/linux/sunsite.unc-mirror/Incoming/SVGATextmode-*
Am I just blathering on, or is this a workable and decent suggestion?
Cheers
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | De
most upstream packages will be
harder to convert, but someone has to make a start. At least all debian
originated packages can be made to use this.
Thanks
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unstable
PG
fsd - i.e.
what programs to use - I tried downloading the tar.gz mentioned in the
kernel help docs, but couldn't get them to compile :-(
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unstable
PGP key availab
should take advantage of this, it would be a nice
"first" if Debian can do this properly before the other distributions.
Thanks
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unstable
PGP key available
I'm going to package cftp (full screen FTP client) - upload on Monday :-)
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unstable
PGP key available on public key servers | operating systems are from MS
On Sun, Dec 07, 1997 at 07:42:56PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm going to package cftp (full screen FTP client) - upload on
> > Monday :-)
>
> Umm, a little more information would be nice.
I've
y had too much
> trouble finding out about new releases, though...
I use debhelper rather than debmake as I prefer it's "clean" design. I
really should look at some of the debhelper (or is it devscripts now) stuff.
It would be nice to have this "watch process" setup once for
ges, maybe i586 is better than pent.)
>
> I think it should be i586, although I'm not clear if ecgs supports Kx et
> al. It should...
I don't think i486 is neccessary - does anyone else - AFAIK, there is no
compiler-time benefit worth obtaining.
Adrian
email: [EMAIL P
On Sun, Dec 07, 1997 at 02:09:57PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
>
> > This is one area where Windows has got a far better solution that Unix. I'm
> > sure it's for technical regions, but I have at least ten different
ed that they wouldn't change it to delete to the left. Why Linux kept
this I don't know. Personally I don't care what it set to what, as long as
it works like in DOS/OS2/NT - and Atari :-)
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/a
On Tue, Dec 09, 1997 at 02:10:35PM -0500, Brandon Mitchell wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 07, 1997 at 06:20:27PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >
> > > it's the obvious way... create another architecture tree, binary-i58
On Fri, Nov 28, 1997 at 07:48:04PM +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> i'm looking for a new maintainer for all my packages :
>
> mpage
> makedev (taken)
> giflib
> kde*
I'll take mpage.
Thanks
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debia
/libnullplugin.so:
netscape/libnullplugin-dynMotif.so:
netscape/dynfonts/libTrueDoc.so:
libmcheck.a:
libc5-compat/libcompface.so.1.0.0:
libc5-compat/libpng.so.0.96:
libgmp.so.2.0.2:
libcompface.so.1.0.0:
Thanks
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux
t's only 14k to download!
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unstable
PGP key available on public key servers | operating systems are from MS
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the w
ackaging is that dpkg needs updating (as we
all know). Some things that debhelper does like "dh_du" (diskspace usage)
should be in dpkg-buildpackage instead.
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unst
> old commodore 64 days?).
> > >
> > AFAIK, we already have a xscavenger package, which is maintained by Adrian
> > Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .
>
> This is fun, I first installed a local version of my package, which is
> version 1.3.1-2 by now, because I clea
--
suggests emacs, no mention of xemacs:
elisp-manual
gnats
gnats-user
depend on emacs, no mention of xemacs:
hyperlatex
auto-pgp
w3-el
mailcrypt (emacs >=19.28-1)
gnuserv
bbdb
crypt++
elib
calc (emacs >=19.34)
auctex
emacspeak
debview
emacs-czech
port
snews_proxy http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port
snewspost_proxy http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port
snewsreply_proxyhttp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port
nntp_proxy http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port
wais_proxy http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port
finger_proxyhttp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:port
cso_proxy h
ever is decided, the original scheme (or having a
conffile) is a very good idea that is easily implemented and Yann's
suggestion should be mentioned in the menu package itself.
Cheers
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett |
is no way to
get back inside the yang-yang once you have gone outside it AFAIK, and when
I get the bottom lot of gems, the man kills me as he is right behind me :-(
Cheers
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because
xlaby traps your mouse cursor in one of the mazes generated by "maze", you
must move around until you can escape - invisible walls is an option!
xnetload is like xload for network connections (similar to pppload and half
a dozen other utils, you takes your pick!)
Adrian
email: [EMAIL
ve no plans to install glimpse. What's wrong with splitting it off and
making glimpse depend on it?
Adrian (who hates it when people don't explain reasons when they aren't
obvious)
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett
d dpkg too I imagine) expects
each package in available (and status) to be in a paragraph, but it imposes
no restriction on the formatting of that paragraph. I wonder what the
speed-up would be if we imposed an ordering on the paragraphs (note that
this would *not* prevent future expansion).
gmemusage is a rather neat memory monitor which displays a bar chart of
memory usage divided by process. It displays the number of each process name
(e.g. (4) bash means there are four copies running) and is periodically
updated.
Main site: http://reality.sgi.com/raju/software
Adrian
email
rovide: unzip.)
Even if this is uneccessary, I think it would be nice to allow it (or even
encourage it?). It makes script writing easier (egrep "^Provides:.* unzip").
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because
nighthawk is a clone of paradroid - a C64 game that was the precursor to
Quazatron. You have to shoot things, but there is strategy involved too:
http://www.downunder.net.au/~jsno/
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett
s and then file a new bug detailing the original bugs and the fixes.
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | Because bloated, unstable
PGP key available on public key servers | operating systems are from MS
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE
I've just about finished packaging SOCKSv5 - clients, library, server.
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | 2.0 release soon - over 1800
PGP key available on public key servers | packages on a stable OS
I've just lost my email file (/var/spool/mail/bridgett) for some unknown
reason. My sorted mail in /home/bridgett/mail/ is fine.
a) Warning - backup your mail file
b) has anyone else had this?
A Seriously PO Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
my fault - I was messing with emacs and something went screwy. Something
moved my mail spool to ~/RMAIL.
Phew - while :; do echo "I *will* keep backups" ;done
A relieved Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridge
thing.
If we have room for the 2.1 kernel I think we should put it on since it will
save people downloading about 11MB (or 9.5? for the bz2 version).
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | 2.0 release soon - over 1800
PGP k
(1x) - (unknown)
Cheers
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | 2.0 release soon - over 1800
PGP key available on public key servers | packages on a stable OS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Wed, Apr 15, 1998 at 03:15:57PM -0500, Zed Pobre wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
>
> >These are pages that have a bad NAME section. You can do
> >
> > apropos -r \* | grep \(unknown\)
>
> apropos -r \* returns nothing on my system. I ca
, just un-setuid the program and run it as root (it'll probably work
then, just to nark you off!)
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian Linux - www.debian.org
http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett | 2.0 release soon - over 1800
PGP key available on public key servers | packag
o use this software for any
> purpose on any computer system, and to redistribute it freely,
^^
Hmmm - which version of free is this - ethically or financially?
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett
Win
vigator-v405-export.x86-unknown-linux2.0.tar.gz
Yes - it *does* fail without the --force-overwrite.
Adrian
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. PGP key available on public key servers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rrent release process with testing has problems
that make it impossible to achieve a release cycle on the order of 12-18
months with many architectures.
One possible solution for this problem you observed is reducing the
number of architectures.
Another possible solution for this problem is to s
completely different release process.
I for one do believe that the pre-testing release process was still able
to cope with releasing with the number of packages currently in unstable
on a dozen architectures and yearly releases with an amount of work
comparable to what is required for rele
nterprise. Note that they were still being sold as new
> only a few years ago.
>...
HP still produces both workstations and servers with PA-RISK processors.
Note that 50 out of the 500 fastest computers in the world [1] are
computers with PA-RISK processors manufactured by HP in 2004.
cu
A
ood connections with HP.
Wouldn't an arrangement with HP of getting hardware plus some years of
support being an alternative to your announcement that you plan to drop
the hppa and alpha architectures from Debian releases?
> Steve Langasek
cu
Adrian
--
"Is ther
has).
The release team's announcement affects only hppa and alpha in the
forseeable future.
And in both cases an arrangement with HP could erase the problems.
> Regards
> Alastair McKinstry
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
uploads to frozen
should be much smaller than the number of daily uploads to frozen).
This would therefore make (at least from a release management point of
view) all discussions regarding the required speed of buildds obsolete.
cu
Adrian
[1] but build dependencies are still not tracked
[2] http
ing testing
>
> Taken together, these probably account for more of my release management
> time than anything else, including actual work on release-critical bugs.
>...
Is it correct that none of these three points that account for most of
your release management time would exist in a rel
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:55:17PM +, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:14:17 +0100, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 06:50:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > >...
> > > The top three things I've s
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 03:20:04PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:14:17PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 06:50:22PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > >...
> > > The top three things I've spent release management
The most recent version of the rlfe package (from readline5) is
therefore available and it's not a problem.
And in unstable, readline4 no longer produces a rlfe binary package.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness.
ee how the installer could be a major
obstacle for any of the 11 sarge architectures in etch.
> Steve Langasek
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a prom
, but also to important ones (and "minor" ones, if you feel
> inclined). For usage information about this site, please see the
> previous announcement concerning it[1].
For the record:
I started doing this during the last days [4].
RC bugs are IMHO better since they also show up
self would hint it for removal from testing today and it
wouldn't have any chance of entering testing again for sarge [2]
although it's completely bug-free.
Or a package might simply be removed because it depends directly or
indirectly on a buggy package without being itself buggy.
&
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:35:55AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It doesn't need to be an exact date, but someting like
> > "third quarter of 2005" or "mid-2008" would help to avoid situations
> > lik
to know
what to do when the installation of a package fails.
E.g. DSA-177-1 describes a _real_ problem - and this wouldn't have been
caught.
> Regards,
>
> Thijs Kinkhorst
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked sudd
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 05:19:41PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The milestone that included the start of the official security support
> > for sarge was only 6 days after the announcement, but is was missed by
> > more than 6 months.
> >
>
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:15:40PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050401 23:35]:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:48:00PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > >...
> > > Major changes in etch
> > > -
> > &g
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:17:54AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Why do you need to know about all transitions this month if Debian 3.2
> > is scheduled for the end of 2006 or 2007?
>
> ... so that the releas
is the one of the Debian cvs package up to
1.11.1p1-5 plus one additional cvsnt entry at the top.
It doesn't seem cvsnt itself was ever part of Debian.
> Christian
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had
ed
work a copy of the GPL.
Therefore, all GPL'd programs will have to go to non-free.
Q.E.D.
Is this a correct interpretation of what will happen after the release
of sarge or is there any mistake in my proof?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan ask
think any bigger transition can ever enter your
"candidate" if you add to the testing criteria a "3 months" criteria all
affected packages have to fulfill at the same time?
> Pat
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:31:47PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 08:08:18PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:47:26PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Therefore, all GPL'd programs will have to go to non-free.
> >
> &g
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 02:22:11PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd also say that for a user, access to documentation is an unavoidable
> > requirement for using the software (e.g. for most non-trivial uses it
> >
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 05:30:15PM +0200, Jacobo Tarrio wrote:
> > > Adrian, you're deliberately wasting the project's time with a very old,
> > > eternity-since-debunked "argument". That's known as "trolling". Unless
> > > you have s
;t a problem, is it?
>
> [1] http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#TOCModifyGPL
That's interesting.
IOW:
Different from what both I and several other people in this thread
stated, the GPL is DFSG-free?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not prom
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:33:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:44:04PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > The question remains whether a gcc or MySQL without documentation is of
> > any practical value.
>
> There are MySQL documentation package
soon as you reach any question like e.g.
How do I pass in a additional path to the include path of gcc?
Which optimization levels does gcc support?
Which optimization option is best for my CPU?
you are pretty lost without the documentation.
>...
> Adrian> Until recently, non-f
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 07:17:08PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:05:42AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If you call people who don't know about it a troll you should ensure
> > that it's documented at the places where you'd expect to r
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 09:07:58AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:18:45AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:33:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > Cool. Didn't know that. Then again, I've only been using MySQL since
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 09:22:48PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 02:51:32AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > Please tell me where the document is I should have found that explains
> > Debian's position on this issue and then you have my publically
this manual to his dead father.
In the first case you might have convinced a system administrator that
non-free software has serious disadvantages.
In the second case you'll hear a loud laugher.
> Glenn Maynard
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise o
e?
>
> Well, it's not that we don't want gcc's documentation to be moved to
> non-free; rather, we don't want gcc's documentation to *be* non-free.
> The moving to non-free is just a side-effect; Adrian seems to be
> saying that we should eliminate the side
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 12:31:23AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 05:54:08AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > Case 1: foo = nvidia binary modules
> > Answer: Because these modules are binary-nonly and therefore
> > undebuggable for everyone
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:45:17PM -0400, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 11:59:52PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:12:31AM -0400, Patrick A. Ouellette wrote:
> > >...
> > > The progression I see is:
> > &g
that through this GR it was "firmly decided".
If this was true, please give a good explanation WTF a GR that causes
big changes was titled "Editorial amendments to the social contract"
instead of "Debian will treat everything as software".
> Glenn Maynard
cu
Adrian
ng
a CD with the distributable part of non-free are prerequisites if your
users are still a priority for you.
> Greetings
> Bernd
cu
Adrian
[1] that includes hardware drivers you are removing from the kernel
sources
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan as
1 - 100 of 1529 matches
Mail list logo
