On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 23:04 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> [debian-release: Read this if you care about the details. The executive
> summary is to note that openssh 1:4.3p2-8 corrects an RC bug and should
> be hinted into testing if its five days expire without any new RC bugs;
> also that all other
On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 02:50 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 19:23:40 +1100, Robert Collins
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 23:04 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> >> Fortunately, all of this is only necessary for upgrades fro
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 12:40 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> But from etch onwards, the job consists of putting the file in a
> different package and adding a Replaces. There'd be nothing for a
> debhelper program to do. Sure, maybe a year ago it would have been worth
> it - but it's now too late to
On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 21:20 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am packaging a program for debian, and wrote a manpage and two patches
> > for making it compile with libwxwindows. I am not very interested in
> > being the author list: I would be a bit as
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 20:54 +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Luigi Gangitano said:
> > * Package name: squid3
> >
> > This is the Squid Internet Object Cache developed by the National
> > Laboratory for Applied Networking Research (NLANR) and Internet
> > volunteers
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:42 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:13:32AM +0200, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> > Squid 3 is not release ready. And with current plans should not
> > release with etch. So squid 2.5 needs to stay in unstable/testing at
> > least until etch is relea
cycles of packages that come from the same
source are a problem as well, and are in a way forbidden by policy...
cu robert
--
Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 15:45 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think the core issue here is if we deem presenting purchased
> > identification at an event designed to extend the web of trust
> > acceptable behaviour.
>
> I don't thin
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 19:23 -0500, martin f krafft wrote:
> Taking this to debian-devel...
>
> also sprach Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.28.1840 -0500]:
> > (c) Allocate partcipants to the groups in a round robin following
> > centrality order and starting with the most central.
>
ackages file.
disabling diffs for file/cdrom urls makes perfect sense imho...
cu robert
--
Robert Lemmen http://www.semistable.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: oss-compat
* URL : http://aybabtu.com/rmh/deb/
* License : GPL
Description : OSS compatibility package
This package ensures that OSS support is provided in some way. On
lems in many tools, not
only apt and dpkg, and also for people. reducing the complexity of the
dependency tree *if it does not cost too much* is certainly a worthy
goal that will pay off. removing circular dependencies is a way to
reduce the complexity a lot that doesn't c
Hi!
In order to ease my maintainance tasks, I'm going to split the kfreebsd5
package into two source packages, as follows:
kfreebsd5-source
Provides packages "kfreebsd5-source" and "kfreebsd5-headers"
kfreebsd5
Build-Depends on "kfreebsd5-source"
Provides package "kfreebsd5"
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ltsp-utils
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : James McQuillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ltsp.org/
* License : GPL
Description : LTSP administration utilities
Utilities for installing and managin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: zeiberbude
Version : 2.0.4
Upstream Author : Christian Toepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://zeiberbude.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : A program for administering internet cafes.
The pack
I don't know about other mirrors, but AFAICT tsx-11.mit.edu doesn't even carry
the 0.93R6 release any more. It only offers debian-1.0.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 12 Dec 95 02:22 UT
Source: mount
Binary: mount
Version: 2.5-1
Description:
mount: mount, umount, swapon, and swapoff.
Priority: Low
Changes:
Upgraded to 2.5; built for ELF.
Files:
-rw-rw-r-- 1 rob rob 45387 Dec 11 21:20 mount-2.5-1.tar.gz
-rw-rw-r-- 1 rob rob
suggest the sysvinit scripts should indeed be changed.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As long as I've been updating the mount package, I have a question:
The mount package contains a "configuration" file /etc/fstab.sample. Would it
not be better to include this file in /usr/doc/examples, or does something
actually depend on it being in /etc?
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mount point is in
> the ramdisk. The problem was a screwed up filesystem.
>
> So, "mount" needs to be fixed so that it prints appropriate error
> messages. Also the install program needs to be fixed so that it won't
> let the user make silly mistakes like this.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oduced and a
solution found, or (b) it is agreed the problem likely no longer exists. (In
either case, the report should probably be reassigned to address the
installation issue, unless that's already been taken care of?)
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NB: This version doesn't address the umount -n issue.
Date: 14 Dec 95 08:50 UT
Source: mount
Binary: mount
Version: 2.5-2
Description:
mount: mount, umount, swapon, and swapoff.
Priority: Low
Changes:
* Added /usr/doc/copyright information
* Added libc5 dependency
* Enhanced one error mess
#x27;s probably best that `umount' be as flexible as possible. I've sent
a request to the util-linux maintainers to see why they changed it and if the
option can be restored.
Thanks.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-2.6beta12-1.tar.gz
0b5cfa06f80ea1507d1f466e4e51a240 zsh-2.6beta12-1.deb
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in /var/spool/fax instead, and
b. This directory (and various subdirectories) are not created during
installation (I have no idea what mode they should have?)
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Robert> 2. /usr/bin/fax should probably no longer be listed in conffiles.
>
> No! It is a conffile because /usr/bin/fax, a bash script, was the
> only place to set your local fax settings as serial port, modem capabilities,
> INIT strings, phone number, prinyer what have yo
the preinst
script:
30: if [ ! -L /usr/lib/X11 ]
31: then
32: echo "Warning: /usr/lib/X11 was not a symlink. It has been moved to"
33: echo "/usr/lib/X11.old"
34: mv /usr/lib/X11 /usr/lib/X11/old
35: fi
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rob156247 Dec 16 06:05 xkeycaps-2.29-1.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root93393 Dec 16 06:00 xkeycaps-2.29-1.deb
7b78b5f4e1a44bb62c5aa84810ad8487 xkeycaps-2.29-1.tar.gz
d2a87634dc508cd003447fbd7f123326 xkeycaps-2.29-1.deb
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the new xterm didn't log anything
into utmp; should this really be the default?
Thanks.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
G+L=Y-JL%4JM^Z"E%C#C!'
MU(OH_("W,U_Z*YI^G697T5JH:X;L?XS!X*_8MC$IE8ZN_63*5LL9N@:68QSW
M5,$ZU]3.=)(0IGA);6YC&R%[ZE:=\C0H#4LHW.(:][C(_C5!#9D6W.3N":$[
M;*YA>=I;,O:HJHJ2+$7OV,:+>J:!3I2/%*=KLM`"$COI<2/'#*7%6,;MC81=
M:6X6QRIHXI:\LD*C5/>+-FHBU;[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"(HN7Q;$!E%-F#Y4UK2L9U4B
M4X-2R#C$-*I(A>AF%WO=4&*U'Y$$%M#\6[C%AM6R$1NP7>$72!+C"#AJ=<\H
MVUK*MP;)6$Z=:\GJ>M@,X[4H>LUFX!B6,AK?TL8R-J;_W(?BA2(V?HIM;S2*
[EMAIL PROTECTED]&VZ4X7.KJ\NTBSU7CSE]"IP:X,ZIV4>N+*,@HG';R"G4._H
MYJ%^ZUS*M132V`!5H=UWQ2SX_NU`S88FB:907W8]^Z$1ZGT.PG5KR3OILWW83<,-2AA6'9VV*MI!Y
M?]YD[*MW[.7&@1EM8L9EQ&$]Y$6!]H=J+F)IMRS:-]OV*G(>L3E5^MH[$XG>
F1=!S(`>II&[EMAIL PROTECTED]<'[R=NC!%7JEXWET&R[]T0D``#M5
`
end
If I can provide any more helpful information, I will do so gladly. Thanks for
any help.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t least expects to
find it in /sbin. I made a symlink to pacify my system, but perhaps it should
really be moved there?
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nel makefile calls /sbin/genksyms explicitly, which is why I
think *something* ought to be there.
Actually I see now it is a kernel version issue: 1.2.13 calls
/usr/bin/genksyms, while 1.3.47 calls /sbin/genksyms. What to do?
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
installed suid root, they should also probably go in /bin or
/usr/bin rather than /sbin? I'd prefer /usr/bin, but either would be fine.
Thanks.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rship of all files
and directories to be the same as the user who mounted the filesystem. So, it
doesn't work well to require root to mount an SMB filesystem for a user (say,
the user's home directory on an SMB server) because all the files will
effectively be owned by root.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
off your hands.
Feedback appreciated.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this will be kinder to software needing to parse package names.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: cron
Version: 3.0pl1-21
The `checksecurity' script should probably ignore NFS filesystems, or at least
NFS filesystems which are mounted nodev && (nosuid || noexec).
Otherwise this can have miserable effects esp. when the path to the NFS server
crosses 14.4Kbps links.
--
FYI -- This appears to affect Debian's mailx as well.
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Forwarded Message
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 1995 17:35:01 -0500
From: David J Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mailx-5.5 (slackware /bin/ma
lex-2.5.2-2.diff.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root rob129524 Dec 23 02:36 flex-2.5.2-2.deb
b1f9161bb387a5f7261ad7a5d441493b flex-2.5.2-2.tar.gz
d6ac69a49dd1808a05a163c39a10b4dd flex-2.5.2-2.diff.gz
54c0a83418af27526f3b617f3b07248b flex-2.5.2-2.deb
Happy Holidays.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
21:20 bind-4.9.3BETA26-3.deb
8aff8d674f3fd05ff8d830e09e442e9f bind-4.9.3BETA26-3.tar.gz
68de1d709aa1fe4e3eae526aee2153d2 bind-4.9.3BETA26-3.diff.gz
a25d1e7a0bd8e7fa5d3ecac1d4bafe7d bind-4.9.3BETA26-3.deb
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
root root51163 Dec 23 23:22 figlet-2.1.1-1.deb
a0cae762bfad7cae84e14373f11dccb3 figlet-2.1.1-1.tar.gz
51c6fd9d6018ed91af1777304174469d figlet-2.1.1-1.diff.gz
10d715c6fb1e9b940d31c276b5c3db65 figlet-2.1.1-1.deb
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
9318701243ba104a6a25e54baf5dbf09 zsh-2.6beta13-1.deb
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
own into the resulting shell command above. I've
tried many variations on quoting and backslashing, and none seem to give the
desired results. Any ideas, or can this be classified as a bug?
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ftpd(8)] seems to
me the same as wu-ftpd(8). And the same maintainer...
--
Robert Komanec mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
UMEL FEI VUTcheck out if http://www.umel.fee.vutbr.cz is alive
t...
:Approximate total space required: 0k
:Do you want to select the files to get [n]:
and NO files are downloaded, installed etc etc.
The status changes to the original state then.
(I got no responses from linux.debian.users)
--
Robert Komanec mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] using MIME
UMEL FEI VU
.
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: nvi
Version: 1.34-13
This version of nvi is quite old. Please can it be updated to 1.76 or later?
It can be retrieved from:
ftp://ftp.bostic.com/pub/nvi-1.76.tar.gz
Thanks,
--
Robert Leslie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
stribution.
--
Robert Coie
Implementor, Apropos Ltd.
On Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 06:30:40PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> i don't really feel that this issue pertains specifically to the kernel, or
> X, or apache. it has much more to do with the fact that our release practice
> makes it impossible to have Good Software Now. we spend all of our time
> fixin
PC.
I tried to find it on download.stormix.com but failed
--
Robert Ramiega | [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: _Jedi_ | Don't underestimate
UIN: 13201047 | http://www.plukwa.net/ | the power of Source
port of some kind of dos/ms-win software). This works for me,
and I think other debianers with this family of UPSs might appriciate it.
-Robert
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with
finger fo
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 06:24:47PM -0500, Will Lowe wrote:
> > One other question: Does anyone think having a "never ask about this
> > config file again" option is a good thing? I'm torn.
>
> Not on a per-conffile basis, I think. Maybe there should be a way to make
> the default for _all_ conffil
se shortly that places it under the GPL.
Because it requires an mp3 encoder to function, it will go in contrib.
Once it's there, I can make abcde use it transparently :)
--
Robert Woodcock - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"To the other one percent -- thanks for the passion and color!" -- Jeff Bezos
. Searcher on Debian Web site can't find it either =o((
--
Robert Ramiega | [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: _Jedi_ | Don't underestimate
UIN: 13201047 | http://www.plukwa.net/ | the power of Source
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 05:02:31PM -0500, Nick Cabatoff wrote:
> I'm interested in being able to upgrade packages noninteractively,
> assuming that the postinst script itself is noninteractive. Search as
> I might however, I can't find any easy way around dpkg's handling of
> conffiles. I'm quite
"Martin Bialasinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So a note that GNOME packages are available from the regular Debian
> mirrors would be sufficient, no?
Perhaps linking to an up-to-date list, like
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=gnome&searchon=names&version=unstable&rel
Dylan Paul Thurston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 11:52:37AM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> > at the risk of reigniting a flame war, how is traceroute in a different
> > catagory that ping?
traceroute is "deeper" than ping. It exposes things that the casual
user neither sees
Jacob Kuntz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > traceroute is "deeper" than ping.
>
> and that changes something? one cannot assume that because someone is not
> logged in as root, they are a casual user.
Why not? Non-casual users can start these programs from sbin
nonetheless (see FHS rationale for
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:24:42PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Dylan Paul Thurston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 11:52:37AM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> > > at the risk of reigniting a flame war, how is traceroute in a different
and one needs to convert Redhat
compatibility libraries to be able install it, and a patch from Oracle.
I have heard it also broke Applixware, but I am not sure.
Robert Varga
Peter Cordes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unless the darkish colours get used as alternate background colours, they
> are wasted. There only are 16 colours, so deciding to never use 4
> ({dark ,}{blue,red}) of them seems like a bad idea. Brightening them up so
> they look good on a black backg
Robert Woodcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Without going in depth as to what traceroute and ping are (a fruitless flame
> war)
Facts can not build a flame war. Opinions (about "depth" or somesuch)
can.
> suffice it to say that I disagree with your "deeper"
Peter Cordes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In the case of terminal colours, I thought most people really did
> use black bg terminals, or at least dark something, like blue. Also,
> real VT100s and VT220s have black bg screens with amber text.
> There's a precedent for black bg terminals outside o
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 23-Mar-00, 18:08 (CST), Andor Dirner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Robert Varga wrote:
> > >
> > > The other one it breaks is Oracle 8.0, and one needs to convert Redhat
> > > com
Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So my question is, what are your thoughts on adding a signature to the
> current Packages.gz file, or adding a similar *dsc file for it,
> which is then signed?
Do you want to sign each package entry, or the whole file? Whose
signature would be used?
> T
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 11:03:11PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> > Do you want to sign each package entry, or the whole file?
>
> The whole file --- verifying each entry would take at least three minutes
> on my hardware, and god knows how long on a
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes I know, I should probably extract all the "identities" from a single
> PGP/GPG key and look for all those adresses in the Packages file. Or
> something like that.
Hmm, /usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg lists 278 identities,
while the Maintain
Anthony Towns writes:
> The only reason not to trust a key dinstall uses explicitly for signing
> Packages is if you believe dinstall is compromised. If you believe that,
> then you shouldn't be downloading .deb's *ever*, because you're immediately
> running *untrusted* scripts as root on your sy
Taupter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was poking update-alternatives, but didn't find a way to point my
> default window manager to /usr/local/bin/gnome-session.
FWIW, gnome-session is not a window manager. If you're sure you want
to do that, you could issue:
update-alternatives --install /usr
Taupter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. Does Debian install any stuff inside /usr/local ?
That would be a bug. You can make sure with "dpkg -S /usr/local" (or
"dlocate /usr/local" if you have the dlocate package)
> 2. Is secure to the system integrity to _wipe_ /usr/local (no
> daemons/services
Anthony Towns writes:
> Well, it'd be nice to be able to do so, to verify that a mirror hasn't
> been compromised, but no, you're right.
Actually I don't care that much if the mirror is compromised, if it
affects only packages that I don't install. If it affects some of
those packages, I will no
packages somewhere also? (www.ecoservice.de
would be great as i'm from Poland too) I'm using PowerPC and would like to
try MiniVend
--
Robert Ramiega | [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: _Jedi_ | Don't underestimate
UIN: 13201047 | http://www.plukwa.net/ | the power of Source
(I'm also a first-time aptitude user)
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Remark: I think I would find the overloading of the '-' key confusing.
> Please consider using a different key for hold operations. 'h' seems
> intuitive but might be pressed by novices as an attempt to get hel
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> most of the recent spam would have been blocked by using MAPS RSS
> (relays.mail-abuse.org), though...and not by MAPS DUL.
>
> IMO, we should use both. individually they are quite effective in
> blocking spam, but they are even better when used together
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 01:12:10PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> > Before all useful points are lost in the flamage, may I suggest that a
> > X-Filtered-By: DUL
> > or similar header be added to all list mail?
>
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I usually run my shell with LC_ALL set to de_DE. Calling 'printf "%1.1f\n" 1'
> then gives me 1,0 which is the correct answer under the german locale.
>
> Now I unset LC_ALL to get the command to print 1.0 but wasn't able
> to.
printf is a bash builti
f "route" prints its usage based on a 80x50 terminal - and
does not output to stdout, so the user cannot pipe through "more" or similar!
It is a good idea never to assume anything.
--
Robert Hunter
"I pack meat"
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, but you have not "the right" (what loaded words!) to close the bug
> reports. Feel free to ignore them, but don't close them without a better
> reason.
If communication with the reporter is necessary to fix the bug, and
this communication is bro
Anthony Towns writes:
> There is an existing single-point vulnerability in *every*
> mirror. Compromise the mirror and you can compromise every single Debian
> user who upgrades from that mirror. You don't even have to try touching
> anything at *.debian.org.
Yes, and I'd very much see this vuln
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On my home machine, I have an identity in .ssh/identity.pub.
> I copied that into .ssh/authorized_keys on master (possibly using the
> LDAP system).
> I *also* copied it into .ssh/authorized_keys on my home machine.
>
> That extra copy on my home machin
Nicolás Lichtmaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> All packages can run things as root. Even the most simple game.
Doing clandestine things in a install-script is harder than in a
binary.
--
Robbe
First I'd like to know what "dialup" includes means for you.
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It does seem that some people do find it beneficial to send mail
> direct from their dialups (static or dynamic). I don't understand why
> they think this is a good idea,
There are apparently
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 07:44:56PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> > Note that *any* keys that your agent holds can be snarfed by the
> > admin(s) of any hosts where you ssh-in with agent forwarding enabled.
>
> As I understand it, you can't
intainer's key. The new
keyring just includes a new version of the kicked maintainer's key
with one additional revocation-signature. This new signature tells
that this key is no longer trusted. Example:
$ gpg --check-sigs testkey
pub 1024D/36FF3F58 1999-07-24 Robert Bihlmeyer (Testkey -
imes lagged). It's
very tedious task to lookup if there is newer version of Debian package
available in sources.
At least i find it very usefull (well right now i'm judging only on the
basis of this mail <>)
--
Robert Ramiega | [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: _Jedi_ | Don&#x
x G400. switching VTs and back
fixes it, temporarily. switching to 24 bpp color fixes it permanently.
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
acked with dpkg-source
in version < 1.8. So I think that probably the best solution of the
problem is to revert changes made in dpkg-source 1.8.
Regards,
Robert
--
Robert Luberda * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* GnuPG: AEE0 1F85 3E63 8BAA CDF1 3D18 4E18 7570 9D30 9C3B *
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 10:34:59PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> $Subject. Enjoy.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x86-64/
thanks Josip!
CCing debian-devel as there likely are people interested around.
--
Robert Millan
make: *** No rule to make target `war'. Sto
(cc'ing debian-devel to discourage people from ITPing this, or filing more
wishlist bugs on Gaim for me to include it, cc'ing Gentoo's maintainer
for the Gaim emerge because they include Gaim-Encryption, cc'ing
gaim-devel so everyone there knows, cc'ing fedora-devel because they
currently ship the
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:25:32AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It should be noted that this can only be a violation of the GPL if
> someone is distributing the encryption plugin in binary form. (Does
> Gentoo distribute binaries of this software?) It is generally held that
> it would also *not
- support playstation exes
and probably has a lot of known and unknown bugs, so please use it
only for testing!
.
NOTE: This package is based on the UCL library, which is licensed under GPL.
Regards,
Robert
chine at a Hurd
> developer's home or work.
>
> -devel: Is this something developers would like?
>
> -hurd: If consensus says we proceed, are there any volunteers for
> hosting this?
>
> Please include me to replies to -hurd since I am not on that list.
--
Robert Millan
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: e2tools
Version : 0.0.13
Upstream Author : Keith Sheffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://home.earthlink.net/~k_sheff/sw/e2tools/index.html
* License : GPL
Descripti
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 11:35:29PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 05:24:21PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > E2tools is a simple set of GPL'ed utilities to read, write, and manipulate
> > files in an ext2/ext3 filesystem.
>
> please exc
GNU version (which might be an incredibly bleeding-edge
> pre-alpha thing, like for example mailutils was not so long ago)?
bleeding-edge pre-alpha thing... well task-gnu-only will include the Hurd,
won't it? ;)
--
Robert Millan
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:43:55PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
>
> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:58:54 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > One question: what's the point? Surely you want the best, not
> > > neces
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Oh guys. I'm waiting some 500 days now. I think that's a record (the
current is around 470). And I'm still working and contributing. Some nice
other DDs stepped forward and wrote mails to the DAM but that didn't cause
anything.
Robert.
As
ld on m68k or arm is broken and
needs to be fixed, even if it works on x86 by chance!
cu robert
pgpgsFwbEpqfT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;t because i have no access to any arch except x86 and
alpha. but that is only true for non-DDs like me and (i presume) you,
DDs have access to all those architectures.
cu robert
pgpZltHXVd16H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
101 - 200 of 888 matches
Mail list logo
