Hi,
Am Freitag, 12. November 2004 14:47 schrieb Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo:
> I've just started packaging some library which provides .pc file for
> pkg-config. So I was wonder where to put this file and if my -dev package
> should depend on pkg-config.
IMHO not. Because you don't need pkg-config.
Hi,
Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not the
-dev).
Mass bugfiling with allowed? Which severity?
A quick apt-file search on sarge/i386 shows:
$ apt-file search \.pc | grep pc$ | grep pkgconfig | grep -v dev
beast: usr/lib/pkgconfig/bse.pc
beast: usr/lib/pkg
Am Dienstag, 16. November 2004 16:16 schrieb Scott James Remnant:
> On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Many packages are buggy and include the .pc file in the main package (not
> > the -dev).
>
> Did you actually check whether any of these *had* -
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2005 11:02 schrieb Takuo KITAME:
> mozilla (2:1.7.5-1) unstable; urgency=high
> .
>* New upstream release (closes: Bug#288047,Bug#288044,Bug#287111,
> Bug#277515)
ARGS. Two of those bugs at least are *NOT* "new upstream release" type bugs.
Is it really to hard to
Package: ndiswrapper
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge, sid
Hi,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:58:56PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> > Apparently the dickhead maintainer of ndiswrapper-source has just gone
> > into his shell and refuses to discuss this problem.
>
> Btw, cou
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Increasing the rate at which new packages flow into unstable is NOT
> something that should be a priority when we're trying to get the RC bug
> count down in preparation of a release. Show me that there are enough
> people working on release-critical issues for sarge,
Hi,
Drew Parsons wrote:
> The OpenOffice web site gives clues for running the 1.9 test releases on
> Debian at
> http://installation.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=609
>
> These hints, for OO 1.9m51, are out of date for recent snapshots.
>
> I have gotten 1.9.74 to work on Debian
Hi,
Am Montag, 14. MÃrz 2005 08:36 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> wanna-build stats:
> i386: 99.83% up-to-date, 99.83% if also counting uploaded pkgs
> ia64: 97.39% up-to-date, 97.41% if also counting uploaded pkgs
> powerpc: 97.99% up-to-date, 98.00% if also counting uplo
Hi,
Am Montag, 14. März 2005 18:58 schrieben Sie:
> Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > pcc is barely at 98%. I don't think that barrier should be that high. We
> > *should* at last release with the tree most important archs: i386, amd64,
> > powerpc.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ieee80211softmac
Version : 20060114
Upstream Authors:
* Copyright (c) 2005 Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*Joseph Jezak <[
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bcm43xx
Version : 20060108
Upstream Authors:
Copyright (c) 2005 Martin Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Stefano Brivio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
Zak B. Elep wrote:
> On 2/2/06, Gregory B. Prokopsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've not have had time lately to maintain these packages properly and
> > it'll
> > be best for everyone to have them officialy orphaned.
> >
> > First come - first serve. Please Cc: me, I am n
Christian Perrier wrote:
> List of current ttf-* packages
> --
> (just looking at the packages descriptions give a good idea of the
> non-coordination of font packaging..:-)))
[...]
> ttf-opensymbol - The OpenSymbol TrueType font
built from OOo...
Regards,
Rene
sign
Hi,
besides the fact that I agree with the people saying that this team is a
unnecessary institution for *package maintenance*, and that ttf-opensymbol
is built from the openoffice.org source package anyway ...
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Improve communication
> -
> This team
Hi,
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> Don't forget to tell Rene Engelhard to rename OpenOffice.org2.
>
Uh, you know that openoffice.org already is in the archive and
openoffice.org 2.x is supposed to be parallel installable until it is
uploaded to unstable (and it's only in experimenta
Hi,
Ron Johnson wrote:
> When I installed openoffice.org2, out went OOo 1.4. (Which
> surprised me, since I remember you writing that they are supposed
> to be parallel installable.)
Then you most probably had a thesaurus installed. The formats are
incompatible and so...
If you don't have a the
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : OpenOffice.org
> * URL : http://www.openoffice.org/
> * License : GPL
> Description : Fonts for use with the Ming Li
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:13 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>
> > Are those fonts manually converted? If not, wouldn't it be better to convert
> > them as needed instead of yet-another-incompatible-font-package?
>
> The long term plan is for libmin
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:47 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> Yes, the packages I have prepared are built as part of the rest of the
> ming package. The ming source package Build-depends on the package that
> contains the TTF fonts that will be converted into a libming font package.
> Upstream ming
close 381992
thanks
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 14:11 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 09:28 schrieb Alejandro Rios P.:
> >> * Package name: libming-fonts-openoffice
> >> Version
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 15:10 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> > OK. Now, I fetched your -openoffice pakcage and saw that (as I guessed) it
> > just does OpenSymbol. Can you please name it -opensymbol (to show that it
> > is the
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 8. August 2006 15:32 schrieb Stuart Anderson:
> So this should cover it?
>
> Package: ming-fonts-opensymbol
> Conflicts: ming-fonts-openoffice
> Replaces: ming-fonts-openoffice
> Provides: ming-fonts-openoffice
No, Replaces:/Povides:/Conflicts: libming-...
Hi,
Alejandro R?os P. wrote:
> "Alejandro (in case you read that in the buglog since your ??%&??
> mailserver doesn't accept mail)..."
Well, it's not personal. It just the mailserver not accepting mail
and that makes problems for reaching you (as in case for this ITP).
As mail is to debian commun
Am Montag, 4. September 2006 08:08 schrieb Mgr. Peter Tuharsky:
>
> >
> > Personally I think the DS team have enough work making sure
> > security updates are a smooth process for packages *in the
> > OS*: being expected to test random-external-package-x on top
> > of that is asking too much.
> >
Hi,
Am Freitag, 22. September 2006 15:14 schrieb Luca Capello:
> After having read zack's blog entry [2] about the new XS-X-VCS-xxx
> field for debian/control files, I was adding it to my packages [3]
> (all related to Common Lisp).
Does this handle two VCSes?
Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Eng
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwps
Version : no release yet
Upstream Author : Andrew Ziem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libwps.sf.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
Am Dienstag 21 März 2006 12:56 schrieb Martin Michlmayr:
> * Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-21 09:46]:
> > So I'm wondering if building xulrunner with debugging symbols is
> > possible considering the buildd infrastructure, or at all useful on
> > arches like m68k, mips, sparc, where the
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> > > Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken
> > > from
> > > me, and why i find out only now as i was going to fix the iss
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> &
ED]:~ $ apt-cache show bcm43xx-fwcutter
Package: bcm43xx-fwcutter
Priority: optional
Section: contrib/utils
Installed-Size: 108
Maintainer: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: powerpc
Version: 20060501-1
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.5-1), debconf (>= 0.5) | debconf-2.0
Recomm
Hi,
Am Freitag, 21. Januar 2005 12:08 schrieb Artur R. Czechowski:
> pkg-config. It gives standarized interface[1] for getting compiler and
> linker flags. What is your recomendation for adding a .pc files in -dev
> package? What is your recomendation for using pkg-config in packages
> dependend
Hi,
Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:47:52PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > > >* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276)
> > >
> > > Changelog abuse. This is only a valid entry if all 3 of t
Hi,
Guido Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 04:23:49PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > The BTS now has "lfs" (large file support) and "ipv6" tags.
> > http://bugs.debian.org/tag:lfs and http://bugs.debian.org/tag:ipv6 will
> > search for matching bugs.
> Since we're using bug tags for such
reopen 193497
thanks
Hi,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Changes:
> svtools (0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* New upstream version (Closes: #193497)
Meep. No.
Write proper changelogs and(or close bugs the right way[tm].
That form is only acceptable for "New upstream version, pleas
Hi,
James Troup wrote:
> I don't; it's silly. At best you'll get an architecture tag for the
> arch that the buildd maintainer reported the bug on, but that's it.
> An inaccurate architecture tag is worse than useless, it's misleading.
> Just parse wanna-build's failed logs; it's trivial.
Sure,
Hi,
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 02:59:40PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> > >* New upstream version (Closes: #193497)
> >
> > Meep. No.
> >
> > Write proper changelogs and(or close bugs the right way[tm]. That
> &
Hi,
> However, it really might be better to put a longer statement into
> changelog. _But_ it's certainly much worse to re-open a really closed
> bug than to make a too short changelog entry. (BTW: You should really
a wrongly closed... (whithout explanation what the fix was; the
new upstream vers
Hi,
Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> 2 i386 libc support? (The large thread starting with
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200304/msg01895.html
> and going into the May archive talks about this). Do we have to wait for
> upstream to fix this? We want to stay compatible with othe
Hi,
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 09:19:19PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > Stock OpenOffice seem to be able to embedd java applets into
> > documents. RedHat nuked this.
>
> And we can't do the same because ... ???
We have done that (as Jan wrote.)
Building n
Hi,
Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 10:40:15PM +0200, Angathule wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to install KDE on a Sid Machine, but I can't, this is what I
> > do:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ apt-cache show libsensors1
> Package: libsensors1
> Status: install ok installed
Yes. It is inst
Hi,
Millis Miller wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: email
> Version : 1.9.0
> Upstream Author : Dean Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.cleancode.org/email
> * License : Custom
> De
Hi,
Adam Heath wrote:
> this is a bug in apt. dpkg correctly handles this case(it breaks the dep loop
> randomly, which means postinsts of the affected packages need to be aware of
> the issue.
>
> The apt developer has refused to fix apt to work around this non-problem in
> the past, I suggest
Hi,
Michael Koch wrote:
> Connections with webbrowser fails too. Can someone please notify its
> admin ?
They already know...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Hi,
[ please wrap your lines after 72 chars ]
Matthew P. McGuire wrote:
> The grumpy user might accuse console-tools-libs of being the problem, but I
> decided to try another route. Install a chroot woody system, and upgrade that
> chroot system to sid using apt. During that upgrade apt shows t
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 03:28:18PM +0200, David Martinez Moreno wrote:
> > Hello, guys. Here in Debcamp we decided that we're going to kill as
> > many bugs
> > as possible (and even releasing sarge if we work hard ;-) during the entire
> > Debcamp, so we'll appl
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-26
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: openoffice.org-dictionaries [*]
Version : 20030617
Upstream Author : David Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gianluca Turconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Davide Pri
Hi Alfie,
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in Vienna,
> Austria. Why that early announce? So we have time enough to find
cool.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://
Hi,
Adam Heath wrote:
> These bugs won't be fixed in gcc-3.2. gcc-3.3 is a newer upstream version.
> Just because it's made as a separate package doesn't mean a newer upstream
> hasn't been uploaded(3.3).
You shouldn't forget that gcc 3.2 is still default on sparc...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.
Hi,
I forgot that doing before, so forgive me sending this mail now and not
earlier... ;)
"Packages MUST NOT use virtual package names (except privately, amongst
a cooperating group of packages) unless they have been agreed upon and
appear in this list."
OK, as the procedure describes, here I am
Hi,
[ note that I atm have the tendency to say that the Depends should
remain... ]
Hans Fugal wrote:
> * Andreas Jellinghaus [Wed, 6 Aug 2003 at 00:27 +0200]
> > mutt can do many nice things without /usr/sbin/sendmail.
> > a dependency is set if something is always required,
> > a recommends i
Hi,
Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> Is there any way to find out who uploaded a given package?
[...]
> listed in the list of NM applicants. So, I'm assuming that there must
> be a sponsor for the upload, but is this information kept anywhere?
You could gpg --verify the .dsc or .changes...
R
Hi,
Jose M. Fdez wrote:
> Patent on LZW algorithm expired so the support for GIF and TIFF
> images is now back in the main Gimp package.
Only in the US...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/
Hi,
Greg Folkert wrote:
> Quick question then... how do I get on the mailing list that develops
> the d-i? I don't see a specific one on lists.d.o. (I could be blind
> though)
debian-boot
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org
Hi *,
Chris Halls wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 07:12:52PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> > We didn't have OpenOffice at last release and it doesn't seem to be in
> > unstable yet. 'apt-cache search openoffice' only find myspell
> > dictionaries.
>
> It's in contrib, package openoffice.org. It
Hi,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> With the exception of the recent aptitude bug, this makes all the
> difference between pulling in non-free packages by default, and
> informing the user by default that a non-free package is available which
> complements the chosen package.
umm. there are packages in c
Hi,
Kim Lester wrote:
> Although debian packages may contain md5sums it seems package
> verification is
> not available (unless I have missed something).
Probably you missed debsums...
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org |
Mike Furr wrote:
> These packages were all auto-built with the right version, but the
Wrong. I has to do a binary-NMU for ARM...
> maintainer uploaded a package with the wrong ABI:
> libmyspell3c2 (myspell) [powerpc]
*shrugs*. Fixed.
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene
fice.org but I don't know the actual state of this.
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F2
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> With the new style of "mass tirage" of bugs,
triage.
> The user submits a bug;
> while (sleep 1 year) {
> He gets a message asking him to verify if the bug still exists;
> He perhaps especially reinstalls the package that he long ago stopped
> using &&
> He v
Hi,
John Goerzen wrote:
> I have learned that certain well-known packages (OpenOffice, say) are bug
OpenOffice isn't in Debian. If you mean OpenOffice.org, I feel obliged to
answer this now, because you complely underestimate a) how many people maintain
OOo (hint: 1) and b) how many time even k
Hi again,
> See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419523 for a RFH open >
> for looong.
Oh, and note that I *did* reply to the offers there, but that didn't turn out
(except Lior and and Tim Richardson with their bug triage of *OLD* bugs which I
am very thankful for)
Regards,
Hi,
John Goerzen wrote:
> > > blackholes. I submit a bug, and never hear anything from Debian
> > > maintainers
> > > except for periodic triage stuff when a new upstream comes out.
> >
> > Sorry, that's not fair at all.
>
> The two bugs I see in src:openoffice.org with my name on them are:
>
Hi,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Things I want to see use triggers, in approximate priority order:
>
> - scrollkeeper
> This is a huge speed pig, and d-i has hacks to disable it and
> run it at the end that I would love to be able to remove.
> dpkg's triggers.txt has a plan for triggeriz
Package: openoffice.org-voikko
Version: 2.2-2
Severity: serious
Unfortunately I didn't think about/notice this either, but a etch->sid
dist-upgrade with openoffice.org-voikko involved now fails with the
scriplets using -env.
Stripped log from the dist-upgrade:
Preconfiguring packages ...
[...]
P
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My question is why can't this drama be played out behind the scenes?
>
> Why can't all the dependency stuff be resolved first before it is sent
> to sid?
>
> Or is that how dependency problems are detected and hunt down? If so,
> then why can't this be played out o
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 01:48:55PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Andrey Tataranovich schrieb:
>
> > What should I do to satisfy DEBIAN policy?
> >
> > a) rename/move this file another place and patch code
Depends on the license. If it was (L)GPL you could use
/usr/share/common-l
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:50:07PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> c) patch it to display /usr/share/doc/$package/copyright ?
That would be against policy.
No package is supposed to rely on /usr/share/doc/$package for doing stuff.
Regards,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:20:25AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Sam Morris , 2009-08-25, 21:48:
>> The gcc-mingw32 package provides GCC configured to target Microsoft
>> Windows. The executables built by GCC will pick up a dependency on
>> libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll; the question of where that file s
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:33:44PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Can anyone explain if/why stlport is still useful? Given the low
> popcon, and small number of rdepends, could this be a candidate for
> removal?
libstlport4.6 has to be kept on i386 for ABI issues. For the rest[1],
yes I agree
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:11:30PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> 2) Package too large to be tested:
> openoffice.org: too large
Nonsense. You could speed up the build and make it use less
hd space like we do for buildd builds (lang=en-US). That's visible
from the source package. (Still build
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 04:45:23PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> There's no reason for skipping openoffice.org. And openoffice.org is a clear
Actually, there is, as installing libjpeg7-dev would break some of OOos
r-b-deps...
Will try hack around this for trying a build with libjpe
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 05:05:11PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Actually I tried to build it twice and it failed with "disk full" error.
Anyway, when hacking around the build-dep problem openoffice.org builds with
libjpeg7-dev. Didn't try the "working" part yet as I only tried with a 3.2
snapsho
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > So in short: we should choose the "well-defined" subset of packages
> > which are candidates for autobackporting according to their feature to
> > be buildable insi
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 10:59:51AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> That said uploading missing binaries yourself is not the rigt way forward,
> official build daemons must be able to build it and you should work with
> buildd maintainers and porters to get your package built (and building).
I
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:48:00PM +0800, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 28. September 2009, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > That said uploading missing binaries yourself is not the rigt way
> > > forward, official build daemons must be able to build it and
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> 3) When a new version of a component is released, how to handle it in
> the new source format? I can't find any standard place where to put meta
> informations regarding extra origin tarball.
I don't think there exist one
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 05:00:35PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> However, seems like on IRC we reached kind of a consensus on the fact that
> metapackages should use Recommends instead of Depends. I plan to do a mass-
> bug filing on this issue sooner or later, just need some time to do it :)
Wha
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 05:12:15PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> You're on your own with these.
I don't think you want to go though A recommends B which depends on C
which depends on D etc." route on servers which should have only
the stuff installed you need. Or even on desktops which you wan
Hi,
Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> The problem is that the mentioned lintian warning was fixed in .27 .. so if
> testing and unstable are using .28, there should be no problem with just
> ignoring the warnings for now and see what my _tests_ on debian will
No, that's wrong. *Build* also on Debia
Hi,
James Troup wrote:
> Other teams
> - ---
>
> If any other teams/groups want to use rt.debian.org to track their
> requests, they're welcome to do so, just send us the details in an RT
> ticket for DSA.
What about the ftpmasters? (As you are ftpmaster anyway, you
probably don't need a
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the openoffice.org package.
The package description is:
OpenOffice.org is a full-featured office productivity suite that provides
a near drop-in replacement for Microsoft(R) Office.
.
This metapackage installs all components
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libsvg
Version : 0.1.4
Upstream Author : Carl Worth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cairographics.org/snapshots/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwpg [1]
Version : 0.1.0 (not released yet)
Upstream Author : Fridrich Strba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libwpg.sf.net
* License : LGPL
Program
Hi,
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Some of them: fontconfig-config, blender, openjdk-6-jre,
> openoffice.org-core, vlc. And, as I understand, it leads to 93 bugs of
> "serious" severity and yet another pain for release team.
ttf-opensymbol comes out of openoffice.org itself (easily checkable) and i
Hi,
Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> When building against system agg, I get the lintian error:
>
> E: libmapnik0.5: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/libmapnik.so.0.5.0
>
> this does not occur when compiling mapnik's own agg library.
> I'm not sure what's happening here; does it indicate a mistake in
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>aria
> => gwget
You're kidding? gwget does not have many features aria has.
>manedit
> => gmanedit
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Deve
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 16:27 +0100, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
> > Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >aria
> > > => gwget
> >
> > You're kidding? gwget does not have
Hi,
Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
> suitesparse (3.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
WTF?
> Accepted:
> libsuitesparse-3.2.0_3.2.0-1_i386.deb
> to pool/main/s/suitesparse/libsuitesparse-3.2.0_3.2.0-1_i386.deb
> libsuitesparse-dbg_3.2.0-1_i386.deb
> to poo
Hi,
Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Holger Levsen schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Montag, 15. Dezember 2008, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> Something like that, I don't really care about the name. The important
> >> thing is, that unstable is never frozen, but temporarily disconnected
> >> from the unstable >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rene Engelhard
* Package name: libmysqlcppconn-dev
Version : 1.0.2 snapshot
Upstream Author : MySQL AB, Sun Microsystems Inc.
* URL : http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/Connector_C++
* License : GPL v2 with "FLOSS exce
Hi,
Harald Braumann wrote:
> package's directories for the new user. But a downgrade would then not
> be possible. The old version couldn't access the directories.
>
> Is there precedence for such a situation? How can it be resolved?
Downgrades are not supported.
(which doesn't mean they should
Maximilian Gaß wrote:
>Examples of programs that embed libev: the EV perl module,
>rxvt-unicode, gvpe (GNU Virtual Private Ethernet), the Deliantra MMORPG
>server (http://www.deliantra.net/), Rubinius (a next-generation Ruby
>VM), the Ebb web server, the Rev event toolkit.
>
> I ha
Guillem Jover wrote:
> I don't think it makes sense to have different Homepage fields on the
> binary stanzas, but if someone can think of a case it might be useful
> I could change it to override the source stanza field.
I have one.
OpenOffice.orgs homepage is www.openoffice.org. Now, since 2.3,
Hi,
RalfGesellensetter wrote:
> I'd plea to follow the policy of openoffice.org by tagging conf folders
> with versions:
Where you you see openoffice.org doing this? It doesn't.
It only encodes the major:
~/.openoffice.org2 (we take upstreams default here)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René
Hi Gunnar,
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 03:27:49PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> libprawn-ruby uses the 3.0 (quilt) format and is built from three
> tarballs
> (libprawn-ruby_0.7.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz,libprawn-ruby_0.7.1+dfsg.orig-pdf-inspector.tar.gz
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:13:40AM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 03.02.2010 07:14, schrieb Mike Hommey:
>> I'd go for the -browserplugin suffix.
>
> Fine, but what now? Can we already call this a consensus? Shall I file
> wishlist bugs against the affected packages? What's the opinion
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 03:48:13PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 04.02.2010, 10:13 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath:
> > Am 03.02.2010 07:14, schrieb Mike Hommey:
> > > I'd go for the -browserplugin suffix.
> >
> > Fine, but what now? Can we already call this a consensus? Shall I
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 06:14:22PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Actually, libjpeg62-dev is needed to build LSB compliant software that use
> libjpeg, so losing that would not be very nice.
But depending on the software this will be practically impossible (at
least for all gtk apps) as gtk wan
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 06:29:01PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 06 juin 2010 à 18:06 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
> > [Bill Allombert]
> > > Dear developers,
> > > Today circular dependencies in unstable reached an all-time low.
> >
> > Very good to hear. If only we c
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 06:15:41PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> The bug report doesn't explain why this needs to be a Depends: either -
> it could be a Recommends AFAICT. To quote the report, "which for some
> stuff needs" - the definition of a Recommends in my book. If
"some stuff" in t
1 - 100 of 237 matches
Mail list logo
