not?
IMHO, NEWS.Debian should cover things the users should know in order to
successfully operate the package. Knowing who is the maintainer does
not fall into this category. If they cared about changes for the Debian
packaging, they would read up on it in changelog.Debian.gz.
Michael
--
Mich
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: knetworkmanager
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Timo Hoenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.opensuse.org
* License : GPL
Description : system tra
7;load average:' are under one.
Please do not follow-up to end-user questions on -devel without at least
setting Mail-Followup-To to a more appropriate list. Better yet, move
them elsewhere alltogether.
thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ad
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Stilkerich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fvwm-crystal
Version : 3.0
Upstream Author : Maciej Delmanowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://fvwm-crystal.berlios.de/
* License : GPL
t http://alioth.debian.org states:
Any problems?
If you encounter a problem with Alioth, please check out the Site Admin
group. You may want to use the support request tracker to report
problems.
http://alioth.debian.org/projects/siteadmin/
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi all,
How to I contribute an application to Debian?
I am the developer of the application and it is released under GPL
Regards,
Michael Rasmussen
's a physical entity), it runs a
> proprietary operating system, but can be taught. This is very much
> unrelated to the rest of the thread *grin*.
I don't see how this is either relevant to Debian development per se,
nor rehashing past discussions. So please take this to anothe
n which is not
part of the Debian repository and I would like to know how an
application can be part of the Debian repository?
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael rasmussen cc
http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 04:54:57PM +0100, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>
> On 13-02-2006 15:49:02, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >
> >If you are running Debian, use the reportbug tool to file a bug
> >against
> >"wnpp", type RFP and answer its questions. Or j
uld probably be packaging it yourself, and
contact
the debian-mentors mailinglist to get somebody to sponsor the package
for
you.
Thanks, I will do it this way then.
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael rasmussen cc
http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/pks/looku
PS. releasing under the GPL is a good first step because licensing is
very important to Debian and the GPL is one of its most used license.
Check. There can be only one license:-)
--
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen
Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael rasmussen cc
http://keyserver.veridis.com:1
t; I want to change in source in which pkg I can change ..
If you run a recent Gnome installation edit the file
/etc/xdg/menus/gnome-applications.menu.
Go to the section and change the content
between ...
The gnome panel should pick up the changes immediately.
Cheers,
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
till present in libarts1c2a,
> but because they are from the same source package, it can be assumed
> that the maintainers know about this.
It might make more sense to reassign those bugs to the current binary
package in unstable in that case, maybe.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian
o push against ndiswrapper is a
grudge.)
Michael Poole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that policy requires.
You are the one who insists that the execution must be "free, non-toy,
non-POC", and that is why I said that if you want to change the state
of things, you should revise the DFSG or policy.
Michael Poole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g drivers to run on Linux.
This apparently means that you object to translation at the binary
level but not translation at the source level. I guess that's
reasonable in a general sense, it's just not a distinction that policy
or the DFSG makes.
Michael Poole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le samedi 18 février 2006 à 09:59 -0500, Michael Poole a écrit :
> > Anthony Towns writes:
> >
> > > But even if that weren't the case, nasm is an assembler -- it doesn't
> > > rely on assembler code to do anything useful,
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:59:07AM -0500, Michael Poole wrote:
> > Anthony Towns writes:
> > > But even if that weren't the case, nasm is an assembler -- it doesn't
> > > rely on assembler code to do anything useful, its purpose
it is free) from outside
> > > Debian for ndiswraper. That makes it contrib imho.
> >
> > Are there any free MSWord files in main ? No ? Then please move
> > antiword and similar tools to contrib.
>
> *points at abiword and openoffice.org*
Those are (arguably) differe
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:29:52AM -0800, Peter Khwatenge wrote:
> Do you have a program that can change .rm to mp3 or wave files? If
> yes, how can I get one?
This question is inappropriate for this list, please ask on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
ontain only Debian. They require bits of non-free. As is often
pointed out, Debian has chosen (twice) to make life hard for those
users. I guess the preferred solution for them is to just use some
other distribution.
Michael Poole
Peter Samuelson writes:
> [Michael Poole]
> > What's the purpose of an assembler without assembly code to use it
> > on? Despite Anthony's claim, I see no packages that can use nasm out
> > of the box
>
> If you hadn't already shot your credibility, you
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le samedi 18 février 2006 à 21:32 -0500, Michael Poole a écrit :
> > > I wonder why all people go on trying to build up tons of different
> > > fallacious reasonings to keep firmwares in main. Non-free is here for a
> > > reason, we
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le dimanche 19 février 2006 à 08:46 -0500, Michael Poole a écrit :
> > > Please stop these lies. I repeat: technical solutions do exist. For
> > > hardware unnecessary at installation's first stage, it is only a matter
> > > of maki
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le dimanche 19 février 2006 à 08:40 -0500, Michael Poole a écrit :
> > > If you hadn't already shot your credibility, you just did. Anthony
> > > listed a dozen or so packages in Debian which require nasm in order to
> > > build. Ho
F's usual position[1] is that the GPL does not require GPL
compatibility for non-distributed modifications of a GPLed program.
Are you saying that the FSF is incorrect about the GPL, or are you
making some other claim about what behavior is permitted?
[1]- http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#
and then have an automated check
> compare 'tag' with 'oldtag' and flag this upload as requireing a license
> re-cert.
In your example the package doesnt even hit the NEW queue as long as no
binary package name changes.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Cl
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 05:17:56AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:10:27PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 04:58:07AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:48:30AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > > Hi Th
I've read a lot about the binary incompatibility concern between
Debian and Ubuntu. I have an idea, but I don't have the skill to
implement it myself. I figured it would be useful to throw it out
there for you all to scrutinize, determine the implementation
feasibility, and perhaps run with.
Fir
utting a package in
contrib when it could go into main raises questions of *why* it was
put in contrib -- and which other packages might get the same
treatment. If putting it in contrib were simply an accident, then
that bug could just be fixed with no policy implications.
Michael Poole
--
Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
> Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It has been argued in this thread that if ndiswrapper were put in
> > main, it would mean that contrib has no point at all. One could
> > equally well argue that if ndiswrapper were put i
s
argued a year ago, ndiswrapper-in-main advocates think it is a waste
of time and want to convey their arguments so that everyone remembers
and does not want to argue again in another year.
Michael Poole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as an exhaustive list. If you use a broad
definition of "require", it is reasonable to exclude ndiswrapper from
main on the grounds that there are no NDIS drivers in main. I think
that is a too-broad definition of require, but using it does not
require changing foundation documents.
Micha
ference to
the "main" versus "non-free" sections, since it already says "We
promise that the Debian system and all its components will be free
according to these guidelines." Thus, it requires that the Debian
system not include packages that meet Policy's definitio
ody), a General
> > Resolution.
>
> Wouldn't the ftp-masters be the right authority for this issue? It is
> them who decide if the package can go into main or not.
The package is already in main. The person who filed this bug thinks
the maintainer and ftp-master decisions were wrong
and
are written to let Debian interoperate with that non-free software?
Michael Poole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s.debian.org. Discussions on how to make
Debian more cross-compile friendly are OK for debian-devel, but patches
to individual packages are not.
thanks,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n KDE.
>
> Indeed. Wasn't there a fork of gnome for this reason recently?
Yes, it just never took off, because maybe Button position aren't that
important after all? It was called Goneme, for the record.
Anyway, I don't think GNOME bashing is really on-topi
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 03:36:12PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Is there any objections to my uploading a new e2fsprogs package which
> does this?
Please take into consideration that libselinux is not available on
Debian's non-Linux ports.
thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Banck
in it" - see bug #273871 for more info (including the message
referenced above).
--
----
Michael Schultheiss
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
xactly are you missing in dpkg that isnt already addressed by the
dpkg maintainers?
Cheers,
Michael
--
http://www.worldforge.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I was recently browsing the web on a windows box and realized that
over the last 4 years, I had forgotten how nice it is to be able
browse back/forward with a single button click. So I set about
enabling this functionality on my Debian box. I found this gentoo doc
(http://gentoo-wiki.com/
On 3/12/06, David Nusinow wrote:
> Please note that the usual way to do this is by
> filing a wishlist bug against the package, and I'd appreciate it if you use
> this mechanism so I can keep track of it easily.
ok, will do. i didn't think that this discussion fit nicely under a
single package.
isions
> in a proper way.
I am not sure, but did you get the mails from ftp-assistant Jeroen van
Wolffelaar to this thread? If you haven't read them already, I suggest
you do so, realize that there is nothing to communicate, and move on to
other things.
cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ssage --
> > > > From: John Gee < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Date: Mar 13, 2006 1:41 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: for those who care about Debian supporting namecalling
> > > > To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Please make this stop. Now.
r two now?
Your continuing replies seem to nicely demonstrate this exercise to some
degree.
cheers,
Michael
--
vorlon: also, i don't intent to be agresive or something, and
keep the thread resonable, so if you feel insulted or something,
please take it as a problem wit
thread, your voices will all be heard
in the next stage, there is no need to clutter -devel even further at
this point.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:34:01AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Dear developpers,
Thanks for your input, but this message is off-topic on -devel. Please
consider using -project for non-technical discussions next time.
Michael
PS: The svenl thread is off-topic as well and should be
On Wed, 28 May 1997, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > We are running cvs.debian.org over an ISDN line. Currently the only
> > code under it is the Deity project.
> >
> > I can make other source trees and set up other users if others want to
> > do distributed development this way.
> >
> > Unfortunately,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 28 May 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
> Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > BTW, psupdate is the only program I can think about using
> > System.map. Are there any other ?
>
> klogd
ksymoops
Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset:
ized that I
>did not install the kernel source on these machines and did so and tried
>again. Still choked due to that missing file. So I decided to look at if
>modversion.h was included in the kernel source. It isn't. Doing a search
>
>[Michael Meskes] You're right. A while
On 1 Jun 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
> Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Perhaps. Anybody have any serious arguments? I think the reason we
> > configure gcc as i486 is so it automatically optimizes for the 486; it's
> > a good middle ground.
>
> I think the only optimization gcc 2.7
On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> >I don't think it does any optimization at all for pentium.
>
> Correct. Of course, there's the experimental pgcc (http://www.goof.com/,
> if anybody wants to look).
>
> I'd like to pack this up and stuff it into experimental, if I had a
> little more t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I just had a look at ftp.xfree86.org.
They finally have 3.3 out.
Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM5J+gUAgIJ53sbT9AQEJ8gP/XaRFImH2den6zE5uMTct5YX4yrUKkxMS
LZyHcbgLQ+DyLIsxdhtykHja0IBeScc/gtpeKRu6Co6O5dBAdRlHMVw3i6TT
On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Michael Neuffer wrote:
>
> >This is not necessary. gcc 2.8 includes the pentium optimizations
> >from pgcc.
>
> All of it?
No not all, they took a stable subset.
Mike
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail t
Where do I find it? I read somewhere it fixes that nasty dpkg-source bug.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
topsystem Systemhaus GmbH| Phone: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20 | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
52146
Could anyone tell me where the difference between the linuxlibc1 reboot()
function and the one in glibc is? The prototype has changed dramatically and
I cannot find it in the info files.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
topsystem Systemhaus
Am I correct that libnet-perl supersedes libnet? If so libnet should be
removed from the archive.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
topsystem Systemhaus GmbH| Phone: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20 | Fax
I've found two different source trees for xfree under bo XFree 3.1.2 and
xfree86 3.2. I doubt we need/want both or is there a reason for this.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager | [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
topsystem Systemhaus GmbH| Phone: (+49) 2405/46
Yes, it's there. Thanks.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Tel: (+49) 2405/46
No. I found it on unstable. Thinking about it I just checked the mirror
in dresden. I haven't looked at master.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROT
On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Philippe Troin wrote:
> What's the stability of hamm right now ? Is it usable ?
Yes it is. My machine here has been running on hamm for weeks.
A bunch of libs are still missing but otherwise it is quite functional.
Mike
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the w
ssh seems to use login. IMO you forgot one very important player: xbase.
Lot's of people use xterm. rxvt should be in this list, too.
BTW Johnie could this utmp problem be the reason for me not being able
to enter proftpd?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Syste
kB <==
Buffers: 11608 kB
Cached: 36736 kB
SwapTotal:64256 kB
SwapFree: 64032 kB
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PRO
How can I have more shared memory than total memory + swap?
Michael
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, June 09, 1997 2:58 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc:Die Adresse des Empfängers ist unbekannt.
>Subject:
I just saw that I still have an xterm-color package installed on my system
but there seems to be no package xterm-color in the archive anymore. I take
it I don't need xterm-color anymore (the standard xterm works with color).
But shouldn't xbase then replace and conflict with xterm-color
On 9 Jun 1997, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> > "GM" == Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> GM: David Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> :: Must all new programs goint into unstable be linked with libc6?
>
> GM: Since Debian 2.0 is meant to be a libc6 system, the answer is yes.
>
>
I just tried starting xnest but it says it cannot find font 'Fixed' and
immediately stops again. What's going on?
I do use xfs and no hardcoded fontpaths for my xserver. Can this be the
reason?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[
/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x400d7000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x400e2000)
libproc.so.1.12 => /lib/libproc.so.1.12 (0x40182000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40193000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000)
gauss:meskes 114)
Mich
don't know how auth is handled, is it
an internal service? www-proxy was added by myself and points to a squid
daemon so inetd shouldn't get a hand on it, or does it?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ls /usr/man/man2 says:
create_module.2.gz
delete_module.2.gz
get_kernel_syms.2.gz
init_module.2.gz
intro.2.gz
modules.2.gz
query_module.2.gz
where are the others?
I also miss the libc function manpages like fgets.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
e it but it
appears the connection is not switched to port 81 at all.
Maybe someone had more luck...
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuerselen
Thanks Peter.
I guess it's the ident service. So I try nowait.120 and see what
happens.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuersel
uests.
Thanks anyway, Peter.
Later
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Tel: (+49) 2405/46
This is from Linux kernel, and it sounds to me, that there might be
versions that we can distribute with Debian.
Mike
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 20:05:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAI
hould
ask identd for connections from outside. Can I configure tcpd so that it
only ask outside machines? Currently I have ALL:@@ALL in my
/etc/hosts.allow file. Would it suffice to add a line http-gw:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Our local network is 172.26.0.0.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Ma
No! You cannot use libc5 compiled perl with glibc locales! Wait for a
libc6 version of perl and everything should be fine again.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED
I wonder whether it's difficult to fix that. If I recall correctly most
of the locale code in libc5 is from glibc anyway.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROT
Is there a reason for the checker libraries to come with debugging symbols?
I haven't used checker yet, so I don't know. But I assume that the libraries
without debugging symbols would work.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL
ork (once again libc5 locale support was
taken from glibc) but apparently it doesn't.
Do oyu have any idea where to look?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ALL: .foobar.edu EXCEPT terminalserver.foobar.edu
>#
>http-gw: 172.26. @@ALL=20
>ALL: @@ALL
>
>And it works nicely.
>
>Michael
>--
>Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 2
aries for the same reason. Instead we
provide an *-dbg package.
What do others think about this?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuersel
True. But I didn't say 'get rid of these symbols'. All I'd like to see
is the chance for me to install a version without symbols.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr.
d into libc-dev again as it was earlier on.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+4
Does this mean I can remove my des-solnet?
Anyway, we didn't win but the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address processed
the most blocks of all email addresses.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europa
Does this mean I could upload all architecture version for my packages?
If so yes, I think it's useful.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
The way I read it the copyright just forbids to change the doc files
itself. There is no problem adding our packages files etc. Even renaming
the source tree is not forbidden.
So I'd say put it in the core distribution.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Syste
needs.
So if anyone could provide the neccessary configuration, that'll be
great.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go
suid at all:
debmake /usr/bin/build root root 755
debmake /usr/bin/debpkg root root 755
I'd like to know more about this (and other) security related packages.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europa
How on earth is it possible to get packages depending on libreadlineg2 into
hamm when there is no package libreadlineg2 in the archive or in Incoming?
At least I couldn't find the readline package.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROT
Do you really run it? The way I hear it from the authors (and according
to my own experience) it won't work with 2.0.30 either. It's broken and
these guys don't know yet, how to repair it. The last working version
was 2.0.29.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager
I see. But I do not totally agree. We're used to do SCO development on
theLinux box and it works like a charm.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROT
Whats the difference between the jdk packages and the jdk1.1 packages? I
just found both in the archive.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED
suid by default should be in /etc/suid.conf.
checksecurity (or another script) could them check for consistency.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROT
But that means we have to add all permission since all are configurable.
Isn't it a better idea to save the standard setting only for those
programs that are setuid by default?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROT
It seems I misunderstood what suidmanager does.
But I still don't see the reason for non-setuid programs listed there
by default. Does that mean 'You can make this program suid, but we
prefer it to be not-suid.'?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem
And why didn't you update libreadline2 (withoug 'g') too, as the
dependency suggested? That worked like a charm for me.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[
Is there soemthing like a real rescue disk? Or are we talking about the
installation disks?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuerselen
I still have problems with that. What you describe is the eventual
scenario, correct? But right now it lacks functionality, because not
every packages uses it. So maybe we should add a new rule in our
policy.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL
Didn't we have something like that for the compress package?
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager| topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein
101 - 200 of 4523 matches
Mail list logo
