Re: Debian Mobile -- Debian GNU/Linux for mobile devices

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 07:13:41PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 17.02.2010, 16:13 +0100 schrieb Bastian Blank: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 03:53:32PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > Is anyone interested in starting a Debian Mobile project, probably as a > > > Debian

Re: FORTRAN implementation in Lenny

cquainted with other compilers, so can't answer questions about them. (And my FORTRAN days are behind me. I can only answer in these general terms. I hope someone else can be more specific.) Hope this helps, Mark Allums *It's been losing ground in some areas, last few release

Re: FORTRAN implementation in Lenny

On 2/21/2010 10:28 PM, Mark Allums wrote: On 2/21/2010 4:44 PM, Fuentes, Adolfo wrote: ]$ gcc -O3 -lm -march=nocona -o nbody.x nbody.c ]$ time ./-o nbody.x 5000 Energy 0: -0.169075164 Energy 1: -0.169059907 Elapsed time: 1m 17.4s ]$ f95 -O3 -lm -march=nocona -o nbody.x nbody.f90 ]$ time

Re: Xen, Squeeze, and Beyond

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:18:41AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > But the pv-ops xen kernel is shaping up well and that is what Bastian > Banks is working on. They have a proper upstream and follow the latest > vanilla kernel well enough. According to the wiki the plan is to have > pv-ops me

Re: libgcrypt brain dead?

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 01:33:43PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Ben Hutchings writes: > > On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 12:03 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > >> The primary problem with using OpenSSL with OpenLDAP is NSS and PAM > >> modules, which pull the libraries into just about any GPL'd (or > >> oth

Re: About new source formats for packages without patches

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 04:07:59PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > For zless, people seem to open the debian.tar with vim or similar but I > can understand that it's less usable than a simple pager view of the > relevant files. Maybe it's a good idea to provide a debreview/debinspect > command in

Re: About new source formats for packages without patches

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:19:41PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Why is there no dak and wanna-build package? Are there plans to create > such packages? There used to be a dak package but it ended up lagging very badly behind the actual dak code because it needed some database schema upgrades as

Re: About new source formats for packages without patches

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:13:01AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > The long tag description probably could be improved to make it clearer > that the intention isn't to be a cudgel. Unfortunately pretty much any lintian warning ends up being a cudgel if it's enabled by default since zero lintian warn

Re: About new source formats for packages without patches

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 09:02:24AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > I'm surprised by the resistance I see to these changes. I see the > approach pushed by dpkg maintainers as fairly conservative with very > progressive changes to existing packages and much respect for people > who don't want to a

Re: What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 03:51:14PM +0200, spamfuerda...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi! > > I (and some other people) are wondering about the question: > > "What does .d at the end of some dirctory and filenames actually stand for?" > > > It does not mean deamon or default. > > Does it maybe mean director

Re: PDF is blocked for printing, etc. OK for acroread (it behaves as expected), but KPDF allows me to print it, even if it is protected! Why?

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:39:03PM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > > Twas brillig at 17:32:51 19.04.2010 UTC+02 when > luca.mercia...@student.ulg.ac.be did gyre and gimble: > > >> Pdf "anti-features" are fake security. Don't trust on them, never. > ML> And what do you suggest if one wants some

Bug#580717: ITP: ctemplate -- A simple but powerful template language for C++ - development files

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mark Purcell Owner: Mark Purcell * Package name: ctemplate Version : 0.96 Upstream Author : Google Inc. * URL : http://code.google.com/p/google-ctemplate/ * License : BSD'ish - see below Programming La

Bug#580718: ITP: kraft -- small business-management application

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mark Purcell Owner: Mark Purcell * Package name: kraft Version : 0.40 Upstream Author : Klaas Freitag * URL : http://kraft.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL2+ Programming Lang: C++ Description : small business

add my id for linkexchange

add my id for linkexchange m...@megrisoft.info -- Regards mark contact me at : m...@megrisoft.info

Bug#585567: ITP: gobi-loader -- Firmware loader for Qualcomm Gobi USB chipsets.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mark Hymers * Package name: gobi-loader Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : Matthew Garrett / RedHat * URL : http://www.codon.org.uk/~mjg59/gobi_loader/ * License : GPL 2 Programming Lang: C Description : Firmware

Re: PLEASE ADD MY EMAIL ID

Hi all I am a freelancer(Link building) and looking for other freelancer to work together. Please contact through mail. Thanks Mark

Re: Update Lenny to Squeeze

On 8/9/2010 9:36 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Michel] I don't know where is the work on upgrade documentation but I wanted underline this order. At least the udev issue is known to me. It can be worked around by touching /etc/udev/kernel-upgrade before upgrading udev, allowing the kernel a

Re: why experimental latest Release file hasn't NotAutomatic: yes

fixing it now Should be fixed now - sorry about that. Mark -- Mark Hymers "'I regret nothing?' That's not a song, that's an idiots charter." Andy Hamilton, Old Harry's Game -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject o

Re: Installing Vmware v71

If anyone can get VmWare-Workstation 7 installed on Debian (Testing/Sid), I would very much like to hear your story. Thanks a lot. I installed it last week, v7.1.2. I had no trouble, worked like a charm. Just invoked the installer. I did invoke it as root. I really can't be more helpf

Re: debian can be better

Am 27.10.2010 23:32, schrieb Russell Coker: Speaking for myself I'm more than happy for people who want Debian with non- free software to use Ubuntu. I think that they are doing a great job of making a Debian-derived distribution that supports non-free software and is easy to use. In my opinio

Re: Debian Installer 6.0 Beta1 release

here will be an IRC meeting this Wednesday, dedicated to the installer. Any chance that WPA issue will be discussed and resolved at last? Thanks in advance to all participants! -- Sincerely Yours' Mark Goldshtein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Re: Debian Installer 6.0 Beta1 release (WPA support)

tch into the installer without localization and put it somewhere aside as an alpha/beta version? Including non-official Debian resources? Plus, a single string note in 'installation howto' pointing to that 'version' of the installer. Sorry, if something like that looks stupid and

Re: Squeeze Artwork: selection of default theme

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:26:01PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On ven., 2010-11-12 at 10:37 +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > In terms of the artwork choice itself (SpaceFun), I've seen a lot of > > comments along the lines of "looks like something even my kids would > > reject for looking to

Re: Squeeze Artwork: selection of default theme

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:22:51AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Mark Brown] > > Honestly I'd have expected something like this to show up on -devel, > > or at least -devel-announce, at some point. > And I do not expect it, I must admit. Everyone do not get a say o

Bug#606493: gnome-screensaver: Fails to authenticate users with NIS on amd64

On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:16:05PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 09 d??cembre 2010 ?? 19:38 +0000, Mark Brown a ??crit : > > I'm not sure why you believe this is an issue in NIS? > I???m not sure why you believe this is an issue in gnome-screensaver > either.

Re: Why is help so hard to find?

On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 04:52:13PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Roger Leigh writes: > > Yes, and this is what I did. It's just rather tedious to (IIRC) > > repeatedly run "dpkg-reconfigure sysv-rc" and then find out which file > > is offending, run "dpkg -S $file", and then purge it. > I've not

Re: Upcoming FTPMaster meeting

thogonal to having buildd support for .all debs which needs discussing with the buildd team. Mark -- Mark Hymers "That's why the good die young; it's because Death can't be bothered to check the paperwork." Andy Hamilton, Old Harry's Game -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Upcoming FTPMaster meeting

r of > > points, if so feel free to tell us about them. > > Would it be possible to add support for ddebs? I'll stick it on the agenda. I assume the details at http://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages are the most up to date notes you know of? Thanks, Mark -- Mark Hymers

Re: Upcoming FTPMaster meeting

y affected, and if so whether ftp.debian.org is > the right place to report the issue. I've put it on the agenda so we can check if it does affect dak and fix it if it does. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Hymers "That's why the good die young; it's because Death can't be bothered to ch

Re: Upcoming FTPMaster meeting

the release notes state that users must upgrade dpkg and apt to the latest point release before doing the dist-upgrade? Mark -- Mark Hymers "I got off at Durham... and fell in love with it instantly. Why, it's wonderful - a perfect little city. If you have never been to Durham, g

Re: Cross compiler ITP (armel)

On Mon, 14, Mar, 2011 at 02:04:30PM +, Hector Oron spoke thus.. > Hi, > > 2009/11/2 Mark Hymers : > > On Mon, 02, Nov, 2009 at 12:43:42PM +, Philipp Kern spoke thus.. > >> Of course it is a sane approach but very special care needs to be taken > >>

Re: Cross compiler ITP (armel)

On Tue, 22, Mar, 2011 at 12:18:31PM +, Simon McVittie spoke thus.. > On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 at 11:54:47 +0000, Mark Hymers wrote: > > the main people [Built-Using] should be used by, as far as I know are > > cross-compiler builders and the d-i and kernel-wedge people > &g

Re: Cross compiler ITP (armel)

7;s system, it simply allows us to automatically ensure GPL compliance (and means we're doing the right thing) Mark -- Mark Hymers "Well, the thing about a black hole - it's main distinguishing feature - is it's black. And the thing about space, your basic space colour is black.

Re: Cross compiler ITP (armel)

On Tue, 22, Mar, 2011 at 01:57:42PM +, Hector Oron spoke thus.. > Hi Mark, > > 2011/3/22 Mark Hymers : > > > The current design is the Binary packages can contain an additional > > control field: Built-Using. > > First of all, thanks very much for taking ca

Re: Kernel weirdness

Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn said on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:42:53PM +0200: > On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Rob wrote: > > > I've installed the kernel-image-2.4.22-1-686 package. Until now, I've > > been running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel. Though I didn't change what > > modules I load, with this new kernel packag

Re: Kernel weirdness

Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn said on Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:57:34PM +0200: > With all due respect for the our kernel maintainer, Herbert Xu, throwing > up all those ide-driver modules (on a scsi only box, or anywhere else) is > IMHO insane :( The IDE modules were there before, on your SCSI only box.

Re: recent spam to this list

Manoj Srivastava said on Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 04:40:15PM -0500: > Consider this use case: I travel a lot, and stay in hotels > with network connections. Unfortunately, these nigtly billed domains > have very poor mail gateways; I've been burned before. I now connect > directly and deliver

Re: The sense of automake (Was: Processed: better make that 1.7.8... :-()

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 11:27:54AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I would love to do so but it happened to me that the files I created seem > to depend from automake. I do not call any automake script - just > the usual >configure; make; make install > but I had to add a build-dependency f

Re: [debian-devel] Re: which policy checker?

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 03:23:24PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote: >Just for an example where it annoys me: I use lintian.d.o as a summary > of my lintian warnings because it gives me a nice overview of what needs > to be done, and I always need to manually filter out newer-standards- > version warn

Re: nethack popularity contest - number_pad?

On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 06:30:26PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > Which is better? I like the default keys because you learn how to use > nvi very efficiently knowing the hjkl-style keys :) I'm searching for as > many opinions as possible so please speak up! Disabling hjkl results in a rather nasty

Re: nethack popularity contest - number_pad?

On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:15:00AM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote: > Well, one problem I see with that immediately is that 'k' when > number_pad is enabled means kick; if number_pad is off it means go up. > Of course, we could disable k for kick and use ^D; but in the end we > might end up with an awkwa

Re: faster boot

Robert Giardalas said on Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:55:52PM -0400: > I had some preliminary modifications of the parallel loading system > proposed by James Hunt from IBM working for Debian, but it looked like > it would speed things up less than 10%, which wasn't enough to lure me > away from SysV

Re: Source only uploads?

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 09:52:14AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > 1. A package may not be important to developers, but is > still important to users. Alternatively, developers may simply > recompile the package without submitting a bug report. One would hope that developers would bother filing a bug r

Re: Bug#215827: ITP: lartc -- Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control HOWTO

Marc Haber said on Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:57:03PM +0200: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:24:25 +0200, Andreas Metzler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Being a normal Linuxdoc howto this has been available in Debian for a > >long time in doc-linux-html. > > And calling this document a HOWTO has been a jok

Re: Looking for Moshe Zadka

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 10:46:34AM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > Has anyone heard from Moshe Zadka lately, or know where I can find him? He's often on IRC as moshez - he tends to be pretty responsive there. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Version Updating Question

seems like an odd way to do it. Also, I'd rather not give V1.0 a version like 1.0really - unless I 'really' have to:) Any help on this would be much appreciated. Thanks, Mark -- _____ Mark Johnson<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian XML/

Re: problems with dpkg, apt, perl etc. ( wait/waitpid)

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:56:04AM +0200, Cristian Rauta wrote: > I know, maybe -devel is inappropriate list for my problems, but i don`t > know another list for that. debian-user might've been a better bet. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Re: ftpmaster accepts packages that have been rejected a few days ago

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 08:18:51AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Even if this is not a personal issue of Mr. Troup towards me, having > ftpmaster behave like A today and like B tomorrow is a bad thing. If I There's more than one person behind ftpmaster. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into i

Re: ftpmaster accepts packages that have been rejected a few days ago

On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 03:08:11AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > I think rejecting it during this process of deliberation is better > than letting it sit there. A rejection alerts the maintainer that > there's something wrong with the package. In most cases, the maintainer > will agree and fi

Re: Example of really nasty DD behavior

On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 01:29:08PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Thats stupid. A DD already has some packages so on average he will > have less time to care for yet another package. There's so many variables influencing the level of support developers are able to offer for their packages t

Re: Trouble Compiling Simple Glade.

glade xml dynamically from your program rather than generating c code from the glade xml and then editing that - you will then find it far easier to modify your interface in the future. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bits from the RM

bug is still RC, even if it only affects dependent packages -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [custom] Debian Enterprise - flavors

Zenaan Harkness said on Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:58:18PM +1100: > Flavours (and sub-flavours/ tasks/ yadda) is as good a place to start as > any. So here are some proposed flavours: > > - Enterprise (base packages and more "neutral" config) > - Enterprise Desktop - with sub-flavours of: > - S

Re: debian pxe dhcp netinstall (debconf enterprise fai etc.)

Tim Krieglstein said on Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 02:10:57AM +0100: > I would like to have some feedback, especially on the topic of > doing automatic updates with an cron job. I would also like to hear of > some hints if there is an other tool which does the job (debix, > skolelinux,...: haven't looked

Re: debian pxe dhcp netinstall (debconf enterprise fai etc.)

Chad Walstrom said on Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 02:17:55AM -0600: > > I did what you are trying to do using systemimager, cvs, and cvsup. > > ... There are a few rough spots (mostly in that I don't have a fully > > automatic way to restart daemons that have been updated in the golden > > client, so I h

Re: debian pxe dhcp netinstall (debconf enterprise fai etc.)

Chad Walstrom said on Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 10:05:15AM -0600: > On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:13:57AM -0800, Mark Ferlatte wrote: > > FAI is good, but it doesn't handle updating the systems once you have > > them installed. > > You're absolutely right. The cfe

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for December 12, 2003

is clean and robust and I wouldn't want it to be > at some point removed from testing because of a bug in unstable. > > So - shouldn't there be [U] mark for this bug? sth. like: -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAI

Re: Bug#273734: education-common: con't fulfill the Recommends on !i386

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:17:50PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 11:16:56PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 12:03:48AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > > Assume a package would recommend grub which is only available on i386

Re: installing TCP programs when RPC programs are running

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 02:08:18PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > This could be documented in a note with low priority when one installs > portmap for example? I'd like admins to have a chance to read they > can expect port usage collisions. Not all ONCRPC programs have this problem: it's perfec

Re: about volatile.d.o/n

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 05:51:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi all, > > we had some discussion about volatile, and I'm more and more considering to > pick this task up. I think some issues are quite obvious: > > - packages should only go in in c

Re: about volatile.d.o/n

On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > > Packages like virus checkers seem to be > > composed of 2 parts: the app program and the data where the data in > > this case are viru

Re: installing TCP programs when RPC programs are running

On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 04:18:36PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > Conclusion, I am going to file bug reports of wishlist priority for the > above packages, linking to this thread and suggesting a notice / > warning that RPC port are not fixed and could collide with services > that are installed o

Re: about volatile.d.o/n

On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 10:43:05AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Kevin Mark said: > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > > > > Pac

Re: about volatile.d.o/n

On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 04:37:14PM +0100, paddy wrote: > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 10:43:05AM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote: > > This one time, at band camp, Kevin Mark said: > > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:00:51AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oc

Re: [OT:HUMOR] Re: software

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:37:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: Price for Commercial Software: > > Adobe Illustrator CS - 90.00 > > Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional - 100.00 > > McAfee Personal Firewall Plus 2004 v. 5.0 - 20.00 > > Adobe Photoshop Elements 2

Re: [OT:HUMOR] Re: software

On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:37:06PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, wrote: > > McAfee Personal Firewall Plus 2004 v. 5.0 - 20.00 > Why? If you really care there's clamav, also for 0.00. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

Right Way to make a configuration package

debconf is not particularly well suited to integrating several otherwise-unrelated packages and I am unsure whether working around the problem, or helping to improve debconf, or doing it some other way entirely is the better approach... thoughts? Thanks, Mark Roach

Re: gfreeamp playlist inquiry

On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:05:30PM -0400, Siqueland-Gresch wrote: > > Hello and good evening from Rhode Island ! > > I do not know whether you can help me. Right up front, I am not a programmer > at all. No clue. Not a sausage.So if I sound ignorant it is because I am. > But here it is: > I ha

Re: Menu icon policy (Was: Bug#142818: xteddy: Icons missing from menu entries)

eddy: title="XRuessel" icon="xruessel.xpm" command="/usr/bin/X11/xruessel" /usr/lib/menu/xteddy: title="XTeddy" icon="xteddy.xpm" command="/usr/bin/X11/xteddy" /usr/lib/menu/xteddy: title="XTuxxy" icon="xtuxxy.xpm" comm

Re: need to collect a list of files for HTML docs

It could also be a simple use of sgrep... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problems with freeswan upload

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:21:44PM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > Since I am getting more and more bug-reports about users requesting an > updated package, I would like to get this resolved quickly. Therefore, I > am happy about any hint on what I am doing wrong (RTFM with a pointer to > the respe

Re: Bug#156407: ITP: free-java-sdk -- Complete Java SDK environment consising of free Java tools

asily and efficiently interact with traditional libraries written in C or C++ through CNI - or JNI). I really hope that message will be told a bit more. Note that all of the above does not mean that I want to discourage your new Debian packages. I really want to see them next to the gcj tools! Let those gcj hackers prove their tools are better :) Cheers, Mark

Re: Upcoming bug mass-filing re. non-free TrueType fonts in main

On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:45:06PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > Ben> "How am I going to deal with it when someone changes my font to > Ben> something ugly and it reflects poorly on my skills as a > Ben> fontographer?" > In that context, it is part of the rationale for the Q license, > AFAIK. (R

Re: When bind9 reinstalls, no db.root

On Wednesday, August 21, 2002, at 09:08 PM, Marc Singer wrote: Without a single example, I don't see how installing a configuration file where there is none can have *any* affect on the system. Admittedly, replacing a configuration file may be undesirable. In addition to the example of configuratio

What's up with testing??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Can anyone advise why packages aren't getting though into testing? Thanks, Mark On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:30, Cron Daemon wrote: > * hpoj (0.8-11 to 0.90-1) > + Maintainer: Mark Purcell > + 13 days old (

Re: Make python2.2 the python default

On Sat, Aug 24, 2002 at 12:21:41AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote: > I would say yes. We need 2.1 in sarge at least, so that each generation of > Debian still has support for the previous generation's standard python. Why? If you're upgrading then you can always leave the 2.1 packages installed can

Bug#158059: ITP: metacity-themes -- Themes for the Gtk2 metacity window manager

Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-24 Severity: wishlist * Package name: metacity-themes Description : Themes for the Gtk2 metacity window manager This collection of themes for the metacity window manager has been carefully compiled from a number of sources. Each one is pub

Re: Bug#158059: ITP: metacity-themes -- Themes for the Gtk2 metacity window manager

On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 20:18, Colin Walters wrote: > On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 14:37, Mark Howard wrote: > > > Initial packages for this are available at > > http://tildemh.com/tmp/metacity-themes/ > > Hmmwhere's the source package? http://tildemh.com/tmp/debia

Re: old ITP's

test 'news' on the site being from many months or years ago; poorly designed website). As I am not yet a developer, I did not try to close the RFP's. What action should be taken about such RFPs? -- +--+ | Mark Howard

RE: Sharp SPAM [marketing@sharpsystems.com: Special Price Offer f or Select Sharp Systems Products]

Erich, Good comment. I too will ensure that Sharp products are not included in any future systems that I or the company that I work for design. Mark -Original Message- From: Erich Schubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:33 PM To: debian-laptop

Re: Dumb little utilities

begin Oohara Yuuma quote on Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:57:31PM +0900: > > generate id3 tags from file name (probably not generally useful). > It may save some perl one-liner. id3ren does this. M pgp7m14E3fGi3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Improper NMU (Re: NMU for libquota-perl)

On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 09:16:24AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > In the case of something so trivial as causing a recompile for a > problem that has been known for some time the warning given by the > delayed upload should be enough. While a recompile *should* be trivial they still have the po

Re: NMU for bayonne

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bas, It is actually courtesy to file a bug/ contact the maintainer prior to uploading a NMU (even to DELAYED/3-day). Have a look at Bug #159174 which I received two hours after your NMU notification. Mark On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 01:36, you wrote: >

Re: Improper NMU (Re: NMU for libquota-perl)

On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 12:57:10PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > That depends on your mail-setup. IMHO it's reasonable to expect from DDs > to follow -devel-announce without accidently overlooking a post there or > two. Seeing the mail is one thing. Fully understanding it and grasping that it af

Re: Improper NMU (Re: NMU for libquota-perl)

On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:25:34PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote: > And by the use of DELAYED it does not even need to be installed in the > pool before you react. Why get so upset about a, what I can tell from > this discussion, working NMU. Having been in this position in the past I have to say

Re: location of UnicodeData.txt

On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:33:43PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > These days I wouldn't be eager to rely on the limits of copyrightability. >CNN.com - Composer pays for piece of silence - Sep. 23, 2002 > It's worth pointing out t

Re: Last known forwarding address for Jared Johnson?

1.3 from the galeon-snapshot package (updated weekly, when possible). This is the gtk2 rewrite of galeon, which is now getting quite stable. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: why was there no bug filed?

On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:04:21AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > you, oh my sponsor, advocate, and mentor. i thought that the bugs were > automatically filed. wouldn't that be rather easy to accomplish? It would be easy to file bugs when builds fail but it would be hard to do this constructivel

Re: popcon?

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:46:33PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > Hi, > > Is master just hopelessly overloaded, or is popcon defunct? I get bounces > ('warning: msg not delivered after 24h') from master. > > cheers > -- vbi > > -- > featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro Hi vbi, IIRC

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for April 4, 2003

On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:06:29AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > This package has is taged patch to one bug and in fact includes another > patch in the text of the other bug which is tagged pending. Moreover > it contains an offer from Colin Watson to sponsor the package from > half a year ago.

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for April 4, 2003

On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 10:03:50AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Could you please be so kind to ask the maintainer whether he want to > continue maintaining? Will do. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."

[desktop] Patched kernels

stopping the packages from being created? -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Debian Developer LDAP

I've no experience with it so I'm leery of starting something I cannot finish. Thanks for any feedback. Mark P.S. I'm not subscribed, so please CC me.

Re: Maintainers with excessive old RC bugs

is still waiting for a maintainer. Java-gnome builds have not been restarted by the buildd's since it moved to main. I've asked on debian-powerpc (since I've not found anywhere more appropriate), but had no response so far. Can anyone on -devel help? -- .''`. Mark Howa

Managing bug reports

s. Please file any feature requests as wishlist bugs on the debbuggtk package, keeping to one request per bug report. If anyone has any advice about improving the user interface, this would also be appreciated. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `

Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)

On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 01:08:28PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > Former tetex packages provided language.dat as a > conffile so if one changed (manually!) it then one would > be asked whether to replace it or not everytime at upgrading. Does this file really change so often that this is a probl

Re: Managing bug reports

On Thu, 2003-04-17 at 22:03, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Mark Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hi, > > version 0.7 of debbuggtk is now in the Debian repository. This is a > > set of tools (bugwatcher, bugviewer and buglister) to help manage Debian > >

Re: Managing bug reports

the buildd maintainers stopped its builds as they would always fail with missing dependencies. java-gnome has moved to main recently and the dependencies have been removed - it should now compile on buildd machines. It just needs somebody to reenable them. I've not found out who or ho

Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)

On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 06:07:28PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > From: Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Does this file really change so often that this is a problem? Users > > will only be prompted if the distributed version of a conffile has > > changed. &g

Re: Bug#189370: acknowledged by developer (irrelevant)

On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 05:53:09PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: > From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > So you do not understand the value of being compatible with > > other TeX installations? You think it is not arrogant for Debian to > > assume the rest of the world also runs Debi

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >