digikam was linked against libexiv2-1, but kipi-plugins was linked against
libexiv2-0.12
which seems to crash..
Mark
pgpWG9FRDxLOE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:15:28PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2007, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > On ti, 2007-05-22 at 13:30 +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> > > 1. The GPLv3: the latest draft did not raise major objections from
> > > -legal and despite its concerns with the strategies
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:27:22PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2007, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > >Because software under the GPLv3 is incompatible with GPLv2-only
> > > software, while "GPLv2 or above" software is compatible with both.
> > Coul
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:58:54PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Saturday 26 May 2007 23:07, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > and the debian-www team is recovering from the
> > > shock that HTML 4.01 has been released recently and tha
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 11:35:26AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> >Yes, a complete redesign of the website is a herculean task, but
> >contributing to specific pages or parts is trivial. OTOH, I expect that
> >for a webdesign professional even a redesign wo
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 02:23:48PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 27 May 2007 11:13, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > By the way, does anybody knows if it is possible for non-DDs to get
> > write acces ?
>
> Yes it is. The procedure to request commit access describes the difference
> between DDs an
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:44:36PM +0200, Tobias Nadler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a program (called "MyUniverse") that has reached a
> point, where it can show its very basic abilities, but still needs
> much programming effort to fullfill its aims. It is a platform for
> strategy/simula
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 04:00:10PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 13:31 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What you're saying here appears to be that you find Frans' response
> > unhelpful and unconstructive.
> I didn't read it that way. I th
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:39:31AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, if I did use emdebian, I would be mirroring
> > anything I need, and would be rather upset if emdebian tools would
> > insist on clogging my network connection (which I might not
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 04:20:16PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 12:49 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> >
> > > ...
> > > This is only my (ill-informed) opinion - I am neither a German, nor a
> > > German lawyer :)
> >
> >
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 04:04:44PM +0100, Anton Piatek wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to teach myself to package up a program for debian, but can't get
> the manpage I have written to work properly.
> It has the line '.TH CAJUN 1 "June 10, 2007"' near the top of the file and is
> named cajun.1 in t
--
Alex Jones
http://alex.weej.com/
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
--
Mark Reitblatt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:46:08PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> I personally have 6 or 7 U320 73GB 10K RPM SCSI drives that I am not using
> for
> anything interesting. Can anyone tell me if these would be useful to Debian
> or recommend another free software group to donate them?
As shipping m
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 06:20:17PM -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> I would like to ask you interested in our next release to stop and
> look at 'testing' for a while. I believe that now, during the start of
> a development cycle and during debcamp/debconf we've a interesting
> opportunity to review
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:19:00PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Monday 11 June 2007 21:52:09 Kevin Mark wrote:
> > As shipping may be a consideration, in the cost-benefit analysis, it may
> > be useful to say where in the world you are, in a general way, so that
> > som
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 07:56:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> This assumes that experimental is used by a lot of people, which I
> doubt, especially given the default apt pins and the numbers above.
There's also the fact that if you remove experimental it's easy enough
for people to set up their a
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:42PM +0200, sean finney wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 June 2007 06:28:09 Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > I imagine it would be relatively simple to have the postinst generate
> > a random time during the day for a cron script to run, but this
> > doesn't work with anacron -- man
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 02:20:33PM -0400, Zachary Palmer wrote:
> Hello, all. It has been my understanding that the reason that the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] distributed computing software has not been made a Debian
> package is that the license under which it is released does not allow it
> to be fr
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 08:24:22PM +0200, ignatius wrote:
> I have two questions that really concerned me.
>
> - Why it's Debian that fixes bugs and security holes?
There are lots of differences between:
upstream and Debian release goals
upstream and Debian build environment (debian has 10+ arch
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 09:11:04PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:43:45PM +0100, Lior Kaplan wrote:
>
> > Description : Turns on CTL support & sets Hebrew as the default CTL
> > locale
> >
> > This package installs an OO.org extention which turns on CTL support, and
On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 02:50:44AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: sorting-hat
> Version : 1.0.0
> Upstream Author : Erinn Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL :
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 01:04:30PM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
> Em Qua, 2007-06-27 às 19:28 +0330, Amin Shali escreveu:
> > Hi :)
> > Can anyone please sign my key?
>
> No.
>
> Quoting http://www.debian.org/events/keysigning:
>
> "You should never sign a key for somebody else you hav
Hi,
I was just reading an interview[0] of someone from the 'Freetype' project
and he said:
...
Also, I still don't understand why Debian and Ubuntu keep distributing
patent-infringing code in FreeType, while they keep MP3 and DVD playback
out of their normal installs. I'm not even sure it's DFSG co
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:50:52AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> This check would fail many packages that can still be built twice in a
> >> row (any package that runs autotools during the build process without
> >> doing a complicated dance to
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:53:05AM -0600, Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
> show uninformative assembler failure messages. I also made several unanswered
> requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for build-depends installation on
> any developer accessible mips/mipsel machine to try looking at the build to
> fi
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:03:09PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Mark Brown]
> > Did you do this by mailing debian-admin or by using the request
> > tracker[1]? Requests sent via RT should have less chance of being
> > missed.
> Perhaps the link https://rt.deb
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:23:53AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> The problem was due to a subtle change in zlib1g: in newer versions, the
> compressed output has 0x02 instead of 0x00 at the 10th byte (that is in
> the header). This change occurred somewhere between version 1.2.3-13 and
> 1.2.3.3.dfsg-
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 02:40:17PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> >With these fixes it still did not build on my system. I needed to change
> >the Build-Depends on lib64z1-dev into zlib1g-dev to get it to build in a
> >clean pbuilder chroot.
> Well, I gue
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 12:21:52PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> This seems to happen to me most often on the s390 build daemon, and has
> happened with at least 3 to 5 different packages now. (Current example
> is hpodder). In fact, I don't think I've ever seen it happen elsewhere.
> It seems t
ian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493787
--
Mark Hymers
"That's why the good die young; it's because Death can't be bothered to check
the paperwork."
Andy Hamilton, Old Harry's Game
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 04:06:50PM -0400, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 09:57:49PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > I would rather have maintainers spend time improving their packages
> > instead of wasting it trying to figure out why some architecture
> > fail/refuses t
earching manually. Sorry about that.
Please re-upload and I'll re-process it.
Mark
--
Mark Hymers
"But Yossarian *still* didn't understand either how Milo could buy eggs
in Malta for seven cents apiece and sell them at a profit in Pianosa
for five cents."
Catch 22,
),
> and waiting a month for each of them, well, is quite a drag.
You can upload all of them one after the other. We're usually
intelligent enough to process them as a batch.
Mark
--
Mark Hymers
"I once absent-mindedly ordered Three Mile Island dressing in a restaurant
and,
n
(mostly) but still is a bit green/"wet behind the ears" when it comes to
something like a rescue.
Mark Allums
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Mark.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-486
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=locale: Cannot set
LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or
could then be configured to allow source builds of all
additional packages.
Mark.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-486
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (char
value!
Mark
-original message-
Subject: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#498263: kaffeine: please provide
debian/README.source
From: Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 09/09/2008 07:23
Package: kaffeine
Version: 0.8.7-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
policy version 3.8.0 recommends that packages using a
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:21:30PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Come on, we are not trying to imitate Vista. Why do you need to ask tons
> of questions just to report a bug? Their only purpose is to confuse the
> guy reporting a bug and who doesn???t know what this /etc/apt/sources.list
> file
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:46:11PM +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> I had posted a followup to linux.debian.user.german. Now I got a very
> strange mail from a italian host telling me that the post was canceled
> and that I have to subscribe a mailing list.
> What the hell is that about? I did not po
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:55:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I object to a second round of this. I was ok with it once, as a
> compromise, but the understanding I had then was that it was a one-time
> thing, to give time to actually *fix* the problem.
Note that there is currently activ
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:22:25PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 19:11 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:55:00AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > We need the relevant maintainers to be told "your unwillingness to
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:49:40PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 22:26 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > If they were actively stopping people working on these issues then that
> > would be different but I have not seen them doing this.
> Great, so since
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:17:37PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 22:47 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Doing so would be a violation of basic NMU policy.
> The claim was, hey, nobody is stopping anyone from fixing it, if it's
> not fixed, it's lame for people to complain,
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:41:14AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: general
> Severity: serious
> Justification: DFSG
>
> raff.debian.org uses a Compaq Smart 5i RAID card. A flash memory is used
> to store the firmware. While the firmware is freely downloadable (as in
> beer) on HP website
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:10:19AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 18:31 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Because that's how the hardware works. If you are making a widget and
> > you need a fpga or hybrid chip of any sort, then you generate a binary
> > blob using the chip manufac
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 03:41:29PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't think that we should drop the legal review (that would probably
> > be dangerous). However, NEW reviews seem to cover a lot of other
> > aspects currently, which might explain wh
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 06:18:59PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'm not advocating that we just stop doing reviews. But IMHO, NEW
> processing should be about the legal problems, not about the random
> lintian warning/errors, and the various other packaging malpractices.
At least package namesp
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>powertweak
> => Is that still relevant with modern power management policies?
It's nothing to do with power management. I'd rather let it stay until
lenny is rel
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 04:25:17AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 05 d?cembre 2008 ? 22:49 +0000, Mark Brown a ?crit :
> > It's nothing to do with power management. I'd rather let it stay until
> > lenny is released, though if it were the only thing keeping
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:12:04PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 11 d??cembre 2008 ?? 11:46 +0100, Tim Dijkstra a ??crit :
> > It still works, some people still use it... so I do not see any need
> > to remove it now. If the time comes to remove gtk+1.2, digitaldj can
> > go too IYAM.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:34:39PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > I think you completely forgot about the fact that this project is run by
> > people who aren't payed for that.
> >
> > And, yes I didn't fix any RC bug today, nor yesterday. I even have now 3 on
> > medi
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 09:27:55PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Steve McIntyre schrieb:
> > I'm curious about that myself. We've tried that in the past, and a
> > 3-year release cycle was what happened. Experience tells us that we
> > have much too big a system to suddenly one day declare "rele
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell
* Package name: lensfun
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Andrew Zabolotny
* URL : http://lensfun.berlios.de
* License : GPL, MIT/X
Programming Lang: C++ & C
Description : LensCorrection ed
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 09:11:01AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > FSF), Dynebolic, Musix GNU+Linux, BLAG, and Trisquel. So not only is
> > there one such distribution that takes free software of cardinal
> > importance, there are six
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:37:55PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Didn't mean to sound accusatory - more surprised. It was strange that
> one package is commonly affected and others that also changed versions
> were not. Maybe something to do with pattern matching failing when a
> version includes
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 02:44:45PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> On 21.07.2007 13:36 schrieb Brice Goglin:
> > reportbug-ng does *not* gather all the information about the reporters
> > system... see #422085
> This bug is about replicating a reportbug specific feature. In my
As Steve pointed o
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 04:42:48PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.en.html
> /usr/share/bugs was in my opinion a reportbug specific feature, since it
> wasn't documented on the above site on how to report bugs and since it
> was the only program I knew wh
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:11:19PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> On 21.07.2007 18:04 schrieb Frans Pop:
> > $ less /usr/share/doc/reportbug/README.developers
> At least now it should be clear why I assumed it is a reportbug
> *specific* feature.
The first line of that document indicates that t
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 12:57:03AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> I don't know exactly how it happened, but a large number of maintainers
> apparently ignored the discussions on this list and added to their
> packages a dependency on update-inetd.
> This is *TOTALLY WRONG* because the /usr/sbin/updat
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 10:29:52AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Aug 2007, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > I wish for an include mechanism! :)
...
> applicable if you use an include mechanism. Duplication is bad, but it may
> be easier to manage.
Realisitically I expect that if an include
Anand, ARAKI,
We are in the process of moving libosip2 over to the pkg-voip-maintainers
team on alioth.
You are welcome to join the pkg-voip-maintainers team and we will keep
you listed as maintainers of the package.
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 10:03:57PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Let me explain to you the why I have decided to start the project. I
> have searched for a lightweight distribution and none of what is
> available has been what I wanted for one reason or another. I also
> have used IceWM
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 05:11:06PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I came up with nothing on Google for stem linux., and DeliLinux
> looks to be turkish so I don't know if we would even be to
> communicate. I should try talking with them, their desktop looks
> pretty nice. I have already d
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 03:19:02PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> 5/ Fifth example, it looks like 64 bits ports tend to have differences in
> common
> like on libneon2.6 where various functions suffixed by "64" disappear on those
> arches (ne_get_range64, ne_set_request_body_fd64,
> ne_set_requ
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:43:46AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> Has there ever been a case where an RFP bug has actually stimulated anyone
> into packaging a given piece of software?
I packaged TenDRA as a result of an RFP (this predated using the BTS for
WNPP). I'd just packaged it for
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 06:03:05PM -0700, Peter Eckersley wrote:
> This means, in practice, that many sites will be able to track Debian
> users by their User-Agent, even if (say) the user is blocking cookies or
> limiting them to a single session and is changing IP address regularly.
I would str
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 12:39:25PM -0700, Peter Eckersley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 11:36:41 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I would strongly expect that any user sufficiently concerned about
> > these issues to take active steps like those would be willing to use
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 02:57:52AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> > I suppose that everyone are busy today, so do I. I'm a little tired
> > with sponsoring his packages and I know he could to upload his
> > packages by his own.
> >
> > I really don't u
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 07:11:56AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> So, well, despite all arguments developed by Joey in this thread, I
> still think that mass pings can really help maintainers in their work,
> particularly when someone takes over a package that has been neglected
> for some time
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:16:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:47:40AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It might help to do something like use the confirmed tag to flag reports
> > which can readily be reproduced or which otherwise don't need
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 01:27:40PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> I don't miss the point, you miss the fact that the way exists, and is
> marking the bug as "found" in a specific version. It's not a task that
> only the submitter can perform, the maintainer can do that, and it will
> prevent pi
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 03:09:56PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> situation, only makes it more complex as I think the OS field
> of the header zlib generates changed with the versions).
I can't remember if it included the OS field but there were several
informational things that it started ini
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:14:37PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
>
>> * Package name: libpuzzle
>> Description : A library to find similar pictures
>
> The lib sounds very interesting but I would ask the authors to choose
> a not so generic nam
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 10:41:51AM +0200, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
> This is most likely apocryphal. If there is any truth in the above link, it
> has been blown way out of proportion. Nobody gets arrested for using lynx,
> which is what that link says. There is little evidence to corroborate the
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:38:12AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Package name: detach
> Version: 0.2.3-1
> Upstream Author: Robbert Haarman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL: http://inglorion.net/software
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:27:40AM +0200, Philipp Marek wrote:
> How about compiling all programs with debugging information, and strip them
> into a "-dbginfo" package, or something likewise for "apt-get source"? Like
> the "-dev" packages only people who think they need them would install them
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This mail tries to address the problem of not orphaned, poorly maintained
> or useless packages in Debian. The proposal below tries to address both
> cases, because they are often related. (useless packages tend to be poorly
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 06:05:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:33:41PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > If I am a user of one of these packages who may have the skill to adopt
> > it or may know someone who can, I may want to know about its orphaning.
>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 06:38:50PM +0200, Andrea Ferraresi wrote:
> Hello folks,
> I want to install debian lenny on a biostar p4m900 motherboard micro
> ATX on a touchscreen pc...have you ever tried it? what abuot linux
> support?
>
> Thanks AF.
>
> Please cc me i'm currently off list and sorry
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 03:44:30PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:15:42AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> [...]
> > I suggest that, if such a repository will be created for patented
> > codecs, that e.g. sponsored uploads will not be allowed to this
> > archive. I know t
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:54:29PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> The size of the test suite is completely irrelevant. Executing a single
> compiled binary will cause any cross build to break, even if it is a
> 1kb no-op.
Attempting to execute a binary not supported by the host will obviously
fail
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 10:48:55PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> If you run a test you usually *want* to have it fail on build time if
> the test did not go trough. Otherwise running tests is useless - or do
> you check all build logs with every upload?
In the particular case I'm thinking of the
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 09:46:52PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:54:29PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > The size of the test suite is completely irrelevant. Executing a single
> > > compiled
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 12:19:52AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> So there should be a way to disable them if the tests can't work in the
> current build environment.
Don't get me wrong - I think the basic idea is a sensible one, it's just
the making it mandatory bit.
--
"You grabbed my hand and
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:33:58AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Sounds like a bug in the init script. In particular, it sounds like the
> init script is starting some program that's waiting for input on standard
> input. This would be bad when the init script is run during system boot
> as well.
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:08:30PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:06:01PM +0100, SZALAY Attila wrote:
> > I couldn't upload my package into the incoming queue with dupload
> > because I could not connect to ftp-master.debian.org on port 21 and 22.
>
> ftp-master is tempo
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:23:32PM -0500, Gene Kersey wrote:
> Mr Hocevar:
>
> This is my first time communicating with anyone in the Linux
> community, so please forgive me if I have breached some sort of
> protocol. I have been a Linux dabbler, user and supporter for some
> time. One of the de
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:55:50PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> What I'm suggesting is to grep for them in maintainer scripts. Any empty
> directory created in /etc and which isn't used in the maintainer scripts
> is likely to be a mistake.
You'd need to check binaries as well - quite a few t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: merkaartor
Version : 0.0.8
Upstream Author : Bart Vanhauwaert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Merkaartor
* License : GPL
Progr
I have now got packages building and available from buildserver.net
http://status.buildserver.net/packages/status.php?email=&packages=merkaartor&arches=&dists=&subdist=pkg-kde-extra
http://archive.buildserver.net/pool/main/m/merkaartor/
Mark
signature.asc
Description: Thi
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> On 25/11/2007, Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have now got packages building and available from buildserver.net
>
> There is no man page, desktop icon or menu.
Thanks Jeffery,
I didn't say they
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: zope-ploneldap
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Wichert Akkerman
* URL : http://plone.org/products/ploneldap
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: Python
Descr
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 09:42:53PM +0300, William Pitcock wrote:
> > That was opposed quite strongly by the kernel folks last time it was
> > attempted. Were there any fundamental changes in the Xen dom0 patches
> > since then?
> Only by the kernel folks which believe all of the crap that the KVM
to the current state
but none of them seem to have a summary of what the intention is - does
anyone have any information here?
Daniel Baumann
doodle (U)
Mark Brown
nis
Tim Cutts
am-utils
Debian QA Group
unfs3
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
netkit-bootparamd
netkit-rusers
n
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 01:52:43PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> I see that nfs-common depends on portmap | rpcbind. However, nis only depends
> on portmap, and can therefore not be installed at the same time as rpcbind.
Yes, this is the root of the issue - if we're changing what we're doing
with
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 07:17:16PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Ehm, the reason was a bug. nfs-common was broken, if connecting to localhost
> it was only trying ::1, but without a fallback on 127.0.0.1.
> There wasn't any indication in the package that this breakage was on purpose.
> I guess i
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 02:45:27PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> As discussed by a number of people in bug #562757 it appears that
> nfs-kernel-server has kicked off a transition to the use of rpcbind - at
> least, nfs-kernel-server has switched to needing rpcbind and we can't
>
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:11:25AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Marco d'Itri]
> > I maintain the package providing it, but I fear it is the result of
> > cargo cult sysadmining. A driver will not engage the watchdog
> > anyway until /dev/watchdog is opened.
> If I remember correctly, the
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:51:24PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:45:53AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > (BTW, is there any other watchdog daemon? The watchdog package reliably
> > fails to detect when the system is half-killed by OOM.)
> How about explaing your problem
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 12:57:29PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2010, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > This looks like a workaround for some other problem to me. Patting at 0.1Hz
> > should be sufficient if the kernel expects a change at 0.016 Hz. I don't
> > have
> > any r
701 - 800 of 1222 matches
Mail list logo
