Package: general
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
Package: general
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: bullk...@protonmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 06:30:02AM -0700, BugScan reporter wrote:
> Bug stamp-out list for Oct 22 06:02 (CST)
>
> Total number of release-critical bugs: 726
...
> Number that are being ignored: 45
> Number on packages not in testing: 420
> Number concerning the next release (excluding ignored and
ge too? Is it possible to fix this
> sexism problem?
If you draw some (DFSG-free) pictures of naked men for the program, I
hereby promise to patch it to support theming (offer good for two months
from today).
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 15:42, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:01:08 -0600, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 13:26, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> >> Hi again,
> >>
> >> perhaps to bring down the conversation
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:55, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:41:30 -0600, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 15:42, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:01:08 -0600, Joe Wreschnig
> >> <[EMAI
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:36, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:23:21 -0600, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:55, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> And how do we find who we are alienating? Oh, I know: lets have a
> >>
enge/response... A future version will incorporate Sender Policy
Framework (SPF) or similar sender identification systems..."
So not only does it fail to stop spam in any useful way, it doesn't even
fail to do so according to the standard, and it sends out more email
noise while doing so
t;
> I'm pretty sure that FUD got killed last time someone (perhaps you, even)
> raised it. From memory, the FCC rules only state that there must be a means
> for effectively preventing the modification of the firmware used in the
> device. Obscurity is not the only means of doing
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libifp
Version : 0.1.0.11
Upstream Author : Geoff Oakham
* URL : http://ifp-driver.sourceforge.net/libifp/
* License : GNU GPL
Description : library for communicating with iRiver iFP audio devices
libifp al
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: quodlibet
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.sacredchao.net/~piman/software/quodlibet.shtml
* License : GNU GPL
Description : audio library manag
7;s and shopper's
> requirements first. Similarly, other programs are nearly impossible
> to install and use without an IT degree, Zen Cart can be installed and
> set-up by anyone with the most basic computer skills. Others are so
> expensive ... not Zen Cart, it's
at least has the excuse different architectures need different versions.
Why not hold up the examples of the tens of thousands of packages that
only have one version, even though they are development "frameworks"? To
pick one of extreme complexity, Perl. Perl migrations go smoother tha
pace
requirements.
However, it probably shouldn't be default. A hard link would be a pretty
incompatible change if someone modifies the file after it's been
dh_installed (I don't have any concrete examples, but I suspect
something does it, if only because 13000 packages guarantees
cial standards for the character set and
terminal specifications are, but people who are interested are going to
be looking for "ANSI" or "ANSI graphics", not a standards document
number.
(Compare the usage of "ISOs" to refer to CD images regardless of their
status
ship between RC bugs in testing
and new packages. But I would like to have something concrete to tell
upstream developers when they ask me why, despite my having a package
ready a month ago, their users still can't get it via APT. Right now I
just have to mumble something about sarge, busy
"Chip Salzenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who does a developer have to fuck around here to get his key deleted?
I'm not sure your resignation was valid. Most important debian mechanisms
require a signature from a key in the keyring.
It is hard for anybody
"Chip Salzenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who does a developer have to fuck around here to get his key deleted?
--
Chip Salzenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wait. Ignore my previous post. I had forgotten that the resignation post was
indeed signed. It might howeve
Jérôme Marant said:
Quoting Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Jérôme Marant schrieb:
> Is it currently possible to upload amd64 packages to ftp-master?
No.
Well. Yes. Of course you can upload. They just get rejected. :)
Not good. What is missing to get this fixed?
Well There are two mi
"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/5/05, Ivan Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Example: (/etc/apt/sources.list)
deb http://ftp.en.debian.org/debian main stable contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian main stable contrib non-free
"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/5/05, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Olaf van der Spek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 12/5/05, Ivan Adams <[EM
"Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:46:12PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
You have failed to detail any particular difficulty that this causes,
I'm pretty sure I saw him do this already, by noting that it increases the
n
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I won't complain, I'll just send a friendly assassin to your house :-)
A friendly assasin? Is that the type that comes in, talks with you for a
while, and eventually offers you a poisioned beer?
--
To UNSUBS
"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Furthermore, /dev/shm is a mount point with a _very_ specific function.
It's a bad idea to start using it for something else.
Reality check: packages have been using it for a long time and the world
has not fallen yet
"Michael Vogt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:22:50AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Michael Vogt]
> Sorry for the delay. I'm preparing a new upload that adds the 2006
> archive key to the default keyring.
Sounds good. Will this aut
ly also meant 'Debian GNOME Maintainers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
"Joey Hess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
debconf
debconf-english
debconf-i18n
These are all necessary, and debconf is an essential package which is
not subject to the circular dependency postinst ordering problems afaik.
Well
t 6 months ago, but then never got back to
me, so as far as I know there are no users of it. It is fully tested and
simple enough that it probably won't require any maintenance beyond
Python transitions.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
, while the original, offensive message is sitting on d-d-a.
If you are upset by how Andrew acted, talk to him rationally, regardless
of whether it's public or private.
If you are *very* upset by how Andrew acted, there is an appropriate and
agreed-to policy for expelling developers. Roger Leigh
gabytes installed, with no non-Essential
> dependencies.
>
> (strictly an observation of fact; I'm not expressing an opinion either way
> about the change)
The python-minimal I see depends on all of python2.3. In Ubuntu perhaps
it's 2MB, but in Debian right now it's almo
I agree with Steve. Unless we're going to make this package Essential,
it's kind of pointless (unless compatibility with Ubuntu is a primary
goal -- maybe it should be, but then someone needs to explain why,
because it's not obviosu to me). And I don't see a need to make i
so that it could be Essential: yes,
> not to support stripped-down Python installations.
So why does Debian need/want python-minimal?
(This is a question mostly for Matthias, I think, but if you know the
answer that's great.)
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 12:12 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> debian-python Cc'ed
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 07:02:32PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > > This is something that Python upstream explicitly does not want; the only
> > > reason for creating python
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 09:31 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:36:13PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 12:12 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Some reasons:
> > >
> > > * compatability with Ubuntu -- so that packa
the motions without actually changing our Python packaging or
upgrading the version, so we just got all of Python as Essential. No one
wanted that.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
not "I'd like to write
scripts in X" but "There is this large body of people writing scripts in
X, and it'd be nice if we could work with them."
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
amer, so this
doesn't solve a real problem. I would rather see either
1) -ugly get past NEW, we get MAD, users get MP3 decoding, situation
stays as its been for years, or
2) We take the patent issue seriously, and drop all MP3 support.
(Speaking with my hat as a DD, and as upstream mai
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 17:08 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2006 12:10, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2) We take the patent issue seriously, and drop all MP3 support.
>
> MP3 software does not belong in Debian/main. Unlike many patent
ou don't get the patent license. So we're back at the status quo,
but with an MP3 decoder that's worse than the one we currently don't
have a patent license for.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 07:59 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > To get this license one must agree to a contract that forbids
> > modification and further redistribution. It's not going to happen for
> > Debian.
>
> Ok, when its not DFSG-compli
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 19:58 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2006 17:40, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 17:08 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > MP3 software does not belong in Debian/main. Unlike many patents the
>
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 09:35 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> > AFAIK that's only if you want to distribute their binary. If you want to
> > distribute their source, then that's just the MIT license.
>
"Adeodato Simó" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can we please fast-track this clairvoyant NM?
Umm... I belive that is the policy. He needs to have his email read, and
then answer a few questions.
The process for returning emeritus Developers is intentionaly much
Best stock for Year 2006 - read the story and you will s e e f o r y o u
r s e l f.
Breaking news alert issue - big news coming.
A $1,000 dollar investment could yield a $4,000 dollar profit in
just ONE trade if you trade out at the top.
The stocks we profile show a significant increase in st
"Florian Weimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Chad Walstrom:
I'm trying to package up tex2page and noticed that there is no virtual
package for scheme-interpreter. I would like to specify in the
"Depends:" that some sort of scheme-interpreter is required inst
"Stuart Yeates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the USA copyright can be enforced even on laws:
http://www.constructionweblinks.com/Resources/Industry_Reports__Newsletters/May_17_2004/supreme.html
I'm assuming that the legislation in question included the code
"Manoj Srivastava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do not know what GR's are currently open (despite mails
on -announce about them), asnd do not know how to simply look it up
on vote.debian.org, the subject matter is irrelevent to you anyway.
Sorry to change the topic, but looking at some of the manpages in the
"manpages" package,
and some of the pages in the "manpages-dev" causes me no notice some pages
that look like they probably should be in a different package.
ld-linux(8)
ld-linux.so(8)
These probably belong in libc6 which ap
"Philip Charles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have built up a fine-grained mirroring script over time which not only
selects the architecture but also the version (stable, testing etc) to be
mirrored. Unfortunately this script will require ftp/http access
to ..
"Sergio Callegari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have this directory on an Ubuntu system and it seems to be present
on recent Debian systems too...
It is on tmpfs.
Can anybody tell me what is its purpose (as many other distros don't
have it) and when it gets moun
"MJ Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MFT is broken by design. No-one should expect to remote control other
people's mail clients. All one can do is ask and if you want to ask in
the headers, fine, but don't go flaming when it gets lost in the noise.
All of From
sorry, but i disagree with you on that. For me volatile is handling
packages with volatile data, not for handling packages the stable
release manager denys to take into a stable release.
I've not followed this bug but AIUI SRM has approved the package for the
next point release.
If the bug i
"Jeroen van Wolffelaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 07:42:12PM +0100, Joop PG4I wrote:
I have uploaded morse-2.1 about 2 weeks ago.
Nothing heard if it will get accepted or not.
Wondering what is going on Is ftp-master overlo
"Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006, Martin Schulze wrote:
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. März 2006 18:29 schrieb Martin Schulze:
> > The Debian project happily announces the re-availability of the
> > packages.
"Rene Engelhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enforcing this policy to existing font packages is not in the top
priority of the team.
What is a policy useful for when most packages are not following it? I
think if there's a sane policy people should have to mi
"Sven Luther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, will use that nexty time. I don't know if native speaker realise
this, because many non-native speaker seem to have a fluent english, but
there
are times when the right words just don't come, and you are graspin
e file could be deleted if it was
empty (after removing a section, say)....
Has this already been discussed and thrown out?
- Joe
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
? I'd be willing to
write the config utility if I could get some sort of buy-in that it would
actually be embraced by the package maintainers if the utility didn't
suck.
- Joe
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
T
if a system had any of the packages/versions that are
vulnerable?
- Joe
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
. all 5 minutes apart. However, that's about at the top of the scale
of tackiness and inelegance, IMHO.
- Joe
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
laces
everything between "# BEGIN someclient" and "# END someclient" with the
new section. So... it wouldn't be all that difficult to add the other
features I've mentioned.
The only problem is that it uses Perl. I haven't read the Debian policies
so I do
ebating whether to
even bother putting in a command-line switch to turn that behavior off.
- Joe
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
ebianism?)
If everybody in the Linux game is migrating to libc6, then what are the
other piecewise-upgradable distributions (like RedHat) doing to avoid
ugliness like what we're facing?
- Joe
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
ts higher than 255 in IP addresses).
Caldera says that it's all going to e GPL'd. The only question now is, how
long it is going to take.
- Joe
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libmusepack
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : The Musepack Development Team
* URL : http://www.musepack.net
* License : 3-clause BSD
Description : Musepack (MPC) format decoder library
libmusepack allows you
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pyflac
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : David Collett
* License : GPL
Description : Free Lossless Audio Codec [Python bindings]
FLAC stands for Free Lossless Audio Codec. Grossly oversimplified, FLAC is
similar to O
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pymusepack
* URL : http://www.sacredchao.net/~piman/software/python.shtml
* License : GNU GPL v2
Description : Musepack (MPC) decoder library [Python bindings]
libmusepack allows you to decode files in the Musepack au
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pymodplug
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Joe Wreschnig
* URL : http://sacredchao.net/~piman/software/python.shtml
* License : GNU GPL v2
Description : ModPlug mod-like music shared libraries [Python
f US law.
(But then, Clinton never did anything worth knowing anyway, did he?)
It's not hard to find information about the measures Debian has taken
for crypto export compliance, which do involve sending information a
government mailbox (albeit one that probably goes unread) about our
exports:
bian's (and since it uses dh_python, nothing in the package is
changed for it to do that).
I'd be happy if it just said "Foo Bar is the Debian maintainer for this
package; there is no Ubuntu maintainer. Foo Bar may not be able to help
you if you are having problems." or something similar. Right now it
indicates that we're Ubuntu maintainers, and that's just wrong.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
unsubscribe
--
Joe Bowman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
magic smoke.
For that reason, could interested developers please NMU lxdoom? It
has a couple of patches in the bts that should be applied.
Thanks very much to any who can help.
Joe
PS: Not subscribed to -devel, please CC me.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
The upstream folks are planning to split cogito and git into two separate
packages. I requested (and they seemed to agree) that they change the
package name from git to something else before then. Hopefully they'll
see the light and try to play nice with the rest of the world.
Hmm... It look
What is interesting is that this worm will not send to addresses that
contain:
berkeley
bugs
bsd
fsf.
gnu
kernel
linux
mozilla
unix
the.bat
root
sendmail
listserv
So it looks like the worm tries to avoid open source or free software sites.
The worm contains may other no-sends, in categogories l
"Goswin von Brederlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
On Aug 01, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, pbuilder and debootstrap are considered absolutely critical for
serious work.
That's a bold statement.
--
c
"Ben Pfaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
No problem at all. Especially with gmane.org around. I used to
subscribe to dozens of mailing lists, but now I can just browse
all of them as newsgroups.
I agree, I use Gm
"Sven Luther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:27:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 30, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian must decide whether it wants to ship BLOBs with licensing which
> technically does not permit
"Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 11:39:51AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
"Joe Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I really wonder why mailing lists are so common.
It sort of depend
"Jeremy Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:14:19AM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
Ok, this is a good argument.
I think the oppinion is more or less clear:
Some people think it would be a nice idea, BUT it can be also a problem
because so
"Frans Pop" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 22:25, Berke Durak wrote:
I will just say that in my opinion, a repository such as stable,
testing or unstable should be self-contained.
For stable and testing that is true. However, sid is broken by design as
it
"Andreas Tille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of libgtkdatabox-0.2.3.0-0. Until now there
was no request for an update of the upstream version and I had
personal reasons to stay with an outdated version. Now I was
asked to package the late
"Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:32:52PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seems to me that this should be at least a bug report on alsa-utils.
> I'm surprised that there would be a
"Steve Langasek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 09:00:53PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
The alsa-utils package depends on python-minimal.
As a result, I must now have two versions of python installed. That's
a bug.
alsa-utils should de
"Rogério Brito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there.
I think that this may be interesting to anybody that has to work with
computers that are not the latest/more recent as most people in richer
countries seem to have.
It seems to be that a good amount of peopl
"Frank Küster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hendrik Sattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, version 3.7.2.0 is neither in unstable nor at
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
Both only have version 3.7.1.0. How comes that the PTS has a newer
version
th
"Raphael Hertzog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems to me that it is unreasonable for the PTS to be updated before
the
policy package actually hits the mirrors.
There is a period of time after a package leaves incomming but before the
mirrors are updated when
"Lionel Elie Mamane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get source ${PACKAGE}
cp -R ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION} ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION}.pristine-deb
cd ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION}
# hack away
cd ..
diff --recursive -u ${PACKAGE}-${VERSION}.pristine-deb
${PACKAGE}-${VERSION} > d
"Matt Taggart and others" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi debian-devel,
For a couple years now a few of us have been talking about an idea called
"multiarch". This is a way to seamlessly allow support for multiple
different
binary targets on the same system, for
"Adam Borowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:49:26PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
On the other hand, if we continue that thought process we could end up
with all headers and libraries in /usr/share/, which is absurd.
Why?
"Daniel Ruoso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Em Qui, 2006-05-11 às 09:56 +0200, Gabor Gombas escreveu:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:33:45PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Why would that not fly?
> Both versions of the arch-independent package could be installed a
"David Moreno Garza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Luca Capello wrote:
As a side note, while my passport was valid (re-newed the day before
leaving for Mexico because I forgot it was expired after 5 years and
not 10), I didn't get any Mexican seal when I arrived a
"Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Claiming that what Martin did was good since he was showing something
useful
for our community is equivalent to saying it was a "red team attack".
Nobody
used that term explicitly probably because t
"Martijn van Oosterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/7/06, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Sure. SPI owns many of the machines that Debian owns. If any o
"Ian Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy Hankins writes ("Non-DD's in debian-legal"):
I'm not sure I understand this part, though. Do you think that folks
like myself, who are not DD's, should not participate in the discussions
on d-l?
Actually, I thi
"Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: googleearth-package
Upstream Author : Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : (native packag
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, I agree that it's ok to trust installer source that they will not
install a backdoor into your system.
However, chances that they will write to directories that should be under
control of package manager, o
"Wesley J. Landaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Smith wrote:
Is this really needed? Google was very careful in making sure that the
package installs in /usr/local, and does not interfere with the
system. Normally the main reason why a d
"Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:18:11PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
In cases where a security bug is being fixed, you usually try to
upload the package as soon as possible. If your sponsor is on
We did
"Petr Vandrovec" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since this seems to have been an intentional behavior change by
upstream to better align with a published standard, I'm uninclined to
fight it, and think our best response is to update our utilities to
include the --wildcards option, with
"Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006 21:35:19 +0200
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 09:20:34PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> With the 2.6 kernel programs using OSS for sound are not working
> anymo
1 - 100 of 353 matches
Mail list logo
