On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:36, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:23:21 -0600, Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:55, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> And how do we find who we are alienating? Oh, I know: lets have a > >> GR. > > > Don't put words in my mouth. I hate GRs. > > That, unfortunately, may be the only recourse you have, if > this thing ever gets packaged.
You seem to be under the false impression I am vehemently against packaging hot-babe. In reality, I only wanted people to consider the legal (rather than ethical) consequences. Early in the thread the conversation was veering off in stupid directions about whether or not it was sexist or whether or not we want 13 year olds seeing it; I wanted to get it off of that. Since it seems that at least some people (such as yourself) have considered it as a legal issue and think it not a problem, I am fine supporting its entry into main, as I have stated elsewhere in this thread. I am open to a common sense resolution of the issue -- provided people are actually addressing the issue (which the vast majority of participates in this thread are not). This will be my last post on this topic; it's wasted too much of everyone's time already. -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
