On Mon Apr 21, 10:05am -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 19-Apr-03, 11:44 (CDT), David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > From debconf-devel(8): "low: Very trivial items that have defaults that
> > will work in the vast majority of cases; oinly contro
On Wed Apr 23, 09:35pm +0200, Wilmer van der Gaast wrote:
> Bug 183186 seems to be stopping irss-text 0.8.6 from entering Sarge, but
> IMHO the bug is not quite release critical. Botti is just a small part
> of irssi, not used by 90% of the package users (at least, I think so).
> (Maybe it should b
On Sat Apr 26, 07:36pm +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> * The /etc/init.d/ scripts would need to add "need otherscript" (and
> sometimes "provide something"). As I think it is a very bad idea to edit
> these scripts in our post-install (and try to reedit them in
> pre-remove)) one would have to fi
ded. Better to build one
ten-lane highway than build five two-lane highways(for lots of reasons,
and the analogy holds).
David Barclay Harris, Clan Barclay
Aut agere, aut mori. (Either action, or death.)
pgpW77l7kLroh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e so.
David Barclay Harris, Clan Barclay
Aut agere, aut mori. (Either action, or death.)
pgpyAYzGRErVa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hiii olkjsadflkja laskfakssfksj lkjasdlkj asdlf
kj sdlfkj asdglkj sldkfj
--
.--=-=-=-=--=---=-=--
spiffy, if you ask me. And
like I said, it'd be nice to be able to 'apt-get source quake2' and read
what they've written.
--
.--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori
data.
Maybe I'm splitting hairs, but I think that, at least morally, it's
allright to put Quake2 in main.
--
.--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut ager
On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 00:44:39 +1100,
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 08:35:34AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> > Come on ... this is a cool-factor thing, at least partially :)
> > Having Quake II source in Debian would be pretty spiffy, i
pgpHhthiP6Qsp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001 21:58:34 +0100
"Tom Jongsma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm running debian potato right now. I want to upgrade it to Debian
> Woody, but I don't have a free internet connection. Can I update my
> potato by burning a cd on school. And Install it on my machine at
> home? I can't
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:56:58 +0100
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it would be possible, you know. an RPM that basically substitutes
> every installed RPM by the corresponding DEB. that would rock ;)
Well, what you're suggesting isn't really feasible ;)
But it would be feasible to pac
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 18:18:41 +0100
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ps: please don't cc me on list responses.
Yeah, my apologies. Hit the wrong keybinding :)
pgpuw3oHQFncR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
till call it nontrivial, and rather extraordinarily
difficult to automate.
--
.--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori. \
\Clan Barclay Either action, or death./
`---==-=-=-=-===-=---=--='
pgpPTsGtFjnbL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-19
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ipm
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : phlux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://udpviper.com/project.php?project=ipm
* License : GPL
Description : PHP-based tasklist/project ma
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 1998 at 11:40:30PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > Package: bootdisk (pseudo)
> > Maintainer: Maintainer Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 20779 Debian 2.0 won't boot of a hard disk after install
> >
David Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 08:35:47PM +0100, Chris Reed wrote:
> >As listed in The Hamm Bugs Stamp-Out List for 1998-06-08, p3nfs is still
> >linked against libc5, and the maintainer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Billy
> >C.-M. Chow) cannot be contacted.
> >
> >I have
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "There's always one more bug"
> I got it. At least, I got one...
>
> Adam P. Harris writes:
> > I know there were a few cyrix-specific fixes introduced in 2.0.34.
> > Maybe some of the people experiencing
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've never had the kernel glitch on any of these (thankfully!) Sounds like
> there may be some obscure problems - I know the pre-patches did not work
> well on master. Perhaps we should chuck .34 on murphy and master and see
> how it handles there? - Le
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 1998 at 01:07:33AM +0200, Remco Blaakmeer wrote:
> > > [Yeah, it's new software -- it's also the best way to keep the hamm
> > > upgrade from completely breaking an existing debian installation.]
> > The autoup.sh script also does the job well, doesn't it?
>
Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) writes:
>
> > (a) we need specific installation instructions for upgrading. Igor,
> > is this supposed to be part of the install.sgml document, or is it
> > separate?
> >
Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) writes:
> > Interesting. Apparently, there's going to be coverage of these topics
> > in the release notes, not the install.sgml document.
> >
> > Volunteers? I'm a bit overc
At 16 Jun 1998 11:42:39 -0400, Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam P. Harris) writes:
>
> >
> > Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I will be out of town after tomorrow for about a week, so I won't
>
Peter Maydell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fabrizio Polacco wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 14, 1998 at 11:10:13PM +0200, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> man-db installs Spanish, Italian and German versions of its manpages,
> >> as well as English ones.
> >
> >This is one of the goals of Debian.
> >It is surely t
Dan Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will do, then. This leaves me one big question, though. This is going
> to require mixing four things:
> (A) apache 1.3.0
> (B) netgod's massive apache diff
> (C) mod_perl upstream -- probably going to version it by date and use
> the CVS tree instead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory S. Stark) writes:
> I asked once earlier, but no one responded:
> Does anyone know how PAM modules should be packaged?
Gregory, I'm sorry I cannot provide good technical information. I do
know that we had backed out PAM-ifying hamm sometime last year. I
think we shou
Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What sorts of things can pam do? I only know that for example a long
> program that uses PAM works regardless of weather the password file is
> shadowed or not, but can it do more advanced authentication, ie. could it be
> used to replace radius?
PAM, a
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 22 Jun 1998, Rob Browning wrote:
> > Good luck. It would be great if you come up with one, but I fear it's
> > going to be a lot of work for essentially a *really* minor aesthetic
> > gain.
> >
> > One way this could almost be handled is with and addi
I suspect strongly that many packages are doing full 'texconfig init'
runs rather than running texconfig only for their relevant packages.
An example in this case is jadetex. It runs (it's own copy of)
'texconfig init' rather than just generating .fmt's for what it is
installing (jadetex and pdfj
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Sat, Oct 03, 1998 at 06:32:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava écrivait:
> > I agree.
>
> I do not. Perl 5.005 and the new perl-thread seems to interest a lot of
> people. But if we don't switch to perl5.005 right now, they would presumably
> download
Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the *right* way to sync to slink (or any other distribution)?
> I looked into dftp and found that it seems more like a method for
> installing new packages than keeping in sync with the most recent
> versions.
>
> The main thing I'm trying to avoid
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> On Sat, Oct 03, 1998 at 06:57:54AM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> > > I thought 2.2 was going to be "rc", and 3.0 would be "woody". Johnnie
> > > Ingram was pushing for that one, as were a few others.
> >
> > But didn't an even earlier discussion c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale E. Martin) writes:
> I maintain cdparanoia, which has bug #23236 filed against it. This is an
> alpha version of the software, and the bug is that a feature isn't yet
> implemented.
> I don't want this to keep this package out of the new
> release, as its base functionalit
FWIW, I think having McAfee .debs, even in non-free, would be a win.
However, another thought occurred to me. Stephen, could you ask them
to clarify the licensing of their DAT files? If they are indeed free,
as http://www.nai.com/download/updates/whatdat.asp> seems to
imply, someone oughta look
Roberto Lumbreras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday, October 9 1998, at 21:19:38, James Troup wrote:
> : Look at fakeroot's shlibs file. This is not a bug (or certainly not
> : the one you're claiming it is).
> Ok. Of course, you are right ;) I've added (>= 2.0.7u) to
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/
"James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>A link has been added from all the /Pics -> ../english/Pics on
> master.
>They weren't added to CVS as it doesn't handle special files very well.
>Its only important that master have them anyway, so the pages the public
> sees
>have t
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One wonders why you don't. Thisporting effort seems to lead to a lot of
> bitter people being involved in it. One wonders why. Anyhow, TTFN.
Well, I think I can see why. Because porting is a thankless and
gruelling task. You come head to head with every li
"Christopher C. Chimelis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is true, and this should be fixed, IMO. If "Debian", as an entity,
> is making a decision to become multi-arch supportive, then maybe it's
> time to update the older rules that were made when x86 was the only
> arch, and time to implemen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I introduced a severe bug. Could you try the next prelimnary
> version and tell me if it works for you?
> ftp://ftp.infodrom.north.de/pub/people/joey/debian/sysklogd_1.3-29.2_i386.deb
Works for me. I was getting hangs
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > around compiling all the i386 stuff for the other archs. But
>> nobody > goes around compiling the stuff from the other archs for
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
