On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 00:44:39 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 08:35:34AM -0500, David B Harris wrote: > > Come on ... this is a cool-factor thing, at least partially :) > > Having Quake II source in Debian would be pretty spiffy, if you ask > > me. And like I said, it'd be nice to be able to 'apt-get source > > quake2' and read what they've written. > > If it's just source (with no useful binary package), why should > it be packaged? Why can't you download it directly from the > web if it interests you?
One word; 'debuild' :) See my response to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Re: Quake 2 sources GPL'd) for the rest of my feelings on the matter :) -- .--=====-=-=====-=========----------=====-----------=-=-----=. / David Barclay Harris Aut agere, aut mori. \ \ Clan Barclay Either action, or death. / `-------======-------------=-=-----=-===-=====-------=--=----'
pgp5jgNiN2xQb.pgp
Description: PGP signature