On Sun, 23 Dec 2001 00:44:39 +1100,
  Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 08:35:34AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> > Come on ... this is a cool-factor thing, at least partially :)
> > Having Quake II source in Debian would be pretty spiffy, if you ask
> > me. And like I said, it'd be nice to be able to 'apt-get source
> > quake2' and read what they've written.
> 
> If it's just source (with no useful binary package), why should
> it be packaged? Why can't you download it directly from the
> web if it interests you?

One word; 'debuild' :)

See my response to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Peter Makholm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Re: Quake 2 sources GPL'd) for the rest of my
feelings on the matter :)

--
 .--=====-=-=====-=========----------=====-----------=-=-----=.
/    David Barclay Harris            Aut agere, aut mori.      \
\        Clan Barclay              Either action, or death.    /
 `-------======-------------=-=-----=-===-=====-------=--=----'

Attachment: pgp5jgNiN2xQb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to