As the new maintainer of psutils, I have rebuilt the package as ELF. No
other modifications were made to the package.
As I have not yet obtained the upstream source, I have been unable to
create a diff file for this package (I had to fake out dchanges with a
fraud .diff.gz file). It is my unde
As the new maintainer of the libident package, I have rebuilt it as ELF
and uploaded the binary package and the source tar.gz to Incoming.
As with the other packages I have picked up, I have no upstream source,
so couldn't create a diff file.
Here's the .changes file:
Date: 19 Dec 95 13:21 UT
As the new maintainer of the gmp package, I have rebuilt it as ELF. No
other changes have been made to this package.
As with the other packages I maintain, I have not yet obtained the
upstream source, so there is no .diff file.
The source and binary packages have been uploaded to Incoming.
He
As per several requests, and with help finding the upstream source from
Ray, I have been able to create and upload to
ftp.debian.org/debian/private/project/Incoming the diff file for the m4
release 1.4 R2.
Although this is a trivial diff file, this fulfills all the requirements
for installati
-1.3.2-2.deb
20c80f8cb322cbf9b08b7662a130c500 gmp-1.3.2-2.tar.gz
e7ca90a22fa12c481ea9cc87a6ff43c7 gmp-1.3.2-2.diff.gz
a64b6ab7c1cf37af944ad7680cee gmp-1.3.2-2.deb
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
aea0fe477057c31fa0c323b0e1b2489b libident-0.17-1.deb
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
This upload fixes architecture and name issues for this package.
Date: 27 Jun 96 21:26 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: libident
Version: 0.17-2
Binary: libident
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
libident: li
Figured I'd bring this puppy up to date as well.
Date: 28 Jun 96 20:45 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: m4
Version: 1.4-3
Binary: m4
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
m4: GNU m4 - a macro processing langu
position information on my former
> packages:
>
> bc-1.03 gone to Austin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cvs-1.8.1 gone to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> diff-2.7gone to Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ed-0.2 gone to Austin Donnelly
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
27.
I will mark this as done...
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
This fixes the architectural problems in the source.
Date: 02 Aug 96 13:36 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gmp
Version: 1.3.2-3
Binary: gmp
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
gmp: Multiprecision arithmetic l
itor is installed, ae can be removed without difficulty.
(Actually I think the above problem is aleviated by removing ESSENTIAL
from ae, but the editor provides helps maintain the existance of some
editor on the system)
Later,
Dwarf
-
This fixes the description bug.
Date: 02 Aug 96 13:34 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: libident
Version: 0.17-2
Binary: libident
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
libident: a simple RFC1413 client library
C
This repairs the architecture bug reported against this package.
Date: 02 Aug 96 16:44 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: diff
Version: 2.7-11
Binary: diff
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
diff: File comp
everything runs fine... :-S
Any pointers would be appreciated,
Dwarf
------
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mai
On Sun, 4 Aug 1996, Guy Maor wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> > cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake -w all
>
> > cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake - all
>^ (no w)
>
> Was that a typo on your part?
>
No! Not a typo. This is the
On Mon, 5 Aug 1996, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> You (Dale Scheetz) wrote:
> > No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed
> > when debian.rules calls for a make, and when I call for the same make.
> >
> > The line in the Makefile is:
Ian, Provides/Conflicts is to be
used when you wish your package to be the only one providing the given
feature. I think that Provides/Replaces is not that strict in it's
implimentation. That is, it will allow other packages to be in the system
with this feature.
Luck,
Dwarf
Thanks to Ian for the excelent description of imapd. This will close the
description bugs against this package.
Date: 25 Jul 96 22:34 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: pine
Version: 3.94-3
Binary: imapd pico pine
Archit
).
Also, if you have changed your pine configuration in any way, I need to
see your .pinerc file. (Send me this stuff in private e-mail)
Thanks,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexi
On 8 Aug 1996, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miquel van Smoorenburg) wrote on 05.08.96 in <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>:
>
> > You (Dale Scheetz) wrote:
> > > No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed
> > > when debian.
e. Try a lower case p and see if
that works as you expect.
Luck,
Dwarf
---- --
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
I removed the Essential field and added Provides: editor as well as
incorporating the Architecture field correctly.
Date: 08 Aug 96 23:27 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: ae
Version: 962-8
Binary: ae
Architecture:
ssed through the
> environment already, so using -$(MAKEFLAGS) is (1) redundant (2) wrong
> if there are no options already given...
>
I believe the make file comes with the upstream source. I can, of course,
modify it.
Thanks for all the help guys, I think I can take it from here ;-)
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
On Fri, 9 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dale Scheetz writes ("Re: New virtual package names. "):
> ...
> > On another note, is there an editor virtual package? Is there any interest
> > in adding one? It could be valuable to add Provides: editor to ae (and
> &g
couraging
users to talk to me first about problems with my packages, and I will
continue to do so. I see no reason for those who disagree with this
attitude to continue to point it out.
If we really need to grind on the differences in our personal philosophy
we should probably do it on debian-priva
On Wed, 21 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dale Scheetz writes ("Re: New virtual package names. "):
> > On Fri, 9 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
> ...
> > > Noone is going to deinstall all the editors on their system and not
> > > notice what they've d
he term) and programs that depend on them belong in
contrib (or non-free if they have distribution restrictions).
Luck,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software
k,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
free.
Luck,
Dwarf
------
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
----------
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
of an editor on the system, I would be happy to hear it.
In addition, it is not clear to me that being unnecessary is the same as
undesirable. I can be convinced (no, really!) of either position at this
point. I just need a little more 'splaining.
Thanks,
Dwarf
Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
On Tue, 27 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Dale Scheetz writes ("Re: New virtual package names. "):
> >... Part of my concerns stem from the past history of ae. I have
> > only recently taken over the maintainance of this package. When I got it,
> > the essential
On 27 Aug 1996, Rob Browning wrote:
> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > (Until they try to remove all editors)
>
> I don't want to cause trouble, but why don't we just completely
> disallow the removal of ae. It's harmless, and the entire
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
nd is strict enough to require special intervention with dselect in
order to install a package without it's recommends. The policy on these
conditions should be made more clear.
Thoughts?
Dwarf
--
aka Da
h more authority than myself agrees with you, I am
disinclined to re-release the old version. Barring further instructions
from that direction, I will close this bug report.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phon
ft me with that impression. (I was
sure that someone less ignorant than myself would surely correct me if I
was wrong)
Luck,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software
ast be some mention of their
usefulness in the description somewhere.
Thanks for the help,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Cree
be able to cash it.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
ing to
it's host tree. That way they would be less pre-mature.
Thanks,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters
On Wed, 4 Sep 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I got several errors about the failure of getpwd to return a path.
>
> One of the directories above the current directory is not readable?
>
By root? Pwd works ok. I'll keep an e
ed" functionality, so at the most, it might need to
appear in the suggests list. On the other hand, if one of the programs
providing functionality in the package actually needs this file to
operate, then yes, emacs should be in the dependancy list.
Luck,
Dwarf
gives the error: "invalid date format"
Ian, how do you do this? Anybody?
TIA,
Dwarf
------
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek
see this in the docs somewhere?
Thanks,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e supported (at least in
the kernel) for quite some time (read forever...).
Luck,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
ooked
through the new docs with no success (my index karma again probably). Is
there a method of picking up this information from a central source in the
package?
TIA,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 23:33:40 -0400
Source: diff
Binary: diff
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.7-11
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
diff - File comparison utilities
C
that seems to confirm this
> conclusion.
>
> This is *very* annoying ...
>
Well, like the doctor said: "If it hurts when you do that, just don't do
that". ;-)
Seriously, I'll see what I can figure out.
Luck,
Dwarf
cessity. For others it may be totaly unnecessary. How do I determin
which level of depends to use (if any)?
Help me decide which is correct by sending your suggestion via private
e-mail. I will summarize the vote back to the list so we can see just how
much consensus can be had
html file, then choose file/save as
and change the file format from "Source" to "PostScript" and click "OK".
This should get you the format you want.
Luck,
Dwarf
-------- --
aka Dale Scheetz
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
t were pine, pico, and
imapd. I suspect that at least one package in the group must have the name
of the source, although the rational for such a thing escapes me. Can you
name at least one of the packages the same as the source?
Luck,
Dwarf
has libc5,
ncurses and some xlib things. You will need to add the desired dependency
information to /etc/dpkg/shlibs.default if I am not mistaken.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
therwise, every time I pick up a new package I am likely to
need to add one, or more, libraries to this file.
Later,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 19:55:31 -0400
Source: pine
Binary: imapd pico pine
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.95L-1
Distribution: non-free
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
imapd - remote mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 22:43:15 -0400
Source: gmp
Binary: gmp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
gmp- Multiprecision arithmetic l
------
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
On Wed, 18 Sep 1996, Guy Maor wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> > I am converting the joe package to the new source format and have run into
> > a strange problem.
>
> What version of tar are you using? tar 1.11.11 is a beta that changes
> tar
z file without error. Shouldn't the script be able to do so as
well?
If I fix this in the original source (so there is no hard link) don't I
violate the "pristine source" requirements?
Thanks,
Dwarf
---- --
aka
by the same application. I can only
assume that if your case differs from this scenerio you should not expect
useful results.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Softw
/usr/bin/dpkg-source has fixed the problem for me. I can now
extract from the orig.tar.gz with no errors.
Thanks Heiko!
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software F
rst place. Or maybe patch/diff.
Let me see if I can fix this instance at my end.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critte
n
you can find it at ftp://dwarf.polaris.net/debian.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [
tions.
Since the original source is "supposed" to look as much like the "prisine"
source as possible, the "-" is kept in the source path. The "_" convention
is only for the various distribution files.
Luck,
Dwarf
it should probably be linked to the pic versions
of these libraries, since it is supposed to run on the base system.
What should we do about it? Is there some reason your system builds the
package static?
Thanks,
Dwarf
---- --
aka
your architecture different in this reguard?
Thanks,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PR
linked executables.
BTW, what architecture are we talking about?
Luck,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters
Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
as depends.
As best as I can tell, neither of these items should be in recommends.
Have I missed something, or should I submit a bug report?
Thanks,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 10:03:05 -0400
Source: ae
Binary: ae
Architecture: source i386
Version: 962-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
ae - Anthony's Editor -- a tiny
rmation you are looking for.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ildpackage I got was informed that debian/rules did not exist.
Removing the quotes got it working again.
Luck,
Dwarf
---- --
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fa
On Tue, 24 Sep 1996, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> Dale Scheetz wrote:
> :
> : On Mon, 23 Sep 1996, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
> : >
> : > withecho $rootcommand "debian/rules clean"
> : > If I did no mistakes it worked for me.
> :
> : When I
an that the "quote
patch" should not be used.
Thanks,
Dwarf
---- --
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 09:26:20 -0400
Source: libident
Binary: libident
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.17-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libident - a simple RFC1413
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 11:34:36 -0400
Source: gmp
Binary: gmp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
gmp- Multiprecision arithmetic l
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 877-0257
Flexible Software Fax: NONE
Black Creek Critters e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you don't see what you want, just ask --
--
TO U
Don't you just hate it when people answer their own questions?
I finally found what I needed (I hope) at
ftp://ftp.uoknor.edu/linux/sunsite/X11/libs/
Sorry to be a bother,
Dwarf
--
aka Dale Scheetz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 14:10:56 -0400
Source: m4
Binary: m4
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
m4 - a macro processing language
C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 1996 16:29:38 -0400
Source: m4
Binary: m4
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.4-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
m4 - a macro processing language
C
uld suggest re-running Install, not Configure.
Running Install until all errors cease is the prescribed work around for
dselect.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_-_- _-_-_-_-_-_-_-
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (904) 656-9769
Flexible Software
Or should mirror depend upon perl5? If
both of these packages have the correct dependencies, where do I get a
version of perl that provides perl, that will install beside perl-5.005?
Waiting is,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_
On 23 Sep 1999, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > not re-configure either libnet-perl, or mirror, both of which depend upon
> > perl.
>
> This is incorrect. Current versions of libnet-perl do not require
> perl.
But the ver
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 05:24:32PM +0000, Dale Scheetz écrivait:
> > After looking over things, both perl-5.004 and perl-5.005 replace perl and
> > provide perl5, but neither of them provide perl!
>
> This has been done so volu
On 23 Sep 1999, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This brings up another issue. Both perl-5.004 and perl-5.005 provide
> > perl5, but it was my understanding that these two versions were
> > "substantially" different,
eem a bit "insensitive" to force these two packages on
everyone. It seems a better situation than requiring you to load two
complete versions of emacs just to get console _and_ X aware editors. The
fact that this impacts every application that would be useful in an X
environment, makes &quo
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Guys, guys, guys... This is a discussion that was had quite a while ago,
> > and which lead to the creation of xlib6. The whole point was that it was
> >
over and play
dead before it tries to install any packages. It should probably just mark
dhttp as a failed attempt, and go on with the rest of the packages.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_-_-_-
aka Dale Scheetz Phon
es it to match anyway! Is this something to do with the
form of my expression?
Any information will be greatfully appreciated,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_-_-_-
aka Dale Scheetz Phone: 1 (850) 656-9769
Flexib
On 1 Oct 1999, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > $ grep -w debhelper override.potato
> > debhelper optionaldevel
> > hello-debhelper optionaldevel
> >
> > In the man page, under the -w option, it sa
is. Is there a better way to integrate these two
systems than the one I worked out?
Sorry this went so long, I thought I only had two points to make ;-)
Luck,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "The Debian Linux User's Guide" _-_-_-_-_-_-
aka Dale Scheetz P
ail and I'll provide the
necessary information. In addition, I would ask that whoever takes on this
"task" please try to convince him to port his "mill" game to Linux, so I
can package it for the distribution.
Thanks for your time,
Dwarf
--
_-_-_-_-_- Author of "The De
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> The second nit has to do with the way that dpkg assigns permissions to the
> package files it creates. I'm not certain why, but I sort of expected the
> files to be 664, not the 644 that it produces. If group projects are to be
> man
101 - 200 of 352 matches
Mail list logo
