ns parameter
Chris> (in version 1 & 2)
No, max_versions is not correct. It will only work if all my computers
use the same distribution; if some computers use unstable while others
use stable for example, then the stable version will get deleted after
n revisions of the unstable version of the package.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n. The other
part comes from the fact apt-proxy 1.9.18 in unstable is probably v2.
(As for why it is not in testing, see bug #267880 + others).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s, then. -- Joe Wreschnig
Joe> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
If we did this, we would allow people to create CDs, if they desired,
without the offending software.
This would solve complaints along the lines of "I want to distribute
Debian without accidently upsetting parents by distributing Adult
software that is useless anyway...".
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
emoved the software).
In much the same way I have seen people get upset when they discover
commercially available Windows software comes with free erotic photos
(sorry, I can't remember what software now), I think the same applies
here. (Admittedly it is worse, IMHO, when it gets installed without
your consent).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sage to the user, users
frequently (read: close-to-always) are unable to *read* error messages
(in my experience) and will interpret the error as "invalid password"
regardless of what was actually displayed in the message box. These
people won't be able to tell technical support any more
ldn't stop you from downloading illegal content, it
would make it possible to distribute Debian legally in the given
countries.
Just a thought.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
it was intentional or not,
however a number of students got to see it. According to the media, it
was very distressing to concerned parents.
If we want everybody to use Debian, including schools, then this is an
important issue we cannot ignore.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
because it's
Andrew> primarily used as a vehicle for delivering porn.
Not my point.
My point was for somebody thinking along the lines: "I want to
distribute Debian to this target audience but I don't want to risk
upsetting anybody or risk getting arrested and I don't want to have to
do it in secret".
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
now that it exists?
I might be naive, but am somewhat skeptical...
Also, to the best my knowledge the kernel doesn't contain any pictures
of naked people either. I might be mistaken.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ram from being
configurable. If you really want the image of the naked woman, then
you can download the image (from non-Debian website) and install it in
the appropriate directory, and it could automatically be used instead.
I think such a solution would kill off all the complaints I have seen
so far...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
7;t mind or understand...
I think the issue, for the general case (some cultures may be
different), isn't so much "seeing the naked body is bad", rather,
seeing pictures that present the body as a sex item is seen as bad.
There is a fine line between the two, people will have different
opinions.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
;-)
An extra good reason not to overwork your poor overloaded CPU ;-).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
re them and it seems to work). There
probably are better photos if you looked.
While some photos are rather erotic (unfortunately), there are some
very decent photos, too.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
be violating your
Ron> ISP's AUP.
So are you saying I should take my web pages of my naked dogs down?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
bset of Debian that doesn't
{do,use,require,consume,kill,display,say,etc} XYZ.
No - I am not volunteering.
This also raises lots of issues, like how to do it with minimum fuss
and who is legally responsible (if anybody) if mistakes occur.
No - I am not volunteering here either.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> "Nico" == Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nico> i think this should be created be default, but thats the
Nico> decision of the maintainer.
Looking at the script, I was under the impression it is created by
default.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chris> * URL : http://www.nemeton.com.au/sw/autoreply/
Chris> * License : BSD
Chris> Description : A safe, rate-limited autoresponder
Chris> Autoreply is a simple autoresponder useful for replying to
Chris> email upon receipt.
May I suggest that
nly part that means anything is "you can redistribute". No rights
to modify, implies non-DFSG.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
art, whether
digital images, digital video, writing, etc.
I really think we need to draw the line somewhere.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e
it will check the home directory for obvious directories that it
shouldn't delete.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bout this a while ago on debian-devel and was told (IIRC)
that a major rewrite was happening in order to make Povray DFSG
compliant.
Is this still the case?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You obviously need to run "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade" on
your car more often.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
One question:
Brian> I asked about this a while ago on debian-devel and was told
Brian> (IIRC) that a major rewrite was happening in order to make
Brian> Povray DFSG compliant.
Bri
Cut twice, measure once.
Ron> Google it!
Loose it!
Notes:
[1] I was debating putting a smiley face here, but then remembered
some recent court cases...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ile). Its a bit more
Goswin> complex algorithm but works even better than rsyncable
Goswin> files and rsync.
zsync looks suspiciously like it might have similar patent issues
which killed the rproxy project.
Then again I am no expert; Please tell me I am wrong...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL
However, based on Robert's response it would appear that patent issues
have been considered for zsync and considered OK. I would speculate
this is because information is pre-calculated at the server and stored
in *.zsync files.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
g users.
I consider that a bug.
If something like this is different, then not only should Debian
supplied documentation reflect the change, but a list of differences
should appear in README.Debian.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lean target
Christoph> anyway, so it doesn't hurt to move instead of copying
Christoph> it.
A benefit of moving files, rather then copying, is that you get to see
at a glance what files your package left behind and missed in
debian/tmp (e.g. if upstream adds new files to the packages b
essage). So what appears to be to separate messages contained in
mbox format in mutt can be interpreted as only one message by
formail (see bug #295604 for example).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o far exclusively uses
mbox files.
Sure, these are implementation issues that could be solved, but
currently mbox wins.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tunately, as I seem to be running behind with my own packages, I
don't think I can spare time to help with other packages at this point
in time.
I am glad to hear though that it is still being worked on.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> I wrote approx for exactly this purpose. It's now in
Eric> testing.
Is a back port available for sarge? If not, how feasible would it be
to create on? Does it depend on anything n
>>>>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russ> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> * Find out what is required to keep AFS support working
>> (assuming I don't already have it).
Russ> Well, what so
ing duplicate symbols or using a version that is incompatible.
* Upload Heimdal.
* Rebuild above packages.
* If packages don't rebuild then it may be because it requires krb4
support => drop krb4 support (cyrus-sasl?), or entire package
(arla?).
* Drop kerberos4kth.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
krb524 working with Heimdal.
I had to insert
enable-524 = true
in /var/lib/heimdal-kdc/kdc.conf (the man page for kdc lead me to
believe this was the default).
and add:
[login]
enable-524 = true
in /etc/krb5.conf
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pass SMTP
level SPAM controls, but taken to the extreme, you would have to also
do this to every server that forwards you email (perhaps even every
mailing list server?).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ges never uploaded to Debian,
maybe not).
* others I am too lazy to think of.
Matthew> I've never seen dpkg-sig mentioned before, only debsigs,
Matthew> so I'm not familiar with the tool itself, but the concept
Matthew> is one that needs a lot more exposure.
I would
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marc> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I've never seen dpkg-sig mentioned before, only debsigs,
>>> so I'm not familiar with
es on to trace SPAM (which have no cryptographic signature).
I also believe that the threat of somebody being tricked into
installing a Trojan package is a very real possibility, and we should
do everything we can do to aid our users prevent this from happening.
Notes:
[1] Assuming you have a car,
glob$U.lo and glob$U.o.
I asked upstream Heimdal and got no response.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks.
PS. Source code is Heimdal in Debian experimental.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
ail on the heimdal-discuss list...
I sent the message to heimdal-bugs.
Maybe heimdal-discuss would be more appropriate?
Unfortunately, my laptop computer is throwing one of its "I will not
power on unless you remove my power source and batteries for several
days" tantrum, so I can't dou
able this implicit shell, either with ssh
or rsh? I really don't like it. I would rather each parameter be
passed straight to the remote executable via exec without being parsed
by sh first. Then, if I want to use the shell, I can say so. I don't
like this business of the command line b
y, the shell isn't required, no splitting of the
parameters is required, and this makes the script more secure.
Unfortunately, it seems the same methods have yet to come to
rsh/ssh, etc. Hmmm. I think sudo supports it though:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo 'id; echo hi'
sudo: id; echo hi: comma
drivers optional? If ndiswrapper moved to contrib would this package
have to move to?
I am not providing an opinion here, but I didn't notice these issues
being discussed earlier.
back to your regular program...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
341
What does the "block" command do? I have never seen it documented
anywhere, including at http://bugs.debian.org/>. Did I miss
something?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
m it is listed:
--- cut ---
Blocking bugs added: 355341 Request was from Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Full text and rfc822 format available.
--- cut ---
2. is it possible to list all bugs that are not blocked?
3. does blocking imply any action will automatically be taken
appear that NEW is blocked for some reason.
However, no changes in my upload are critical (at least none that I am
aware of), and there are no known security bugs, so I am not
complaining. Just curious.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
un, and this meant I
couldn't run any executables that required libc6.
Eventually I was able to run ldconfig from a preexisting chroot, and
my system was fine.
Maybe it has changed now, but it didn't look like the applications
were falling back to ld.so.conf when this happened.
--
Bria
trchr(lang,"_");
if (ptr) *ptr='\0';
memset(buffer,'\0',sizeof(buffer));
snprintf(buffer,sizeof(buffer)-1,"txt/%s_%s",getenv("LANG"),LONG_TXT_FILE);
--- cut ---
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
new packages with known source code end up in the
NEW queue?
The source code has already been examined for the US export
legislation.
e.g. if soname changes on shared library, it requires the package be
renamed which appears as a new package.
Could be an issue if such an upload contained securit
treated equally to the
other candidates, despite her superior, bossy, know-it-all cat
attitude.
Wouter> Besides, I don't like cats anyway.
You should be expelled instead! ;-)
Wouter> ... then again, maybe this isn't.
Huh ? ;-)
Wouter> Get over yourself. Please.
No! T
have done this, realize there is only one thing left to
do. Find the guilty party. There is only one guilty party. IT WAS ALL
TUX' FAULT! TUX IS EVIL! EXPEL TUX NOW! BURN TUX!
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cpu.
What the heck? Are you implying that would be a suitable well-formed
patch suitable for inclusion? Or did I miss some sarcasm?
Apart from the NULL pointers, strdup only takes one parameter...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ven "make him go away"? Would it make him lose
interest? Or would the arguments continue either with Sven (from
outside the project) or somebody else to take his place?
Would the next step be to ban Sven from participating in our public
mailing lists?
Has the world gone completely crazy?
--
header set:
Mail-Followup-To: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
was this intentional? I think Sven is subscribed to this list...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are still making
machines that use a non-Intel based CPU, as it makes me nervous that
Intel and AMD have such a huge monopoly.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fact the source code is in Debian would imply that
the ftpmasters have already checked the licensing, legal issues, and
other things?
In contrast it is possible to upload packages containing new upstream
source code (but no new packages) that has no manual checking.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTE
#x27;t observed anything like this behaviour with devfs, so I
suspect this is udev specific.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
removes all these potential nasty flame wars about the
pros/cons of various licenses.
I wanted to verify the license, but the upstream web page of
http://www.example.org/> didn't work for me. I suspect contacting
the upstream author at "Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" would
l packages in the filesystem structure of a
Jorge> remotely-booted machine.
If a package directly uses /etc/init.d/ in its scripts, file a
bug report.
It should use invoke-rc.d instead. man invoke-rc.d
It should work for chroots, and does work for pbuilder.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL
>>>>> "Joerg" == Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joerg> You know, our userdir-ldap manages ssh keys. You dont need
Joerg> to put them manually in .ssh dirs.
How do you set the ssh key in LDAP?
I can't see any settings in db.d
free software based there. Just look at the
ITPs here.
Unfortunately the website doesn't seem to be working right now.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as
Maciej> well?
It might be better to ask this question on debian-legal.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#x27;t want to use an initramfs to initialize it. Or if
you want /usr to be shared between computers but don't want to share
all of /.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0:53 snoopy sshd[15846]: error: PAM: Authentication failure for jan
from localhost
[3] "Account deactivated" option in "LDAP Account Manager". I haven't
worked out how this is stored in LDAP yet. No messages displayed to
the user.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have any
downside.
Perhaps the only exception I can think of is if the account is locked
due to "too many login attempts" as opposed to "password expired" or
"account has expired" or some other predictable reason. Then, yes,
that would be a problem.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
have the time or patience to learn that
awful-programming-language-that-requires-lots-of-nested-brackets... errr... I
mean LISP... right now. ;-)
However, this won't work anyway for people stuck using lesser MUAs
(e.g. mutt), fake MUAs (e.g. evolution), or worse (e.g. anything
written b
s kept accurate via some other
means.
You could argue based on this, /lib isn't designed to be shared, so
you still need to split it into /usr/lib and /lib. Alternatively you
could argue only /lib/modules isn't sharable, I guess.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUB
what the point
would be.
Peter> You would put up with all *that* for a 6-megabyte savings
Peter> on your root filesystem?
It would be more then 6 megabyte savings on the root file-system if
/usr was moved to /. That was the original point I responded to.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PRO
rect solution to fix the file system?
Disclaimer: I don't care too much either way. It is perhaps worth
noting that a package I maintain does use /usr/lib/$packagename/* for
inetd servers, and this reduces file conflicts with other packages.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
?
Does this mean people who want secure pre-compiled kernels have to
resort to unstable until the issue is fixed?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rnel-source version 2.6.8-16"?
Again, I think it would be much quicker, easier, and less prone to
errors if the DSAs where mentioned in the relevant kernel-image-change
too.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and had mounted additional filesystems - the only solution I
could come up with was to stop the daemon in the chroot before
unmounting the file-system).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o very complicated networks.
The difficulty with supporting firewalls is that people will expect
"if I install package X, then it should automatically adjust the
firewall to allow it to work". I really do *not* want to go down this
path.
The firewall is up to the administrator to decide on, not the package
maintainers.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_powerpc.deb
69301110f8865edd7f2f93d79ad6a715
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_powerpc.deb
Then again, this package looks old, so maybe the entire mirror is old,
and no longer usable.
My point though that aptitude should tell you what went wrong
t; there for only 1 symbol on 2.4; didn't check 2.6), and so on
Joey> might just make it work.
klibc? Not yet in Debian, is there any reason for this?
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed, using what I believe to be the standard
process[1][2][3][4][...]:
1. I claim to be "Brian May". I have a passport that proves that I am
in fact "Brian May". I have a drivers license that proves that I am
"Brian May". The photos are identical to what I look l
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-cache show libc6 | grep MD5sum MD5sum:
Brian> ab0895ee6d8d2cf3b6906eb5228e5c25
Brian> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# md5sum
Brian> /var/cache/apt/archiv
hs
behind. I don't think the bug reporter used hurd though.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it with
Steve> a grain of salt for now. :)
Sounds like a much needed feature, IMHO.
Good like for getting your changes integrated into debhelper.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brian Mays doesn't seem to be watching this thread...)
My point though is that I could have taken my dodgy key into a
keysigning session, and people adhering to many standard keysigning
would not notice anything wrong, even if I couldn't intercept the mail.
This would mean:
* If I was a n
P server...
e.g. network tunnels and DNS servers both might need to be started
first before the NTP server can be contacted.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed assembling the RAID with the --update=super-minor option (as
well as all the other options), but it didn't seem to help.
In the end, I gave up and changed /etc/fstab to the new system.
I no longer have access this machine, the other machine doesn't seem
to have the problem anymore.
How
in Debian be able to use klibc in Debian for all the user
tools (I believe there is already an ITP for klibc).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
an
application that uses this library in the one source, by the above
criteria I could rebuild the library but not the application, which
seems pointless.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ivist Network, said: "The fact that somebody, just by claiming
to own a word, can intimidate large companies and powerful law firms
shows the damage, to an extent, is already done."
In the movie realm, Stoller says that he wrote to Sony in March,
objecting to Columbia Pictures' plan t
counts as prior-art if you published it in some public
forum (not sure of the exact criteria).
If it was a private thing, then it doesn't count.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quently went very slowly until it was
unusable. It took me two reboots of the computer before I finally
realized the DOS attack was from *my* own script! It took me another
reboot to fix the problem properly.
Sometimes it pays to use the full pathname to the executable...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
x27;t
give you access to your newly created package.
4. Make dupload obsolete, and replace with dput. Make dput the default
in debrelease. I think dput would have prevented me uploading my
unsigned package.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
don't think it will work from X-Windows when the system is too
bogged down to switch to a text console though...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
time, regardless of
regular interruptions, that I am incompetent?
You must be perfect!
Which means the fact I could not have any definitions of [1] or [2] in
your message must be my fault.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ding disabled.
debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey).
debug1: channel 0: new [client-session]
debug1: Entering interactive session.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ving old entries from ~/.ssh/known_hosts, I can
Osamu> update host key and login.
Yes, I got that.
Osamu> PS: It would have been nicer if old hosk identification was
Osamu> backuped and used in new system.
They may have been concerned that the old host identification had been
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> (note: I am using ssh-krb5 - not that should matter - it
Brian> authenticated OK).
Brian> This is weird. Maybe I will need to experiment more.
I just tried the standard ssh in sa
ed):
udevd_event: rename_net_if: error changing net interface name eth1_temp to
eth0: timeout
which seems really confusing, IMHO.
Thanks for any advice.
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Brian> (note: I am using ssh-krb5 - not that should matter - it
Brian> authenticated OK).
Brian> This is weird. Maybe I will need to experiment more.
Brian> I just tried the standa
the build - I probably
wouldn't notice that there is a minor (perhaps obsolete) feature
enabled with no corresponding build-depends.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7; in systems like
CVS or SVN and we refer to them as 'checkouts'. (bzr also supports
"lightweight checkouts", which are like local checkouts, and aren't
branches at all.)"
Can anyone confirm/deny?
My central dislike of bzr is bugs like:
http://bugs.debian
:)).
No, this was a conversion from baz. Might be the same bug though,
hopefully.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ng weird (and perhaps
ancient history) on my computer?
What should be creating the above users/groups?
Could udevd be changed to make debugging these issues easier,
e.g. maybe some sort of verbose mode?
Should I file any bug reports, if so what packages?
Thanks.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECT
1 - 100 of 878 matches
Mail list logo
