* Shengjing Zhu , 2018-09-02, 14:42:
When I try to package execline(a non-interactive shell script)[1], it
installs following binaries in default PATH,
cd, if, exec, wait,
Three of them (cd, umask, wait) clash with shell's regular built-in
utilities. POSIX requires them to be exec(2)abl
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:17 PM Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
> * Shengjing Zhu , 2018-09-02, 14:42:
> >When I try to package execline(a non-interactive shell script)[1], it
> >installs following binaries in default PATH,
> >
> >cd, if, exec, wait,
>
> Three of them (cd, umask, wait) clash with shell's
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:43 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > Three of them (cd, umask, wait) clash with shell's regular built-in
> > utilities. POSIX requires them to be exec(2)able[0][1]. Debian doesn't
> > currently provide standalone executables for them (which is a bug), but
> > some other distros
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Gabriel
* Package name: appmenu-registrar
Version : 0.7.1
Upstream Author : Konstantin Pugin
* URL : https://gitlab.com/vala-panel-project/vala-panel-appmenu/
* License : LGPL-3.0+
Programming Lang: C
Descriptio
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 10:17:09AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Shengjing Zhu , 2018-09-02, 14:42:
> > When I try to package execline(a non-interactive shell script)[1], it
> > installs following binaries in default PATH,
> >
> > cd, if, exec, wait,
>
> Three of them (cd, umask, wait) clash
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 10:17 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/xrat/V4_xcu_chap01.html#tag_23_01_07
TIL: there is a (slightly, but not insanely so) roundabout rationale
for having a non-builtin `cd`... thanks!
Ian.
On Sun, Sep 02, 2018 at 02:42:36PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
* If I install them in path like /usr/lib/execline/bin, then I need to
ensure this path are in everyone's PATH.
Yes. This is similar to ccache; users will need to make sure they set
their path correctly to use the package.
--
⢀⣴⠾
Tobias Frost writes:
>
> The split was actually thought to be a feature [1] :)
> It was to make the process itself less normative about the actual
> (concrete) figures/criterias, but still give safe figures to e.g
> necomers they can rely on, and on the other side enable more advanced
> people to
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 08:17:24AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Tobias Frost writes:
>
> >
> > The split was actually thought to be a feature [1] :)
> > It was to make the process itself less normative about the actual
> > (concrete) figures/criterias, but still give safe figures to e.g
> > neco
Tobias Frost writes:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 08:17:24AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>> OK, I understand the reasoning, but I hope we can improve the wording on
>> both sides a bit so it's clear that the rule is "use your judgement, and
>> if you're not sure about your judgement, refer to these
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 3:24 AM, jose R Rodriguez wrote:
> Niltze, all-
>
> I had a need to create an more recent version of OpenSSL than the
> default in Stretch and/or stretch-backports --which dates back to 2007;
er... 2017, (1.1.0f-3+deb9u2 < https://packages.debian.org/stretch/openssl >)
http
11 matches
Mail list logo
