Tobias Frost <t...@debian.org> writes: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 08:17:24AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>> OK, I understand the reasoning, but I hope we can improve the wording on >> both sides a bit so it's clear that the rule is "use your judgement, and >> if you're not sure about your judgement, refer to these numbers in the >> wiki, which represent a current concensus". Assuming my summary is >> correct, of course. > > Yes, your summary is correct. I'm happy to make the wording a bit more > clearer and start by shamelessly stealing your sentence as a base for it > ;-) Here's my attempt at rewording your rewording: <para> You will have to use your judgement as to whether a given combination factors constitutes neglect; in case the maintainer disagrees they have only to say so (see below). If you're not sure about your judgement or simply want to be on the safe side, there is a more precise (and conservative) set of conditions in the <ulink url="&wiki-salvaging-packages;"> wiki</ulink>. These conditions represent a current Debian concensus on salvaging criteria. In any case you should explain your reasons for thinking the package is neglected when you file an Intent to Salvage bug later. </para> I thought the changed wiki wording was ok (and easier to change anyway).
