Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On 04/24/2018 07:45 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > if that's possible, fine. otoh, I would be fine to have a very reduced set of > python2 apps in buster+1, if that's needed. Sure we can remove mercurial and > OpenStack if they are not ready for Python3 OpenStack in Sid/Buster is already fully swit

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On 04/24/2018 05:11 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > The reason it was brought up > earlier in this thread is because Thomas has recently dropped Python > 2.7 builds for it and switched to only building Python 3.x packages. I have *not* removed Python 2 support. Only services are switched to Python 3 b

Bug#896868: ITP: starjava-dpac -- Java classes to process GAIA data

Package: wnpp Owner: Ole Streicher Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-as...@lists.debian.org, debian-j...@lists.debian.org * Package name: starjava-dpac Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium * URL

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On 04/25/2018 06:25 AM, olivier sallou wrote: > Regarding education, using python 2 or 3 > should be transparent. At this point, new comers should learn Python 3 only. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On 04/24/2018 07:39 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 23 avril 2018 23:54 +0200, Thomas Goirand  : > >> Isn't 10 years of Python 3 enough time for a migration? > > Python 3.3, the first release people could reasonably start migrating > to, is from 2012. Before that, it was very difficult to have a c

About chances to fix issues in Debian and roles that do not exist (Was: Please do not drop Python 2 modules)

Hi Nicholas, On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:54:00PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > At what stage should Python IDEs uploaded to NEW disable or not > install Python 2 support? Now? > > Should Python 2-specific IDEs and/or Python 2-specific educational > materials be removed from the archive?

Bug#896871: ITP: orca-sops -- simple orca plugin system

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Sebastian Humenda * Package name: orca-sops Version : 1.0.2 Upstream Author : Christian Hempfling * URL : https://github.com/chrys87/simple-orca-plugin-system * License : LGPL-3 Programming Lang: Python, Shell Descrip

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

Hi, 2018-04-25 9:06 GMT+02:00 Thomas Goirand : > > I would like to start dropping Python 2 as early as possible though. The > only question that remains is: how many people still have Python 2 only > code using clients. > /me And because: 1. OS clients are already packaged for Py2 now 2.

Re: Completed: lists.alioth.debian.org migration

Hi Carsten, > So far I've read the overview on alioth-lists.d.n [1] the correct > address to get in contact for requests like this is > mail...@alioth-lists.debian.net. AFAICR it's always been admin@. In fact, I don't remember any mention of mailman@. Where did you find that mailman address? May

Re: Removing Python 2 support in OpenStack [was: Please do not drop Python 2 modules]

On 04/25/2018 09:39 AM, Ondrej Novy wrote: > Hi, > > 2018-04-25 9:06 GMT+02:00 Thomas Goirand >: > > I would like to start dropping Python 2 as early as possible though. The > only question that remains is: how many people still have Python 2 only > code using

Re: Completed: lists.alioth.debian.org migration

Hello Alex, Am 25.04.2018 um 10:02 schrieb Alex Muntada: > Hi Carsten, > >> So far I've read the overview on alioth-lists.d.n [1] the correct >> address to get in contact for requests like this is >> mail...@alioth-lists.debian.net. > > AFAICR it's always been admin@. In fact, I don't remember a

Re: Completed: lists.alioth.debian.org migration

Excerpts from Carsten Schoenert's message of april 25, 2018 11:12 am: Am 25.04.2018 um 10:02 schrieb Alex Muntada: So far I've read the overview on alioth-lists.d.n [1] the correct address to get in contact for requests like this is mail...@alioth-lists.debian.net. [...] The https://alioth-lis

Re: Completed: lists.alioth.debian.org migration

Hi Carsten, > it's the only mentioned email contact on > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo > > I suggest to change the text passage in the site then. Messages to that list will be delivered to admin@ from now on. I've found several other requests that were made through mai

Re: Removing Python 2 support in OpenStack [was: Please do not drop Python 2 modules]

Hi, 2018-04-25 11:11 GMT+02:00 Thomas Goirand : > > - faster build time (no need to test with Python 2, so less chances of > build failure). > build is done once, customer happiness is for years (buster lifetime). - no chance to have any Python 2 packages installed, so we're sure we're > on a fu

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On April 25, 2018 5:51:54 AM UTC, Andrea Bolognani wrote: >On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:17:08PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2018-04-25 01:05:59 +0200 (+0200), Andrea Bolognani wrote: >> [...] >> > So you could say that RHEL is taking the approach described above - >> > having a transitional

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On 2018-04-25 at 06:46, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On April 25, 2018 5:51:54 AM UTC, Andrea Bolognani > wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:17:08PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >>> Given that "software collections" provides a containerized Python >>> 3 build and basically none of the rest of t

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On Mi, Apr 25, 2018 at 07:30:15 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: The simple, obvious means of installing Python in Debian - either manually, or as a dependency of another package - is via the package named 'python'. At present, in current testing, doing this will pull in I don’t think you can see it

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On April 25, 2018 11:30:15 AM UTC, The Wanderer wrote: >On 2018-04-25 at 06:46, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> On April 25, 2018 5:51:54 AM UTC, Andrea Bolognani >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:17:08PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > Given that "software collections" provides a co

Bug#896887: ITP: ttf-myanmar-fonts -- Myanmar Fonts Pack - ttf-myanmar-fonts

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: kokoye2007 * Package name: ttf-myanmar-fonts Version : 2.0.5 Upstream Author : Name kokoye2...@gmail.com * URL : http://www.ubuntu-mm.net/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Description : Myanmar Fonts Pack - ttf-

Bug#896892: ITP: feature-check -- tool to query a program for supported features

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Peter Pentchev * Package name: feature-check Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev * URL : https://devel.ringlet.net/misc/feature-check/ * License : BSD-2 Programming Lang: Perl Description : tool to q

Bug#896894: ITP: libtelephony-asterisk-ami-perl -- Simple Asterisk Manager Interface client (Perl module)

Package: wnpp Owner: Damyan Ivanov Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libtelephony-asterisk-ami-perl Version : 0.006 Upstream Author : Christopher J. Madsen * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 05:49:32PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 08:57:55PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > The tip of the iceberg are some recent cases where Python 2 modules > > were dropped that still had reverse dependencies in unstable, but > > also for those without ther

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:10:12AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >... > This cannot go on, and on, and on, and on... We have to send a clear > message on the right direction, which is Python 2 removal. Yes, removal! > Why are we even discussing this? Isn't it obvious? It is not for us to decide wha

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:54:51PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >... > Right now, the only reason I'm keeping Python 2 support within a number > of packages in OpenStack, is because one of our team member wrote he's > using Python 2 in his company, and that we never finished the > conversation as t

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On 04/25/2018 06:14 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:10:12AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> ... >> This cannot go on, and on, and on, and on... We have to send a clear >> message on the right direction, which is Python 2 removal. Yes, removal! >> Why are we even discussing this?

Re: Removing Python 2 support in OpenStack [was: Please do not drop Python 2 modules]

On 04/25/2018 11:59 AM, Ondrej Novy wrote: > 2018-04-25 11:11 GMT+02:00 Thomas Goirand >: > > - faster build time (no need to test with Python 2, so less chances of > build failure). > > build is done once, customer happiness is for years (buster lifetime). More

Re: Please do not drop Python 2 modules

On 04/25/2018 01:30 PM, The Wanderer wrote: > The simple, obvious means of installing Python in Debian - either > manually, or as a dependency of another package - is via the package > named 'python'. At present, in current testing, doing this will pull in > python2.7 and will not (as far as I can

Planning the removal of c_rehash | mass bug filling

> Hi, > > the openssl package provides the c_rehash script which creates the links > from .Y to the actual certificate in /etc/ssl/certs/. During the > transition from 0.9.8 to 1.0.0 the hash (for the X part) changed from > md5 to sha1. Since that transition in Debian the c_rehash script >

Bug#896927: ITP: tvb-gdist -- Compute geodesic distances

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: umar haruna abdullahi * Package name: tvb-gdist Version : 1.5.5 Upstream Author : umar haruna abdullahi * URL : http://www.thevirtualbrain.org/ * License : (GPL v3.) Programming Lang: (C++, Python.) Description :

why hasn't the debian transition freeze been announced or shared in debin testing info. or bits.debian.org ?

Dear all, I had read https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2018/04/msg6.html so knew when the transition freeze is going to happen. For a blog post/technical article I wanted to share about the transition freeze and went to https://www.debian.org/releases/testing/ as well as https://b

Re: why hasn't the debian transition freeze been announced or shared in debin testing info. or bits.debian.org ?

On 26 April 2018 at 00:16, shirish शिरीष wrote: > I had read > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2018/04/msg6.html > so knew when the transition freeze is going to happen. For a blog > post/technical article I wanted to share about the transition freeze > and went to https://www.

Bug#896936: ITP: file-cache-simple.js -- simple file key/value cache for Node.js

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Xavier Guimard * Package name: file-cache-simple.js Version : 0.0.7 Upstream Author : Michiel van der Velde * URL : https://github.com/MichielvdVelde/file-cache-simple * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript D

Bug#896938: ITP: inireader.js -- small ini files reader for Node.js

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Xavier Guimard * Package name: inireader.js Version : 1.2.0 Upstream Author : Lajos Koszti * URL : https://github.com/Ajnasz/IniReader * License : Expat Programming Lang: Javascript Description : small ini files