Re: HEADSUP: mails sent to n...@bugs.debian.org are NOT sent to the submitter

Hello, On Mon, 2016-12-26 at 14:56 -0200, Samuel Henrique wrote: > I didn't know that, fortunately i didn't ended in a situation where i needed > feedback from the bug submitter. > > But the question is, shouldn't the bot forward to the submitter? > I've run into this problem in the past. Quick

wanna-build doesn't email the maintainer on build failures by default

On 26/12/16 17:29, Samuel Thibault wrote: > This happens again and again... Quite a few maintainers don't seem to > realize that mails sent to n...@bugs.debian.org are not sent to the bug > submitter, and the bug tracking thus halts down completely when the > maintainer asks for information only t

Re: wanna-build doesn't email the maintainer on build failures by default

On 12/31/2016 09:58 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Somewhat related, and something I think ought to be changed... wanna-build > doesn't email the maintainer when a package fails to build... you have to > explicitly subscribe to buildd failures in the PTS. I think we should change > that, and i

Re: wanna-build doesn't email the maintainer on build failures by default

On 31/12/16 10:40, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 12/31/2016 09:58 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Somewhat related, and something I think ought to be changed... wanna-build >> doesn't email the maintainer when a package fails to build... you have to >> explicitly subscribe to buildd failures in the

Re: Bug#849703: ITP: ansible-doc -- Documentation for Ansible

Hi Evgeni, On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:44:50PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 12:58:02AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > documentation. This package aims to supply the documentation in HTML > > form offline, so one should not need to go to the aoupstream website to > > read i

Re: Bug#849703: ITP: ansible-doc -- Documentation for Ansible

On 2016-12-31 10:52, Toni Mueller wrote: > I am building from a git clone of the ansible repository, and, more > specifically, from the tag v2.2.0.0-1. Then why not make an additional binary package from the same source package? This way ansible and its documentation would not get out of sync. >

Re: Can we kill net-tools, please?

On Fri, 2016-12-30 at 16:09 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > Fix it instead :) I have submitted patches for kernel the network stack to improve QoS for ADSL (ie where ATM cells are the link layer carrier). I'm not terribly forgiving of the long drawn out initiation rites the kernel dev's seem to demand

Bug#849809: ITP: libtest-unixsock-perl -- test module for UNIX domain sockets

Package: wnpp Owner: Christopher Hoskin Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libtest-unixsock-perl Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Fujiwara Shunichiro * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Test-UNI

Bug#849811: ITP: fonts-apropal -- Sans-serif font for decorative signs, one of the Warsaw Types

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dominik Danelski * Package name: fonts-apropal Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Rafał Buchner * URL : https://github.com/warszawskie-kroje/apropal * License : SIL Open Font License Programming Lang: None Description

Re: Can we kill net-tools, please?

On 14533 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote: dak override net-tools net optional I: Will change priority from important to optional Continue (y/N)? y dak override iproute2 iproute2 is in section 'net' at priority 'important' Whoever wants net-tools can have it by simply installing it - or getting it

Bug#849812: ITP: requests-ntlm -- HTTP NTLM authentication using the requests library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Dominic Hargreaves * Package name: requests-ntlm Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : Ben Toews et al * URL : https://github.com/requests/requests-ntlm * License : ISC Programming Lang: Pyth

Re: wanna-build doesn't email the maintainer on build failures by default

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:46:51AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hmm. Maybe the issue is when you don't subscribe to the PTS because you're the > maintainer, or the maintainer is a team and you're subscribed to the team > mailing list. In those cases, neither the team nor you are subscribe

Re: wanna-build doesn't email the maintainer on build failures by default

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:33:51PM +, Sean Whitton wrote: > Why not just have wanna-build e-mail the Maintainer: address, like > everything else does? I was not even aware that wanna-build sent any > e-mails at all :) I'd rather have wanna-build to keep its current behaviour¹ to email dispa..

Re: wanna-build doesn't email the maintainer on build failures by default

On 12/31/2016 02:05 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I'd rather have wanna-build to keep its current behaviour¹ to email > dispa...@tracker.debian.org²³, and have BTS, dak, and all other tool > stop to email Maintainer directly, eventually finally implementing > DEP-2⁴. > > ¹ which, btw, is not reliabl

Re: wanna-build doesn't email the maintainer on build failures by default

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 02:15:46PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 12/31/2016 02:05 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > I'd rather have wanna-build to keep its current behaviour¹ to email > > dispa...@tracker.debian.org²³, and have BTS, dak, and all other tool > > stop to email Maintainer directly, event

Bug#849820: ITP: libnet-cisco-mse-rest-perl -- REST interface for Cisco MSE

Package: wnpp Owner: Christopher Hoskin Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org * Package name: libnet-cisco-mse-rest-perl Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Fabrice Durand * URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Net-Cisc

Re: auto-removal and alternative dependencies

Hi! On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 08/12/16 13:02, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> I have two packages that depend on: nagios3 | icinga >> >> nagios3 is being removed[1], but icinga[2] is still available, so why >> can't my packages continue to list nagios3 as a possib

Re: auto-removal and alternative dependencies

On 2016-12-31 17:42 +0300, Sergei Golovan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 08/12/16 13:02, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> I have two packages that depend on: nagios3 | icinga >>> >>> nagios3 is being removed[1], but icinga[2] is still available, so why >>>

Re: wanna-build doesn't email the maintainer on build failures by default

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > But you should probably remove mips64el, which is a release arch now. Not hard-coding the list of release architectures would be best. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Re: Bug#849703: ITP: ansible-doc -- Documentation for Ansible

"W. Martin Borgert" writes: > Then why not make an additional binary package from the same > source package? This way ansible and its documentation would > not get out of sync. Unfortunately, we don't build ansible off of the git repository, but rather from the released tarballs. (The version in

Re: Migration despite an RC bug?

On Sat, 31 Dec 2016, Ian Jackson wrote: > Don Armstrong writes ("Re: Migration despite an RC bug?"): > > I'm still not quite sure how the script was failing. The outer shell > > invocation which calls a perl script to do the versioning database > > update is run with set -e, and the perl script sh

yf(6):

http://lagiostradelmonaco.it/epaialy.php A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both.Margareta Oregon

Bug#849842: ITP: ykush-control -- control application for Yepkit YKUSH Switchable USB Hub board

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christoph Biedl * Package name: ykush-control Version : 1.0.0 Upstream Author : 2015-2016 Yepkit Lda * URL : https://github.com/Yepkit/ykush * License : MIT Programming Lang: C++ Description : control application