Colin Watson wrote...
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:52:15PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > That's a good theoretical argument. But in practice, I think the subset
> > of architectures for which bar works correctly will always include
> > amd64, and John D. Rebuilder will have access to such a box
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:57:33AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Colin Watson (2016-11-12 03:58:04)
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:58:13AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > * wanna-build(?)'s resolution of arch-specific build-depends is buggy.
> > > For
> > > example, my packa
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:57:33AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Colin Watson (2016-11-12 03:58:04)
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:58:13AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > * wanna-build(?)'s resolution of arch-specific build-depends is buggy.
> > > For
> > > example, my
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:51:50AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:57:33AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Quoting Colin Watson (2016-11-12 03:58:04)
> > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:58:13AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > > * wanna-build(?)'s reso
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 11:51:50AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:57:33AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Quoting Colin Watson (2016-11-12 03:58:04)
> > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:58:13AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > > * wanna-build(?)'s resolution of arch-specifi
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 09:56:01AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote...
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:52:15PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > > That's a good theoretical argument. But in practice, I think the subset
> > > of architectures for which bar works correctly will always
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 09:56:01AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote...
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:52:15PM -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > > That's a good theoretical argument. But in practice, I think the subset
> > > of architectures for which bar works correctly will always
On Thursday 28 July 2016 12:10 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I'm going to setup a gitlab.debian.net alias to git.fosscommunity.in for
> those who want to use gitlab unofficially.
I have setup gitlab.debian.net as an alias for git.fosscommunity.in
$ host gitlab.debian.net
gitlab.debian.net is an ali
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 01:50:32PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > There is currently one package in the Debian archive (pixfrogger) that
> > > declares "Build-Indep-Architecture: i386" in its .dsc because, even
> > > though it builds an architecture-independent binary package, building it
> > > r
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 03:13:54PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 09:56:01AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Colin Watson wrote...
> > > We know this not to have been the case in the past.
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/217427 mentions the cases of
> > > pa
Hi,
Quoting Colin Watson (2016-11-12 18:09:22)
> > * it supports only a single build-indep architecture rather than a list
>
> Not so; you have misread the code. It is a list of architectures that
> architecture-independent binary packages can be on.
>
> > I propose the new field to be a list p
Hi,
On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 16:24:32 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Important change in this release of the installer
> =
>
> * debootstrap now defaults to merged-/usr, that is with /bin, /sbin,
>/lib* being symlinks to their counterpart in /usr
On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 15:13 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
[...]
> If manually specifying that is needed, pixfrogger is another case that
> should declare a list rather than a single arch: i386 is basically gone
> other than hardware emulation on amd64, armhf is a better supported 32-bit
> arch these
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:47:00PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 15:13 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > If manually specifying that is needed, pixfrogger is another case that
> > should declare a list rather than a single arch: i386 is basically gone
> > other than hardware emu
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 06:27:55PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Colin Watson (2016-11-12 18:09:22)
> > > * it supports only a single build-indep architecture rather than a list
> >
> > Not so; you have misread the code. It is a list of architectures that
> > architecture-independent b
Control: severity 843073 important
On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 18:37:52 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 16:24:32 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Important change in this release of the installer
> > =
> >
> > * debootstrap now defau
On 06/08/2016 09:39 PM, Adrien CLERC wrote:
> Let me add another one: GitBlit (http://gitblit.com/) It may not be as
> active as others, but it is quite simple, and provide me a huge benefits
> over Gogs, since it knows how to handle git repositories created by
> third-party on disk. Using Gogs,
On 06/08/2016 10:08 AM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:47:56AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
>> I am also not very keen on using a system with a "open core / enterprise"
>> model. For such a crucial service I would really prefer a real open source
>> system. But maybe I am alon
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Smirnov
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: affects -1 golang-github-appc-docker2aci
Control: block 839282 by -1
Package name: golang-github-opencontainers-image-spec
Version: 1
Am 12.11.2016 um 19:17 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> Control: severity 843073 important
> Ok, Mattia Rizzolo tells me (thanks!) that it's actually twice per
> week, and that the debootstrap used is from jessie
Is this really so for all buildds?
See #843433, the sparc64 buildds apparently do use a mer
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 08:55:43PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 12.11.2016 um 19:17 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> > Control: severity 843073 important
>
> > Ok, Mattia Rizzolo tells me (thanks!) that it's actually twice per
> > week, and that the debootstrap used is from jessie
>
> Is this really
On 07/11/16 at 21:52 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/11/16 at 17:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Nov 2016, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > It's worth noting that TSX is broken in 'Haswell' processors and is
> > > supposed to be disabled via a microcode update.
Lucas,
Thanks for trying a build run with TSX enabled.
On Sat, 12 Nov 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I did an archive rebuild on Amazon EC2 using m4.16xlarge instances, that
> use a CPU with TSX enabled.
What microcode revision is that Xeon E5-2686 running?
> I've filed bugs for the packages tha
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 07:23:13PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> It is nice, I'm running it, but even for my personal installation I
> found too many annoying things (including looong time till bugfixes
> arrive in a release), so that I think about migrating to gogs.
> Its nice, works well, but it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Pentchev
* Package name: libconfig-methodproxy-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : Aran Deltac
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Config-MethodProxy
* License : Artistic or GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
Des
On Wednesday 13 July 2016 08:41 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> I have referred this to CTTE
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830978
grunt is now available in main, a big part of this issue is resolved,
but I need help to fix the remaining issue.
RFH http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 08:55:43PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Is this really so for all buildds?
> See #843433, the sparc64 buildds apparently do use a merged-usr chroot.
The issue depends on the loader path of the architecture. Although I do
not understand why, it seems that /lib64 is less pro
27 matches
Mail list logo
