On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 05:47:00PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 15:13 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > If manually specifying that is needed, pixfrogger is another case that > > should declare a list rather than a single arch: i386 is basically gone > > other than hardware emulation on amd64, armhf is a better supported 32-bit > > arch these days (at least counting porters and new gear). > > Simpler solution: remove fenix, pixbros and pixfrogger. The world > doesn't need a 32-bit only game library and 2 derivative games. > (fenix is dead upstream - homepage is still up but the links are all > broken; it's never had a new upstream version in Debian.)
I have no particular attachment to pixfrogger et al, but the underlying problem isn't new and isn't likely to be fixed by whack-a-mole. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]