Here is a little bug I just discovered:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22664658/finding-off-t-size
For reference, here are the packages affected in debian:
http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=LARGE_OFF_T
For reference clang fails as was expected by the initial author, but
recent gcc (defa
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Here is a little bug I just discovered:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22664658/finding-off-t-size
>
> For reference, here are the packages affected in debian:
>
> http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=LARGE_OFF_T
While this affe
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:06:02PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Here is a little bug I just discovered:
> >
> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22664658/finding-off-t-size
> >
> > For reference, here are the packages affected in debian:
> >
> > http://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=LARGE_
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:06:02PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> > Here is a little bug I just discovered:
>> >
>> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22664658/finding-off-t-size
>> >
>> > For reference, here are the packages affec
Hi,
I need to test some stuff on an x32 image. Does Debian have one already
to use in a VM?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1395926052.14680.68.ca...
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
> I need to test some stuff on an x32 image. Does Debian have one already
> to use in a VM?
This wiki page explains how to setup an x32 install:
https://wiki.debian.org/X32Port
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSC
* Mathieu Malaterre , 2014-03-27, 13:06:
I preferred not to mass bug everyone out there and instead:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742780
But many packages don't regenerate autofoo at build-time. :-(
LFS is still a release goal, not a requirement.
Then "severity: grave"
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Mathieu Malaterre , 2014-03-27, 13:06:
>
>> I preferred not to mass bug everyone out there and instead:
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742780
>
>
> But many packages don't regenerate autofoo at build-time. :-(
And your
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:22:59PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > I need to test some stuff on an x32 image. Does Debian have one already
> > to use in a VM?
>
> This wiki page explains how to setup an x32 install:
>
> https://wiki.debian.o
Quoting Cameron Norman (camerontnor...@gmail.com):
> El Wed, 26 de Mar 2014 a las 9:03 PM, gustavo panizzo
> escribió:
> >On 03/26/2014 11:49 PM, Cameron Norman wrote:
> >I wonder if dbus activation
> >> could be used to accomplish this. Of course, then one would not
> >>be able
> >> to put (in t
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-ecodist
Version : 1.2.9-1
Upstream Author : Sarah Goslee and Dean Urban
* URL or Web page : http://cran.r-project.org/package=ecodist
* License : GPL-2
Description : GNU R package for d
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-energy
Version : 1.6.1
Upstream Author : Maria L. Rizzo and Gabor J. Szekely
* URL or Web page : http://cran.r-project.org/package=energy
* License : GPL-2
Description : GNU R package f
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-mvnormtest
Version : 0.1-9
Upstream Author : Slawomir Jarek
* URL or Web page : http://cran.r-project.org/package=mvnormtest
* License : GPL-2
Description : GNU R package for multivariat
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> You don't need to jump through those multistrap hoops anymore.
Could you update the wiki page with the latest instructions or ask the
x32 porters to do so?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Maximiliano Curia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: redshift-plasmoid
Version : 0.6.2
Upstream Author : Simone Gaiarin
* URL :
http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Redshift+plasmoid?content=148737
Does
Le 27 mars 2014 15:05, "Mathieu Malaterre" a écrit :
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > * Mathieu Malaterre , 2014-03-27, 13:06:
> >
> >> I preferred not to mass bug everyone out there and instead:
> >>
> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742780
> >
* Mathieu Malaterre , 2014-03-27, 15:04:
I preferred not to mass bug everyone out there and instead:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742780
But many packages don't regenerate autofoo at build-time. :-(
And your point is ?
That they won't immediately benefit from fixed #742
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Christian Körner"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: hastymail2
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Jason Munro ja...@hastymail.org
* URL : http://www.hastymail.org/
* License : GPL, BSD
Progr
Greetings everyone.
As we all know apt-get does a very good job, by identifying which
packages were installed automatically as dependencies and aren't needed
anymore.
Wile this is very nice, I still fear that, from time to time, there are
manually installed packages gathering on my computer which I
Sven Bartscher writes:
> I thought a little while about this problem and came up with the idea,
> that every manually installed package whose files were not accessed for
> more than a specified time (a month, a year, whatever) could be
> considered unneeded.
> So I started writing a script that
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> This approach also brings some problems. For example some packages
> that have files which belong to a frequently scanned database aren't
> detected because they are accessed by the scan.
popcon-largest-unused gets at this somewhat, and you could achiev
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 567 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 134 (new: 0)
Total number of packages request
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Sven Bartscher wrote:
> Also I'm not really sure if this is even a good idea, or if there is
> maybe another program already present which does already identify
> unused, manually installed packages and I just didn't find it.
deborphan seems like a similar package
Hello,
I'm trying to upload a source package created with
svn-buildpackage. However:
$ svn-buildpackage -S -d -nc
[...]
dpkg-buildpackage -S -d -nc
dpkg-buildpackage: source package python-dugong
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.2+dfsg-2
dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution unstable
dpkg-bui
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 05:14:47PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> I'm trying to upload a source package created with
> svn-buildpackage. However:
> $ svn-buildpackage -S -d -nc
> [...]
> dpkg-buildpackage -S -d -nc
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package python-dugong
> dpkg-buildpackage: source versio
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 18:19:45 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 05:14:47PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> > I'm trying to upload a source package created with
> > svn-buildpackage. However:
> > I have no idea what may have caused this. Can someone give me a hint
> > where I sh
On 03/27/2014 05:14 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to upload a source package created with
> svn-buildpackage. However:
[...]
> Good signature on python-dugong_2.2+dfsg-2.dsc.
> Checksum doesn't match for python-dugong_2.2+dfsg-2.dsc
Turns out this is bug #742535
A workaround (
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Robie Basak
* Package name: mod-authnz-persona
Version : 0.8.1
Upstream Author : Dirkjan Ochtman
* URL : https://github.com/mozilla/mod_authnz_persona
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : Apac
Hi Joerg,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:11:16PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Those are just two examples - we sure could go and write down some
> more. But they are examples: we can't foresee all the possible content
> someone may propose.
> So instead, we have a simple set of questions that should
On 26 Mar 2014 12:30, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
[...]
> > But here is the vastly oversimplified technical argument...
> >
> To the point of being neither technical nor valid.
> (Which admittedly was never in doubt even before I started reading.)
What do you consider technical?
Vastly oversimplifie
30 matches
Mail list logo
