On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > Lack of use? No kidding. TLSA RRs have been promoted to IETF proposed
> > > standard in August 2012[1]. And DNS servers haven't support for them
> > > since recently (I'd say 6 months to 1 year).
> >
> > DNS servers have supported them for years;
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 05:03:00PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > And while we are at it, do we *really* need the information about
> > /bin/sh in at least a significant share of today's bug reports?
>
> You probably want it, beca
Thomas Weber writes:
> The fact that a lot of people use a variety of shells does not mean that
> it makes sense to include it in *every* bug report. How important is the
> user's shell for every database-, web- or fileserver? How for every
> office application? How important is it for requests t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-rednose
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Tim Cuthbertson
* URL : http://gfxmonk.net/dist/0install/rednose.xml
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description :
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 742540 gnome-panel
Bug #742540 [general] general: Get the "Oh no!" message after moving the top
menu bar to the left side of then screen
Bug reassigned from package 'general' to 'gnome-panel'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of
reassign 742540 gnome-panel
thanks
Le lundi 24 mars 2014 à 16:22 -0500, Lowell a écrit :
> After moving the top menu bar to the left side of the screen I am forced to
> logout, and then on every login I am forced to logout.
> If I knew which config files to edit I could login as another user and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-as...@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: wcslib-contrib
Version : 4.21
Upstream Author : Mark Calabretta
* URL : http://www.atn
Edward Allcutt wrote:
>>> Le 24/03/2014 14:23, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
If only people actually used DNSSEC and DANE - Chromium/Google Chrome
dropped support for the latter due to the lack of use[1].
[1]https://www.imperialviolet.org/2011/06/16/dnssecchrome.html
>
> I believe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Xavier Claude
* Package name: casperjs
Version : 1.0.4
Upstream Author : Nicolas Perriault
* URL : http://casperjs.org/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: JavaScript, Python
Description : a navigation scripting &
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-termstyle
Version : 0.1.10
Upstream Author : Tim Cuthbertson
* URL : http://gfxmonk.net/dist/0install/python-termstyle.xml
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Descr
Thank you for the suggesions
-- Forwarded message --
From: Oscar Tark
Date: 2014-03-21 19:04 GMT+01:00
Subject: Glom DEBIAN packaging
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Hello,
I am having problems building the glom debian .deb package so that we may
easily install glom on all ou
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:12:06AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> The fact that a lot of people use a variety of shells does not mean that
> it makes sense to include it in *every* bug report. How important is the
> user's shell for every database-, web- or fileserver? How for every office
> applicat
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Kevin Toppins wrote:
> -> Debian needs to *cut all ties* to systemd
[…]
> -> revert every program systemd took over to its pre-systemd state
>
> -> cut your losses while you still can technically achieve a reversion
Seconded (especially the last bullet point).
bye,
//mi
Simon McVittie debian.org> writes:
> (I would recommend that porters doing manual builds use sbuild if at all
> possible, though, to be as close as possible to what a buildd would have
> done.)
On the other hand, porters are often packagers, and many packagers are
much more familiar with cowbuil
Hi,
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On the other hand, porters are often packagers, and many packagers are
> much more familiar with cowbuilder or pbuilder as it’s *much* simpler
> to set up, and also provides good isolation.
How so? With sbuild-createchroot, sbuild is really simple
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stéphane Glondu
* Package name: ocaml-ctypes
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Jeremy Yallop
* URL : https://github.com/ocamllabs/ocaml-ctypes
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: C, OCaml
Description : library for
On 24/03/2014 17:42, Kevin Toppins wrote:
> To all debian developers:
[snip]
> -Kev
Lots of asterisks won't make a point.
federico
--
Federico Di Gregorio federico.digrego...@dndg.it
Di Nunzio & Di Gregorio srl http://dndg.it
If nobody unde
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:22:53 +1100, Dmitry Smirnov
wrote:
>I just want to note that Startcom is no match to cacert.org in regards to free
>SSL certificates. Some years ago I got free certificate from Startcom but a
>year later Startcom refused to renew it for free.
They renew their certificates
Marc Haber (2014-03-25):
> They renew their certificates only in the last (two?) weeks of the
> lifetime.
Correct, two weeks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Ok, I think we need a wider audience - what d-d thinks about it? bonus
> points if - in case we come out to add init info to every bug report -
> a proper way to retrieve the init running is provided :)
could we please stop talking about shel
On 25 March 2014 08:54, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
[...]
> Lots of asterisks won't make a point.
The asterisks are there to specifically focus your attention on those words.
Because -> I find that if I don't use them -> people tend to misread
what I write (or more so at least)
-Kev
--
To UN
Sandro Tosi writes:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Ok, I think we need a wider audience - what d-d thinks about it? bonus
>> points if - in case we come out to add init info to every bug report -
>> a proper way to retrieve the init running is provided :)
> could we p
I was very proud of my fellow colleagues for not feeding the troll a
full 24 hours later. Thanks for breaking the record :(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debia
On 25/03/2014 16:46, Kevin Toppins wrote:
> On 25 March 2014 08:54, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> [...]
>> > Lots of asterisks won't make a point.
> The asterisks are there to specifically focus your attention on those words.
>
> Because -> I find that if I don't use them -> people tend to misrea
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 04:15:25PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I was very proud of my fellow colleagues for not feeding the troll a
> full 24 hours later. Thanks for breaking the record :(
I agree -> I even *told* people on #-devel to not even -> bother
replying -> since I figured no one woul
On 25 March 2014 11:25, William Unruh wrote:
[...]
> And if they are there, together with all the boldfacing, people tend to
> think that you are a complete kook. So you makes your choices...
Okay, my apologies.
I am not very experienced with lists and the expectations that run within them.
Her
Am 25.03.2014 17:14, schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Sandro Tosi writes:
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
>>> Ok, I think we need a wider audience - what d-d thinks about it? bonus
>>> points if - in case we come out to add init info to every bug report -
>>> a proper way to ret
On 25 Mar 11:36, Kevin Toppins wrote:
> On 25 March 2014 11:25, William Unruh wrote:
> [...]
> > And if they are there, together with all the boldfacing, people tend to
> > think that you are a complete kook. So you makes your choices...
>
> Okay, my apologies.
>
> I am not very experienced with
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:15, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I was very proud of my fellow colleagues for not feeding the troll a
> full 24 hours later. Thanks for breaking the record :(
I had a hope that the no one will answer OP. :(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:40:02 AM UTC-5, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I was very proud of my fellow colleagues for not feeding the troll a
> full 24 hours later. Thanks for breaking the record :(
Jonathan we've been through this before.
-> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/11/msg
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Yaroslav Halchenko
* Package name: python-expyriment
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Oliver Lindemann
* URL : http://www.expyriment.org
* License : GPL-3.0+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python library
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:31:44PM -0500, Kevin Toppins wrote:
> Jonathan we've been through this before.
>
> -> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/11/msg00565.html
>
> -> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/11/msg00604.html
Thanks for the trip down memory lane. This is not
On 13525 March 1977, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> If you can answer these questions with a yes or even a maybe - don't
> While I did agree mostly with this. I believe the last sentence should
> be reworded. Because aircrack-ng, crack or rarcrack could 'maybe' harm
> Debian/mirrors or derivatives.
>
On 13526 March 1977, Ming-ting Wei wrote:
> Distributing pornography in academic network in Taiwan seems like a gray
> area. http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/EngLawContent.aspx?Type=E&id=2
Nice for them, but thats a minority.
> If it can be distributed from a separate repo it should be fine, but I also
On 2014-03-24 17:23, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
I don’t have the source of it at hand (and IANAftpmaster), but
right now, the answer is NO because the promise of the DFSG and
surrounding documents also extends to not just the source pak-
kages but also the distfiles (*.orig.tar.*) isolated. Basically
El Mon, 24 de Mar 2014 a las 9:42 AM, Kevin Toppins
escribió:
To all debian developers:
-> systemd is *fundamentally incompatible* with linux
Now, I realize that's a bold claim, but if you are up for some
reading, I will prove it.
I'll bite.
I even went to Lennart Poettering's google+
El Tue, 25 de Mar 2014 a las 3:11 PM, Cameron Norman
escribió:
See the documentation for the following if they are not familiar to
you:
* dependencies: Wants/WantedBy, Requires/RequiredBy (in
man::systemd.unit)
* states: ConditionFileExists, ConditionFileExecutable, Condition*
(probably in man
previously on this list Brett Parker contributed:
> Maybe you should do some more investigation, get some better clue of
> what you're talking about, and come back with a better, more thought
> out, set of arguments that actually have merit.
Right, by arguing on the basis of the definition of Lin
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:16:12PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> To be honest I'd rather like to see a "ruling" which is codified in
> a policy than random guesswork we do on -devel from observing FTP
> masters' actions. This is not Mao.
There was an ftpteam meeting last week, and this was discusse
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> To be honest I'd rather like to see a "ruling" which is codified in a policy
> than random guesswork we do on -devel from observing FTP masters' actions.
> This is not Mao.
Figuring out what the source is and where it is can be hard, even for
Dear all,
during upgrade tests from stable to sid I found that upgrading
TeX Live does not work.
The reason is that although texlive-common is uninstalled,
and texlive-base (2012) *depends* on texlive-common,
texlive-base is still in installed and proper state:
un texlive-common (
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:29:12 Marc Haber wrote:
> wrote:
> >I just want to note that Startcom is no match to cacert.org in regards to
> >free SSL certificates. Some years ago I got free certificate from Startcom
> >but a year later Startcom refused to renew it for free.
>
> They renew their certif
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:01:24AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear all,
> during upgrade tests from stable to sid I found that upgrading
> TeX Live does not work.
> The reason is that although texlive-common is uninstalled,
> and texlive-base (2012) *depends* on texlive-common,
> texlive-ba
Hi Steve,
thanks for the answer.
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I think your root cause analysis is wrong. If you want help understanding
> why your dist-upgrade didn't work, you should show the output of the actual
> apt command.
Which is very very long, unfortunately.
> What yo
44 matches
Mail list logo
