Thomas Weber <twe...@debian.org> writes: > The fact that a lot of people use a variety of shells does not mean that > it makes sense to include it in *every* bug report. How important is the > user's shell for every database-, web- or fileserver? How for every > office application? How important is it for requests to the release > team? Every single bug report for these (pseudo)packages will include > this information, so it better be important.
It's potentially important for any bug report involving a package containing a shell script, if the bug report involves that shell script, which is hard to determine in advance. There are shell scripts in just about every package we have, given that many packages contain maintainer scripts. It's also a single line in the bug report, so I'm having a hard time understanding why people think it's important enough to even debate. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/8761n2pvy2....@windlord.stanford.edu
