Le vendredi 16 octobre 2009 à 00:51 +0400, Alexander Polakov a écrit :
> Description : lightweight tiling window manager
>
> echinus is a dynamic window manager for X11 supporting
> managing windows in floating, tiled and maximized
> layouts based on dwm. All the configuration is made
> v
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:04:48PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> | This target may be invoked in any directory, and should take care
> | to clean up any temporary files it may have left.
>
> I'm not sure if it is my english at fault here, but don't read this as a
> must requirement (tha
On 10/16/2009 12:25 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 16 octobre 2009 à 00:51 +0400, Alexander Polakov a écrit :
>> Description : lightweight tiling window manager
>>
>> echinus is a dynamic window manager for X11 supporting
>> managing windows in floating, tiled and maximized
>> la
* Ben Finney , 2009-10-16, 10:08:
c) 15 packages call interactive programs (like lynx);
Does your test determine whether this usage is actually invoking the
programs interactively? e.g. ‘lynx -dump $URL’ is not interactive.
I determined failure reasons by manually grepping through logs.
There
]] Daniel Moerner
| > Le vendredi 16 octobre 2009 à 00:51 +0400, Alexander Polakov a écrit :
| >> […] All the configuration is made via config file in Xresources
| >> format, […]
| And it offers a clear advantage: configuration via .Xresources (does
| any other WM support this?) rather than vi
[...] (cool stuff)
> >
> > I'm now wondering whether something like this already exists (I
> > couldn't find anything, though). I'm also not sure where to put this.
>
> gnatbind could be instructed (-E) to store non-symbolic traceback in
> exception
> occurrences, which would be printed out as
On 10/16/2009 01:37 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Daniel Moerner
>
> | > Le vendredi 16 octobre 2009 à 00:51 +0400, Alexander Polakov a écrit :
>
> | >> […] All the configuration is made via config file in Xresources
> | >> format, […]
>
> | And it offers a clear advantage: configuration via
Any opinions?
This ONLY MATTERS if the user is using a self-compiled kernel, upgrades
of Debian kernel packages are automatically detected.
- Forwarded message from Greg Alexander -
From: Greg Alexander
To: Marco d'Itri
Subject: Re: Bug#551140: udev preinstall script fails if kernel d
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 01:54:48AM -0700, Daniel Moerner wrote:
>
> You're correct, I was skimming and misread the description. I think the
> advantage still lies in being reconfigurable via changes to a file,
> rather than recompilation like in the case of dwm. But it is admittedly
> more debatab
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Romain Francoise
* Package name: zeya
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Phil Sung
* URL : http://web.psung.name/zeya/
* License : AGPLv3
Programming Lang: Python, Javascript
Description : a web music server
Zeya
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: mp3diags
Version : 0.99.06.041
Upstream Author : Marian Ciobanu
* URL : http://mp3diags.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : find issues in MP3 files
There are two problems:
- kernel versions
- configuration of kernel
The first one is a nightmare to solve properly and IMHO we
can still require some brain and manual tweak of admins.
One solution is to have (like old modutils and kernel modules)
different programs for different kernels, but this
Hi,
On Freitag, 16. Oktober 2009, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Most tiling WM are customizable by changing one configuration file.
> On that regardi, dwm is quite unique.
So you're arguing that echinus fixes this bug in dwm and echinus should
conflict+provide dwm? ;-)
regards,
Holge
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Pollock
* Package name: blame
Version : 1.3.1
Upstream Author : Michael Chapman
* URL : http://blame.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : display the last modification for e
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 08:23:34AM -0700, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Andrew Pollock
>
> * Package name: blame
> Version : 1.3.1
> Upstream Author : Michael Chapman
> * URL : http://blame.sourceforge.net/
> * License : G
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 05:44:19PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> As much as I do like this software as it turned out to be useful to me
> in several cases, I'm not sure using the generic 'blame' name is a
> good idea. Probably rcs-blame (with or without dash, you choose) would
> be better IMHO.
I co
R 2.10.0, due out October 26, will switch to an internal html converter from
the latex-alike Rd format coupled with an internal webserver. See below for
the section on 'Significant user-visible changes' in the NEWS file from
2.10.0 -- taken from the Oct 13 beta currently in unstable.
This means
Package: wnpp
Owner: Luca Falavigna
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-launchpadlib
Version : 1.5.2
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/launchpadlib
* License : LGPLv3
Programming L
Package: wnpp
Owner: Luca Falavigna
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: lazr.restfulclient
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/lazr.restfulclient
* License : LGPLv3
Programm
Package: wnpp
Owner: Luca Falavigna
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-wadllib
Version : 1.1.4
Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
* URL : https://launchpad.net/wadllib
* License : LGPLv3
Programming Lang: Pytho
[Daniel Moerner]
> I think the advantage still lies in being reconfigurable via changes
> to a file, rather than recompilation like in the case of dwm.
Seriously? Having a configuration file is considered a noteworthy
feature? 1985 called, they want dwm back.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Hi:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: Luca Falavigna
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name : lazr.restfulclient
> Version : 0.9.9
> Upstream Author : Canonical Ltd.
> * URL : ht
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:31, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
> version number. A casual listing from:
> $ apt-cache search . | cut -d" " -f1 | grep "\."
>
> doesn't seem to turn anything up.
$ apt-cache -s=? search . | cut -d" " -f1 | g
Hi Sandro:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:31, Jonathan Yu wrote:
>> Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
>> version number. A casual listing from:
>> $ apt-cache search . | cut -d" " -f1 | grep "\."
>>
>> doesn't
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:38, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Interesting. Of note, however, is that those packages all begin with
> python-. Maybe something like: python-lazr.restfulclient is more
> appropriate?
Source packages names are different from binary packages names: did
you read Python policy abo
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:31:37 -0400
Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
> version number.
openoffice.org* is a long list of packages that contain a dot that is
not part of a version and then there are all the libraries that have
libfoo0.1 and
Sandro:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:38, Jonathan Yu wrote:
>> Interesting. Of note, however, is that those packages all begin with
>> python-. Maybe something like: python-lazr.restfulclient is more
>> appropriate?
>
> Source packages names ar
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:31:37 -0400
> Jonathan Yu wrote:
>
>> Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
>> version number.
>
> openoffice.org* is a long list of packages that contain a dot that is
> not part of a v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Yu schrieb:
> Yep, that's what I meant by 'version part' -- though not part of the
> actual package version, it does refer to a series (apache2.0 vs
> apache2.2 for example) of packages. This, I consider to be distinct
> from other packages li
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:53, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> In Perl at last,
> packages are named like "Package::Name", while the Debian packages are
> called "libpackage-name-perl." If the only justification for naming
> Python modules that way is that it is more similar to the Python
> module names, one
A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I includ
.. Original Message ...
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:38:58 -0400 Jonathan Yu
wrote:
>Hi Sandro:
>
>On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 23:31, Jonathan Yu
wrote:
>>> Strange, I've never seen a package name with a dot in it prior to the
>>> version
Hi folks,
I have released schroot version 1.3.0, which will shortly be uploaded
to Debian experimental. This will undergo further testing and gain
a few more features and fixes (see the TODO file) before it enters
Debian unstable as a 1.4.x stable series targeted at squeeze.
If you are an schroo
Dirk Eddelbuettel (16/10/2009):
> This means we "should" rebuild all packages or else they will upon
> load trigger a nagging message 'package foo was built under R
> version x.y.z and may not function properly' as well as possible
> malfunctions of the help system. As we're only talking 100+
> p
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:44:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have released schroot version 1.3.0, which will shortly be uploaded
> to Debian experimental. This will undergo further testing and gain
> a few more features and fixes (see the TODO file) before it enters
> Debian uns
On 17 October 2009 at 01:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel (16/10/2009):
| > This means we "should" rebuild all packages or else they will upon
| > load trigger a nagging message 'package foo was built under R
| > version x.y.z and may not function properly' as well as possible
| > m
Package: wnpp
Owner: tak...@asis.media-as.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-mecab
Version : 0.98
Upstream Author : Taku Kudo
* URL or Web page : http://sourceforge.net/projects/mecab/
* License : GPL | LGPL | BSD
Description : mecab binding for Python
37 matches
Mail list logo
