<>
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:12:59AM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> The justification in the bug report is completely bogus. If the
> clients did not shut down by the time the UPS master goes down then
> you have bigger problems. Making the UPS daemon available for half a
> second more does not make s
Dear friends,
I am glad to announce release 0.9.1 of Artha ~ A handy off-line English
thesaurus/dictionary based on WordNet with regular expressions based search
feature added to it with this release.
Artha houses distinct features like global hot key look-ups, regular
expressions based search
reopen 529871
clone 529871 -1
reassign -1 nautilus-image-converter
severity -1 serious
retitle -1 nautilus-image-converter: upload of experimental packages to
unstable required
reassign 529871 nautilus-filename-repairer
severity 529871 serious
retitle 529871 nautilus-filename-repairer upload of ex
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 529871
Bug#529871: Dependency mismatch for nautilus-filename-repairer and
nautilus-image-converter
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> clone 529871 -1
Bug#529871: Dependency mismatch for nautilus-filename-repairer and
nautilus-imag
Hello,
I am trying to find docs teaching how to package (The Right Debian Way)
an application SELinux custom policy.
Could you point some urls to study this packaging procedure (policy, dev
helper scripts, etc)?
At the [1], I found somewhat vague instructions (for a newbie) regarding
custom policie
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefanos Harhalakis
* Package name: iguanair
Version : 0.99
Upstream Author : IguanaWorks Inc.
* URL : http://iguanaworks.net/
* License : GPLv2 and LGPLv2
Programming Lang: C and Python
Description : IguanaWorks
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: r-cran-g.data
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : David Brahm
* URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/g.data
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: R
Description : GNU R package for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller
* Package name: r-other-mott-happy
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Richard Mott
* URL : http://www.well.ox.ac.uk/happy/happyR.shtml.
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C,R
Description : GNU R pa
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:23:16PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I admit that keeping OpenMotif for one single package with a
> low popcon seems not very effective and it is probably not really
> the most up to date GUI library. But there are some users of
> Arb (and their number is growing as I k
Hello Stephen,
On Friday 22 May 2009 16:30:03 Stephen Gran wrote:
[...]
> If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
> accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
> with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
>
Much appreciated. Thanks.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
> and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
> on various debian.org machines (primarily ri
* Stephen Gran [2009-05-22 23:30:03 CEST]:
> If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
> accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
> with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
> from debian.org machines or
On Fri, 22 May 2009 22:30:03 +0100
Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to
> packages.debian.org, and it looks like it collects some useful mail
> from automated scripts on various debian.org machines (primarily
> ries), and about 1000 spams a day
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
> accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
> with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
> from debia
> I haven't done an exhaustive survey, but it seems pretty clear so far
> that the domain does not get any significant amount of legitimate mail
> from machines other than the debian.org hosts.
As I understand it, @packages.d.o is the standard way of contacting
the maintainers of a package in an e
On Friday 22 May 2009, Stephen Gran wrote:
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
I always use it to CC the maintainer(s) of a package I reassign a bug to,
or if I want to CC a package maintainer on some discussion.
For me it's the most natural address to use,
On Friday 22 May 2009, Neil Williams wrote:
> Maybe a list of packages that do use it and an address to email for
> those who want to start using it at a later date?
That would defeat its purpose. It is not about which maintainers use it,
but about who uses it to contact maintainers.
Cheers,
FJP
On May 22, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> @packages.d.o is known to be "the easiest way to get in touch with a
> maintainer," and is often used when CC'ing maintainers of multiple packages.
Then it needs to be fixed, soon, because it the last few weeks I started
receiving a huge quantity of trivially
This one time, at band camp, Jonathan Wiltshire said:
> The debian-l10n-english team, and perhaps others, use this domain to
> keep the maintainer in the loop during Smith English-language reviews
> and the subsequent translations.
This one time, at band camp, Adeodato Simó said:
> I use it all th
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to
> packages.debian.org, (...) it seems pretty clear so far that the
> domain does not get any significant amount of legitimate mail from
> machines other than the debian.org hosts.
I
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Hommey
* Package name: vmfs-tools
Version : 0.1.0 soon to be released
Upstream Author : Christophe Fillot
Mike Hommey
* URL : none yet
* License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: C
Description
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
>So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
>and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
>on various debian.org machines (primar
23 matches
Mail list logo
