On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
For Lenny, we just removed the `[Biology]' tag that was heading the
short descriptions of the packages maintained by the Debian-Med
packaging team, and my gut feeling was that forcing additions of
"biological" in a field where space is limited was lettin
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> The more we signal to non-biologists that the package is not for them,
> the less we can tell biologists what it does. Couldn't we rely on
> Debtags to indicate the field of the package to our users?
No. Debtags is meant for searching, it's not meant to
ti, 2008-07-08 kello 14:51 +0900, Charles Plessy kirjoitti:
> How about "builds assembly by mapping short reads to reference
> sequences"?
Speaking as an outsider to both biology and interior decoration, as far
as I can determine that short description could apply equally well to
genetics and IKEA
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> How about "builds assembly by mapping short reads to reference
> sequences"? (cut from Upsteam's website) The mapping is definitely
> not genetic, and if the authors avoided "genomic", there is probably
> a good reason for.
Consider:
"assembles short
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:19:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Using alternatives for kadmin is more problematic.
Which means that you need to find a consens and rename _both_ if none is
found.
> (BTW, Brian, this discussion reminds me that I'd like to use alternatives
> for krb5.conf.5 so that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ruben Pollan Bella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tudu
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Ruben Pollan Bella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cauterized.net/~meskio/tudu/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Desc
Le Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:55:01AM -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit :
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > How about "builds assembly by mapping short reads to reference
> > sequences"? (cut from Upsteam's website) The mapping is definitely
> > not genetic, and if the authors avoided "genom
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 8. Publicise more clearly the places where new people could help
> out. I'm commonly asked by people how they could get involved in
> Debian, or what tasks most urgently need help, and those are quite
> difficult thi
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4980
I just find it wierd that there doesn't appear to be a single person
who can explain the reasoning for the change...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTE
* Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4980
>
> I just find it wierd that there doesn't appear to be a single person
> who can explain the reasoning for the change...
T
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, William Pitcock wrote:
If you do build-depends on gcc-multilib and g++-multilib, it should fix
this problem.
As I said it fixes the build problem - but now I have a package with a
not working executable. I guess it is also a simple 64 bit problem which
might be easily solv
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 01:52:43PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4980
> >
> > I just find it wierd that there doesn't appea
Yeah, I'm reasonably sure that alternatives are wrong for kadmin.
Editor is intended to be used by a user. Kadmin is often used by
users but is also quite often used by scripts.
Editors also can all work with text files. It's basically not true
that you can use a heimdal kadmin against an MIT re
> Yeah, I'm reasonably sure that alternatives are wrong for kadmin.
> Editor is intended to be used by a user. Kadmin is often used by
> users but is also quite often used by scripts.
>
[...]
Well, if alternatives is the wrong approach, let's try an analytical approach:
- heimdal-clients and kr
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:45:23PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:16:22PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >For various reasons we don't use it at work - instead we added some GCC
> >command line options to relocate the debug info at compile time. In
> >the end, it comes
Hi,
since a few feeks reportbug-ng segfaults quite often. Since I haven't
made any changes in this time, I think one of the libs rng depends on is
the problem. Currently it depends on python-soappy and python-qt3. I
think SOAPpy is not the problem, since I played around with it a few
days ago
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 01:47:51PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:37 AM, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4980
> I just find it wierd that there doesn't appear to be a single person
> who can explain the reason
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:19:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Using alternatives for kadmin is more problematic.
> Which means that you need to find a consens and rename _both_ if none is
> found.
I certainly agree that's an even worse option.
--
Charles Plessy dijo [Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:00:17PM +0900]:
> > Consider:
> >
> > "assembles short fixed-legth DNA sequences by mapping to reference
> > sequences"
>
> Hi Don,
>
> After quickly browsing the Maq's user manual, I get the feeling that its
> main feature is not assembly (in parti
Michael Tautschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, if alternatives is the wrong approach, let's try an analytical approach:
>
> - heimdal-clients and krb5-user must not both be installed: Clearly,
> conflicts: is indicated. Then both may provide kadmin. It will break
> no system (they can'
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 06:40:05 pm Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ulrich made the change, and he's not exactly known for giving helpful
> explanations. Apparently he thinks bug ping-pong is a better use of his
> time.
it sounds like we have another contender for the annual jörg schilling
award[1].
DE MME ANTOINETE VAUDEQUIN
19 Seagrave Road, Fulham,
London SW6 1RP,
United Kingdom.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bonjour,
Je suis Madame Antoinette Vaudequin une citoyenne américaine, mais jâhabite
à Londres.
Je suis négociant dans la vente et lâachat d'or,je travaille toute
lâannée sur ce t
On Tue,08.Jul.08, 10:48:18, ruben wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Ruben Pollan Bella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: tudu
> Version : 0.3
> Upstream Author : Ruben Pollan Bella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://cauterized.net/~meskio/t
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
> After quickly browsing the Maq's user manual, I get the feeling that
> its main feature is not assembly (in particular, it can not compute
> de novo assemblies).
Yes, but can it complete a dense enough map so that it's an assembly?
[De novo assembly is
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 03:15:28AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 02:42 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> > For discussion:
> >
> > Gnome, KDE, and XFCE are the the top three desktops used in debian and
> > cover most users of desktops in debian.
> >
> > They all us
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 04:56:02PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Actually, should udev be killed at all when switching to single user
> > mode?
>
> I don't think so. Single user mode is for sysadmin tasks and I'd say that
> the udev daemon should be running for those as perfor
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:28:51AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Seems like this script really belongs in the examples directory.
>
> IMHO it is an RFC requirement, however the solution with a synchronous
Eh, that does not parse. Either it is a matt
On Jul 09, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would tend to disagree. 'single user mode' means 'the bare minimum for
> the system to work'; provided the system still has a static /dev if udev
> is not active (it does, right?), udev is not required at all for
> single user.
If the syste
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:06:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Correct line numbers when dealing with inline templates, for one.
>> There were some other niceties, but I can't recall what they were off
>> the top of my head.
>
> Sorry, but this is e
> Charles Plessy dijo [Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:00:17PM +0900]:
>
> How about "maps short polymorphic reads to reference biological sequences".
Le Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 08:40:28AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
>
> I think this line is quite nice as a short description - And as the
> first line of t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: srf
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : http://srf.sourceforge.net/groups.html <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://srf.sourceforge.net/
License : Apache License V2.0
Progra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> IMHO it is an RFC requirement, however the solution with a synchronous
>
> Eh, that does not parse. Either it is a matter of opinion, or it is a
> matter of standard. Please pick one, not both; they are incompatible.
s/IMHO/AFAIK/ - but see my other po
Bastian Blank wrote:
>> (BTW, Brian, this discussion reminds me that I'd like to use alternatives
>> for krb5.conf.5 so that krb5-doc and heimdal-doc don't need to conflict.
>>
>
> Prdon, this is missuse of that mechanism. man already can do that.
>
How?
Brian May
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Second: XDG has less features than debian-menu currently does. For
> instance, unless I'm mistaken it's not possible to specify in an XDG
> .desktop file that a particular application is a curses or similar
> application
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:06:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> Correct line numbers when dealing with inline templates, for one.
> >> There were some other niceties, but I can't re
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> (BTW, Brian, this discussion reminds me that I'd like to use alternatives
>>> for krb5.conf.5 so that krb5-doc and heimdal-doc don't need to conflict.
>> Prdon, this is missuse of that mechanism. man already can do that.
> How?
Al
36 matches
Mail list logo