On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 12:00:38AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:06:40PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > >> Correct line numbers when dealing with inline templates, for one. > >> There were some other niceties, but I can't recall what they were off > >> the top of my head. > > > > Sorry, but this is either someone's uncontributed gcc patches, or > > (more likely) hearsay. > > I fairly sure I saw a clear difference at one point, though it would > have been with GCC 3.3 or 4.0. Here if I didn't use -g3, I would get > the line number in the source file with a backtrace, but with -g3 I > would get the line number inside the inline templated function I was > calling on that line. > > However, it's been some time since I did this and my memory may be > faulty. It may be that I was also using -gdwarf-2 when stabs was > still the default, and that's where the difference lies. I can't > remember when DWARF2 became the default.
Hum, unless I'm mistaken as to what you mean by inline templated functions, I do see that on mozilla nsCOMPtr<type> constructs, that show me line numbers in nsCOMPtr.h. That is with -g, not -g3. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
