Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sebastian Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: packagekit
Version : 0.1.8
Upstream Author : Richard Hughsie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.packagekit.org
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C, Python
D
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:42:17AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I have had a problem with the way GSOC was handled in Debian in the past
> years.
>
> Many of the students that were selected were already well-known Debian
> contributors or developers. The first problem with that is that some of
> > (1) Forbid DDs and people in the NM process waiting for FD/DAM to
> > apply as students.
>
> I'm not sure we will be able to reach a consensus on this, but my vote
> would be for this point.
Seconded. :)
Greetings
Winnie
>
> Cheers.
--
.''`. Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :'
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:23:33AM -0600, Anibal Avelar wrote:
> http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/Mascot_Harmony_without_Strings_by_ravenmosher.jpg
That looks like some sort of big eyeball?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 08:53:04AM +0100, Sebastian Heinlein wrote:
> * Package name: packagekit
> Description : PackageKit provides a distribution neutral interface to
> manage software packages. It provides a system wide daemon that performs
> tasks like refreshing the cash, updating
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:55:23AM +0100, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
>
> > > (1) Forbid DDs and people in the NM process waiting for FD/DAM to
> > > apply as students.
> >
> > I'm not sure we will be able to reach a consensus on this, but my vote
> > would be for this point.
I'm not completely persu
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:15:48 -0800, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Timothy G Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Anders Kaseorg and I created a system of CDBS modules (which we've
>> tentatively packaged as the config-package-dev package) for creating
>> Debian configuration packages.
Hey,
> > > > (1) Forbid DDs and people in the NM process waiting for FD/DAM to
> > > > apply as students.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure we will be able to reach a consensus on this, but my
> > > vote would be for this point.
>
> I'm not completely persuaded this is correct. Someone should explain
> why
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 10:20 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> You don’t know Jidanni, do you?
It doesn't matter if I do or not. Someone who is trying to contribute
shouldn't be told to piss off, or ridiculed on -devel. Doing that will
drive away not only that contributor, but any potential contribu
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
I'm not sure we will be able to reach a consensus on this, but my vote
would be for this point.
I'm not completely persuaded this is correct. Someone should explain
why an existing contributor does not concentrate his/her efforts on
the choose
On Tue February 26 2008 2:05:50 pm Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> It is very unfortunate for git that most of its advocates want to
> adopt these almost unmanageable development practices along with the
> revision control software.
Yes, I agree. And even more ironic that Linus himself doesn't think that
On Tue February 26 2008 6:55:53 am Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Edward Allcutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >
> > So that would make hg the only VCS package maintained in a VCS inferior
> > to itself? :P
>
> That's because hg-buildpackage is not really used much in Deb
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pymssql
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Park joon-cheol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andrzej Kukula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pymssql.sourceforge.net/
* Li
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 08:11 -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Tue February 26 2008 6:55:53 am Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Edward Allcutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > So that would make hg the only VCS package maintained in a VCS inferior
> > > to itse
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:42:17AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> (1) Forbid DDs and people in the NM process waiting for
> FD/DAM to apply as students.
What if we do this, and still do not get many new people
applying? How about a policy of prioritising
non-DD/NM/DM/whatever contributions, rather
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thorsten Schmale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: monkey
Version : 0.9.2
Upstream Author : Eduardo Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://monkeyd.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Hi.
I has been suggested by people met at the FOSDEM this weekend, that I
forward my request to -devel list, so here is it.
phpGroupware was removed from Debian, and I'm proposing a new packaging
(and a new maintainer) in order to have it back if possible (and on time
for lenny ;).
You'll find be
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27/02/08 at 00:42 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Google are running their Summer of Code programme again this year[1],
> > and if we want to take part again we need to apply between March 3rd
>
Hi Patrick,
* Patrick Winnertz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-27 12:14]:
> > > > > (1) Forbid DDs and people in the NM process waiting for FD/DAM to
> > > > > apply as students.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure we will be able to reach a consensus on this, but my
> > > > vote would be for this point.
> >
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:42:17AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/02/08 at 00:42 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Google are running their Summer of Code programme again this year[1],
> > and if we want to take part again we need to apply between March 3rd
> > and March 12
On 27/02/08 at 16:33 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> If some projects in the past were a failure, it is solely the problem
> of the management (=student's mentor:), it doesn't matter if the
> student was or wasn't a DD. If the student is working on something
> else (doesn't matter it is also related
On 27/02/08 at 11:33 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> I'm not completely persuaded this is correct. Someone should explain
> why an existing contributor does not concentrate his/her efforts on
> the choosen project instead of wasting time in other tasks
Because all DDs are human, tend to hav
On 27/02/08 at 14:04 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I partly agree here. For instance it might be hard to find out a
> reasonable task that fits the skills and interests of the student
> out of the pure description if he is not involved in Debian before.
Then fix the task or its description? I'm s
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27/02/08 at 16:33 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > If some projects in the past were a failure, it is solely the problem
> > of the management (=student's mentor:), it doesn't matter if the
> > student was or wasn't a
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 18:52, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> However, we cannot blame the managers/mentors here: it's difficult
> enough to manage people working remotely, possibly in a different
> timezone, and for free (students are paid for their time, not their
> mentors).
This is also a matte
* Lucas Nussbaum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080227 08:41]:
> On 27/02/08 at 00:42 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Google are running their Summer of Code programme again this year[1],
> > and if we want to take part again we need to apply between March 3rd
> > and March 12th. If we'r
> > I would regard
> > GSoC as a reasonable means to stress the tasks we would really
> > like to have done and encourage people to tackle them.
>
> I consider that the main goal of GSOC is a social one: let new people
> learn about free software projects. If we start to depend on Google
> fu
Andreas Tille dijo [Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 08:21:47PM +0100]:
> >Heh, start a bit earlier (think Ruby)... Educate maintainers to
> >release proper .tar.gz, not braindead .gem packages containing the
> >equivalent to an orig.tar.gz (but created due to a nice
> >don't-ask-me-why-that's-not-properly-imp
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 03:51:38PM +0100, Thorsten Schmale wrote:
> * Package name: monkey
> Description : monkey is a small webserver based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol
Don't include the name of the package in the short description. Also,
"HTTP/1.1 protocol" is more something for the long
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:52:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/02/08 at 11:33 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > I'm not completely persuaded this is correct. Someone should explain
> > why an existing contributor does not concentrate his/her efforts on
> > the choosen project instea
> Er, by what metric have these students "failed" their projects?
>
> The summer has finished, and it's about time I summarised how we got
> on. We had 9 Summer of Code students working for us, and we had a 100%
> success rate this year. Woo! Last year we only managed 6 successful
> projec
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Forensics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: missidentify
Version: 1.0
Upstream Author: Jesse Kornblum
URL: http://missidentify.sourceforge.net]
License: GPL-2+]
Description: a program to find win32 applica
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:07:33PM +0100, Monniez Christophe wrote:
Miss Identify is a program to find Win32 applications.
In its default mode it displays the filename of any executable that
does not have an executable extension
(i.e. exe, dll, com, sys, cpl, hxs, hxi, olb, rll, or tlb).
The pr
On 27/02/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Many of the students that were selected were already well-known
> Debian contributors or developers. The first problem with that is
> that some of those students used their GSOC time to work on their
> usual Debian tasks instead of their GSOC project, leading
Am Mittwoch, den 27.02.2008, 11:28 +0100 schrieb Guus Sliepen:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 08:53:04AM +0100, Sebastian Heinlein wrote:
>
> > * Package name: packagekit
> > Description : PackageKit provides a distribution neutral interface to
> > manage software packages. It provides a sy
Hello Jörg,
Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Hello Raphael,
>
> Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>jed (U)
>
> This is a SVN snapshot. There's no release of it. I fail to see how to
> point to a changelog file in a SVN repository. How should I handle this
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Luebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: edje
Version : 0.5.0.042
Upstream Author : Carsten Haitzler and the e17 devel team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.enlightenment.org
* License : BSD
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Luebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: edbus
Version : 0.1.0.042
Upstream Author : Carsten Haitzler and the e17 devel team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.enlightenment.org
* License : BSD
Programming Lan
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Luebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: embryo
Version : 0.9.1.042
Upstream Author : Carsten Haitzler and the e17 devel team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.enlightenment.org
* License : BSD
Programming La
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas GOIRAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dkimproxy
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Jason Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dkimproxy.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL v2
Programming Lang: Perl
Descript
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mozilla-dom-inspector
Version : ??
Upstream Author : Mozilla Foundation
* URL : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6622
* License : MPL/GPL/LGPL
Programming Lan
On 27/02/08 at 18:51 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Absolutely, I agree it is not black and white. But this is the
> responsibility of the mentor. He needs to be the one, who makes this
> decision and he needs to stand behind this decision.
I don't know if that's allowed by GSOC, but taking the fin
On 27/02/08 at 11:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:52:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 27/02/08 at 11:33 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > > I'm not completely persuaded this is correct. Someone should explain
> > > why an existing contributor does not con
On 27/02/08 at 22:00 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 27/02/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Many of the students that were selected were already well-known
> > Debian contributors or developers. The first problem with that is
> > that some of those students used their GSOC time to work on their
>
44 matches
Mail list logo
