On dim, fév 10, 2008 at 07:44:02 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Dear Debian-Devel, we need your advices.
>
> Yesterday, we (the qt-kde packagers) uploaded qt3 version 3.3.8b. The biggest
> differences over 3.3.7 is that it is now also gplv3 licensed.
>
> And then this bug report came:
>
> http://
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Asho Yeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I intend to orphan the pcmanfm package. The upstream author released a
new package. I hope I can continue maintain this package.
Thanks a log.
* Package name: pcmanfm
Version : 3.5.8
Upstream Author : 洪任諭 Hong
Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 20:10:20 -0500 Philippe Cloutier wrote:
>
>>> That probably won't make much time difference on "fast" archs (i386,
>>> amd64 etc), but on slower ones like mips, mipsel etc (those sometimes
>>> hold up testing transition :().
>> A missing build will only sl
> There *is* a pkg-rrdtool team in alioth, and a public SVN (that you see
> was
> having commits as of two days ago). I had problems to access my @debian.org
> address and just saw your mails today.
I've offered to help you with the package several times during the last
months, I don't
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonny Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: modest
Version : 0.0+svn1054
Upstream Author : Dirk-Jan C. Binnema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://modest.garage.maemo.org/
* License
Si vous ne pouvez pas lire cet email, cliquez ici
(http://front05.clicstream.eu/php/emailing/view_mail.php?CODE=05RXU9LG_13864&HASH=c4b71992bd71327e8969323a5058372a)
Dataevent Agenda des salons (http://www.dataevent.com/)
Newsletter Fevrier 2008
Moteurs de recherche, vers des applications méti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonny Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: tinymail
Version : 0.0.7
Upstream Author : Philip Van Hoof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://tinymail.org/
* License : LGPL
Desc
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:02:14PM +, Jonny Lamb wrote:
> Although the main target of Modest are devices with low resources, it
> can be used as desktop e-mail client as well. This is possible because
> it was designed on top of both the Maemo platform and the GNOME Mobile
> stack.
Did you tes
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:08:13AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 08:10:20PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier a écrit :
> >
> > it would be much more efficient to work on buildd
> > redundancy (or other improvements to the buildd network).
>
> By the way, is there a plan to solve
Miles Bader necel.com> writes:
> Vadim Zeitlin wxwidgets.org> writes:
> > if you appreciate using Debian as a development platform, the fact
> > that CodeBlocks can't be built on it is IMHO a pretty critical
> > problem.
>
> Why?
Maybe "because not being able to build" and "development platform
Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
> I don't think it's a cache problem on PDNS, firstly because it doesn't
> seem to be caching anything (based on log output) and secondly because
> the answer is changing between requests inside a small time-frame. But I
> could be wrong.
Thanks to the help of Michal C
Package: wnpp
Owner: Varun Hiremath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gant
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Russel Winder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://gant.codehaus.org/
* License : Apache
Description : Groovy build framework ba
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:05:20PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > even with 2.6.24-4 linux images?
> > please mention the uname of your tests
>
> I'll see if I can do the tests on a clean install with the latest linux
> images tomorrow.
uname:
Linux barebone1 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 11 13:
On Wed 13 Feb 2008, Asho Yeh wrote:
> Subject: Bug#465568: ITP: pcmanfm -- an extremely fast and lightweight file
> manager for X
>
> I intend to orphan the pcmanfm package. The upstream author released a
Orphan? Or package? ITP implies the last.
Paul Slootman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Il giorno Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:24:15 +0530
Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering how to interpret the GR altering upload rules
> (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_002) in practical terms.
Hi can't even find the text of this GR.
This is the relevan
Hello,
I was wondering how to interpret the GR altering upload rules
(http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_002) in practical terms.
I suppose this means that one can upload a _multi.changes
file containing _.deb for multiple values
of providing one has access to all these architectures.
Does i
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> I was wondering how to interpret the GR altering upload rules
> (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_002) in practical terms.
>
> I suppose this means that one can upload a _multi.changes
> file containing _.deb for multiple values
> of pr
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 06:41:57PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> > I was wondering how to interpret the GR altering upload rules
> > (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_002) in practical terms.
>
> This is the relevant bit, I think:
>
> /-
Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering how to interpret the GR altering upload rules
> (http://www.debian.org/vote/2007/vote_002) in practical terms.
Basically, the intent of the GR is to say that any developer who can do
regular uploads for an architecture
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: extreme-tuxracer
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Pawel Drewniak, Guillaume Martres and others
* URL : http://www.extremetuxracer.com/
* License : GPL (mostly)
Prog
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:44:33PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Moritz Muehlenhoff writes:
> > [This message has also been posted to gmane.linux.debian.devel.general.]
> > On 2007-12-25, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Matthias Klose wrote:
> > >> This is a proposal to introdu
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:14:21PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> That said, there are good reasons why one shouldn't do (massive)
> binary-uploads (reproducibility of builds on official buildd => important
> for the security team which will have to make builds of packages on the
> official buildd
On 13/02/2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The architecture for which a DD is initially uploading a package is
> already lacking a build log on buildd.debian.org and the
> corresponding build has no guarantee to be reproducible.
>
> So if these are good arguments for not doing (massive) binary
> up
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:58:05PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
> Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>sasl2-bin (U)
This will be handled by the Cyrus-SASL team.
>shorewall-common
>shorewall-lite
These two are false positives.
>webcpp
This one I am investigating and hop
On 13/02/08 at 22:21 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> So if these are good arguments for not doing (massive) binary uploads,
> they are also good arguments for not allowing binary-uploads at all
> (thousands DDs making binary uploads are hardly worst than 1 DD doing
> massive binary uploads). Or,
Hello everybody!
Now that FSVS has made it into debian (http://packages.debian.org/fsvs) I'd
like to make it easier for users to keep track of their systems'
configuration.
I asked Sheldon to build a package fsvs-system-versioning; that will depend on
fsvs, and provide some default configurati
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I haven't used the program in a while and frankly am no longer
interested in it.
A new verwion has been available at http://gp2x.org/adtool/ for quite
some time.
If nobody takes the package, it might as well be removed from the
distribution. (I'm sure that anyone w
¿QUERES TOMAR CLASES DE PIANO ?
¿QUERES TOMAR CLASES DE CANTO ?
Esta es tu oportunidad de aprender con gente capacitada y de gran trayectoria
No importa tu edad ni tu nivel, lo importante es que tengas ganas
de aprender y crecer .
Resultados asegurados.
Las clases se dictan en Capital Fed
On 13/02/2008, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> [A] Removing /usr/lib in $auto_path [3]. That has been already
> announced in the past message with motivations for that, and
> experimental packages are available in experimental for testing.
> We are going to release a non-/usr/lib Tcl/Tk in unstable
Philipp Marek wrote:
> * Some files have a commit-pipe defined, so that eg. the passwords get
> stripped out of the shadow files.
> In case of a restore all passwords have to be set afresh.
> * For a few files that include passwords (like ddclient) there are
> already filters.
Is there some
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "a. kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cinebench
Version : 0.22-3
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : www.cinepaint.org
* License : GPL - LGPL - MIT OSI (a BSD-like license) CinePaint
* contains code that
Le Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:24PM +0100, Florian Lohoff a écrit :
>
> Ryan and me have been communicating on a hardware mod on rem - one of
> the mipsel buildds. Basically the machine is running on a PIO based ATA
> disk because of the fundamentally broken design of the IDE interface
> (abusing s
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "a. kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: CinePaint
Version : 0.22-3
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : www.cinepaint.org
* License : CinePaint contains code that is a mix of open source
* licenses - GPL - L
a. kelly wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "a. kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: cinebench
> Version : 0.22-3
> Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : www.cinepaint.org
> * License : GPL - LGPL - MIT OSI (a BSD-like li
On Feb 14, 2008 11:03 AM, Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cool. What is cinebench, though?
Some proprietary benchmark software. #465689 was a mistake and etorix
will close it.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Also, it really isn't safe to assume people posting ITPs read
debian-devel, so please CC the bug report and the ITP submitter.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
This idea might have been raised earlier but here goes anyway...
How about allowing the addition of build logs to the upload? Something
like _.log.gz to accompany _.deb when
the latter is uploaded.
This log would be merely put (by the incoming system) into
buildd.debian.org along with the
Paul Wise wrote:
> Also, it really isn't safe to assume people posting ITPs read
> debian-devel, so please CC the bug report and the ITP submitter.
I read through gmane and knode. Apparently knode sends one message to the
newsgroup and (when specified) another to an email address. So an email sho
On 2/14/08, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13/02/2008, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > [A] Removing /usr/lib in $auto_path [3]. That has been already
> > announced in the past message with motivations for that, and
> > experimental packages are available in experimental for testi
Quoting Alexander Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: extreme-tuxracer
> Version : 0.4.0
> Upstream Author : Pawel Drewniak, Guillaume Martres and others
> * URL : http:/
Quoting a. kelly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "a. kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: CinePaint
> Version : 0.22-3
> Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : www.cinepaint.org
> * License : CinePaint conta
Quoting a. kelly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "a. kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: cinebench
> Version : 0.22-3
> Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * URL : www.cinepaint.org
> * License : GPL - LGPL - M
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Description : Arcade game featuring tux the penguin, snow ice and fishes
Thanks for your work on it. Could you please clarify whether it
is just an alternative to ppracer or whether it is a replacement?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
htt
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:07:22PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I never saw the point of binaries+source uploads where you throw away the
> binaries. The only point of this is to force DDs to check that the
> package actually builds. If some DDs upload stuff that they don't know
> to work, that's
44 matches
Mail list logo
