On 2/14/08, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13/02/2008, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > [A] Removing /usr/lib in $auto_path [3]. That has been already > > announced in the past message with motivations for that, and > > experimental packages are available in experimental for testing. > > We are going to release a non-/usr/lib Tcl/Tk in unstable… > > Any timeframe for that? I noted the "ASAP" some words later, but > having an idea of the #days might help coordinating uploads.
We're planning to file bugreports during the next week or two. > > > … and preparing a few NMUs for packages which need fixed > > pkgIndex.tcl for that. That will happen as soon as possible. > > What about first reporting bugs (with eventually the NMU patches that > are already prepared)? See gcc folks' advanced warnings, that looks > like the way to go, instead of NMUing in the wild. You're right. The procedure will be the following: 1) Reporting bug with proposed patch; 2) After some time period (a week?) NMUing. -- Sergei Golovan
