Hi debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Ankur Gupta has invited you to join as a friend at MovieZen.
http://www.moviezen.com/connect/6621460-da33dfc2-74856577
About MovieZen:
MovieZen is a website where you can rate movies, share reviews with
friends, and meet people that have similar taste.
___
On 11286 March 1977, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I saw that there is now a new debhelper package version 6 in SID. I have
> been told by my sponsor to have a dependency to it, and set my
> compatibility level to 6. This is quite ok, but I need to maintain my
> package for Etch. I did a quick backport
Hi all,
I was reviewing a library package RFS (libthai) and I noticed that the
shlibs pointed at version X and all the symbols in the symbols file
pointed at an earlier version. Here I assume that the shlibs should be
changed to point to the earlier version?
Then I had a look at the 26 (out of ~5
[forced change to debhelper v6 compat]
> Do not follow the advice of that sponsor, look for a different sponsor
> instead. Only ever update the debhelper dependency if you really use a
> feature of the new version.
Now, as this raised some comments on IRC, lets clarify it a bit:
- compat mode v
Hi,
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
> I was reviewing a library package RFS (libthai) and I noticed that the
> shlibs pointed at version X and all the symbols in the symbols file
> pointed at an earlier version. Here I assume that the shlibs should be
> changed to point to the earlier versio
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:34:08AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:54:11 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >> > Of course, that would mean that the few debian/rules (hi Manoj)
> >> > in Debian not being makefiles [...]
> What do you mean, still? I have never use
On Tue Feb 05 00:51, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > If we can't figure out a good and clean way to keep a large stack of
> > long-lived patches in the vcs then I firmly believe we should
> > standardize on quilt.
>
> I think I have indeed solved the issue of long standing feature
> sets usin
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Umm. Why would any distributed version control system always
> need history truncation? I am not even sure that arch has such a
> thing; and I have never felt the need for such a beast.
>
> A distributed VCS that bundles in the whole
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:41:24AM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> If there are no objections I want to upload a new and heavily overworked
> package in about two weeks
I cannot image that there are any real objections. There was only a
single non-NMU upload since the beginning of 2005 and that
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am against patch system users being forced to changed to a DVCS
> system, however, which _has_ been suggested.
I've not seen that suggested in this thread. Can you give a reference,
please?
What I've seen, that might be confused with the above, is:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:41:56AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11286 March 1977, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> > I saw that there is now a new debhelper package version 6 in SID. I have
> > been told by my sponsor to have a dependency to it, and set my
> > compatibility level to 6. This is quite
On ti, 2008-02-05 at 12:07 +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Also: * The package format should be standardised such that the same
> workflow works for everyone.
If that's a reference to my first post to this discussion, it's not
accurate. I don't care about standardizing package formats, but
On Tue Feb 05 22:43, Ben Finney wrote:
> Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am against patch system users being forced to changed to a DVCS
> > system, however, which _has_ been suggested.
>
> I've not seen that suggested in this thread. Can you give a reference,
> please?
>
> W
Hello.
Policy says I should ask here before I add -fPIC to dialog.
So: May I build libdialog using -fPIC?
My idea is to do this now, document which packages use it in a README,
and if athe number of packages using it grows, consider the shared library.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Tue Feb 05 14:16, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On ti, 2008-02-05 at 12:07 +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > Also: * The package format should be standardised such that the same
> > workflow works for everyone.
>
> If that's a reference to my first post to this discussion, it's not
> accurate
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:34:08AM +, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:24:09 +0100, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 08:02:42PM +, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:54:11 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >> > Of cour
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also: * The package format should be standardised such that the same
> workflow works for everyone.
Not necessarily the pacakge *format*. The request you seem to be
referring to was that of Lars, when he requested that a specific
sequence of o
On Feb 4, 2008 6:24 PM, Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard, please don't profess to speak for me -- especially not couched
> in terms such as "more or less". There were several things that people
> tried to explain to you in that discussion that you 'more or less'
> refused to accept, so p
On Tue Feb 05 23:34, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Case 1: It is because all the changes were in the diff.gz.
>
> Case 2: It is because a clean way of applying the contents of
> debian/patches has been developped and used.
>
> In that case, unless "dpkg-source -b" has been similarly engineered to
>
Le Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:16:09PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
> Specifically I want "dpkg-source -x" to unpack a source package so that
> it is ready for modification, and "dpkg-source -b" to build a new source
> package after it's been edited. Patch systems can and should conform to
> that,
Hi Yves-Alexis,
Il giorno Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:09:27 +0100
Yves-Alexis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> * Package name: ktsuss
> Version : 1.2
> Upstream Author : David B. Cortarello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/ktsuss
> * License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: ktsuss
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : David B. Cortarello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://developer.berlios.de/projects/ktsuss
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 03:41:46PM +, David Paleino wrote:
> And the main differences with gtksu are...? Just keeping simple?
Not depending on gnome stuff. See thread on -release (about su-to-root).
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Il giorno Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:54:52 +0100
Yves-Alexis Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 03:41:46PM +, David Paleino wrote:
> > And the main differences with gtksu are...? Just keeping simple?
>
> Not depending on gnome stuff. See thread on -release (about su-to-r
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alberto Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: vagalume
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Alberto Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://people.igalia.com/berto/
* License : GPL 3
Programming Lang: C
Description
On 11286 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> In any event, perhaps the advice you provide in your other mail in
> this thread should be included in the Debian developer reference.
Want to write the wishlist bugreport?
--
bye Joerg
Debian is about free speech. beer once brewed can no longer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: librest-application-perl
Version : 0.992
Upstream Author : Matthew O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/REST-Application/
* License : Perl
Simon Huggins wrote on 29/01/2008 02:51:
[wig&pen]
The meta data can easily be in these version control systems that
everyone on these threads seems to love so much.
If you want to keep more patches than you expose through wig&pen then
just don't publish them in the dsc.
That won't work well
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:40:14AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> This seems to be much cleaner than dpatch or quilt. Also with the help
> of gitk, history is much more visible. I look forward to see it matured
> and accepted.
personally I am a fan of the diversity in the Debian project. Its re
On 05-Feb-08, 01:10 (CST), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 07:34:06AM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
> > > > Yes. Apparently what's special about this is that it can be
> > > > controlled over the network. Probably not the only one but
> > > > noticeable enough t
> rsyslog could of
> course read configs from syslog.d and rsyslog.d, and admins could
> install those under /etc/rsyslog.d/ or edit /etc/rsyslog.conf to make
> use of those additional features.
This would also be a way to solve #311812.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Zeimetz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> [CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED] as he is listed as Uploader]
>
> Hi,
>
> as rrdtool is a vital part of a lot of system monitoring solutions and
> should not go into Lenny in its current unmaintained state, I intend to
> hijack it.
After a lot of positiv reactions on my intention
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 05:49:19PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11286 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > In any event, perhaps the advice you provide in your other mail in
> > this thread should be included in the Debian developer reference.
>
> Want to write the wishlist bugreport?
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> Hi,
> 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:
>http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr
> the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem?
The s390 buildd maintainer presumes to
Hi,
15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr
the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem?
Thanx.
--
Håkan Ardö
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> Hi,
> 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:
>
>http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr
>
> the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem?
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pk
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:24:38PM +, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> So, I would agree with those recommending quilt, if it has significant
> pros besides dpatch. That would be forcing to a specific tool and so
> giving up some diversity, but it would keep giving up freedom of choice
> on a low le
On 25/01/08 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've done two rebuilds of sid on i386.
> - one in a perfectly clean chroot, as I usually do
> - one in a chroot, where as many build-dependancies as impossible were
> installed (take the Sources file, extract the build-deps for all
>
Hi,
Thanks to the help of Adam Borowski we now got a working solution for an
automatic mirror selection scheme.
Please help us test this infrastructure so that I can convince the DSA
to add it to our servers or at least give us a delegation from a
debian.{net,org} subzone! ;)
Again: I have no in
Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Besides that I'm interested in how your script works at DNS level and if it
> wouldn't be more suitable to just setup a server with BIND + GeoDNS[1].
That's exactly the idea, but I chose to use pdns-backend-pipe +
libgeo-perl, so that I could grep the Mirrors.masterlist f
On 05/02/2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal,
\o/
> debcmp is an home-made script I use to compare packages, looking
> more deeply than what debdiff does. It's available from
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-qa/tools/debcmp/ , if you wan
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:13:29PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 05-Feb-08, 01:10 (CST), Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mpd has a play queue.
>
> No it doesn't. See SVN revision 7155. (Short version: the maintainer
> didn't like the implementation, and ripped it out.)
Erm, th
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 09:37 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I was reviewing a library package RFS (libthai) and I noticed that the
> > shlibs pointed at version X and all the symbols in the symbols file
> > pointed at an earlier version. Here I ass
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:
> >
> >http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr
> >
> > the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem?
>
> http://buildd.deb
Hello,
Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
>
> Another minor problem is that the use of some DNS resolver that's not on
> the same country as the user (OpenDNS, for instance) will result in a
> incorrect guess by the server.
Thanks for the clarification, I was about to say that it failed to detect my
c
The priority of selinux packages was changed from optional to standard,
fairly shortly before the release of Etch.
I propose to revert that change before Lenny. The basic reason is that the
selinux packages have basically been unmaintained since the release of
Etch. Because of that current SeLi
Hi!
* Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080205 21:57]:
> I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read
> http://io.debian.net/ssh.html . If web access is enough, go to
> http://io.debian.net/~lucas/bdf
On 05/02/2008, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Why that? Both, the diff.gz and the .dsc, are part of the source
> package, so why did they change at all?
See the build log:
,
| gpg: Signature made Tue Jan 29 21:33:22 2008 CET using DSA key ID 00D8CD16
| gpg: Can't check signature: public key not f
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:57:16PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 25/01/08 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read
> http://io.debian.net/ssh.html . If web
On 05/02/08 at 11:43 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:
>
> >http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr
>
> > the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. Wha
On 05/02/08 at 23:43 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:57:16PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 25/01/08 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> > results are available on io.debian.net. If you wan
On 05/02/08 at 23:32 +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080205 21:57]:
> > I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> > results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read
> > http://io.debian.net/ssh.html .
Hi
Dne Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:13:48 +0100
"Leo \"costela\" Antunes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> The -geomirror.d.n addresses are manually added CNAMEs to a
> PowerDNS server that manages the zone geomirror.angband.pl (helpfully
> loaned by Adam Borowski). This server is running pdns-backend-pip
Hello Frans, Hello fellow DDs,
Yes, the SELinux stuff doesn't seem to have any currently active
developers. I haven't heard anything from Manoj in months.
I had to stop working on SELinux myself for various reasons; it's not
that things didn't work, but it was a mixture of personal reasons
(mostly
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:57:52AM +0900, Michal Čihař wrote:
^
> Dne Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:13:48 +0100
> "Leo \"costela\" Antunes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
>
> > The -geomirror.d.n addresses are manually added CNAMEs to a
> > PowerDNS server that manages
Hi
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 02:18:10 +0100
Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> geoip is not perfect, but a glance at your mail headers suggest that there
> may be some confusion from another source.
>
> Received: from mort.cihar.com (mort.cihar.com [82.208.50.189])
> by liszt.debian.org
I agree. Regarding the installed size, on my not-so-barebone KDE lenny
PC (1067 packages installed), installing standard selinux packages would
require 40 MB more. Systems with old HDD-s and miniature systems could
be bothered.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libgcl
Version : 0.2.4
Upstream Author : yetist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/liblunar
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Chinese
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:35:30PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 05/02/08 at 11:43 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:
> > >http://buildd.debian.org/build.p
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read
> http://io.debian.net/ssh.html . If web access is enough, go to
> http://io.debian.net/~lucas/bdfh-20080202/
t
Quoting Alberto Garcia ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Alberto Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> * Package name: vagalume
> Version : 0.5
> Upstream Author : Alberto Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://people.igalia.com/berto/
Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This makes me wonder if we actually have enough developers working on
> security infrastructure and the core system in general. Actually I have
> the impression in general (not only with respect to security) that we're
> losing developer share, but I ca
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I did another rebuild. Thanks to the Debian GNU/kFreeBSD cabal, the
> > results are available on io.debian.net. If you want shell access, read
> > http://io.debian.net/ssh.html . If web access is enough
63 matches
Mail list logo
