On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 11:35:30PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 05/02/08 at 11:43 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote: > > > Hi, > > > 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:
> > > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr > > > the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem? > > The s390 buildd maintainer presumes to mark all packages as 'Not-for-us' if > > he doesn't feel like building them for the arch, without bothering to reach > > a consensus first together with the maintainer, the ftp masters, or the > > maintainers of the P-a-s overrides. > I think that the following patch would solve this problem in a nice and > easy way: Which is not the same thing as deciding that s390 is no longer a release candidate, so if s390 is *not* dropped as a release candidate it would then become the release team's problem to clean up the resulting delta in testing... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
