On 7/10/07, Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- reporting illegal dependencies [5] (Anthony said last year that no
one was looking at these; it seems to remain true)
[5] http://ftp-master.debian.org/unmet-deps/
Looks like those are outdated. There is also http://edos.debian.net/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libcgi-untaint-email-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Tatsuhiko Miyagawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~miy
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libcgi-untaint-date-perl
Version : 1.00
Upstream Author : Tony Bowden
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~tmtm/CGI-Untaint-date/
* Licens
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libfile-mmagic-xs-perl
Version : 0.09002
Upstream Author : Daisuke Maki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~dmaki/Fil
Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?"):
> Lo?c Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Why not promote these to requirements in a particular policy version
> > instead? I fear we will have to list 10 Build-Options in all packages
> > in a couple of years.
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 09:34:36PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> * Package name: ll-core
> Version : 1.9.1
> Upstream Author : Walter Doerwald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.livinglogic.de/Python/core/index.html
> * License : Python lic.
> Programmin
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 06:40:57PM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
> We have a bunch of override change requests outstanding, mostly because
> the ftpmaster alias is so absurdly heavily spammed that they get lost in
> the noise;
>
Maybe is it time to adopt some required tags in the mail subjects to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ipaudit
Version : 1.0BETA2
* URL or Web page : http://ipaudit.sf.net/
* License : GPL v2
Description : IPAudit monitors network activity on a network by host,
protocol and port.
IPAudit listens to a network device in p
(Please CC me in your replies, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel)
Hi,
I'm trying to get my package to depend on a specific upstream version of
another package and ignore the Debian component of the version string.
Given package foo 1.2.3-1, I want package bar (which is not built from the
same s
How about:
Depends: foo (>= 1.2.3), foo (<< 1.2.4~)
or
Depends: foo (>= 1.2.3), foo (<< 1.2.3.0~)
Julian
Am Mittwoch, den 11.07.2007, 00:32 +1200 schrieb Francois Marier:
> (Please CC me in your replies, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel)
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get my package to depend o
On 7/9/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I have the time and inclination maybe I will port it to gtk2, but why
should I spend that effort when it's a perfectly good working program.
Sure it's not getting new features, but it gets along fine without them.
Because, as it has been
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 05:51:11PM +0100, Luis Matos wrote:
> Sex, 2007-07-06 ??s 18:47 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz escreveu:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > My development workstation is running Debian, and I'd like to produce
> > > both .deb and .rpm releases of my software.
> you can easily use virtual machines lik
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:35:09 -0300
"Margarita Manterola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/9/07, Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If I have the time and inclination maybe I will port it to gtk2, but why
> > should I spend that effort when it's a perfectly good working program.
> > Su
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 11:50:25PM +0200, Andreas Tille
wrote:
> Perhaps not because of some dependencies (perhaps because
> GTK 1.x will be removed) it might be removed by aptitude /
> synaptics besides a lot of other stuff.
If a user removes the package themselves, even if they don't
realise it,
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for
> lenny?"):
>> Currently, policy says that it's recommended (the weakest policy
>> directive) to support noopt and nostrip. My main concern with
>> increasing the strength of that dire
I'm just forwarding this ITP to the debian games team list,
as it should be of interest to us :-) :
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:04:39AM +0200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: unmass
>Version : 0.9
>Upstream Author: Mirex <[EMAIL PRO
On Jul 10, 9:40 am, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have a live-CD that i'm building withdebootstrap+ udev .
> > everything is fine with the live-CD , however when i try to remove the
> > "working directory" - i can't remove it due to an existing mounting
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 15:20:05 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> one last thing - Daniel has recommended the "policy-rc.d" , i really
> don't understand why do i need it and how it's gonna help me: when do
> i use this script and why...
>
When you're building the live-cd. To prevent daemons fr
Hi,
On Fri, 06.07.2007 at 22:43:31 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> As you might be aware, there are several bugs in the Debian boot
> sequence. The bugs affect some combinations of packages, and are some
> times hard to solve. To solve them once and for all, I want us t
Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Packages may or may not require services, depending on actual runtime
> configuration. Eg. roundup can use one or more out of a number of
> database mechanisms, some of which require external SQL servers, and at
> least one that doesn't. Request-Tracker m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> one last thing - Daniel has recommended the "policy-rc.d" , i really
> don't understand why do i need it and how it's gonna help me: when do
> i use this script and why...
for the 'how' part of your question, look at:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-live/dists/trunk/li
[Toni Mueller]
> Packages may or may not require services, depending on actual
> runtime configuration. Eg. roundup can use one or more out of a
> number of database mechanisms, some of which require external SQL
> servers, and at least one that doesn't.
Correct.
> Request-Tracker may be run at l
Joseph Neal a écrit :
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:09:35 +0200
> "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Xmms-shn was last updated March 28th 2007. I personally have about
>>> 40 hours of zappa boots in shn format that would only be playable
>>> from mplayer and perhaps vlc if xmms w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: camlp4s
Version : 4.03
Upstream Author : Daniel de Rauglaudre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/camlp4s/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: OCa
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The current proposal is to document dependencies in the init.d scripts
themselves (or override files while we wait for the init.d scripts to
be updated), and then replace the update-rc.d program with a program
that take these dependencies into account when creating the
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> What about circular dependencies that must be broken differently
> depending on the admin configuration ?
You have your answer right there: let the admin fix it.
> For example, looking at openvpn and nfs :
> * On some machines, openvpn must depend (pe
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> When last I looked (some time ago), none of the different XMMS
> successors were ready for prime time. Are bmpx, audacious, and xmms2
> all usable now?
What's exactly a XMMS successor?
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
Use GPG.
--
T
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Also, why don't we create a meta-package in the BTS for priority
> > changes?
>
> It would actually just be enough to create a set of usertags for
> priority changes, usertag bugs involving priority changes, a
Hi,
How do I debug this situation: ipe won't install, yet I have the
dependencies that "apt-get install" complains about.
Below, you will see that my attempt to install libipe1c2a claims to
have three unmet dependencies. However, as you see by "dpkg --list",
I *do* have these three packages at
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:03:16PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> How do I debug this situation: ipe won't install, yet I have the
> dependencies that "apt-get install" complains about.
> Below, you will see that my attempt to install libipe1c2a claims to
> have three unmet dependencies. Howe
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:03:16PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> How do I debug this situation: ipe won't install, yet I have the
> dependencies that "apt-get install" complains about.
> Below, you will see that my attempt to install libipe1c2a claims to
> have three unmet dependen
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 08:40:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:03:16PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > How do I debug this situation: ipe won't install, yet I have the
> > dependencies that "apt-get install" complains about.
>
> > Below, you will
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:03:11PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > This looks like ipe is misusing freetype, if it refuses to work with newer
> > versions when these versions are ABI-compatible.
> The short answer is -- this is the claim of Ipe's author, not me --
> libfreetype frequently break
On 7/10/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jul 2007, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Also, why don't we create a meta-package in the BTS for priority
> > changes?
>
> It would actually just be enough to create a set of usertags for
> priori
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:03:16PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
How do I debug this situation: ipe won't install, yet I have the
dependencies that "apt-get install" complains about.
Below, you will see that my attempt to install libipe1c2a claims to
have three unmet d
35 matches
Mail list logo
