On 2007-02-27, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maintainers not always responsing to bugs, then probably the simplest
> thing to do would be to code up a view in the BTS that lists bugs that
> have not had a maintainer response (filtering out responses that appear
> to be from the bug submitt
#include
* Don Armstrong [Mon, Feb 26 2007, 01:55:42PM]:
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > A maintainer who refuses to respond to a reasonable bug report of a
> > user does not deserve any user.
>
> It's not a case of maintainers refusing to respond, it's a case of
> some maintainer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brandon Philips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: guilt
Version : 0.20
Upstream Author : Josef "Jeff" Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jsipek/guilt/
* License : GPLv2
Pro
On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Ben Finney wrote:
> Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > - an indication the effort of submitting a bug report is apreciated
> > > - an indication the effort will _not_ be ignored in the long run
> > >
On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Ben Finney wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > SO rather than sending excuses-templates, when I've had time to check
> > the bug is actually there, I do use the confirmed tag to:
> > * ack this is an actual bug ;
> > * ack that I've been able
Le mardi 27 février 2007 à 09:24 +0100, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
> And how do you help a maintainer that does not admit that he needs help?
I can't believe people are thinking such crap.
Please show me where a current maintainer of Mozilla, KDE, GNOME, the
glibc, the kernel, X.org or any such big g
On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 27 février 2007 à 09:24 +0100, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
> > And how do you help a maintainer that does not admit that he needs
> > help?
> Please show me where a current maintainer of Mozilla, KDE, GNOME, the
> glibc, the kernel, X.org
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 02:50:24AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> I'd post the beautiful fingerprint scan I just did, but that's perhaps
> not a great idea. ;-)
Don't sorry, I'm quite sure I'll be able to grab a few ones from your glasses
at next Debconf. :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.ses
On Friday 09 February 2007 22:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where can I get the code ? :-)
http://www.coker.com.au/memlockd/
I've now made a second release of memlockd, it's at the above URL.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://etbe.blogspot.com/ My Blog
http://www.coker.com.au/sponsorship.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:04:47AM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mardi 27 février 2007 à 09:24 +0100, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
> > > And how do you help a maintainer that does not admit that he needs
> > > help?
WTF ?!
> > Y
On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:04:47AM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
wrote:
> > On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le mardi 27 février 2007 à 09:24 +0100, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
> > > Who is not acknowledging such obviou
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:37:56PM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:04:47AM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > > Le mardi 27 février
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocaml-ao
Version : 0.1.6
Upstream Author : the Savonet Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://savonet.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I receive automatic notification from the BTS that the maintainer
> has attached a "confirmed" tag to the bug, that is plenty of
> acknowledgement.
or "pending", "upstream", "wontfix", "help" or change in severity.
Any of those actions indicates that so
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-26 21:51:13 -0500]:
> If someone would actually like to do something about the problem of
> maintainers not always responsing to bugs, then probably the simplest
> thing to do would be to code up a view in the BTS that lists bugs that
> have not had a maint
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: hg-buildpackage
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : hg clone http://hg.complete.org/hg-buildpackage
(coming within a few h
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > I already warned you about this privately in december; here's another
> "Warn"? You feel the need to warn me? Does bringing me to STFU make you
> happy or so?
No; I warned you not to put everybody in the same bag in the same
pointless discussion tha
#include
* Loïc Minier [Mon, Feb 26 2007, 01:32:50PM]:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > A good example already comes to my mind where the maintainer
> > is doing uploads but only for bugs that have RC priority or important
> > and are easy to fix. Not matching this criteri
You've read this correctly! Starting NOW, we are in permanent bug
triaging, bug forwarding, but patching party on ALL GNOME bugs, pick
one before it's too late!
You may immediately take any GNOME bugs which didn't receive due care
and forward it upstream and/or send a patch to it and/or requ
You've read this correctly! Starting NOW, we are in permanent bug
triaging, bug forwarding, but patching party on ALL MOZILLA bugs, pick
one before it's too late!
You may immediately take any MOZILLA bugs which didn't receive due care
and forward it upstream and/or send a patch to it and/or
You've read this correctly! Starting NOW, we are in permanent bug
triaging, bug forwarding, bug patching party on ALL X bugs, pick
one before it's too late!
You may immediately take any X bugs which didn't receive due care and
forward it upstream and/or send a patch to it and/or request more
You've read this correctly! Starting NOW, we are in permanent bug
triaging, bug forwarding, but patching party on ALL SDL bugs, pick
one before it's too late!
You may immediately take any SDL bugs which didn't receive due care
and forward it upstream and/or send a patch to it and/or request
You've read this correctly! Starting TEN YEARS AGO, we are in
permanent bug triaging, bug forwarding, but patching party on ALL
bugs, pick one before it's too late!
You may immediately take any bugs which didn't receive due care and
forward it upstream and/or send a patch to it and/or request mor
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:46:11PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> You've read this correctly! Starting TEN YEARS AGO, we are in
> permanent bug triaging, bug forwarding, but patching party on ALL
> bugs, pick one before it's too late!
>
> You may immediately take any bugs which didn't receive du
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> > people are more likely to help you fix a problem if they are
> > directly affected by it (cause people tend to scratch their own
> > itches).
>
> That's the theory. My experience for KDE bugs, is that something
> l
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mardi 27 février 2007, vers 01:04, Russ
Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Maintaining packages should be fun and rewarding too. Punishing people
> for not doing something that we think is important has its place, but only
> sparingly.
Reporting bug should be f
Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> Maintaining packages should be fun and rewarding too. Punishing people
>> for not doing something that we think is important has its place, but
>> only sparingly.
> Reporting bug should be fun too. Not get
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russ> Correct. This is because the new version of OpenLDAP cannot
Russ> be linked against GnuTLS (our local patch is already
Russ> problematic in 2.1 and broke in later versions), so it can
Russ> only build with OpenSSL, and
#include
* Josselin Mouette [Tue, Feb 27 2007, 10:30:39AM]:
> Le mardi 27 février 2007 à 09:24 +0100, Eduard Bloch a écrit :
> > And how do you help a maintainer that does not admit that he needs help?
>
> I can't believe people are thinking such crap.
>
> Please show me where a current maintain
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Don Armstrong [Mon, Feb 26 2007, 01:55:42PM]:
> > I'm open to suggestions of real solutions to this problem,
> > (indeed, I continue to suggest that interested people jump in and
> > help out) but technical hurdles for maintainers to overcom
in many races because of the public's growing dissatisfaction with the war in
Iraq. And
Critical Care Inc,
symbl: .CTCX.
This one is an easy doubler
@ 65 cents wont last long
Expected target : $ 3.00
Critical Care Announces Expansion of Cost Containment Activities
Business Wire (Fri, Feb 16)
Laura, to celebrate her birthday Saturday. McKay's funeral in Victorville was
the
Critical Care Inc,
symbl: .CTCX.
This one is an easy doubler
@ 65 cents wont last long
Expected target : $ 3.00
Critical Care Announces Expansion of Cost Containment Activities
Business Wire (Fri, Feb 16)
C
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ> Correct. This is because the new version of OpenLDAP cannot
> Russ> be linked against GnuTLS (our local patch is already
> Russ> problematic in 2.1 and broke in later versions), so
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russ> A backward compatibility symlink seems like a reasonable
Russ> idea to me. Is that already what was proposed in the bug?
Russ> (I'm vaguely ancillarily involved in OpenLDAP packaging but
Russ> am not really a core memb
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ> A backward compatibility symlink seems like a reasonable
> Russ> idea to me. Is that already what was proposed in the bug?
> Russ> (I'm vaguely ancillarily involved in OpenLDAP pack
35 matches
Mail list logo
