On Tuesday 27 February 2007, Ben Finney wrote: > Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > - an indication the effort of submitting a bug report is apreciated > > > - an indication the effort will _not_ be ignored in the long run > > > - an indication that actual fixing of the bug will take a while > > > > I think this is significantly more than the OP was proposing. I also > > think that it's unreasonable to expect that *every* bug, no matter > > the severity, should receive this treatment before allowing a new > > version to migrate to testing. > > That should read "... unreasonable to expect that *every* bug, > regardless what severity threshold is chosen, ..."
I'm not asking that such a message be sent to every bug, what I'm asking is that: IF you're not going to do anything with a bug for a long period that you send a message to that effect. Note that this basically consists of: 1) gather the list of bugs that are unanswered 2) send 1 short message to that list of bugs In other words 1 mail every week (or 2 weeks) or so. I really don't think that's an unreasonable think to ask (and 1 could possibly be automated by BTS) -- Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
pgpA3LRewQqGe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
