On Mon, 04 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
> Has blocking been documented since I looked for the last time?
Blocking has been documented for quite some time:
revision 1.54
date: 2006-07-13 15:14:12 -0700; author: joeyh; state: Exp; lines: +7 -0
document block/unblock
Don Armstrong
--
I'd nev
#include
* Marc Haber [Mon, Dec 04 2006, 08:51:51AM]:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:05:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> >On Nov 30, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> But what about the middle case, i.e. "the behaviour described could be
> >> reproduced, but it's no
* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061203 20:48]:
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I just wanted to know if Debian has a policy (timeline) for inclusion of
> > a newer release of a software.
>
> No, it doesn't.
>
> Individual maintainers may set such a policy for their own
Do you have an estimation of the proportion of bugs that should be open? If
less than half of bugs not found in a version ulterior to some version should
be open, closing these bugs sounds like an idea. It would be less rude to
first warn about the upcoming closure and ask owners to mark these b
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 00:30:40 -0800, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Mon, 04 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Has blocking been documented since I looked for the last time?
>
>Blocking has been documented for quite some time:
>
>revision 1.54
>date: 2006-07-13 15:14:12 -0700; author: joey
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libfilter-template-perl
Version : 1.02
Upstream Author : Rocco Caputo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt Cashner
* URL : http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Filter/
* License : GPL
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 02:45:26AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > > Why exactly do you need a pre-depends to use a perl module in postinst?
> > Because:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/bonsai-1.3+cvs20060111/debian$ grep use.*File
> > bonsai.postinst
> > use File::Find;
> > The postinst is a Perl
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 08:51:51AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:05:21 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> >On Nov 30, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> But what about the middle case, i.e. "the behaviour described could be
> >> reproduced, but it
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt dijo [Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:47:45AM +0100]:
use File::Find;
>>> Provided by perl-modules, which is build-essential. However, this
>>> module is used at installation time (in postinst), so yes, this should
>>> be listed as a pre
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 02:45:26AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
>> You need Pre-Depends only when a package must be configured before your
>> postinst is run. In the case of a perl module, I would think it only
>> needs to be unpacked.
> No, you need a Pr
Roberto C Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You mean so that different people can file the same bug over and over
> again? Personally, I'd like to see a notabug tag so that you can have a
> bug still appear on the BTS page but not count (maybe even put the
> notabug bugs at the top or after t
Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> MH> Considering that the maintainer scripts have not been inherited
> MH> from mozilla, and that the mozilla engine is pretty different,
> MH> may I just close all the bugs assigned to old mozilla packages,
> MH> re
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 02:45:26AM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > You need Pre-Depends only when a package must be configured before your
> > postinst is run. In the case of a perl module, I would think it only
> > needs to be unpacked.
>
> No,
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 03:49:27PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The warning on mkstemp is wrong, or at least questionable.
The info manual doesn't have this warning AFAICT.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
99885
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
71798
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 00:30:40 -0800, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, 04 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
> >Blocking has been documented for quite some time:
> >
> >revision 1.54
> >date: 2006-07-13 15:14:12 -0700; author: joeyh; state: Exp;
4067
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
33872
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12971
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
41614
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
21 matches
Mail list logo
