Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>> If my second interpretation is right, we depend on maintainers' action
>> for that. In order to make all dependencies on the old version
>> disappear, would a "still depends on libkpathsea3" bug b
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050929 10:07]:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> If my second interpretation is right, we depend on maintainers' action
> >> for that. In order to make all dependencies on the old versio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emfox Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: filezilla3
Version : 2.9.3
Upstream Author : Tim Kosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.filezilla-project.org/
* License : GPL
Description : FileZilla 3 FTP Clien
hi all,
i've just uploaded curl 7.14.1-3 to experimental, it should put curl
back in a good state. i also uploaded pycurl built using curl+gnutls.
to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
depend on libcurl3 (w
On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
> libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
> depend on libcurl3 (with openssl) or libcurl3-gnutls respectively.
Why is openssl the default?
I think everyb
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
> > libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
> > depend on libcurl3 (with openssl) or
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
> > > libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-d
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
> > libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-gnutls-dev. the built package will
> > depend on libcurl3 (with openssl) or
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:31:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > to build something with libcurl, one has to install either
> > > libcurl3-openssl-dev or libcurl3-g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Radovan Garabík" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: karrigell
Version : 2.1.9
Upstream Author : Pierre Quentel
* URL : http://karrigell.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : python web server application f
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:03:26PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > to build something with libcurl, o
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Why is openssl the default?
> I think everybody agrees that in the long period everybody will want to
> use gnutls,
No, as has been shown by the discussions in the last weeks, there is *no*
agreement on which SSL library should be th
In linux.debian.devel, you wrote:
> That's actually not true, GnuTLS has the reverse licensing issues from
> OpenSSL. OpenSSL cannot be linked with GPL-licensed software; GnuTLS,
> OTOH, is licensed under the GPL (as opposed to the LGPL),
Only some extra features not present in OpenSSL (like SRP a
Hi,
> > pbuilder is doing as usual; it's now switched over to
> > cdebootstrap and cdebootstrap has been working fine.
> >
> Not for me.
>
> I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
> I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere.
> It wasn't able to use th
Hello All,
I read sometime back about Debian GNU/OpenSolaris idea.
Looked great.
Mac OSX's open source version, Darwin, Does it qualify under DFSG ?
If yes, could we have a Debian GNU/Darwin port ?
And even if Apple's Darwin doesn't qualify, GNU-Darwin would definitely
will. Why don't we try to
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:25:23PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
> I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere.
> It wasn't able to use this mirror with pbuilder+cdebootstrap because
> cdebootstrap will see Release.g
Hi,
I put the changes for Debian openssl 0.9.8 into svn on alioth and the
packages for testing on http://www.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de/debian/openssl.
Feel free to check it out from svn or download the packages and test
them and comment on them. I did some first test and they look good.
Maybe I can
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: aspell-te
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Khader Abbeb N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/
* License : GPL
Description : Aspell Telugu wordlist
Telugu language wordlist for GN
"Ritesh Raj Sarraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I read sometime back about Debian GNU/OpenSolaris idea.
> Looked great.
>
> Mac OSX's open source version, Darwin, Does it qualify under DFSG ?
> If yes, could we have a Debian GNU/Darwin port ?
Google is your friend. http://sourcef
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 21:43 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
> Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 16:20 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu:
> > > The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment
> > > (as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture
> > > i386-uclibc with g
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:52:21PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I'm having some problems, but I think it's because gcc is confused about
> which toolchain to use, because it still don't know about
> i386-uclibc-linux as an architecture, and it's falling back to
> i386-linux.
This is correct, as th
Em Qui, 2005-09-29 às 19:05 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:52:21PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > I'm having some problems, but I think it's because gcc is confused about
> > which toolchain to use, because it still don't know about
> > i386-uclibc-linux as an architect
Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 01:20, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> Can libstdc++ be built against uclibc? You're going to have a hard time
> basing a Debian port on uclibc without it.
Hi all!
It may be a stupid question, but I'm wondering if it would be usefull to use
uclibc++[1] instead of libstdc++
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please don't do that. A library transition breaks packages in unstable
> for a while, but if we have both versions, we're going to have to deal
> with them for several *years*. That's what happened for libpng, and
> believe me, it's a nightmare.
Why d
Em Qui, 2005-09-29 às 19:11 +0200, Romain Beauxis escreveu:
> Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 01:20, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > Can libstdc++ be built against uclibc? You're going to have a hard time
> > basing a Debian port on uclibc without it.
> It may be a stupid question, but I'm wondering if it
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:41:15PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I saw this library today... I'm not so sure if it will solve the
> question, as it's still alpha... Did anybody used it in a production
> environment?
you're kidding me. who the hell is using 386's in a production environment?
The issue of where to put state information that needs to be stored
prior to the initialization of networking (or independently of
networking) has been discussed before. The longest discussion I can
recall was in the spring of 2003 and had the subject headings:
* ifupdown writes to /etc... a
Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 19:41, vous avez écrit :
> I saw this library today... I'm not so sure if it will solve the
> question, as it's still alpha... Did anybody used it in a production
> environment?
Well, I knew the existence of this library from the openwrt[1] distribution.
Maybe you can as
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:25:23PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> > I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
> > I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere.
> > It wasn't able to use this mirror with pbuilder+cdebo
2005/9/29, Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Em Qui, 2005-09-29 às 19:05 +0200, Bastian Blank escreveu:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:52:21PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > > I'm having some problems, but I think it's because gcc is confused about
> > > which toolchain to use, because it still d
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:24:27PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:03:26PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > > On Sep 29, Domenico Andreoli <[E
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:27:30PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Why is openssl the default?
> > I think everybody agrees that in the long period everybody will want to
> > use gnutls,
> No, as has been shown by the discussions in
On Sep 30, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to
> convert all curl-using applications from OpenSSL to GNUTLS without a
> recompile due to unavailable ABI changes, but I thought it was pretty clear
> that the default go
Dear fellow Webmaster,
I'm the webmaster of a car crash resource at
http://www.carcrashdir.com .
I've collected quality links to other resources on the Internet
on my links page.
I feel that your site would be a nice fit in my collection of
quality links.
I've already placed a link to your we
Dear fellow Webmaster,
I'm the webmaster of a card reader resource at
http://www.cardreaderdir.com .
I've collected quality links to other resources on the Internet
on my links page.
I feel that your site would be a nice fit in my collection of
quality links.
I've already placed a link to you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 142164 general
Bug#142164: Packages files should be in UTF-8
Bug reassigned from package `debian-policy' to `general'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 183 (new: 7)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 78 (new: 5)
Total number of packages requeste
Please see http://bugs.debian.org/321435.
This bug is that gs-gpl fails to work on s390. I recall just seeing
a principal s390 developers say he was no longer doing the Debian s390
port. I don't know what effect this has on the bug.
This bug is blocking a number of packages, at the very least,
38 matches
Mail list logo
