On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:27:30PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > Why is openssl the default? > > I think everybody agrees that in the long period everybody will want to > > use gnutls,
> No, as has been shown by the discussions in the last weeks, there is *no* > agreement on which SSL library should be the default. There isn't? I saw some arguments that explain why it's not possible to convert all curl-using applications from OpenSSL to GNUTLS without a recompile due to unavailable ABI changes, but I thought it was pretty clear that the default going forward should be the one whose license is maximally compatible with that of applications using libcurl (i.e., GNUTLS). -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
