Hi,
I installed the latest pbuilder (on i386) and basically did
~$ sudo pbuilder update --distribution sid
~$ pdebuild
...
-> new cache content kaffe-pthreads_2%3a1.1.6-2_i386.deb added
-> new cache content libbz2-1.0_1.0.2-9_i386.deb added
-> new cache content libpng12-dev_1.2.8rel-4_i386.de
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:08:42AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:25:05PM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote:
> > I think a simple solution for this would be for the DWN people to read
> > planet.debian.org and report on anything "important" that is seen there.
> > Then you can
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:09:32 +0200 (CEST)
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ~$ sudo pbuilder update --distribution sid
> ~$ pdebuild
[...]
> I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
> It is 'sudo su' ? I would not really like this even if it is convinien
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Ricardo Mones wrote:
I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
It is 'sudo su' ? I would not really like this even if it is convinient.
For /usr/bin/pdebuild, and invoke "sudo pdebuild".
Uhmm, why that? I do not want to run the whole p
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:06:01AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Ricardo Mones wrote:
>
> >>I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
> >>It is 'sudo su' ? I would not really like this even if it is convinient.
> >
> > For /usr/bin/pdebuild, a
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:49:02AM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 09:09:32 +0200 (CEST)
>Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>~$ sudo pbuilder update --distribution sid
>>~$ pdebuild
>[...]
>>I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
>>It i
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
It works with fakeroot, the user the build runs at is configureable in
/etc/pbuilderrc. The reason you require root for the whole thing is because of
unpacking the chroot, chrooting itself, installing build dependencies, and
purging the chroot ag
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:14:49AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:06:01AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> >
> > >>I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
> > >>It is 'sudo su' ? I woul
Hello,
Приходите к нам, здесь вы сможете не просто выучить язык но и
отлично пообщаться.
Сегодня со скидками!!!
Телефоны в Москве:
105-5186
два-три-восемь-три-три-восемь-шесть
Kopmels Lehnert
Williams Chan Bamforth
Gurchenko Cherfas Henson Canbaz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
You don't require root for the whole thing. pdebuild is perfectly
capable of running 'sudo' when appropriate.
This is what I thought, but have you read the beginning of this thread
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01330.html
? Esp
After taking over aide co-maintainership in January and successfully
convincing Mike to put the project on alioth, I have done some work on
aide and have uploaded 0.10-8 on September 18 and 0.10-9 on September
27 to experimental.
These two versions acknowledge the two NMUs we recently had and fix
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 14:05:53 +0300, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I don't think there is a working way of reliably doing that. In theory,
>most web logs can do "categories", but those are not being used
>consistently, and they're also not really visible on planet.debian.org
>in a way t
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:57:23 +0200, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> aide
This is fixed in experimental (dinstall on 2005-09-27), and will go to
unstable in about a week once the package (which has suffered pretty
big changes) has shown not to contain any
Dear Webmaster
I looked at your website - http://lists.debian.org - and I really
liked to be your partner.
I own a site - http://www.replicahause.com. I would like to
propose a link exchange partnership with your site.
My site gets a lot of traffic every day, so a link from my site
to your site
Hi,
> > Of course I read debian-devel. But I fix bugs once they are
> > reported. I use the BTS to track needed work in this way.
>
> This is of course suprerior to running vi debian/control because
> beauracracy is fun.
I'm transitioning one of my packages to a potential new-maintainer;
and
Hi,
> Extracting source
> Password: su: Authentication failure
> Sorry.
> pbuilder: Failed extracting the source
> -> Aborting with an error
> -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem
> ...
>
>
> I guess I have to set a further sudo permission here but for what program?
> It is 'sudo su' ? I would
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I've tracked the problem down to the fact that
/etc/pam.d/su no longer exists with a clean install
since around yesterday.
Upgraded systems continue to work since /etc/pam.d/su
already exists.
Nice that you found an issue. On the other hand my system
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:03:21 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> * Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-27 21:16]:
> > My preference is for slang-foo, as it is more visible that it is
> > a slang-related, rather than a generic DSO; slang-gdbm is more
> > interesting
Hi,
teTeX-3.0 has been sitting in experimental for a while; we have not
uploaded it to unstable because it involves a library soname bump, and
the release team has requested not to upload new library versions.
However, there's much more to this new upstream release, also much more
that requires t
tags 330291 +patch
reassign 330291 login
severity 330291 serious
thanks
Hi,
> > Extracting source
> > Password: su: Authentication failure
> > Sorry.
> > pbuilder: Failed extracting the source
> > -> Aborting with an error
> > -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem
> > ...
> >
> >
> > I guess I h
Hi,
>
> > I've tracked the problem down to the fact that
> > /etc/pam.d/su no longer exists with a clean install
> > since around yesterday.
> > Upgraded systems continue to work since /etc/pam.d/su
> > already exists.
>
> Nice that you found an issue. On the other hand my system was
> installe
Le mercredi 28 septembre 2005 à 14:53 +0200, Frank Küster a écrit :
> Wouldn't it be possible to do the following: teTeX-3.0 is uploaded to
> unstable, including the libkpathsea4 and libkpathsea4-dev packages (it
> uses the library itself), but at the same time libkpathsea3 and
> libkpathsea-dev ar
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050928 14:54]:
> Wouldn't it be possible to do the following: teTeX-3.0 is uploaded to
> unstable, including the libkpathsea4 and libkpathsea4-dev packages (it
> uses the library itself), but at the same time libkpathsea3 and
> libkpathsea-dev are still available
Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
> I have to, I will also continue to host the backport APT repository,
> although I would prefer not to.
Wouldn't this be a good candidate for volatile.debian.net?
Regards,
Emilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
The problem is that we are talking about sid here;
and pbuilder depends upon a functional chroot.
And you were running sid inside chroot.
To summarize: today's sid was rather more unstable than usual
due to shadow.
Sorry for my ignorance - you are pe
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:53:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Wouldn't it be possible to do the following: teTeX-3.0 is uploaded to
> unstable, including the libkpathsea4 and libkpathsea4-dev packages (it
> uses the library itself), but at the same time libkpathsea3 and
> libkpathsea-dev are stil
* Paul Boekholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-28 14:38]:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 23:03:21 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> > I would keep the first version really short. The only two things that
> > are important for now is the package naming, the installation directory
> > f
Re: Martin in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ATTN developers of openoffice org (and gnumeric)
Your chances to get something changed are greatly improved by using:
* a real name to send posts,
* reportbug,
* lower case subjects.
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Descri
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would work for the library issue, and would "only" makes some
> packages FTBFS because tetex changed (but I can think we can live with
> that). Even better, if you do it right, you can change the
> libkpathsea-dev to libkpathsea4-dev if TeTeX-3.0 has
derniere chance de gagner 350$ en bon d achat
date limite 30 septembre 2005
aucun achat requis
1 participation par personne
www.equipemicrosolutions.com
notez bien que c est la derniere fois que vous recevez ce email si vous n etes
pas inscrit
ceci est une liste qui a été
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:13:08 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Well, it is possible to compile the gdbm module with slang 1 - of
> > course you'd have to edit the Makefile to install in v1/modules.
> The question is: can a module compiled with SLang2 be loaded by Slang1 ? In
Hi,
I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like
the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc. My plans are:
1) Build all the packages used by debootstrap to generate a basedebs.tgz
2) Certify this basedebs works with a fresh instalation.
3) Start building a incresi
* Paul Boekholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-28 16:31]:
> No. In fact, I just found out slgdbm 1.6 does not compile with slang 1.
> I'll probably fix it in 1.7, but let me know if you need
> slang1-compatibility.
My guess is that we do not need SLang1 compatibility. But who knows?
--
Rafael
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 03:00:40PM +0200, Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias wrote:
> Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I have to, I will also continue to host the backport APT repository,
> > although I would prefer not to.
>
> Wouldn't this be a good candidate for volatile.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:12:33PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> What do you think?
I would like to see a d-i port to that architecture!
(not volunteering, sorry)
Did you contact the emdebian people?
Cheers,
--
W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://people.debian.org/~debacle/
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hi,
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like
the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc. My plans are:
Well, I need an ARM bigendian uclibc port, so chances are I'm the one to
coordinate with the armbe people (in fact my personal dpkg
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 15:39 +, W. Borgert escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:12:33PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > What do you think?
> I would like to see a d-i port to that architecture!
> (not volunteering, sorry)
Actually... As far as i could see, this would be an easy task...
> Did
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 18:03 +0200, Simon Richter escreveu:
> Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like
> > the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc.
> However, I can see the number of configurations to be somewhat large, so
> I wonder w
I am trying to help move swt-gtk into testing. The excuses [1] for
swingwt, which depends on swt-gtk, says...
* swingwt is waiting for swt-gtk
* Updating swt-gtk makes 2 depending packages uninstallable on arm:
libswingwt0, swingwt-demo
These excuses seem to be circular between swingwt an
Quoting Junichi Uekawa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> To summarize: today's sid was rather more unstable than usual
> due to shadow.
Please bash the shadow maintainers..:-)
Supposedly fixed in 4.0.12-5
There was a very transitional 4.0.12-4 during 15 minuteswhich
claimed to fix the mess with su PA
Hello Junichi!
Junichi Uekawa Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> pbuilder is doing as usual; it's now switched over to
> cdebootstrap and cdebootstrap has been working fine.
>
Not for me.
I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
I own a small modem line, but ca
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like
>the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc. My plans are:
>
>Ok, now what's the problem...
>
>The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-u
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 18:41 +, Miquel van Smoorenburg escreveu:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment
> >(as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture
> >i3
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Telford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: lastfm
Version : 1.0.3
Upstream Author : Last.fm Ltd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.last.fm/help/player/
License : BSD (but see below)
Description : an audi
Alfie Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:32:41 +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
|
| ...but try come up with a rule of thumb for '%%' (big suffix), '#'
| (small prefix), etc.? Maybe the 'p' in percent is for Prefix -- but no,
| the Prefix is the hash symbol; two signs are bigger t
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> If my second interpretation is right, we depend on maintainers' action
> for that. In order to make all dependencies on the old version
> disappear, would a "still depends on libkpathsea3" bug be RC?
Yes, fixable with a quick-and-dirty NMU that only does
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Marcio Roberto Teixeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libiec61883
Version: 1.0.0
Upstream Authors:
Kristian HÃberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (cip and amdtp)
Dan Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (dv, mpeg-2, tsbuffer)
Dan Dennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 18:41 +, Miquel van Smoorenburg escreveu:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment
> > >(as I won't have glibc inst
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 18:07 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh escreveu:
> > > Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment
> > > >(as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture
> > > >i386-uclibc wit
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 23:56 +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> Alfie Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:32:41 +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> |
> | ...but try come up with a rule of thumb for '%%' (big suffix), '#'
> | (small prefix), etc.? Maybe the 'p' in percent is for Prefix --
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:13:46PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Extracting source
> > Password: su: Authentication failure
> > Sorry.
> > pbuilder: Failed extracting the source
> > -> Aborting with an error
> > -> unmounting dev/pts filesystem
> > ...
> > I guess I have to set a further s
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:12:33PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I'm interested in maintaining a i386-uclibc architecture, which is, like
> the name says, i386 binaries linked with uClibc. My plans are:
> 1) Build all the packages used by debootstrap to generate a basedebs.tgz
> 2) Certify this bas
Em Qua, 2005-09-28 às 16:20 -0700, Steve Langasek escreveu:
> > The i386 packages won't be compatible with my i386-uclibc environment
> > (as I won't have glibc installed). So I started calling the architecture
> > i386-uclibc with gnu name i386-uclibc-linux. And I'd like to ask: Is it
> > OK?
> Ca
Frank Kuester wrote:
> As far as I can see, in this case all other packages would continue
> using libkpathsea-dev (corresponding to libkpathsea3) for building, and
> continue to depend on libkpathsea3, which in turn would continue to be
> available. Only the tetex-bin deb itself would depend on l
54 matches
Mail list logo
