Hi,
I recently registered an Alioth project and - call me stupid, but I have
obviousely missed some information - don't know how to proceed. I try to
emphasize my problems by quoting relevant parts of the approval mail:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:20:50 +
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I fully disagree, greylisting is really painful
Since this is contrary to my experience with greylisting, I'd like to
hear more about your experiences with it, and why you consider
greylisting "really painful".
I'm also interested in hearing about th
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:51:07AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>-- Forwarded message --
>>Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:20:50 +
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^
> H, this sound not good for the sake of further communication.
> Why not including a mail address which can
On Jun 27, 2005 at 00:46, W. Borgert praised the llamas by saying:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "W. Borgert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Package name: evilfinder
> Version : 666(?)
> Upstream Author : Michal Zalewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL : http://lcamtuf.c
Le Lun 27 Juin 2005 10:14, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen a écrit :
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I fully disagree, greylisting is really painful
>
> Since this is contrary to my experience with greylisting, I'd like to
> hear more about your experiences with it, and why you consider
>
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:51:07AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:20:50 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^^
H, this sound not good for the sake of further communication.
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmmm, why SSH1 and even telnet and not SSH2?
>
> You misread: There is NO telnet. As for SSH2, it works fine, but SSH1
> doesn't work. Probably a typo .
Does anyone still use ssh1? It seems quite common for it not to be
supported these days...
-
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am pleased to announce the availability of my new (English) book
> "The Debian System",
Congratulations, I'll order a copy soon! :)
> The hardcover edition will be available in stores in the beginning
> of July. A list of online shops stocking it i
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:58:31PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Paul TBBle Hampson
> | The charset of your terminal is orthogonal to the charset you're
> | talking on the IRC network with to my mind, since even the built-in
> | recode support lets you set a default charset for IRC traffic.
Le lundi 27 juin 2005 à 03:05 +0200, martin f krafft a écrit :
> Dear all,
Hello Martin,
> I am pleased to announce the availability of my new (English) book
> "The Debian System", which Open Source Press[0] introduced at the
Congratulations ! I know how difficult it is to write a book ...
>
hoi :)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:18:19AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> The whole question is whether Debian can accept a Debian-specific
> agreement to call Firefox "Firefox".
sure, and the consensus seems to be that there is no problem in
doing so.
It's only you who doesn't want to accept that.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:43:28PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> 2. helper information to allow tools like deborphan to work correctly.
What about adding a 'data' section, parallel to 'libs', which deborphan also
lists by default?
It wouldn't solve every case, but it certainly seems like a good
> A side comment. Not having heard of omni-bot I went to that web site
> and looked for something that would tell me about it. I may be blind
> but after looking I still don't know what it is.
It's an AI framework for variuos games/mods. Currently mainly supporting the
Enemy Territory engine but
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 04:25:14PM +0200, Jaap Haitsma wrote:
> Hi,
Hello.
> A while ago I sent a mail to this list if anybody could host debblue for
> me. Alexander Wirt was so kind to do this for me. What still needs to be
> done is that http://debblue.debian.net has to be set to it's new
>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 05:43:24PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You misread: There is NO telnet. As for SSH2, it works fine, but SSH1
> > doesn't work. Probably a typo .
>
> Does anyone still use ssh1? It seems quite common for it not to be
> sup
Il giorno lun, 27/06/2005 alle 17.43 +0900, Miles Bader ha scritto:
> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Hmmm, why SSH1 and even telnet and not SSH2?
> >
> > You misread: There is NO telnet. As for SSH2, it works fine, but SSH1
> > doesn't work. Probably a typo .
>
> Does anyone
Hello,
I'm actually trying to create a .deb package from sources using
automake, autoconf and libtool. The resulting files consist of some
shell scripts, a shared library and some binaries that must be linked to it.
I'm having the following problem :
the binaries are "temporarily" linked with li
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:03:37AM +0200, Martin Waitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:18:19AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > The whole question is whether Debian can accept a Debian-specific
> > agreement to call Firefox "Firefox".
> sure, and the consensus seems to be that there is no problem
hey,
about a week ago i uploaded a package with priority=high to unstable
to fix a security-related bug. for some reason, that package hasn't
yet made it into unstable:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cacti.html
anyone know more about this? i also notice the policy 3.6.2 vs 3.6.1
problem that
also sprach Raphaël Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.27.1102 +0200]:
> > 1. http://debianbook.info
>
> I'm a bit annoyed by your use of a domain called "debianbook.info".
> You're not the only one having written a book about Debian as you can
> see on :
> http://www.debian.org/doc/books
Fai
also sprach Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.27.1157 +0200]:
> I went to amazon.co.uk to order a copy, but it isn't listed yet :-(
>
> They often list books *before* they become available so you may want
> to contact them and provide details.
Don't worry, we did. It just so happens that
Quoting David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Do we really need this in the archive? Can we not add this to another
> package under games? It is rather small and doesn't serve a significant
> amount of functionality.
Yes. Please suggest a package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
"Ci-ialis Softabs" is better than Pfizer Viiagrra
and normal Ci-ialis because:
- Guaaraantees 36 hours lasting
- Safe to take, no side effects at all
- Boost and increase se-xual performance
- Haarder e-rectiions and quick recharge
- Proven and certified by experts and doctors
- only $3.99 per ta
Op ma, 27-06-2005 te 10:56 +0100, schreef Neil McGovern:
> Hi there, you appear to be depending on build-essential without using a
> versioned depends.
>
> In general a package should not depend on build essential packages but
> if it must do so, the depends should have a version string.
Hi Neil,
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:35 +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> As it is nowhere forbidden in the policy and I use CDBS to generate
> debian/control from debian/control.in (not a build-time though) and CDBS
> adds the reference to build-essential in the Build-Depends, I am
> inclined to leave build-essen
Hello!
I uploaded a new release of jack-audio-connection-kit to unstable. The
following source packages have been built against libjack0.80.0-dev and
must now be rebuilt against libjack0.100.0-dev due to incompatible API
changes. I plan to file important bugs and then upgrade them to
something RC
Op ma, 27-06-2005 te 15:45 +0200, schreef Ondrej Sury:
> On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:35 +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> > As it is nowhere forbidden in the policy and I use CDBS to generate
> > debian/control from debian/control.in (not a build-time though) and CDBS
> > adds the reference to build-essen
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 08:33:26AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> hey,
>
> about a week ago i uploaded a package with priority=high to unstable
> to fix a security-related bug. for some reason, that package hasn't
> yet made it into unstable:
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cacti.html
Followin
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:22:54PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> But whether or not this is a good feature of CDBS, the real question is
> whether build dependencies on build-essential are only allowed when they
> are versioned?
Well, they only make *sense* when versioned -- an unversioned depend
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, sean finney wrote:
> hey,
>
> about a week ago i uploaded a package with priority=high to unstable
> to fix a security-related bug. for some reason, that package hasn't
> yet made it into unstable:
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cacti.html
>
> anyone know more about this
Em Sex, 2005-06-24 às 13:51 +0200, Ondrej Sury escreveu:
> > Correct. And Conflicts: with version <= ${Source-Version} of both, if
> > icewmcp has a greater version than both. I guess you'll need to use an
> > epoch if not.
>
> Only if dummy packages come from same source as icewmcp. If he wants
Em Sex, 2005-06-24 às 17:30 +0200, Ondrej Sury escreveu:
> On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 17:21 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> >
> > 1) foo and foo-data. There is usualy no reason for foo-data to depend
> > on foo. foo-data does not provide user-visible interface, only data,
> > so it does not need to depe
the same for me: I develop and mantain some gtk packages
there is no such thing as an "easy transition from gtk1 to gtk2"
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
>> And how hard is that? It seems that tons of stuff in the archive
>> still requires GTK1. It would b
On Monday 27 June 2005 18.15, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
[circular dependencies]
[uninstalling foo-data at libfoo uninstall]
> This should really be fixed in the packaging tool -- aptitude will
> handle this very elegantly, maybe bringing its expanded package states
> to libapt itself would be n
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Florian Ragwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lmms
Version : 0.0.9
Upstream Author : Tobias Doerffel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://lmms.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Linux Multimedia Studio
LMMS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Jordens wrote:
> I uploaded a new release of jack-audio-connection-kit to unstable. The
> following source packages have been built against libjack0.80.0-dev and
> must now be rebuilt against libjack0.100.0-dev due to incompatible API
> changes.
Em Sex, 2005-06-24 às 23:57 +0200, Ondrej Sury escreveu:
> One thing is very clear:
>
> 1. this is (a sort of) abuse of Depends field
Yes.
> 2. we need reverse Suggest/Recommends field, ie. something like
> Recommends-Uninstall: foo-data
No, all we need is a better handling of what we have toda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> It can be changed via mail2ldap gateway. More information at
> http://db.debian.org/doc-mail.html
Are zonefile entries "owned" by those who once set it up? They are at
least saved in their LDAP records, so probably ot
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 6/25/05, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can see where the game would be installed on the client system, and
> > the data would live on the file server under /usr/share. Currently, the
> > only way to do this is by having installed broken packages
On 6/27/05, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > On 6/25/05, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I can see where the game would be installed on the client system, and
> > > the data would live on the file server under /usr/share. Currently
dabilakorotoum
01bp 326 abidjan01hotel manvy permettez -moi de vous informer de mon desir de cooperer avec vous. je me nomme dabila korotoum, 25 ans, fille de feu colonnel dabila issouf, sauvagement assassine lors du coup d'etat du 19 septembre en cote d' ivoire . mon pere etait
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 6/27/05, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > > On 6/25/05, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I can see where the game would be installed on the client system, and
> > > > the data would live on the file
On 6/27/05, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I understand that part, but I'd expect binaries to be able to live on
> > a file servers too, even for multiple architectures.
>
> /usr/bin/vim is different on PPC than on i386. You cannot share /usr
Sure.
> (and thusly /usr/bin) b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6/27/05, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (and thusly /usr/bin) between architectures. You can with /usr/share, as
>> it is architecture independent.
>
> I guess the tools aren't cap
* Robert Jordens [Mon, 27 Jun 2005 16:10:42 +0200]:
Hi Robert, there a few things I'd like to comment about the handling
of this transition. It is my intention to be constructive.
> The following source packages have been built against libjack0.80.0-dev
At the end of this mail there is the
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 10:08:56PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Margarita Manterola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050623 16:45]:
> > On 6/23/05, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Is there a better solution to this?
> > > I think that there have been proposals for a new header that
> > >
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:44:40PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Indeed, on next mirror pulse, cacti will be in testing. I didn't really
> look into this, but I assume the delay is related to the announced[1]
> ftp-master outage. Several services and scripts have been temporarily
> disabled
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 03:35:42PM +0200, Arjan Oosting wrote:
> Op ma, 27-06-2005 te 10:56 +0100, schreef Neil McGovern:
> > Hi there, you appear to be depending on build-essential without using a
> > versioned depends.
> > In general a package should not depend on build essential packages but
>
Roger Leigh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 6/27/05, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> (and thusly /usr/bin) between architectures. You can with /usr/share, as
> >> it is architecture independen
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2005 08:45 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 12:31:23AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> > please excuse this blatant cross-posting, i wouldn't do it if i didn't
> > think it were critical that i do so...
> >
> > http://www.infodrom.org/~joey/log/?200506142140
> >
>
Increase your CUM VOLUME, and Orgasm Length
main benifits:
- The longest most intense Orgasms of your life
- Erctions like steel
- lncreased libido/desire
- Stronger ejaculaton (watch where your aiming)
- Multiple 0rgasms
- Up to 500% more volume (cover her in it if you want)
- Studies show it tast
Hi,
Are there any Debian developers that would like to work with me to
package Barcode Writer in Pure PostScript
(http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter) with the aim of getting
it into the stable distribution?
If you are interested then please contact me either on or off list.
Thanks,
Ter
Simon Huggins wrote:
That's unfair. I would have summarised more as "there's no problem
doing so as long as Mozilla are reasonable in Debian's eyes". I don't
want Eric to accept the agreement if for every change of code he has to
run to Gervase and ask nicely. (note that's not quite what's happ
Eric Dorland wrote:
* Gervase Markham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Only because there's only one of me, and I'm too busy to deal with the
volume! It's currently ten to midnight and I just got back from speaking
at a conference in Wolverhampton.
The volume has been pretty light compared to most
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:34:00AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> "Presumably" isn't good enough IMHO. If they cared about fairness they
> would develop a trademark policy that could be applied to everyone,
> based on the "quality" criteria that is right now only known to the
> MoFo.
How do you judg
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:28:30PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Sex, 2005-06-24 às 23:57 +0200, Ondrej Sury escreveu:
> > One thing is very clear:
> >
> > 1. this is (a sort of) abuse of Depends field
>
> Yes.
>
> > 2. we need reverse Suggest/Recommends field, ie. something like
> >
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:55:32PM +0100, Terry Burton wrote:
> Are there any Debian developers that would like to work with me to
> package Barcode Writer in Pure PostScript
> (http://www.terryburton.co.uk/barcodewriter) with the aim of getting
> it into the stable distribution?
Hello,
Debian ke
On 6/27/05, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 02:34:00AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > "Presumably" isn't good enough IMHO. If they cared about fairness they
> > would develop a trademark policy that could be applied to everyone,
> > based on the "quality" criter
David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do we really need this in the archive? Can we not add this to another
> package under games?
Er, why? This sounds like a great utility, it seems silly and
artificial to force it to be merged unless there's already a very
similar package to which it woul
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:39:53AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Do we really need this in the archive? Can we not add this to another
> > package under games?
>
> Er, why? This sounds like a great utility
It's a novelty joke program. If that's a "gre
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's a novelty joke program. If that's a "great utility" in your view,
> then I find your opinion hard to take seriously ...
So is debian "business apps only" now?
-Miles
--
(\(\
(^.^)
(")")
*This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your si
Looks good!!!
I went to amazon.co.uk to order a copy, but it isn't listed yet :-(
They often list books *before* they become available so you may want
to contact them and provide details.
Steve
martin f krafft([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-06-27 03:05:
> Dear all,
>
> I am pleased to announce the a
also sprach Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.06.27.1049 +0200]:
> I would be nice if you could include www.bookzilla.de.
>
> Bookzilla is a cooperation between the largest German wholesale book
> dealer Libri (i.e. Bookzilla offers the complete Libri assortment) and
> two companies. They d
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:27:21AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's a novelty joke program. If that's a "great utility" in your view,
> > then I find your opinion hard to take seriously ...
>
> So is debian "business apps only" now?
Oh come on, of co
Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh come on, of course not. But if you can't admit that this is a
> novelty application and not a utility, you're kidding yourself.
For the record, I _was_ kidding in my original message -- but I do think
it looks like a fun program, and certainly st
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:37:25PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oh come on, of course not. But if you can't admit that this is a
> > novelty application and not a utility, you're kidding yourself.
>
> For the record, I _was_ kidding in my original
On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 05:43:24PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Does anyone still use ssh1? It seems quite common for it not to be
> > supported these days...
>
> One machine I use fairly frequently as a terminal is a PowerMac
> running Mac OS 8, where k
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:10:42PM +0200, Robert Jordens wrote:
> I uploaded a new release of jack-audio-connection-kit to unstable. The
> following source packages have been built against libjack0.80.0-dev and
> must now be rebuilt against libjack0.100.0-dev due to incompatible API
> changes. I pl
Gervase Markham wrote:
> We say Debian has a reputation for shipping quality software, and we
> want them to use the trademark. I would hope you guys also want to use
> it, as a well-known free software brand. Why is our recognition of
> Debian's quality used as a negative against that happenin
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 11:42:34PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 01:37:25PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Oh come on, of course not. But if you can't admit that this is a
> > > novelty application and not a utility, yo
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Lun 27 Juin 2005 10:14, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen a écrit :
> > Since this is contrary to my experience with greylisting, I'd like to
> > hear more about your experiences with it, and why you consider
> > greylisting "really painful".
>
> I already did : for personnal use (
Magik wrote:
> > I think the typical answer will be to compile in a woody chroot.
> > There are several different packages to help such as pbuilder and
> > dchroot. This works quite well for C programs because gcc is very
> > mature and the woody default gcc compiler is sufficient for most
> > tas
Le Mar 28 Juin 2005 08:36, Bob Proulx a écrit :
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le Lun 27 Juin 2005 10:14, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen a écrit :
> > > Since this is contrary to my experience with greylisting, I'd
> > > like to hear more about your experiences with it, and why you
> > > consider greylisting
73 matches
Mail list logo
