Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: usbmount
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : Martin Dickopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.zero-based.org/debian/usbmount.html
* License : GPL
Description : Automatically mount and unmount USB mass st
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:52:23AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> IMO, this actually _proves_ the case that ftpmaster is one of the
> biggest problems that Debian has at the moment, now that the DAM
> problem has been solved elegantly and efficiently.
Wrong, the BIGGEST problem is that we have so m
retitle 276148 ITP: nsis -- Nullsoft Scriptable Install System (modified for
debian)
retitle 276153 ITP: nsis -- Nullsoft Scriptable Install System (modified for
debian)
owner 276148 !
owner 276153 !
thanks for the banana republic :(
More info and a long description about the version I intend to
(Moving to -project, as requested by Steve Langasek)
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:52:23AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>>
>> IMO, this actually _proves_ the case that ftpmaster is one of the
>> biggest problems that Debian has at the moment,
Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:52:23AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> >
> > IMO, this actually _proves_ the case that ftpmaster is one of the
> > biggest problems that Debian has at the moment, now that the DAM
> > problem has been solved elega
severity 175077 wishlist
thanks
On Mar 07, Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco, what's your current feeling towards #175077 (non-PIC code in
> libdv) that you submitted back then when prelink entered Debian? It's a
> case of hand-optimized assembly in a multimedia lib, and here I've
Hi,
Does anyone know about the whereabouts of the mrtg maintainer, Shiju p.
Nair?
The package has bugs that are multiple years old and no recent uploads
by the maintainer.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mrtg
--
Olaf van der Spek
http://xccu.sf.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 08-Mar-05, 01:39 (CST), martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, it can't be done... that's one thing. You can "remove
> knowledge of the medium from the system once it has been pulled
> out". You cannot unmount it because it will already be removed by
> the time that udev or any othe
On 07-Mar-05, 17:46 (CST), David H?rdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> o Revocation certificates for the gpg keys, are there arguments
> for/against storing them on the usb key?
While you might store the revocation certificate (RC) on *a* key, I certainly
wouldn't store it on *the* key. If yo
* Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050307 09:50]:
> Scripsit Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I also think that it would be a very good thing if we were to use our
> > collective discretion more often -- to say, for example, "well, you could
> > call this source, but it's bloody horribl
* John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050307 14:50]:
> Henning Makholm writes:
> > Yes, but we shouldn't act as if it was a _freedom_ problem.
> If it was deliberately made bloody horribly ugly and painful in order to
> make changing it difficult, it's a freedom problem.
>
> There are sure to be bor
* Clint Byrum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050307 18:15]:
> Please understand.. I want Debian to be great. I want it to "release
> when it is ready." Under the current system, being ready means achieving
> an enormous number of goals that benefit a very small number of users.
For sarge, the number of arch
Dear Debian developers,
I gather there are some people out there with MIPS little-endian
machines (from mipsel drop discussion) and Debian on it. Do huge shared
libraries (containing >4 symbols) work for you? I am currently
investigating an issue I have with my MIPS32r4, binutils > 2.14.90
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 23:52 +, Will Newton wrote:
> Try the debian-uk list:
>
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/debian-uk
Perfect, thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op za, 05-03-2005 te 18:55 +0100, schreef martin f krafft:
> also sprach Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.05.1840 +0100]:
> > ssh -i usualy helps.
>
> not if you cannot influence how SSH is called.
TTBOMK, distcc is free software.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -
Op za, 05-03-2005 te 14:26 +0100, schreef Thiemo Seufer:
> Steve Halasz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've sent a few emails over the last month to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] requesting that grass be removed from
> > packages-arch-specific. But my pleas have fallen on deaf ears, or
> > p
(Note: In order for this thread to prove useful I'm going to adhere to aj's
ObBug: rule [0]. This will also probably limit my answers somewhat and
prevent me from answering every post]
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 12:05:32PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> What's the purpose of NEW then? Why are package
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 00:46 +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> first of all, this might be slightly off-topic for the debian-devel
> list, but I've got the impression that it's already been solved by some
> DD's and might prove interesting to others (including non-DD's such as
> me).
I use a very s
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 14:58 +, Ben Hill wrote:
>
> In my home directory I create a symlink for /media/usbkey/ssh ->
> ~/.ssh
> and /media/usbkey/gnupg -> ~/.gnupg.
It has to be said, this method isn't the most secure method by any
means, and I'm interested to hear other's approaches.
Cheers,
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 14:58 +, schreef Ben Hill:
> On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 00:46 +0100, David HÃrdeman wrote:
> > first of all, this might be slightly off-topic for the debian-devel
> > list, but I've got the impression that it's already been solved by some
> > DD's and might prove interesting t
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 02:58:41PM +, Ben Hill wrote:
>
> In my home directory I create a symlink for /media/usbkey/ssh -> ~/.ssh
> and /media/usbkey/gnupg -> ~/.gnupg.
One can also use the --home flag to gpg.
--
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix Sy
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 04:07:02PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> The only difference is that, rather than symlinking ~/.gnupg, I symlink
> ~/.gnupg/secring.gpg; that way, I can mount the USB key read-only, which
> allows me to safely remove it while still mounted; my trustdb and public
> keyri
Hello Joe,
* Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-08 11:25]:
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 22:32 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > On Monday, 07 Mar 2005, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:03:50 +0100, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >* Frank Küster <
also sprach Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.08.1423 +0100]:
> While not perfect, using autofs with a very short timeout (5 seconds,
> say) alleviates this problem.
No it does not. You would be surprised how many people copy to and
remove the stick the same second that cp returns to th
Le Mardi 8 Mars 2005 16:15, martin f krafft a ÃcritÂ:
> also sprach Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.08.1423
+0100]:
> > While not perfect, using autofs with a very short timeout (5
> > seconds, say) alleviates this problem.
>
> No it does not. You would be surprised how many people co
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 16:07 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> The only difference is that, rather than symlinking ~/.gnupg, I
> symlink
> ~/.gnupg/secring.gpg; that way, I can mount the USB key read-only,
> which
> allows me to safely remove it while still mounted; my trustdb and
> public
> keyrin
Wouter wrote:
>Op di, 08-03-2005 te 14:58 +, schreef Ben Hill:
>>
>> So, when I stick the dongle into the USB slot, the drive is
>> automatically mounted, and the symlinks point to my real key
>> directories.
>>
>> When the key is out of the machine, my keys are safe offline.
>
>This is also
Hi!
Pierre Habouzit [2005-03-08 16:22 +0100]:
> mount -o sync ... is then a solution, especially if you only put small
> things, and that the performance loss is not too painfull.
That would be completely true if "sync" would hold what the name
promises. VFAT does not (completely) implement "syn
On Mar 08, 2005 at 14:40, Ben Hill praised the llamas by saying:
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 23:52 +, Will Newton wrote:
> > Try the debian-uk list:
> >
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/debian-uk
>
> Perfect, thanks!
>
You may also want to join #debian-uk on OFTC too, which
On Mar 08, 2005 at 14:58, Ben Hill praised the llamas by saying:
> On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 00:46 +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> > first of all, this might be slightly off-topic for the debian-devel
> > list, but I've got the impression that it's already been solved by some
> > DD's and might prove
Hi,
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-08 15:24]:
> Hello Joe,
>
> * Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-08 11:25]:
> > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 22:32 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > > On Monday, 07 Mar 2005, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:03:50
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mount -o sync ... is then a solution, especially if you only put small=20
> things, and that the performance loss is not too painfull.
Currently sync isn't supported on FAT (there are patches to provide
it). If you're using ext2/3, that isn't a problem
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 17:21 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> Marco Alfonso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> * Package name: gtk2-engines-clearlooks
>>> Version : 0.4
>> [...]
>>> This is a GTK+ 2.x engine based on Bluecurve. It fe
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:41 +, David Pashley wrote:
> Ideally I want to keep the disk formatted as vfat so it is usable on
> other operating systems and use an ext2 loopback filesystem. Getting
> the
> system to mount that is the hard part.
I initially had my stuff stored on a VFAT partition,
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:50:10 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Without alsa-base installed, hotplug and discover will load both
> modules, resulting in various disasters depending on the hardware. It's
> not because things work with your setup that they are suitable for a
> stable Debian release.
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 16:50 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> But instead of starting to be more than a little bit rude, you should
> have tried to understand the meaning of the last sentence in my mail. I
> think this is Ross' error, he should have used the usual procedure to
> announce that
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:01 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Clint Byrum ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050307 18:15]:
> > Please understand.. I want Debian to be great. I want it to "release
> > when it is ready." Under the current system, being ready means achieving
> > an enormous number of goals that bene
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 20:33 +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:13:20AM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > I feel your pain. Its hard to keep all these buildd's for different
> > architectures up. That goes to the very heart of my point.
> >
> > I'm not saying Debian should totall
On Tuesday 08 March 2005 15.55, Javier FernÃndez-Sanguino PeÃa wrote:
> > Further: do not accept every package to enter Debian...
>
> Should be done, but if ftp-maintainers take this decissions they get
> bashed on the basis of them preventing "freedom". And we're back again to
> the pointless hot-
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:42:58PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> IMHO, Debian has a serious double-problem here and needs to attack it.
> ftp-masters should, as I understand the role, be a purely administrative
> function: keep the archive running. No policy decisions should be made by
> f
On 08-Mar-05, 09:15 (CST), martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.03.08.1423 +0100]:
> > While not perfect, using autofs with a very short timeout (5 seconds,
> > say) alleviates this problem.
>
> No it does not. You would be surprised h
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:50:05PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:42:58PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > IMHO, Debian has a serious double-problem here and needs to attack it.
> > ftp-masters should, as I understand the role, be a purely administrative
> > functi
Sorry... I got your mail the first time, I am sorry I could not reply
to it sooner.
Jose Manuel dos Santos Calhariz dijo [Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 07:15:39PM +]:
> Yes, I care about it. I use it on my laptop to have personalized
> configurations for the places I connect to the Internet. For exam
David Moreno Garza dijo [Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:57:27PM -0600]:
> > Please look at http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html, it's already in
> > the NEW queue. And hey, Ross, what about an ITP of your own?
>
> What should Marco do then? He is learning how to make official Debian
> packages, he is fo
Maybe new versions of packages already in the archive that depend upon
packages which are NEW
could somehow signal or automatically raise the priority of those said
packages waiting to get in.
I guess it's a common case, specially for new libraries, since it can
potentially hold important new
f
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wanted: a policy document that draws the lines (there will always be grey
> areas, yes. But they can be made smaller than they are right now), with
> processes that ensure that handling critical cases does not take 2 months
> or more.
Yay for mor
I discovered with some surprise that the 2.6 kernel does not come with
an archive version
of the NPTL pthreads library (ie., no libpthread.a). So, while
dynamically linked applications will link against NPTL by default,
building a statically linked application will not only link to
LinuxThreads by
hi christian,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 05:58:43PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> You might want to post a call for translations for the common
> templates in the package, as I understand this package includes a set
> of common templates.
yeah, this project aims at making life easier for three d
Hi,
gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 was build with the configure option
--disable-__cxa_atexit instead of --enable-__cxa_atexit. This
causes it to have a different C++ ABI.
This was fixed in the 3.3.5-10 which should be available soon.
I've made a list of source packages that might have been build
with the 3.3
Quoting sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> okay, i'll do that some time in the near future. i'd like to give a
> final look over my templates to make sure that i like my own english
> before i ask anyone to translate it though :)
Well, be sure that we will be critic towards your English too...ev
Quoting sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> to reply to my own post...
>
> i was under the impression that because dbconfig-common was previously
> in experimental that i wouldn't have problems related to the stalled
> NEW queue, but i was wrong.
>
> so you can get them here:
>
> deb http://p
ti, 2005-03-08 kello 13:00 -0800, Blunt Jackson kirjoitti:
> Does anyone know if this is an intentional decision on the part of the
> glibc/nptl crew to refuse to support static linking of the pthreads
> library (perhaps due to ongoing development)?
I don't know the answer to your exact question,
martin f krafft wrote:
[This should have gone to d-d-a in the first place too, sorry]
(So should this - sorry!)
Hello, world.
This year's DPL debate will take place on Saturday, 19 March 2005,
at 23:00 UTC[0]. It will last for two hours. The meeting will take
place on the Freenode IRC network[1], u
Hi,
I am still struggling with the setup of a local buildd for testing
purposes. I was able to manually build a package, using the command
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sbuild -d unstable -v hello_2.1.1-4
However, after I put a package into build/REDO:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat build/REDO
acl2_2.9.1-1
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:51:48PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Comments about the templates:
wow... thanks for all these. i'll work on incorporating these suggestions
in with the next version, before i make a request for translations.
sean
--
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
> How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
> arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
people /still/ try it.
The answer is, simply, 'not'. Go learn to use go
Quoting Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> (Note: In order for this thread to prove useful I'm going to adhere to aj's
> ObBug: rule [0]. This will also probably limit my answers somewhat and
> prevent me from answering every post]
Why the need for being that pretentious?
> On
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
> > How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
> > arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
> This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 22:22 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
> > How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
> > arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
>
> This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
> pe
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
> people /still/ try it.
>
> The answer is, simply, 'not'. Go learn to use google if you want to know
> why.
You're ignoring people arguing the other side of the issue. For example,
in <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:33:05AM -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
> arches(mipsel, s390, ???) and said "these are not going to release with
> the rest of sarge"? Would it reduce the time to test the installer? Any
> RC bugs that were
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:55:15 +0200, Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ti, 2005-03-08 kello 13:00 -0800, Blunt Jackson kirjoitti:
> > Does anyone know if this is an intentional decision on the part of the
> > glibc/nptl crew to refuse to support static linking of the pthreads
> > library (
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 14:36 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 22:22 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
> > > How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
> > > arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
> >
> > This argu
Hi Gergely,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:56:10AM +0100, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Just to chime in, not saying that maintaining a consistent state between
> architectures is an easy thing and presents no problems, but Debian is
> the only distribution that supports all these many architectures. This
> h
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 07:32:30PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Sorry... I got your mail the first time, I am sorry I could not reply
> to it sooner.
>
> > There exist any alternative?
>
> Most of the use I had seen for switchconf was regarding network
> detection - that can be perfectly handled t
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 02:30:06AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
well, me wanting to do things the "right way" it ended up being a pretty
long script and i didn't think the list would appreciate random shell
scripts flying around. but, i'll go ahead and put it online:
http://www.seanius.net/linux/keyl
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:29:20AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 07-Mar-05, 17:46 (CST), David H?rdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
o Revocation certificates for the gpg keys, are there arguments
for/against storing them on the usb key?
While you might store the revocation certificate (RC) on
hello,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:38:22AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> o when the usb key is inserted, the user is prompted for a password to
> the encrypted loopback file which is then mounted, the ssh keys within
> are fed to ssh agent, and the file is unmounted again.
you could easily ext
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:22:00PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> gcc-3.3 3.3.5-9 was build with the configure option
> --disable-__cxa_atexit instead of --enable-__cxa_atexit. This
> causes it to have a different C++ ABI.
>
> This was fixed in the 3.3.5-10 which should be available soon.
>
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 14:36 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
> On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 22:22 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Op di, 08-03-2005 te 10:33 -0800, schreef Clint Byrum:
> > > How much would it help with the current problems if we just picked 3
> > > arches(mipsel, s390, ???)
> >
> > This arg
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 23:01 +0100, schreef Frank KÃster:
> Hi,
>
> I am still struggling with the setup of a local buildd for testing
> purposes. I was able to manually build a package, using the command
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sbuild -d unstable -v hello_2.1.1-4
>
> However, after I put a pack
Op di, 08-03-2005 te 17:58 -0500, schreef Joey Hess:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > This argument has been brought up so many times by now that I'm amazed
> > people /still/ try it.
> >
> > The answer is, simply, 'not'. Go learn to use google if you want to know
> > why.
>
> You're ignoring people
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:31:18AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Nick Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I also think that it would be a very good thing if we were to use our
> > collective discretion more often -- to say, for example, "well, you could
> > call this source, but it's blo
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I very well remember that mail. The key word in Clint's mail that
> prompted my reply was 'current' (problems). d-i has been ported to all
> our architectures now, which required a lot of work, and doing a d-i
> release still requires quite some work to synchronise that amo
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:42:58PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
>> IMHO, Debian has a serious double-problem here and needs to attack it.
>> ftp-masters should, as I understand the role, be a purely administrative
>> function: keep the archive ru
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 06.39, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> There is another problem with NEW: The US laws.
>
> Untill a package has been processed through NEW and a mail send to
> some goverment agency Debian runs risk of violating the crypto export
> laws.
I've already proposed this: if si
Dear fellow package maintainers,
I need you help. I'm currently trying to NMU gnome-find so that this
package is no more a Debian native package, which is pointless. A kind
of QA work on a package with low activity (and a probably MIA maintainer).
So, I grabbed it 1.0.2-1 current version and reco
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:35:25AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I upload the .orig.tar.gz, diff.gz, .dsc and .changes files to the
> upload queue, but I keep getting the following message when the
> package is processed, saying me that gnome-find_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz is
> not in the queue or in t
78 matches
Mail list logo
