Title: loop
afforestation cool demountable cohesion ukrainian hoot burtt
Find all your medications in one place!
We have all pills you may well require!
You name it! We have them all!
Stop receiving
Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Ken Bloom]
I'm confused. One making backports from sid to woody should backport
a package in such a way that it is buildable with woody's
build-essential.
AFAICS, that's no more true for build-essential than for anything else.
That is, you can either backport it so it build
* Dirk Eddelbuettel
| - time (dead upstream)
[...]
| Please CC me on follow-ups to debian-devel, or email me directly if you have
| any interest. I should follow up with RFA and O bug reports over the next
| few weeks, but doing this informally first may be simpler. Or maybe not.
I'd like t
Hi everybody.
I would like to know if Stephen Frost is alright and if he is still
active in any way. He is my Application Manager and i have known nothing
from him since 19th July. He has not even answered my pings on 21st
October, 8&19th November and 29th December, even though i promptly
an
Jorge Bernal wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kernel-patch-ibookg4-suspend
Version : test6
Upstream Author : Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gate.crashing.org/
* License : GPL
Description : patch to support f
On Saturday, 15 de January de 2005 18:51, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> * the Octave complex
> - octave2.0 (to be removed once sarge is release; frozen upstream ages
> ago; one bug that'll never get fixed, we can barely build it as it requires
> g++ pre-3.0)
> - octave2.1 (two minor bugs against t
Hello,
I'm maintaining the freemind package and currently 'sensible-browser' is
used to open links (which are always absolute, either file:/... or http,
ftp, whatever). It works well for remote links (http etc.) but is not
the best solution for file: links, if a true browser is behind
sensible-
* Jos? Luis Tall?n ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I would like to know if Stephen Frost is alright and if he is still
> active in any way. He is my Application Manager and i have known nothing
> from him since 19th July. He has not even answered my pings on 21st
> October, 8&19th November and 2
[Pablo Lorenzzoni]
> If you spot any mistake, please, let me know and I'll fix it in the
> next revision.
Thank you for a good report.
I noticed the list of people from Debian Edu was a bit short.
In addition to me, it should list Andreas Schouldei, Joey Hess and
Konstantinos Margaritis, all of
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dgap
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Digi International
* URL : http://www.digi.com
* License : GPL w/separate non-free firmwares
Description : driver for Digi Acceleport PCI multiport serial cards
This wil
Hi!
I've uploaded a new dpatch into experimental, with two new interesting
features in dpatch-edit-patch (thanks to Marc Haber) that I would like
to subject to extensive testing before I upload the package to unstable.
The package is available from both http://incoming.debian.org/ and
http://dpatc
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 02:59:53AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 02:33:44PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
>> There are a few people who are most likely to be prosecuted over
>> legal issues in Debian packages that have "adult" themes.
> Oh come on, they're at far greater ri
#include
* Gergely Nagy [Sun, Jan 16 2005, 03:27:16PM]:
> The other new feature, which in my optionion would need more testing (I
> tested the other one as much as I could, but this other I can't. At
> least, not easily). So, the second new feature is the --debianonly
> option. This is for trees
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libgnujmi-java
Version : 0.0cvs20050116
Upstream Author : Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/classpathx
* License : GPL
Des
> > The other new feature, which in my optionion would need more testing (I
> > tested the other one as much as I could, but this other I can't. At
> > least, not easily). So, the second new feature is the --debianonly
> > option. This is for trees that consist only of a debian/ directory. The
> >
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 10:05:46AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Dirk Eddelbuettel
>
> | - time (dead upstream)
>
> [...]
>
> | Please CC me on follow-ups to debian-devel, or email me directly if you have
> | any interest. I should follow up with RFA and O bug reports over the next
> | fe
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:09:07AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
[snip]
> > I think the only sensible and simple thing to do is to provide a zsync
> > file for the Contents files (zsync can 'look into' gz to rsync just
> > the changes). Then every user can use a cron job to zsync the file to
> > his
Meeet a skirt 2nite
http://exradiusaffiancevapor-clouded.com/sse/
stp theze : exradiusaffiancevapor-clouded.com/xxt/
The sandhill leech diet gill .
She eugenia detroit hulk moiseyev constitute .
mckay prentice diatom month .
central dolce thorough roberta .
The enter sediment conv
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:14:41PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Dirk!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > * the gsl set:
> > - gsl
> > - gsl-ref-html
> > - gsl-ref-psdoc
> >
> > The two doc packages are currently a week behind packaging the new
> > upstream
> > gsl. Well maintained upstream,
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:21:37PM +0100, Erik Schanze wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > * Miscellaneous
> > - afio (2 open bugs, active upstream, pretty straightforward)
> I like afio for my compressed backups and use it very often.
> I'd like to take over maintainership for i
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 10:05:46AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Dirk Eddelbuettel
>
> | - time (dead upstream)
>
> [...]
>
> | Please CC me on follow-ups to debian-devel, or email me directly if you have
> | any interest. I should follow up with RFA and O bug reports over the next
> | fe
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: scheme.app
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Marko Riedel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gnustep.it/marko/GScheme/
* License : GNU GPL
Description : Scheme interpreter for GNUstep
This is a GNUstep aw
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: fortunate.app
Version : 3.1
Upstream Author : Stefan Kleine Stegemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (GNUstep port),
Chris Saldanha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.orange-carb.org/~csaldanh/software.html
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: backgrounds-debian-shell
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Jakub Budziszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://linuks.mine.nu/jakub/
* License : Artistic License
Description : Photography of shells aligned t
Executive summary: I'm planning on renaming the vips7.10 packages to
get the "7.10" out of the package name unless someone tells me that I
shouldn't. I've discussed this on debian-mentors already. Read on
for the copious details.
-
The recent threads on sonames and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libspandsp
Version : 0.0.2pre9
Upstream Author : Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp/
* License : GPL
Description : Library which provides DSP functions for VoIP.
If one changes the architecture of a package from "any" to "all" but
makes no change to the package name, does this require any special
manual intervention, or would an upload that makes such a change go
through as quickly as a normal upload would go through? Hypothetical
situation: a compiled ex
Hi...
I've discovered that gnome-pilot doesn't work at all with my palm (zire
31, but I guess that it doesn't matter). It works ok with pilot-xfer and
jpilot, but gnome-pilot just timeouts forever.
I was going to fill a bug report, but there are lots of (important) them!!
I've straced (with -f)
Marcelo E. Magallon writes:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:14:15PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
>
> > > occurs when you have for example an ev56 library in lib/ev56, and a
> > > ev67 CPU. Then the loader looks in lib/ev67 and then falls back to
> > > lib. Since glibc is very carefully undocumented i
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:58:24PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Hypothetical situation: a compiled executable gets replaced with a shell
> script.
> Real situation: an architecture-dependent library packages gets
> replaced by an architecture-independent dummy transitional package.
Real situation
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> If one changes the architecture of a package from "any" to "all" but
> makes no change to the package name, does this require any special
> manual intervention, or would an upload that makes such a change go
> through as quickly as a normal upload would
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 19:31 +0100, GÃrkan SengÃn wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: backgrounds-debian-shell
> Version : 1.0
> Upstream Author : Jakub Budziszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://linuks.mine.nu/jakub/
> * License
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:57:57PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 05:26:35PM +, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> There are currently 11 orphaned xfce4-* packages in unstable, including
> three that have just been removed from testing due to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libupnp
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Intel Corporation
* URL : http://upnp.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Description : Intel Universal Plug And Play SDK for Linux
The Linux SDK for UPnP Devices (li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: wmaloader
Version : 0.1a
Upstream Author : Andrew Wild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~acw43/projects/wma11b/wmaloader.html
* License : GPL
Description : Firmware downloader for
Citando Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I know the -goodies packages are in bad shape.
>
> > Please take some time to help figure out what should be done with
> > these packages -- cleaned up/adopted, or removed from the archive --
> > before ITPing more packages in the xfce4 namespace.
>
>
Should changelogs be in chronological order or should they be in version
number order? Specifically I just noticed that libtiff4's changelog is
out of chronological order[attached for reference]. It seems that the
maintainer was maintaining two branches: an experimental
branch[3.6.1-3->3.7.0-
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
The recent threads on sonames and package names convinced me beyond a
doubt that I made a mistake in the names of the vips packages.
Oh dear...
[...] Right now, the vips7.10 source package creates four binary
packages: libvips7.10, libvips7.10-dev, libvips7.10-tools, and
libvi
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 10:20:49PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> Citando Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I know the -goodies packages are in bad shape.
> > > Please take some time to help figure out what should be done with
> > > these packages -- cleaned up/adopted, or removed from the archi
Travis Crump wrote:
Should changelogs be in chronological order or should they be in version
number order?
The changelog should be in the order changes were made.
Specifically I just noticed that libtiff4's changelog is
out of chronological order[attached for reference]. It seems that the
main
40 matches
Mail list logo
