Thank you for your response. Please don't reply to this message - it is an
automated response and your reply will not be received.
If you have a question for eBay Customer Support, please visit the following
eBay Help page. This page will help you locate the answer to your question, or
assist
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Christoph Berg wrote:
> [0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $host archive.debian.org
> archive.debian.org has address 208.185.25.38
> [0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $host 208.185.25.38
> 38.25.185.208.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer raff.debian.org.
>
> http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=ra
* Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050114 00:45]:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:26:52PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:19:03PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Also of interest is that some 1300 packages would no longer need to
> > > declare a Build-Depends: a
Andreas Barth wrote:
* Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050114 00:45]:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 02:26:52PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:19:03PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Also of interest is that some 1300 packages would no longer need to
declare a Build-Depends
Le vendredi 14 janvier 2005 à 01:55 +0100, Robert Millan a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: zeiberbude
> Version : 2.0.4
> Upstream Author : Christian Toepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://zeiberbude.sourceforge.net/
> * License
(moved to -devel, as this is offtopic for -release)
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:48:38PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>* Fixed lintian warning "bzip2 libbz2-1.0 libbz2-dev binaries:
> postinst-should-not-set-usr-doc-link".
>* Fixed lintian warning "bzip2 binary: package-contain
Use 'dselect --expert' if you don't want to see the help messages at
all.
Thanks that was just what I was looking for.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
>> * Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050114 00:45]:
>>>Not if build-essential included a suitable versioned depends, like
>>>debhelper (>= 4). It already does that for gcc.
>> That would still mean a versioned dependency on build-essential.
>
[...]
Anthony Towns wrote:
Scott James Remnant wrote:
The stats:
8,920 source packages in Debian unstable main.
8,254 declare a build-dependency on debhelper
= 92% of packages build-depend on debhelper.
Is that sufficient to declare it build-essential?
Also of interest is that some 1300 packages
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 01:43:12PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>(moved to -devel, as this is offtopic for -release)
>
>On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:48:38PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>> * Fixed lintian warning "bzip2 libbz2-1.0 libbz2-dev binaries:
>> postinst-should-not-set-
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Also, eh, I'm not convinced lintian is correct here in complaining,
> I'm a bit unsure. Lintian has warned for any hardlinks for a long time,
> but is it really bad to have them? Having them across different
> directories might cause problems whe
On Jan 14, Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, eh, I'm not convinced lintian is correct here in complaining,
> I'm a bit unsure. Lintian has warned for any hardlinks for a long time,
> but is it really bad to have them? Having them across different
> directories might cause pr
* Frederik Dannemare
| Package in question is mozilla-firefox-locale-da which is to be replaced
| by mozilla-firefox-locale-da-dk (not maintained by me) from source
| package mozilla-firefox-locale-all.
AFAIK, Danish is not spoken anywhere but in Denmark. Why do you want
a m-f-l-da-dk rather
* Frank Küster
| That's correct from the point of view of a buildd, or of a developer
| running a sid machine. But it is not correct for backporters: Imagine
| that packages are added to build-essential, or versioned dependencies in
| it are bumped to a higher version number. Then a package witho
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: Mosaic
Version : 3.0.0b1
Upstream Author : Riccardo Mottola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://carduus.chanet.de/software/mosaic/index.html
* License : (GPL + NCSA)
Description : Lightweight World Wide Web
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 17:21 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Frank KÃster
>
> | That's correct from the point of view of a buildd, or of a developer
> | running a sid machine. But it is not correct for backporters: Imagine
> | that packages are added to build-essential, or versioned dependencie
Scripsit Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * Frederik Dannemare
> | Package in question is mozilla-firefox-locale-da which is to be replaced
> | by mozilla-firefox-locale-da-dk (not maintained by me) from source
> | package mozilla-firefox-locale-all.
> AFAIK, Danish is not spoken anywher
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 05:06:21PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 17:21 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Frank Küster
> > | That's correct from the point of view of a buildd, or of a developer
> > | running a sid machine. But it is not correct for backporters: Imagi
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In effect, if you're building unstable packages on stable, the first
> thing you should build is unstable's build-essential.
Are you kidding? Well, this is okay if we're talking only about added
packages or higher versioned depends. But you can't m
* Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Scripsit Stephen Frost
> > If the API changes in an incompatible way then *fix* the things which
> > use the library to use the new API. Users aren't affected- the old,
> > already compiled package, works fine against the lib it depends on, the
> > ne
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: acedb
Version : 4.9t
Upstream Author : Ed Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.acedb.org
License : GPL, portions are LGPL
Description : Object-oriented genome database system
ACeDB (originall
Hi,
Just give me 5 minutes,and I will show you how to make an incredible
income from home...
Just send me an email with "Please Send Info" in the subject line.
In the Body of the email, please include your Name,Country and I will
send you all of the details immediately.
You
Frank Küster wrote:
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In effect, if you're building unstable packages on stable, the first
thing you should build is unstable's build-essential.
Are you kidding? Well, this is okay if we're talking only about added
packages or higher versioned depends. B
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 18:44 +0100, Frank KÃster wrote:
> Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In effect, if you're building unstable packages on stable, the first
> > thing you should build is unstable's build-essential.
>
> Are you kidding? Well, this is okay if we're talking on
Marco d'Itri wrote:
I see no reason to complain.
*Woah*.
Cheers,
aj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, eh, I'm not convinced lintian is correct here in complaining,
> I'm a bit unsure. Lintian has warned for any hardlinks for a long time,
> but is it really bad to have them? Having them across different
> directories might cause problems whe
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:33:00PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Also, eh, I'm not convinced lintian is correct here in complaining,
> > I'm a bit unsure. Lintian has warned for any hardlinks for a long time,
> > but is it really bad to have
Remember to make sure the Packages.gz files appear on the mirrors
_after_ the packages they refer to are in place. Bug #217957.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 09:46:45AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 05:06:21PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 17:21 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
> > > * Frank Küster
>
> > > | That's correct from the point of view of a buildd, or of a develop
On Friday 14 January 2005 17:08, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Frederik Dannemare
>
> | Package in question is mozilla-firefox-locale-da which is to be
> | replaced by mozilla-firefox-locale-da-dk (not maintained by me)
> | from source package mozilla-firefox-locale-all.
>
> AFAIK, Danish is not spoke
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 01:43:12PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Also, eh, I'm not convinced lintian is correct here in complaining,
> I'm a bit unsure. Lintian has warned for any hardlinks for a long time,
> but is it really bad to have them? Having them across different
> directories migh
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 12:15:11AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> I don't want to speak for past lintian maintainers but I seem to remember
> that the lintian philosophy that support this check is that hard-links
> in packages should be exceptional and deserve an lintian-override.
> (The same hold
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: xwine
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Philippe Bousquet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://darken33.free.fr
* License : GPL
Description : a graphical user inter
William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 11:33:21AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
>> Right. Do you regard this as a problem?
>
> It would be a lot smarter to check if the install would succeed
> before unpacking it. If you were replacing a previous alsa-modules
> packag
Joel Aelwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:18:21AM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:05 AM, Ingo Juergensmann
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>> > When Joerg Jaspert is already doing the dirty daily work, why does
>> > James sti
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could we have a package which provides /usr/share/.../Contents.gz?
> Not sure that share/ is the right place. And as Matt said, versioning
> is a potential problem. But lintian (and others: apt-file) could
> depend on this package (say, debian-dist-con
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:40:14AM +0100, Martin Waitz wrote:
>> my package tspc could not be build on mips and I don't know why:
>
>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot open output file ../../bin/tspc: Permission denied
>
>> The package builds correctly on all other
William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:30:10AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
>> including insulting you when you type stupid commands. But you don't
>> have the right to insult people because you are pissed for not being
>> clever enough of looking for dep
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 23:15:53 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 04:58:56PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
>>> Apparently the dickhead maintainer of ndiswrapper-source has just gone
>>> into his shell and refuses to discuss this
Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> It *may* require a versioned depends on a newer version, but that's just a
>> normal bug.
>
> ...and no reason to introduce this dependency in the -source package.
And a Depends in the -source package would change nothing:
1. i
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Op ma, 10-01-2005 te 22:43 +0200, schreef George Danchev:
>> On Monday 10 January 2005 22:25, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> > Op ma, 10-01-2005 te 15:12 -0500, schreef William Ballard:
>> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:33:02PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rnc-mode
Version : 1.0b3
Upstream Author : David Rosenborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.pantor.com/download.html
* License : BSD
Description : Emacs editing mode for RELAX NG Compact syntax
This p
Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
>> On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 23:54 +0100, Blade wrote:
>>
>>>That's the normal way. This way allows me to install dozens of
>>>module-source packages and build module packages from them for Debian
>>>kernels, without having to install a
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello
>
> Instead of doing all this by hand I can recommend my own package
> debarchiver. The latest versions of it do this pretty good in
> an automatic way.
>
> Just wanted to let you know.
>
> Regards,
>
Hi,
I know I tried debarchiver for the amd64
Cameron Hutchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Once upon a time Steve Langasek said...
>>
>> There is nothing in the -source package that actually requires (or should
>> recommend) the -utils package. A much better fix here is for people to get
>> over the fact that dpkg isn't apt.
>
> Apologie
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 01:35 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 06:16:01AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>> > dpkg doesn't remove foo-modules_1.0 at all.
>>
> Note that I said "remove", the old files are replaced during
"Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What would be the impact on (c)debootstrap of changing the operation
> of dpkg? I haven't looked at the exact sequence in a while, but IIRC
> those partially-installed states have valid uses in a debootstrap run.
> For instance, an unconfigured
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:25:39PM +0100, Riccardo Setti wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: lopster2
> Version : cvs pre3.9
> Upstream Author : Sgopsgop at users.sourceforge.net
Hi,
Why don't you let the maintainer of the existing 'lopster' packag
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 21:57 -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
>
>> What would be the impact on (c)debootstrap of changing the operation
>> of dpkg?
>>
> Forget the impact on debootstrap, the impact on APT and dselect is
> pretty huge. dpkg is desi
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 18:28 +, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>> Scripsit Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> > What's interesting is nobody has jumped in on this thread to point out
>> > that dpkg *has* a dependency field for forcing chec
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050112 22:08]:
>> Well, you're also leaving the package in a broken and unconfigured state.
>> Doing this in order to save the user a little typing later (adding the
>> original package to the second --inst
51 matches
Mail list logo
